| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#832
-
superwheels (01/31/2012) [-] Alright I don't like this but before you start to hate, hear me out. I am ecstatic about the idea of this guy shooting all these completely worthless people like the Kardashians and whatnot. However, when he got into the habit of killing every single person that pulled a dick move I got a little wary. This is because I can totally see me and my friends hanging out in a movie theater and one of my idiot buds throws candy at somebody. This may be a rude thing to do but how the fuck would you feel if the guy stands up and unloads a clip into you and your friends?? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. So just remember, just because someone does something shitty, doesn't mean they are a complete asshole and deserve to be shot on the spot. It is arguable that nobody should have the choice whether someone else lives or dies, no matter how much of a prick they are. Thank you.
#864 to #832
-
manofparody (01/31/2012) [-] Guess you shouldn't be an asshole for no reason, because the piece of popcorn your friend threw could have just landed on a psychopath. Think better, next time.
And how would you feel if someone threw popcorn at you for no reason while you're trying to watch a movie? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. My day gets easily destroyed over small shit like this, and if I knew I was going to die soon, I would do the same thing frank was doing. There is no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know.
And how would you feel if someone threw popcorn at you for no reason while you're trying to watch a movie? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. My day gets easily destroyed over small shit like this, and if I knew I was going to die soon, I would do the same thing frank was doing. There is no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know.
#867 to #866
-
manofparody (01/31/2012) [-] In my opinion, murdering someone over it is logical.
If you had not thrown the piece of popcorn at me, then I wouldn't have shot you. Don't be an asshole to someone you don't know. You go around thinking there aren't consequences until you get shot in the face for being a douche.
Death deserved, in my opinion.
If you had not thrown the piece of popcorn at me, then I wouldn't have shot you. Don't be an asshole to someone you don't know. You go around thinking there aren't consequences until you get shot in the face for being a douche.
Death deserved, in my opinion.
#868 to #867
-
buttfranklin (01/31/2012) [-]
Where do you draw the line? You can't just kill someone for annoying you. Petty anger isn't worth a human life. That's just mindless savagery, you should have the intelligence to be better than that.
You should take more pride in your moral standing.
You should take more pride in your moral standing.
#869 to #868
-
manofparody (01/31/2012) [-] I hate when people say you "can't" do something.
I CAN kill someone for annoying me, that's the beauty of it. Given, there's consequences, but the fact is I have the capability of killing someone for any reason.
If the person wasn't an asshole in the beginning for no reason, then it wouldn't happen.
Ever hear when someone says, "One day, you're going to piss off the wrong person"? Exactly. They should know that there are consequences for actions. Frank is already going to die, so he has a consequence he can't prevent, so it won't matter. But the kid, he doesn't have a consequence. He would've thrown that piece of popcorn, and continued being a douche to people for no reason, had Frank not killed him. It's really only a matter of time until someone snaps.
I CAN kill someone for annoying me, that's the beauty of it. Given, there's consequences, but the fact is I have the capability of killing someone for any reason.
If the person wasn't an asshole in the beginning for no reason, then it wouldn't happen.
Ever hear when someone says, "One day, you're going to piss off the wrong person"? Exactly. They should know that there are consequences for actions. Frank is already going to die, so he has a consequence he can't prevent, so it won't matter. But the kid, he doesn't have a consequence. He would've thrown that piece of popcorn, and continued being a douche to people for no reason, had Frank not killed him. It's really only a matter of time until someone snaps.
#870 to #869
-
buttfranklin (01/31/2012) [-]
OK, 'can't' means 'should not under social conventions' as in 'You can't just call someone a nigger'. You technically can just call someone a nigger, everybody knows that, but it's not something that you should do.
That's just how people use the English language. It's a colloquialism. You knew what I meant.
And regarding your sentiments, it's ridiculous for the only reason not to annoy someone is for fear that they are a psychopath. The maladjusted lunatics that are prepared to murder someone for such a trivial matter are few and far between.
I don't harass strangers on the principle that I don't want to live in a place where strangers harass each other; it's not a nice society to live in. I also disapprove of a society where everybody has no qualms with perpetrating evil if they believe they won't get punished for it, because that's really just an immature and uncivilised mindset.
Up there, your comment #864, you yourself said there's no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know, yet I'm getting the distinct impression that you think it's OK to be an asshole to someone you don't know if you decided they were more obnoxious than you would 'permit' them to be, as if you were the authority on who deserves to live or die. You seem to be perfectly comfortable with the idea that might makes right, which - as thousands of years of human social development has proven- just doesn't gel.
That's just how people use the English language. It's a colloquialism. You knew what I meant.
And regarding your sentiments, it's ridiculous for the only reason not to annoy someone is for fear that they are a psychopath. The maladjusted lunatics that are prepared to murder someone for such a trivial matter are few and far between.
I don't harass strangers on the principle that I don't want to live in a place where strangers harass each other; it's not a nice society to live in. I also disapprove of a society where everybody has no qualms with perpetrating evil if they believe they won't get punished for it, because that's really just an immature and uncivilised mindset.
Up there, your comment #864, you yourself said there's no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know, yet I'm getting the distinct impression that you think it's OK to be an asshole to someone you don't know if you decided they were more obnoxious than you would 'permit' them to be, as if you were the authority on who deserves to live or die. You seem to be perfectly comfortable with the idea that might makes right, which - as thousands of years of human social development has proven- just doesn't gel.
