weren't we all thinking this?. Comic stolen from a online news paper (sorry i do not have source to the creator).. I I' CREATIV ANOTHER __ THE LOCKET OF SALAZAR
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

weren't we all thinking this?

Comic stolen from a online news paper (sorry i do not have source to the creator).

I I' CREATIV ANOTHER __
THE LOCKET OF SALAZAR SLYTHERIN WILL NOW
HOLD A PIECE OF MY SOUL!
UH, HIS PARK LORDSHIP? I KNOW YOU' RE SUPER
INTO VATTING YOUR SOUL INTO “? THY" ITEMS,
WUT THESE ARE ALL HUGELY OBVIOUS TAETERS
FOR ANYONE LOOKING TO DESTA? YOUR HOR-
JEUSES.
YOU DARE
alennon ME,
KEVIN?
I' M JUST SAYING ._ WHY NOT
MAKE ONE OUT OF,
LIKE, A SEAN OF SAND OE
SOMETHING; AND PROP IT IN
THE MIDDLE OF THE OCEAN? NO
ONE WILL EVER FIND IT AND
YOU WILL BE ASSURE!)
HMHMM, NOT A BAD IDEA,
KEVIN. OR..., GOULD MAKE
NAGINI INTO A !
NO. NO, NO, NO NO NO. PLEASE PO NOT TURN
YOUR MO? TAL SNAKE INTO A . YOU
KNOW THAT SNAKES DIE, RIGHT? THIS
SNAKE WILL DIE SOMEDAY, SO YOU ARE
GUARANTEED TO LOSE THIS .
OKAY, OKAY, YOU WERE RIGHT,
KEVIN, STOP ME!
I STILL PO HAVE ONE
LEFT THOUGH!
AYE YOU HTING IT SOMEPLACE
COMPLETELY SAFE, GIVEN IT' S YOUR
LAST DEFENSE AND IT' S JUST A
STUPID SNAKE THAT HOLDS
VIRTUALLY OFFENSIVE VALUE
AGAINST WIZARDS BLASTING
MAGIG LEFT AND WEIGHT?
...
+820
Views: 38724
Favorited: 63
Submitted: 01/15/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to jonball E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #6 - KayRed (01/16/2014) [+] (31 replies)
Another thing that pisses me off about Dorkly. They find minor, inconsequential (and probably easy to explain in universe) plot-holes, they stretch'em out like a black man ******* an Asian woman, and then call themselves clever.
#4 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/15/2014) [+] (4 replies)
Well since his snake is a horcrux it is immortal to anything but stuff that can destroy horcuxes. Fks the sword of griffendor
#15 - huehuehuepster ONLINE (01/16/2014) [+] (5 replies)
> doesn't have source of comic
> huge letters spell dorkly across the last panel

mfw
User avatar #13 - KellyisAwesome (01/16/2014) [+] (4 replies)
You can't just kill a horcrux with magic. Didn't neville use Godric Gryffindor's sword with poisen from the basilisk on it? It's been some years since I read the books, but I'm pretty sure that's how it went down.
#47 - sonofagun (01/16/2014) [-]
Honoraber Dispray
User avatar #36 - omninickk (01/16/2014) [+] (9 replies)
If you watched the movie, Nagini deflected the magic hits with his fangs. (If I remember rightly.) The horcruxes must also be able to find and they must bear purpose to the person who is performing the spell on it.
User avatar #3 - ChuckNorrisVsMRT (01/15/2014) [+] (2 replies)
It also has to be an item with sentimental value or something
#40 to #3 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/16/2014) [-]
Nah, the books say that Voldemort only wants horcruxes which have sentimental value to him, but it's not necessary.
User avatar #60 - SubjectThree (01/16/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Ok, I've always wondered something:

In Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone, Voldemort is piggybacking off of Quirrel by sharing his body. Was Quirrel a horcrux as well?
#63 to #60 - asthmaticscotsman (01/16/2014) [-]
Eh, no not really. Quirrel was a carrier for what was left of the main soul, not just an offshoot, which is what the horcruxes were. Offshoots, pieces.
User avatar #59 - fuzzyballs (01/16/2014) [-]
people who make comics about "stupid logic" should actually read about the logic first
User avatar #61 - mrgoodlove (01/16/2014) [-]
It's okay OP, I'm sure we can figure out the source on our own.
User avatar #68 - footballmaniac (01/16/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Have you perhaps considered that the author has no choice but to include these flaws in logic? Had he actually been smart about the horcruxes, then there would be no way for Harry Potter to achieve its' 'happy ending'.
User avatar #67 - gardenmanly (01/16/2014) [-]
People are here talking about different explanations as to why he chose the horcruxes he did

and I'm just here overjoyed at the fact that my name is in the comic
User avatar #7 - tittylovin (01/16/2014) [-]
But horcruxes are tough to kill, so really maybe he was just very protective of his snake.
User avatar #2 - cheastnut (01/15/2014) [+] (1 reply)
he couldn't use a grain of sand because to use it one has to tell someone what it is and where it is. that person has to find it and activate it. he's snake was made immortal by his horocrux as long as the snake held it couldn't be destroyed by normal means. the sword of Gryffindor was a special sword. they really didn't cover this very well in the books and even worse in the movies
User avatar #11 to #2 - schmitty ONLINE (01/16/2014) [-]
They actually covered it perfectly in both the books and the movies. The sword of Gryffindor was made by goblins. Goblin made weapons and armor are only affected by things that can strengthen them. Thus, when the sword was plunged into the basilisk's mouth to kill it, it was imbued with its properties. The sword therefore acts as a basilisk fang essentially, thus as the basilisk fang was able to destroy the diary, so is the sword able to destroy other horcruxes.
User avatar #1 - friedgreenpomatoes ONLINE (01/15/2014) [-]
I'm not sure if I remember correctly, but doesn't Voldemort also have to know where it is?
 Friends (0)