| Home | Social Board |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Subscribe |
| Channels Scratchpad & Games | |
| NSFW Content Random Board | |
| Brony Board | Games Board |
Not one of you will not love this.
Uploaded by: anthonysykes
We will all love this movie.
Written & Directed by BOBCAT GOLDTHWAIT.
Written & Directed by BOBCAT GOLDTHWAIT.
Tags: i love you so mu
| |
Links are not allowed.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
Remaining character count: 2000
comments(877)
#877 -
Protomix (02/01/2012) [-]
Oh geez, I really hope this doesn't get an active fanbase, if you know what I mean
This is great, but not as a real movie. The consequences of certain people seeing it could be scary.
#849 -
scorcho (01/31/2012) [-]
Am i the only one who finds it quite hilarious how casually the whole "shooting people" part is handled? Like it's something a bit unconventional but not that much of a big deal. For example the part where they practice and the girl shoots the completely innocent guy and the trailer is just like "oh this guy got shot, that's a bit inconvenient!" like it's some sort of clumsy accident, whilst still a laughing matter. Don't get me wrong, i think it's a good idea for a movie. I mean everyone who is not completely braindead (like most of our society, sadly) has at least thought once about something like this. But if you're gonna make a movie about it, there should be a much darker and psychologically sophisticated feel to it. Something like "look how rotten our world is and what it does with people that are not" If you just go by the feel of the trailer, it's like some kind of roadtrip-movie-typish thing. I mean a bit of comedic relief is allright, but too much and it seems like a big twisted joke.
Trust me, if I knew I was going to die, this is exactly what I would do. The only thing stopping me from doing it is the consequences.
Maybe he just has the mentality of being tired of these assholes, and finally decides to purge the epidemic.
There's always someone with the mindset to do something crazy, and just needs the tiniest thing to spark to cause the rampage.
Maybe he just has the mentality of being tired of these assholes, and finally decides to purge the epidemic.
There's always someone with the mindset to do something crazy, and just needs the tiniest thing to spark to cause the rampage.
I don't like the girl. She seems so taked on and I have a feeling she is going to develop horribly. We got a glimpse at how Frank develops, and its fine. She just seems like 'hey I want to kill people, too, can I come?'. If I were Frank I just would've said 'stay in school, kid' or something brief and stupid like that and drive off.
Just seems...bad. But that's my ONLY complaint. And one I can certainly live with. I am very excited for this movie, regardless. I do want this in theater's like right now.
Just seems...bad. But that's my ONLY complaint. And one I can certainly live with. I am very excited for this movie, regardless. I do want this in theater's like right now.
#843 to #840 -
buttfranklin (01/31/2012) [-]
I find that disturbing too. It's the same as the little girl (played the pink girl in Lazytown - Chloe something?) from that film 'Kick ass'.
Kids that behave like that in reality get really fucked up in the head when they grow up.
It's tragic to see this, and It's worrying that people find these characters entertaining.
Kids that behave like that in reality get really fucked up in the head when they grow up.
It's tragic to see this, and It's worrying that people find these characters entertaining.
Well...I'm not looking at it at that angle. I'm looking at a...creative angle. I feel the girl isn't going to be developed properly, and she'll feel like a stupid, annoying, side-kick with corny one-liners and a very stupid backstory. Her development will probably be summed up as 'yeah, all the girls at school picked on me because I didn't like amerifat idle, and I really hate amerifat idle, so I want to kill everyone there'. And for some reason, Frank will say yes, which is a rather stupid thing.
If her backstory and development turns out to be moving and and at least better than 'i feel like it', then I'll certainly live with it. I wouldn't care if it was a toddler with an rpg, so long as it makes sense to the story.
Let kids kill kids in movies, I don't care...just give me a plot I can get behind and a reason to root for them in their fictional escapades. Let the parents worry about how the kids interrupt the message properly. No reason to censor any sort of art so long as people understand how to digest it.
If her backstory and development turns out to be moving and and at least better than 'i feel like it', then I'll certainly live with it. I wouldn't care if it was a toddler with an rpg, so long as it makes sense to the story.
Let kids kill kids in movies, I don't care...just give me a plot I can get behind and a reason to root for them in their fictional escapades. Let the parents worry about how the kids interrupt the message properly. No reason to censor any sort of art so long as people understand how to digest it.
Alright I don't like this but before you start to hate, hear me out. I am ecstatic about the idea of this guy shooting all these completely worthless people like the Kardashians and whatnot. However, when he got into the habit of killing every single person that pulled a dick move I got a little wary. This is because I can totally see me and my friends hanging out in a movie theater and one of my idiot buds throws candy at somebody. This may be a rude thing to do but how the fuck would you feel if the guy stands up and unloads a clip into you and your friends?? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. So just remember, just because someone does something shitty, doesn't mean they are a complete asshole and deserve to be shot on the spot. It is arguable that nobody should have the choice whether someone else lives or dies, no matter how much of a prick they are. Thank you.
