Skyrim was repetitive and had bad combat
Dragon's dogma had a stupid multiplayer system and weak storyline

both of those games have weak sauce pplots and when it comes to combat skyrim has dragons dogma beat, quite honestly if you want a fun fantasy game just stick to dragon age

i'd agree with you on the plot, but don't even kid yourself saying skyrim's combat is better. any first person hack and slash has horrible aiming systems unless motioned controlled.

the aim may be lacking but at least its involved and you have sense of urgency somewhat like real life in dragons dogma its just boring

They are both awesome for different reasons.

I have skyrim, i like the game, but after like 10 hours of gameplay, atleast for me, got boring, never have played dragon's dogma through, it's really that good?

i've played skyrim, done every mission, gotten every achievement and then some. But dragon's dogma had me more entertained for it's first playthrough then all of skyrim. Look up the angry joe show's review for the PERFECT review of it.

But... But... I love Skyrim...


Nah, in all seriousness, What is Dragon's Dogma? I've heard of it, but never played it.

mfw no one knows of it.

it's one of capcoms newest games. It's a jrpg, so I'd guess off the bat no one would know, but imagine shadow of the colossus boss fighting, skyrim area of exploration, and as hard as dark souls wrapped into one game. story is meh, but ending is awesome and depressing on the side.

That's probably why you love skyrim.

You don't know any better.

You're a moron. The Skyrim fast travel system is a piece of shit.