|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #32143 on SubscribersLevel 195 Comments: Anon Annihilator
OfflineSend mail to zombiexslayer Block zombiexslayer Invite zombiexslayer to be your friend flag avatar
Feel free to add me on xbox or youtube, im almost always up to talk
- Views: 52168you people
2204 252 Total: +1952
- Views: 20847Wut.
714 109 Total: +605
- Views: 4219_
98 24 Total: +74
- Views: 2339Maths.
66 8 Total: +58
- Views: 10151Men
61 3 Total: +58
- Views: 2842So True
49 10 Total: +39
- Views: 610Youtube Trolls
5 1 Total: +4
- Views: 632Lulz
9 4 Total: +5
latest user's comments
|#179 - I disagree. That would be taking away their first amendment ri… [+] (5 new replies)||12/02/2013 on My Affirmation||0|
#223 - cupcakecrusader (12/02/2013) [-]
I'm not trying to ban those that "do not believe the norm", stop making me out to be a neo-nazi or something :\
All I'm saying is that throughout time, time and time and time and time and time again, the walls of history have been painted with various travesties of varies religions, big and small, crude and extensive, established or front.
Handing power to relegion has almost NEVER worked out well, and those where it did are debatable at best. They use the same old tired moral and ethical codes to justify protests based purely on "because our ten thousand year old book, which we claim to be only 4000 years, says it's right/wrong".
If a religious bodies comes and shows that GM crops devistates wildlife, as other factions did, they would be given a fair chance to speak as they wish. However, they march through, make a big to-do over the smallest issue, then when people get interested someone finds a way to stretch the facts to suit the story and they prop them up as doctrine.
#391 - internetzsoviet (12/02/2013) [-]
You're overlooking an obvious substrate to why they do this, and it is because their books are based on a deity or entity that we have no concrete and observable evidence to support. I honestly agree with your opinion that theocracies are not an effective means to govern a body of people but you can not remove a group's right to protest. The means to an end is often overlooked, but I agree that protesting and spreading false information is disgusting. Added to that is my extreme disgust for Islam, and my disrespect toward Judaism as well as Christianity (to a lesser extent, however).
#192 - anonymous poster (12/02/2013) [-]
Gave you a thumb friend :3 I remember what happened. Fuck that. They frowned upon fucking.
|#32 - Maybe the AC was on. The car was probably running, he said it …||11/03/2013 on Dogs are great||0|
|#65 - My wife and I [+] (1 new reply)||10/28/2013 on Unknown Fame||-3|
|#1282 - **zombiexslayer rolls 13**||10/24/2013 on *roll 2* to see your fate||0|
|#30 - That's not just England, it's supposed to be like that here in… [+] (1 new reply)||10/13/2013 on 2013||+1|
|#71 - Where's all of the punctuation?||10/13/2013 on Very true||0|
|#210 - You mean the magazine clip? It holds 300 bullets and makes it … [+] (1 new reply)||10/13/2013 on guns||0|
|#14 - Maybe you should learn to spell "Republican" before … [+] (1 new reply)||10/08/2013 on Welp||-1|
|#40 - Nanners on FJ? It's a dream come true!||09/19/2013 on Play On||0|
|#79 - Who's Steve the Pirate? [+] (1 new reply)||09/18/2013 on Trying to out-logic a robot||+6|
Join Subscribe fucking-rolls
Join Subscribe furry
Join Subscribe stoner-humor
Join Subscribe tard-channel