| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
youwantthisname
| Rank #16576 on Content Online Send mail to youwantthisname Block youwantthisname Invite youwantthisname to be your friend |
|
- Views: 173
5
1
Total: +4
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 05/20/13
Understandable - Views: 16135
209
60
Total: +149
Comments: 19
Favorites: 7
Uploaded: 01/30/13
Do you even rift?
latest user's comments
| #92 - I'm not going to lie, I love these things | 05/14/2013 on Gaytime | 0 |
| #57 - probably | 05/13/2013 on One other major flaw | 0 |
| #53 - I don't remember yelling about how the bible is true. You argu… | 05/10/2013 on One other major flaw | 0 |
| #51 - im literally about to order pizza from a shop called Viking Pizza [+] (1 new reply) | 05/10/2013 on Steel | +15 |
| | ||
| #27 - Australia and NZ in a nutshell #ANZACS | 05/09/2013 on Lovely Grandma | +5 |
| #10 - yeah | 05/09/2013 on And doughnuts. | 0 |
| #199 - The ignorance implied by this picture is being proved by how a… | 04/23/2013 on murica | 0 |
| #43 - Sorry, but im not looking for arguments either, im just trying… | 04/18/2013 on One other major flaw | 0 |
| #11 - This presumes that we cant see God, but in Romans 1:20 It says… [+] (9 new replies) | 04/17/2013 on One other major flaw | 0 |
| Ok. I never said that the joke necesarily pertains to the bible. And also, where is your real evidence that god, first of all created, and also is everything he created (devil, psycopaths, etc.). But claiming that he is inconcievable does not put his existance beyond any reasonable doubt. And also: you say that they both have been seen, and that they are inconcievable. Again I ask: REAL evidence? (And no, I do not want a circular argument based on the bible). And also: it beeing visible means that he manifests in reality. And by the way: that is a falsifyable claim, which can be proved or disproved, which means that he is not beyond investigation. And also: the god described in the bible can (, and has been) disprooved. Sorry for any mistakes languagewise, English is not my motherlanguage. #43
-
youwantthisname (04/18/2013) [-] Sorry, but im not looking for arguments either, im just trying to help answer your question There's a difference between stating that something is ridiculous (e.g. the bible) and accepting anything that is written in there as true you know. What is ironic about that? And it does not necessarily pertain to the bible. And the "invisible" is only meant to refer to the absence of any evidence for god. but when quoting from a bible you give a image that you have some credibility to it whatsoever... you're the same as those believers that shout out how they don't believe in evolution and then start yelling how bible is true and you should come to faith, just other way around... stop attention whoring. #53
-
youwantthisname (05/10/2013) [-] I don't remember yelling about how the bible is true. You argue against me quoting the bible, yet you can't even quote me. Also, I am expressing my opinion, so are you. "Stop attention whoring". And again, I have NEVER said I dont believe in evolution, whether I do or don't is irrelevant. You clearly have no concept on how to win an argument. #13
-
N. Korean citizen (04/17/2013) [-] Well put. It does not mean what God looks like. Why can't people get that. I am a christian and it's ironic how often atheists try to shove their views down my throat when I have said nothing. You are all Hippos I tell you. | ||
| #232 - This is dumb, even basic knowledge of christianity would tell … | 02/25/2013 on Religion Part 2 | 0 |

