Click to expand
Rank #11239 on CommentsLevel 164 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
OnlineSend mail to zhadowklaw Block zhadowklaw Invite zhadowklaw to be your friend flag avatar
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||5/19/2013|
|Funnyjunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#3413|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#7062|
|Content Thumbs:||591 total, 697 , 106|
|Comment Thumbs:||726 total, 927 , 201|
|Content Level Progress:|| 30% (3/10) |
Level 59 Content: Sammich eater → Level 60 Content: FJ Cultist
|Comment Level Progress:|| 80% (8/10) |
Level 164 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 165 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
|Times Content Favorited:||1 times|
|Total Comments Made:||426|
- Views: 1785TPB
8 1 Total: +7
latest user's comments
|#636 - **zhadowklaw used "*roll picture*"** **zhadowklaw rolled image **||02/27/2015 on Random sex roll||+1|
|#382 - Why not add an option for multiple color schemes?||02/13/2015 on Rage about layout changes here||0|
|#81 - Also this is quite recent [+] (1 new reply)||02/13/2015 on Praise Nvidia||0|
|#4 - I disagree. [+] (13 new replies)||02/11/2015 on g intensifies||0|
#5 - sinery (02/11/2015) [-]
The only time it does slack behind is when that vram bottleneck goes in before the processing power bottleneck goes in, which only happens at large resolutions and or heavily modded games.
Yes, there are situations where a 290x will spit out more FPS than a 970, but that are only on a few resolutions/titles/mods which most will never use.
All this while generating less heat and use less wattage.
#17 - wotterpatch (02/12/2015) [-]
Not at all.
At base clocks, they're both about equal at 1080p, with perhaps a slight edge to the 290x. Anything higher and the 290x pulls away.
When overclocked, the 290x to 1200mhz or so and the 970 to 1500, the 970 wins at 1080p, and at 1440p and 4k, the 290x is still ahead
#13 - anonexplains (02/11/2015) [-]
you come across as jealous
#6 - anonexplains (02/11/2015) [-]
my 970 has so far peaked at 45°c at 40% fan
|#11 - TFW you put your fist up to the screen and you can't even see the gif. [+] (1 new reply)||02/11/2015 on dude...||+84|
#39 - anonexplains (02/12/2015) [-]
|#12 - Those apple products deserved it.... [+] (14 new replies)||02/11/2015 on Gore Comp (May be NSFW)||-25|
#82 - anonexplains (02/11/2015) [-]
i hate them just for the ridiculous prices
#79 - hydraetis (02/11/2015) [-]
The only main issue with Apple products is their price tag. Aside from that they're just an operational alternative.
Plus for some people, the Apple product is actually better eg: if someone is bad with computers/technology (like my mum), I will heavily recommend iOS over android.
#50 - marcx (02/11/2015) [-]
to tell truth i just hate most new age apple products. osx/iphone/ over expensive apple laptops also known as the steve jobs era. I liked apple up until then.
The lack of innovative tech/ waste of materials in construction/ form more important than function/ letting consumers become bigots/ "free upgrades"(not really free)
Only praise in apple should be to the PR department
#56 - marcx (02/11/2015) [-]
And thats why i built my own desktop cheaper more powerful/ dsicrete graphics.
Laptop wise i used an old dell vostro 1500 from 07 till the screen took a crap/ picked up a used vostro1700 for cheap and all the parts from the 1500 fit perfectly into the 1700(cpu/mem/etc)
Couldnt have done that with any apple laptop and their lack of workability.
For anything slim and light weight id go for surface pro 3 tablet. which is expensive but i find it more value than an ultra book/apple air/ipad. Least with the surface pro 3 i find the price tag expensive but worth it for the most point.
If i need osx theres hacks to run them natively on most intel based laptops
#60 - wotterpatch (02/11/2015) [-]
...Oh man you're ignorant.
The Vostro stuff is no more upgradeable ram/hard drive wise than the macbooks...and i seriously doubt you brought along a laptops CPU, socketed CPUs in laptops are incredibly rare. Sure, macbooks are harder to open up, but that comes with being so svelte.
And the surface for 3 isn't much different than the macbooks. Low powered ultrabook hardware in a slim chassis, for an incredibly expensive price. It just has a touch screen and a detachable keyboard, which is just going to cost the user more.
Lets not forget macbooks are significantly more upgrade able than a surface pro 3
#72 - marcx (02/11/2015) [-]
and older laptops most are socketed. and able to replace cpu with ease. Gpus were the real issue back then.(before when intel hd graphics couldnt even animate a potato) had to know if you had an integrated boards/ discrete board.
Even now not all laptops have soldered cpus. A lil reasearch and you can find ones that arent made for the masses. The only issues you should have to worry about is socket type/bus speed/supporting chipset. My 1500 has the same chipset as the 1700/ same socket/buss limits. the only thing i needed to switch was the discrete graphics heat sink / switch the processor over. Yes its heavy just like all 17in lappies of that day but it works well runs win10 preview and most older games mid/low long as its cool.
|#103 - **zhadowklaw used "*roll 1, 1-99*"** **zhadowklaw rolls 05**||02/11/2015 on Dubs check picture||0|
|#31 - I demand an 8-bit cthulhu.||02/06/2015 on Lets 8-bit FJ (well lets...||0|
|#17 - You poor bastard.||02/05/2015 on RIP||+1|
|#17 - It says " **** me in the ass tonight"||02/02/2015 on Solve the puzzle||-1|