Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

zaperzero

Rank #2907 on Comments
zaperzero Avatar Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Online
Send mail to zaperzero Block zaperzero Invite zaperzero to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/22/2010
Last Login:12/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2907
Highest Content Rank:#4172
Highest Comment Rank:#1921
Content Thumbs: 482 total,  949 ,  467
Comment Thumbs: 3415 total,  5944 ,  2529
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 39 Content: Peasant → Level 40 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 8% (8/100)
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:75192
Times Content Favorited:36 times
Total Comments Made:3185
FJ Points:3369
Favorite Tags: dark souls (2) | fuck (2)

latest user's comments

#98 - "The word of God is wise and just. I just don't trust th…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/10/2014 on God +1
#213 - mullisaur (12/10/2014) [-]
Sure yeah I get that, so if the bible is not the word of god though, then what is?
User avatar #218 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
The Bible is, but it can be deluded through translation.
That's why there are so many translations of the Bible in english, Hebrew text is hard to change or interpret all of the meanings of.
#97 - >God loves all people >God sees you're being a dick …  [+] (30 new replies) 12/10/2014 on God +9
User avatar #142 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
I getcha there dude..
But "because he loves them" is a pretty lame excuse for burning you for the rest of eternity...
User avatar #159 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
"Because I have free will" is a bad excuse for being an ass hole your whole life and never trying to better yourself...
:/
User avatar #202 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Oh and you better ask for forgiveness for saying ass..
I'd really hate to see all your hard work go to waste because of one little 3 letter word...
User avatar #200 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
So all non-religious people are assholes?
Wow that's a pretty big statement...
User avatar #204 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
Well that's arguing for if you're a believer in Christ and you are a faker who doesn't really act as if you need to better yourself (Think Hitler the Christian on this one).

Also, swearing isn't a sin. I can be a potty mouth all I want as long as I don't use my words to harm others.
User avatar #206 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Actually I'm pretty sure that swearing is a sin..
You really don't make any sense...
But I guess neither does any religion ever...
User avatar #208 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
That's a child's defense against being wrong "You don't make sense and neither does anyone but me!"
Swearing most certainly is not a sin, for if it were there would be boundaries on which words are swears and which ones aren't.
#103 - leifbunny (12/10/2014) [-]
Life's short. Eternity is not. If we are to really believe that he's doing it for punishment... how many lifetimes of damnation is enough for "loving" god?
#153 - crazyitalian (12/10/2014) [-]
well it's not quite eternity, if i remember correctly sometime after judgement day, EVERYONE including those already in hell will be brought to heaven eventually
#156 - anonymous (12/10/2014) [-]
That's a minority interpretation. The majority of denominations and schools teach an endless dichotomy.
User avatar #106 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
He accepts that choice to rebel. It is possible to see it as "just punishment" but the fact is that if you are actively sinning with knowledge that you do not intend to repent, then you are no better than any criminal.
"If you love something set it free"
Well you have freedom to sin and freedom to enter into hell's domain by being a bad person with a truly evil heart that does not want to repent. One who does not intend to better themselves. If you keep sinning but slowly stop being such a cock head and actually start trying to be nicer to others as God would have you be, then you are making semblances of progress. If you intend to do good but do bad, you are rewarded still.
Making us unable to chose the darkness and unable to chose to sin and to damn ourselves is to take away free will, something God does not have intent of doing. That is not a sign of love, that is a sign of control. Angles face that problem, as they cannot consciously chose to do evils. Personal View: Lucifer chose to do what we see as evil but he saw as good.
"If God is weaker then I am, then I may take his seat and be mightier than he."
If a man can surpass God, then it is his duty to do so. To become a greater perfection than perfection itself is an admirable quality. That's how I chose to look at that.

Angles are perfect beings but less so than God is, which God grew lonely with only perfection as his companions, only the pure. So he created a being with the potential for pure good but also for evils, one who had choice and could act on its own, this being of free will is Man.

TL;DR Man is given the freedom to do evil and to reap the consequences, but we're trusted to do good and reap the happiness of this world and the pride of knowing we are the ones keeping it in balance.
"It's impossible to break the law if there is no law."
User avatar #149 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Ok so you have 2 kids..
You love them each the same..
But you tell them if they are bad you will throw them in a hole and burn them..
Also if they are good then they will be treated...
So kid 1 acts up and you throw them in a hole and burn them..
While kid 2 gets to have popcorn and candy..

