Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (31)
[ 31 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - thespick
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
directed by michael bay
#19 - wepwawet
Reply +42 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
I cried a little
#28 to #19 - lolkill
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
he accidentally his whole life
#6 - quintonsword
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#1 - datargumme
-12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#3 to #1 - tweeenveirtig
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
wrong, That's the entire reason for the darwin awards! Natural Selection, idiot.
#4 to #3 - olineadi
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Yep, it is about removing oneself from the genepool, either by killing oneself in the stupidest fashion or "just" removing your reproductive organs in a similar way.
User avatar #26 to #3 - AcidFlux
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Man, I saw what he posted by going to his profile page... and it was so catastrophically stupid, I'm compelled to go downvote everything else he's ever said.

BRB
#5 - manekyo
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Touch it with a stick they said
it will be fun they said
User avatar #20 - icecreamconelol
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
is this real :P i didnt think a wooden stick would do anything
User avatar #27 to #20 - MakiChan
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
he is holding the stick and touching something else like the ground etc .,...that will send a current all the way through. thats why birds dont get zapped casue they are only touching the cables and nothing else.
User avatar #23 to #20 - sverresverre
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
I think the water inside the stick boiled resulting in an explosion, but that's just my idea.
User avatar #24 to #23 - icecreamconelol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
ah right :)
User avatar #25 to #20 - zarcos
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Sticks have a high resistance but technically everything is a conductor if enough current is provided.
#15 - xanaxfreak
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
******* russians thats why we love em
User avatar #9 - thebitcher
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
The guy shouted, "**** THE MOUTH." if anyone wondered.
#17 to #9 - anon id: b4b85e44
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
no
#8 - anon id: c1dd6fcd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Evolution completely refuted with 6 facts:

1. genetic limits- genetic limits are built into the basic types, ex, dog breeders always encounter genetic limits when they intelligently attempt to create new breeds of dogs. Dogs may vary incredibly, but despite the best attempts of intelligent dog breeders, dogs are still dogs. If intelligent scientists cannot break genetic barriers, why expect non intelligent natural selection to do so?

2. Cyclical change - Changes are not directional towards the development of new life forms, as macro evolutionary theory requires, they just shift back and forth within a range. Ex, Darwin's finches adapted to correlate with the weather. Larger beaks helped with harder seeds during droughts and small beaks helped when wetter weather brought smaller seeds. The proportion consistently reversed itself to match the weather,no new life forms came into existence

3. Irreducible complexity - An irreducibly complex system composed of several well-matched interactive parts that contribute to the basic function,wherein the removal of any of these parts causes the system to fail. Being that all biological molecular machines are irreducibly complex,meaning that all parts must be completely formed, in the right places, in the right sizes,in operating order, at the same time, for it to function, therefore any intermediates would be nonfunctional

4. Molecular isolation - It has often been said the close DNA relationship between humans and apes implies an ancestral relationship. This can easily be interpreted as a common ancestor OR a common creator. After all, if every living creature were distinct biochemically, a food chain would not even exist

5. Nonviablility of Transitional lifeforms - Natural selection creating NEW lifeforms is unlikely because transitional forms could not survive. Ex, if birds evolved gradually from reptiles,there would be a transition between scales and feathers, in which would not be able to survive in any habitat
#10 to #8 - funkysack
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
so what your saying is, because we cant replicate evolution,natural selection, there is no such thing?

and there has been a lot of "Transitional lifeforms" ... just because we cant find some(few) , means they don't exist?

well you sound very convincing....
User avatar #12 to #10 - POPNFRESH
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
It's also worth mentioning that there are only 5 facts on his list of 6, what a genius
#13 to #12 - breathor
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Whatever, i could get into an argument about how scientists can be just as stupid by assuming things. but i can only make 1 ******* comment a day anyway. **** you FJ.
User avatar #14 to #8 - megashot
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
why are you telling me this
User avatar #16 to #8 - jinchuuriki
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Maybe humans are just going back and forth within a range.

Evolution isn't ******* breeding two dogs to be prettier. It's a slow process that takes thousands to millions of years, not like 2 generations.

Irreducible Complexity makes sense. It is incredibly lucky, that's why earth didnt have any life forms for around a billion years.

The only one that remotely makes sense is # 5
#29 to #8 - rubbereh
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Looking through the comments, I have to say - 8/10, decent troll.
User avatar #30 to #8 - MakiChan
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
they say we came from a type of ape like creture.....we are close to but not the same to the current apes now. it takes millions of years to evolve into something completely different. you will not see the ape we supposedly evolved from because they all evolved into something else or died. all of the cretures that exist came from a stem creature at some point. dogs and cats came form the same creture too. hell i think all mammals in general casme from a type of reptile.......evolution is basically a creature changing to adapt to its environment to survive. its still happening now even to humans. pinkies are shorter then they were then cave man days casue we dont need them, people are loosing hair casue we dont need it to keep us warm etc. and about number 5 only some retiles have more bird like features and there were some retiles that had feathers most had both scles and a feather like stuff.
#11 to #8 - anon id: a1189cba
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
Anon attempts to refute the theory of evolution with 6 facts... and then uses 5 arguable statements
#22 to #8 - anon id: fe6531cb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
"It has often been said the close DNA relationship between humans and apes implies an ancestral relationship. This can easily be interpreted as a common ancestor..."
#18 to #8 - SadBunny
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2012) [-]
#7 - TheRetardedMule
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
[ 31 comments ]
Leave a comment