Guess you shouldn't be an asshole for no reason, because the piece of popcorn your friend threw could have just landed on a psychopath. Think better, next time.
And how would you feel if someone threw popcorn at you for no reason while you're trying to watch a movie? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. My day gets easily destroyed over small shit like this, and if I knew I was going to die soon, I would do the same thing frank was doing. There is no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know.
And how would you feel if someone threw popcorn at you for no reason while you're trying to watch a movie? I think it would be a pretty shitty day. My day gets easily destroyed over small shit like this, and if I knew I was going to die soon, I would do the same thing frank was doing. There is no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know.
In my opinion, murdering someone over it is logical.
If you had not thrown the piece of popcorn at me, then I wouldn't have shot you. Don't be an asshole to someone you don't know. You go around thinking there aren't consequences until you get shot in the face for being a douche.
Death deserved, in my opinion.
If you had not thrown the piece of popcorn at me, then I wouldn't have shot you. Don't be an asshole to someone you don't know. You go around thinking there aren't consequences until you get shot in the face for being a douche.
Death deserved, in my opinion.
#868 to #867 -
buttfranklin (01/31/2012) [-]
Where do you draw the line? You can't just kill someone for annoying you. Petty anger isn't worth a human life. That's just mindless savagery, you should have the intelligence to be better than that.
You should take more pride in your moral standing.
You should take more pride in your moral standing.
I hate when people say you "can't" do something.
I CAN kill someone for annoying me, that's the beauty of it. Given, there's consequences, but the fact is I have the capability of killing someone for any reason.
If the person wasn't an asshole in the beginning for no reason, then it wouldn't happen.
Ever hear when someone says, "One day, you're going to piss off the wrong person"? Exactly. They should know that there are consequences for actions. Frank is already going to die, so he has a consequence he can't prevent, so it won't matter. But the kid, he doesn't have a consequence. He would've thrown that piece of popcorn, and continued being a douche to people for no reason, had Frank not killed him. It's really only a matter of time until someone snaps.
I CAN kill someone for annoying me, that's the beauty of it. Given, there's consequences, but the fact is I have the capability of killing someone for any reason.
If the person wasn't an asshole in the beginning for no reason, then it wouldn't happen.
Ever hear when someone says, "One day, you're going to piss off the wrong person"? Exactly. They should know that there are consequences for actions. Frank is already going to die, so he has a consequence he can't prevent, so it won't matter. But the kid, he doesn't have a consequence. He would've thrown that piece of popcorn, and continued being a douche to people for no reason, had Frank not killed him. It's really only a matter of time until someone snaps.
#870 to #869 -
buttfranklin (01/31/2012) [-]
OK, 'can't' means 'should not under social conventions' as in 'You can't just call someone a nigger'. You technically can just call someone a nigger, everybody knows that, but it's not something that you should do.
That's just how people use the English language. It's a colloquialism. You knew what I meant.
And regarding your sentiments, it's ridiculous for the only reason not to annoy someone is for fear that they are a psychopath. The maladjusted lunatics that are prepared to murder someone for such a trivial matter are few and far between.
I don't harass strangers on the principle that I don't want to live in a place where strangers harass each other; it's not a nice society to live in. I also disapprove of a society where everybody has no qualms with perpetrating evil if they believe they won't get punished for it, because that's really just an immature and uncivilised mindset.
Up there, your comment #864, you yourself said there's no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know, yet I'm getting the distinct impression that you think it's OK to be an asshole to someone you don't know if you decided they were more obnoxious than you would 'permit' them to be, as if you were the authority on who deserves to live or die. You seem to be perfectly comfortable with the idea that might makes right, which - as thousands of years of human social development has proven- just doesn't gel.
That's just how people use the English language. It's a colloquialism. You knew what I meant.
And regarding your sentiments, it's ridiculous for the only reason not to annoy someone is for fear that they are a psychopath. The maladjusted lunatics that are prepared to murder someone for such a trivial matter are few and far between.
I don't harass strangers on the principle that I don't want to live in a place where strangers harass each other; it's not a nice society to live in. I also disapprove of a society where everybody has no qualms with perpetrating evil if they believe they won't get punished for it, because that's really just an immature and uncivilised mindset.
Up there, your comment #864, you yourself said there's no reason to be an asshole to someone you don't know, yet I'm getting the distinct impression that you think it's OK to be an asshole to someone you don't know if you decided they were more obnoxious than you would 'permit' them to be, as if you were the authority on who deserves to live or die. You seem to be perfectly comfortable with the idea that might makes right, which - as thousands of years of human social development has proven- just doesn't gel.



Report Abuse/Harassment
Report Bugs
Suggestions
Statistics
Contact Us
Unsubscribe from newsletter
RSS Feeds 