I really don't get what aspect of this is love..
I mean if he really loved sinners he would feel bad for sending them to the eternal rotisserie of doom..
I mean really? Couldn't he have just made a place that isn't as good as heaven, so that he wouldn't have to torture his poor little children...
I wouldn't think anyone could stand killing their children, well other than Casey Anthony..
Oh I get it now..
So god is basically Casey Anthony...Great talk I learned loads today...
User avatar #157 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
That is drastic oversimplification of the issue.
If you have 3 kids and one is an asshole and beats the other up and never says he's sorry and you tell him you won't stop the big mean villain from getting him if he keeps being mean, but you give him several reminders and he never lets up or says he will even try to stop being a douche.
You have a second kid who is a douche and you tell him the same thing you told the first. Only he listens eventually and says he's sorry once in a while. After a few years he even stops punching his brothers in the face all the time, though he still does it occasionally. He is trying to improve.
Your third kid is a goodey two shoes who feels bad if he tells you about his two brothers beating him up. You feel sympathy for this kid. You tell him he'll be punished if he's naughty, and if he does a lot of bad stuff you're not going to fight away the big scary monsters.
The first kid goes to hell for never changing his ways after years of being told repeatedly to at least try to be better. The second kid made an effort, even if it didn't change much, he made SOME effort to try to be better, and he was a better person for it. The third kid didn't get in on his merit alone, as he was sometimes mean back to the other two, but you forgive him because he did try to not do bad.
That one that went to hell did so of his own merit and because his heart was set on being bad, he made no action to change and did not remorse.
User avatar #201 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Actually according to most Christians the second kid who kind of changed his way would have went to hell also..
You could be good all your life, and be the best person on earth...
But if you're don't accept god then you're going to hell...
Still doesn't make any sense..
Imma good person, but because I don't worship a certain god means I'm gonna burn..
Sounds fishy to me..
User avatar #203 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
Actually being not a christian is counted as rejecting salvation. No man is without sin and therefore no man is pure enough to get into heaven by their own merit. To go against the belief that you would be saved is why you aren't saved.
"Why would I believe I am saved by God if he does not exist?" is the kind of mindset.
Also, that seems to be more of a Catholic Christian thing from what I've seen. There are many ways to interperet the Bible and the Church I go to interprets it this way,"Your goal is not to be perfect, as God knows better than to expect any man to be born a pure man, since he is the one who made is inherently flawed. Your goal is instead to keep bettering yourself in his image."
User avatar #207 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Man I'm sorry, but this whole convo has made a good laugh..
I mean arguing with a christian about jesus and what not is like beating a dead horse...
Because you guys have split into so many different sects, and argue with yourselves..
It just gets watered down ever couple generations to fit society at that certain time..
User avatar #209 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
Learning to further interpret things without changing what was originally said is a good thing, I'd say. If people at one point believed that because the stars in the heaven glowed that they were fireflies, then you proved it was more akin to flames, then they are stupid to believe that the way they first looked at things was still right. That's how anything that is tough to read is, friend.
User avatar #221 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Do you just keep going?
Hail satan...
User avatar #224 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
it is my duty as a Christian to sincerely pursue the salvation of others.
Figured about 10 posts back you might be a troll, but eh.
User avatar #226 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Troll?
No I honestly think you're a goddamn fool...
also you said duty..
User avatar #227 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
Well think as you might, then. I suppose at this point all you can do is recite the same arguments I've heard 1000 times and I can answer them in kind with the answers I've already given. I urge you to try and look into being a Christian, though.
lel duty.
User avatar #228 - emppilaf (12/10/2014) [-]
Ah I supposed you could also recite the 1000000000 arguments that every christian always spout...
You should really look into to being religion-less..
Also calling people assholes is not kind..
User avatar #229 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
"Shut up" is the best Christian argument, lol.
Seirously though, it bugs me there are so many logic-less ones on both sides.
Why do you think I should be religion-less?
Well calling people fools isn't nice either but when did I call anyone an asshole?
User avatar #231 - emppilaf (12/11/2014) [-]
"#159 to #142 - zaperzero ONLINE (21 hours ago) [-]
"Because I have free will" is a bad excuse for being an ass hole your whole life and never trying to better yourself... :/"

I think you should be without religion because you think I should try religion out...
I never said I was nice, but you are a christian so you should be nice..
That's how this works right?
User avatar #234 - zaperzero (12/11/2014) [-]
That was referring to a hypothetical person. Someone who, in essence, is imaginary and was created to serve the purpose of being a horrible person their whole life.
"I think you should try not eating breakfast because you think I should eat breakfast"
10/10 argument.

I was just saying that you're not being nice, which is true. :c You are being rather hurtful.
I love sharing my thoughts and ideas with others. Bettering communications is always a good way to alleviate pain in the world.
User avatar #235 - emppilaf (12/11/2014) [-]
I'm not nice, never said I was..
Nigger..
Hail satan...
#236 - zaperzero (12/11/2014) [-]
This is a fair enough point. You should try being nicer.
User avatar #237 - emppilaf (12/11/2014) [-]
hail nigger satan
#104 - anonymous (12/10/2014) [-]
Eternity hell= if bad
Eternity heaven= if good
User avatar #107 - zaperzero (12/10/2014) [-]
Kinda simplified....I feel like I lost or contradicted what I said, as I wrote this intermittently with another religious statement...hopefully it isn't too bad.
#399 - Picture 12/09/2014 on [Untitled] 0
#28 - Stalin's army would have had blacks if they weren't killing bl…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/09/2014 on The race war 0
User avatar #38 - captainfuckitall (12/09/2014) [-]
You're incorrect. Both Stalin's army and Hitler's army had white people, as well as many other minorities.

www.google.ca/search?q=Black+Nazis&biw=1366&bih=677&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=7HGHVJmAAcrdoAS_nYJY&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ

You can also find Chinese Nazis, Hindu Nazis, Turkish Nazis, ect.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Russian

www.historynet.com/african-americans-in-the-civil-war

And in the civil war, Northern Blacks enlisted freely, while Southern Blacks were used in labour positions and not on the front lines.

Whites were always the ones in power because we actually bothered to expand our borders and make proper tactics; but despite this, even that isn't quite so, as the largest empires on Earth was between the Mongol empire, Chinese empire, and Persian empire, none of which are 'white'.

listverse.com/2010/06/22/top-10-greatest-empires-in-history/ (of which, we are only 5 out of 10, and even that's stretching it, as two of the empires were really just one split apart, so it should be 4/10)

Power was always evenly distributed, it just belonged to those who worked for it rather than those who threw a temper tantrum every time something didn't go their way.

Maybe if you stopped hating your own race so much and actually did some research, you wouldn't be so wrong all the time.
#65 - Definitely. 12/09/2014 on SHREKT 0
#85 - Blood Borne is a console exclusive. 12/09/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
#94 - Picture 12/09/2014 on Cryptids, Creeps, and Other... +2
#72 - serhiy apparently.  [+] (2 new replies) 12/09/2014 on Cryptids, Creeps, and Other... +1
User avatar #81 - thefates (12/09/2014) [-]
He is clearly just an alien life form trying to figure out our secrets.
#94 - zaperzero (12/09/2014) [-]
#265 - I'd be dead I'm a high school student and my parents… 12/09/2014 on Drinking Game Question +1
#17 - What kinda gay ass friends do you have? 12/09/2014 on Oh super bestfriends 0
#10 - White Power Ranger Kinda sad I didn't see t… 12/09/2014 on The Can 0
#30 - He made it clear it was going well. 12/08/2014 on A Special Place +27
#127 - It is funny because it is true. I go to try to make stuff tha… 12/08/2014 on SOL : Serious business +2
#83 - Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for b… 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
#81 - Demon's Souls faced no performance issues whatsoever, unless y…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #82 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like people are saying in the thread that Demon's Souls ran like shit before it got released as well. So yeah, that's why people right now shouldn't judge Bloodborne this early.

My PS4 is basically my Bloodborn Station. Only game I'm looking forward to play on it. Rest is just stuff that already comes out on my PC, where's it's more enjoyable to play.
User avatar #83 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for bloodborne. I'm getting lordss of the fallen and rayman legends for it too, just cus I have a feel my friends will enjoy playing those at my house (rayman multiplayer tho)
#79 - Given From plans to run the game at 1080p with 30fps locked la…  [+] (4 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #80 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Personally, I don't trust they're good at the technical stuff.
I love their games, but they all suffer from poor optimisation in some areas, or just odd technical flaws. It's mostly because they're a Japanese developer I think, and I expect a bit more from games on PC. Dark Souls 2 was decent on PC, but it wasn't great - and it certainly didn't feel like PC was their target platform as they said it was. A month delay, online not working for previously VAC banned players (I have some age-old bans in HL1 engine games for reasons still unknown to me), locked to 60fps - not ideal on a 144Hz monitor, damage and animations bugged since it was tied to framerate (some of the enemies are 2x faster than on console), controller keys on the UI even though you played with mouse and keyboard, awful m&k controls STILL... It certainly had problems, and the majority was not fixed. It was better than the DS1, but that isn't saying much.

I trust they have a better handle on performance when only developing for a single system, but I don't really see them as a studio with a performance-culture.
User avatar #81 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Demon's Souls faced no performance issues whatsoever, unless you blew up a ton of barrels at once or rolled over a bunch of stuff, in which case you dropped to about 4 fps for about a second or two, then went right back to normal. They've had a lot of experience since then, too. Deving for one system is definitely their strong suit and PC is their bane.
User avatar #82 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like people are saying in the thread that Demon's Souls ran like shit before it got released as well. So yeah, that's why people right now shouldn't judge Bloodborne this early.

My PS4 is basically my Bloodborn Station. Only game I'm looking forward to play on it. Rest is just stuff that already comes out on my PC, where's it's more enjoyable to play.
User avatar #83 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for bloodborne. I'm getting lordss of the fallen and rayman legends for it too, just cus I have a feel my friends will enjoy playing those at my house (rayman multiplayer tho)
#77 - He wants me to do it if I'm going to prove him wrong. Otherwi…  [+] (6 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #78 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like he deserves to waste his money then :p
User avatar #79 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Given From plans to run the game at 1080p with 30fps locked later on, I don't really think it's going to be an issue. If any other dev team said that'd be in the works, I would be hesitant. From, on the other hand, I trust them.
User avatar #80 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Personally, I don't trust they're good at the technical stuff.
I love their games, but they all suffer from poor optimisation in some areas, or just odd technical flaws. It's mostly because they're a Japanese developer I think, and I expect a bit more from games on PC. Dark Souls 2 was decent on PC, but it wasn't great - and it certainly didn't feel like PC was their target platform as they said it was. A month delay, online not working for previously VAC banned players (I have some age-old bans in HL1 engine games for reasons still unknown to me), locked to 60fps - not ideal on a 144Hz monitor, damage and animations bugged since it was tied to framerate (some of the enemies are 2x faster than on console), controller keys on the UI even though you played with mouse and keyboard, awful m&k controls STILL... It certainly had problems, and the majority was not fixed. It was better than the DS1, but that isn't saying much.

I trust they have a better handle on performance when only developing for a single system, but I don't really see them as a studio with a performance-culture.
User avatar #81 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Demon's Souls faced no performance issues whatsoever, unless you blew up a ton of barrels at once or rolled over a bunch of stuff, in which case you dropped to about 4 fps for about a second or two, then went right back to normal. They've had a lot of experience since then, too. Deving for one system is definitely their strong suit and PC is their bane.
User avatar #82 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like people are saying in the thread that Demon's Souls ran like shit before it got released as well. So yeah, that's why people right now shouldn't judge Bloodborne this early.

My PS4 is basically my Bloodborn Station. Only game I'm looking forward to play on it. Rest is just stuff that already comes out on my PC, where's it's more enjoyable to play.
User avatar #83 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for bloodborne. I'm getting lordss of the fallen and rayman legends for it too, just cus I have a feel my friends will enjoy playing those at my house (rayman multiplayer tho)
#75 - Thanks m8. That neogaf thread is better than the one I fou…  [+] (8 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #76 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
He's too lazy to find it himself? :p
User avatar #77 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
He wants me to do it if I'm going to prove him wrong. Otherwise he just won't accept that the framerates were bellow 30 at any point in time.
User avatar #78 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like he deserves to waste his money then :p
User avatar #79 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Given From plans to run the game at 1080p with 30fps locked later on, I don't really think it's going to be an issue. If any other dev team said that'd be in the works, I would be hesitant. From, on the other hand, I trust them.
User avatar #80 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Personally, I don't trust they're good at the technical stuff.
I love their games, but they all suffer from poor optimisation in some areas, or just odd technical flaws. It's mostly because they're a Japanese developer I think, and I expect a bit more from games on PC. Dark Souls 2 was decent on PC, but it wasn't great - and it certainly didn't feel like PC was their target platform as they said it was. A month delay, online not working for previously VAC banned players (I have some age-old bans in HL1 engine games for reasons still unknown to me), locked to 60fps - not ideal on a 144Hz monitor, damage and animations bugged since it was tied to framerate (some of the enemies are 2x faster than on console), controller keys on the UI even though you played with mouse and keyboard, awful m&k controls STILL... It certainly had problems, and the majority was not fixed. It was better than the DS1, but that isn't saying much.

I trust they have a better handle on performance when only developing for a single system, but I don't really see them as a studio with a performance-culture.
User avatar #81 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Demon's Souls faced no performance issues whatsoever, unless you blew up a ton of barrels at once or rolled over a bunch of stuff, in which case you dropped to about 4 fps for about a second or two, then went right back to normal. They've had a lot of experience since then, too. Deving for one system is definitely their strong suit and PC is their bane.
User avatar #82 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like people are saying in the thread that Demon's Souls ran like shit before it got released as well. So yeah, that's why people right now shouldn't judge Bloodborne this early.

My PS4 is basically my Bloodborn Station. Only game I'm looking forward to play on it. Rest is just stuff that already comes out on my PC, where's it's more enjoyable to play.
User avatar #83 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for bloodborne. I'm getting lordss of the fallen and rayman legends for it too, just cus I have a feel my friends will enjoy playing those at my house (rayman multiplayer tho)
#72 - [citation for literally everything from both sides of this arg…  [+] (10 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #74 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Hey, guy. Yes you, guy.
These are speculations.
Yes.
You know.
Those.
The ones that aren't based on facts.
But on speculation.
The reason game developers optimise in the late part of development is because they don't have all the assets ready. It's logic really. You can't optimise something you don't have yet. The problem is when developers make ad hoc code from the beginning so it becomes very ressource consuming to optimise. Cue Dark Souls, Assassin's Creed Unity, Battlefield 4, etc.
Here's for example some possible reasons as to why Blighttown in Dark Souls is so poorly optimised: www.reddit.com/r/darksouls/comments/21oai2/why_is_the_framerate_so_bad_in_blighttown/
Here's a thread on Bloodborne's performance: www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=873686&page=24
Fuck, it's as if no one knows how to fucking Google.
User avatar #75 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Thanks m8.
That neogaf thread is better than the one I found, but I need concrete evidence to my friend that the framerates are sub-30. He is stingy in accepting anything I tell him unless I have documentation 100% proof it was sub-30 at the game play tests.
User avatar #76 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
He's too lazy to find it himself? :p
User avatar #77 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
He wants me to do it if I'm going to prove him wrong. Otherwise he just won't accept that the framerates were bellow 30 at any point in time.
User avatar #78 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like he deserves to waste his money then :p
User avatar #79 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Given From plans to run the game at 1080p with 30fps locked later on, I don't really think it's going to be an issue. If any other dev team said that'd be in the works, I would be hesitant. From, on the other hand, I trust them.
User avatar #80 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Personally, I don't trust they're good at the technical stuff.
I love their games, but they all suffer from poor optimisation in some areas, or just odd technical flaws. It's mostly because they're a Japanese developer I think, and I expect a bit more from games on PC. Dark Souls 2 was decent on PC, but it wasn't great - and it certainly didn't feel like PC was their target platform as they said it was. A month delay, online not working for previously VAC banned players (I have some age-old bans in HL1 engine games for reasons still unknown to me), locked to 60fps - not ideal on a 144Hz monitor, damage and animations bugged since it was tied to framerate (some of the enemies are 2x faster than on console), controller keys on the UI even though you played with mouse and keyboard, awful m&k controls STILL... It certainly had problems, and the majority was not fixed. It was better than the DS1, but that isn't saying much.

I trust they have a better handle on performance when only developing for a single system, but I don't really see them as a studio with a performance-culture.
User avatar #81 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Demon's Souls faced no performance issues whatsoever, unless you blew up a ton of barrels at once or rolled over a bunch of stuff, in which case you dropped to about 4 fps for about a second or two, then went right back to normal. They've had a lot of experience since then, too. Deving for one system is definitely their strong suit and PC is their bane.
User avatar #82 - buriedstpatrick (12/08/2014) [-]
Seems like people are saying in the thread that Demon's Souls ran like shit before it got released as well. So yeah, that's why people right now shouldn't judge Bloodborne this early.

My PS4 is basically my Bloodborn Station. Only game I'm looking forward to play on it. Rest is just stuff that already comes out on my PC, where's it's more enjoyable to play.
User avatar #83 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I get ya man. I'm getting mine pretty much solely for bloodborne. I'm getting lordss of the fallen and rayman legends for it too, just cus I have a feel my friends will enjoy playing those at my house (rayman multiplayer tho)
#71 - They aren't letting glorious PC race touch this game.  [+] (3 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
#84 - darksoulsj (12/09/2014) [-]
all the good ones are PC-Exclusive, you will not get Metro 2033/LL never on your shitty consoles for example
User avatar #87 - pwnagraphy (12/10/2014) [-]
Nigger u wat

Metro 2033 and Last Light came out on console the same time as on PC, and Redux before PC
User avatar #85 - zaperzero (12/09/2014) [-]
Blood Borne is a console exclusive.
#70 - Cinematic=/=Aesthetic value. That **** is just w… 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
#8 - I enjoyed Skyrim's ****** engine bugs over the f…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Elder Scrolls Privelage +4
User avatar #9 - derpwolf (12/08/2014) [-]
Fuck that, just give me an Oblivion re-release with Skyrim's engine and I'll die a happy person.
#82 - dacrimsonfucker (12/08/2014) [-]
It's already beind done, but it's going to take 10 years to be finished
tesrenewal.com/skyblivion-v01-released
#14 - I just hope they make the gameplay good, that's all i care abo…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/08/2014 on Bloodborne. 0
User avatar #27 - mhden (12/08/2014) [-]
You cant have GOOD gameplay with less than 30 fps !
This CINEMATIC bullshit they push is almost as bad as GG .
User avatar #70 - zaperzero (12/08/2014) [-]
Cinematic=/=Aesthetic value. That shit is just wrong to say it's bad.
Spyro 2 had good Aesthetic Values, same with Crash Bandicoot, Sonic CD, and especially Dark Souls.
The less than 30fps is striking to me, but have they said it will always run at this < 30 fps?
#10 - I feel like Gafagear's art style would fit this post better, b…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/08/2014 on SHREKT 0
User avatar #64 - gafagear (12/09/2014) [-]
you flatter me, but this post is amazing as is
User avatar #65 - zaperzero (12/09/2014) [-]
Definitely.
#87 - Yeah, season 2 was nice. 12/07/2014 on Binding of Isaac 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 3922 / Total items point value: 4252
[ 41 items Total ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#36 - jellybaby (09/15/2014) [-]
Yeah, I have a cute lil' dog called Coco, you? (Continuing the conversation here, it's easier!)
User avatar #37 to #36 - zaperzero ONLINE (09/15/2014) [-]
Good idea. I have a pit named Misty, but no pics of her on my computer.
User avatar #38 to #37 - jellybaby (09/16/2014) [-]
Sounds cute.
User avatar #39 to #38 - zaperzero ONLINE (09/16/2014) [-]
Yep! She keeps whinning to get into my room though, which is annoying. I do, however, understand that she just wants to hang out.
The guy who is helping me get inspired to lose weight just got a pet yesterday.
User avatar #40 to #39 - jellybaby (09/16/2014) [-]
Can't you just keep the door open? Haha. Cool, what kind of pet does he have?
User avatar #41 to #40 - zaperzero ONLINE (09/16/2014) [-]
I can't keep it open. If I do then everybody will hear my conversations with my gay lover... >///> Or something like that. He got a little Beta fishy. He was also supposed to get this weird species of frog that starts about the size of a nickel as soon as it's no longer a tad pole and winds up being about the size of a softball.
User avatar #42 to #41 - jellybaby (09/17/2014) [-]
Ah, that's understandable. Aww, I love beta fish! They're so pretty. That sounds cool. I wouldn't want one myself, though, haha. I kinda want a python or a parrot, but ehh I don't fancy cleaning up poop.
User avatar #43 to #42 - zaperzero ONLINE (09/17/2014) [-]
He happens to want a python, a puppy, a few birds, some lizards (like a komodo dragon), foxes, cats, and more fish. His dad and eventual college only allow fish though.
User avatar #44 to #43 - jellybaby (09/20/2014) [-]
That's a lot of things to look after, haha. Ah well, at least he can have his beta fishy.
User avatar #45 to #44 - zaperzero ONLINE (09/20/2014) [-]
Yep. He is loving his little Beta. He named it Metal.
User avatar #46 to #45 - jellybaby (09/22/2014) [-]
That's pretty metal.
User avatar #35 to #34 - zaperzero ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
10/10, would bread again.
 Friends (0)