Upload
Login or register

xheavymetalx

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/08/2011
Last Login:4/09/2015
Stats
Content Thumbs: 232 total,  288 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 2488 total,  3430 ,  942
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 23 Content: Peasant → Level 24 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 36% (36/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:6953
Times Content Favorited:11 times
Total Comments Made:943
FJ Points:2695
Favorite Tags: Cleverbot (3) | stalker (2)

latest user's comments

#119 - Eh. Fair enough. To me, though, that seems more liberal. I, fo…  [+] (2 replies) 08/16/2013 on Liberals.... +2
#178 - yeorey (08/16/2013) [-]
You want government for unethical business practices? Don't we have that now? Because every time a major corporation does something wrong, they get fines, which doesn't really hurt them that much. The idea of a philosophical libertarian society is that all of that would be self-regulated within the free market. People would stop buying products and services from that bad business, while the competition would be competitive by offering better services at better prices. Government would only fine them. And depending how much that corporation is lobbying for the government, the fines they receive may not be very hefty.
User avatar
#120 - soulstealerr (08/16/2013) [-]
I agree. Social engineering can be lefts to the states as it was meant to be. If you do not like the way the state is run, you can move and give your tax money to a state you want to support.
#107 - Tbh I was just trying to make light of the situation with a bi…  [+] (3 replies) 08/16/2013 on Liberals.... +1
User avatar
#114 - soulstealerr (08/16/2013) [-]
I don't know any Libertarians that believe in not having a government. Government is needed for infrastructure and public works. We just don't believe that the government should regulate every faucet of our lives. Social engineering, nanny states, these are not needed. Personal responsibility above all else.
User avatar
#134 - angelusprimus (08/16/2013) [-]
Look, I'm ok with moderate libertarians, like you seem to be.
Problem is libertarian party is not led by moderates, and republican libertarians are neither moderate nor libertarian (how someone dares to call themselves libertarian and think that government has a right to regulate sexuality is beyond me).
If you check the libertarian party program they want to completely cut federal funding for education and put it on states.
Except most states can't afford it. So tremendous cuts would have to be done, which would fuck our education for those that can't afford private schools to standards enjoyed by such educational superpowers like Cameroon or Congo.
I very much support idea of a smaller more efficient government, but i think that agenda that Objectivist libertarians, who are running the movement at the moment, are trying to push would bring us back to 19th century, without settlement of the west as an economic safety valve.
User avatar
#110 - pebar (08/16/2013) [-]
Still, only the anarchist factions would want to get rid of the police and fire department, etc... Tax funded things like that and roads would still exist under a libertarian government.
#102 - K then, stop using public services and paying taxes altogether…  [+] (10 replies) 08/16/2013 on Liberals.... -4
User avatar
#112 - soulstealerr (08/16/2013) [-]
Libertarians are not anti-government. We believe in less government. Schools, roads, infrastructure are all things that a centralized government provides and oversees. You do not need the government to regulate every part of you life. Whether you can have a big soda, or what kind of car you can drive. These decisions should be made by you.
#119 - xheavymetalx (08/16/2013) [-]
Eh. Fair enough. To me, though, that seems more liberal. I, for one, don't want the government interfering with abortion, same sex marriage, etc. The only type of government regulation I really support is regulation on unethical business practice.
#178 - yeorey (08/16/2013) [-]
You want government for unethical business practices? Don't we have that now? Because every time a major corporation does something wrong, they get fines, which doesn't really hurt them that much. The idea of a philosophical libertarian society is that all of that would be self-regulated within the free market. People would stop buying products and services from that bad business, while the competition would be competitive by offering better services at better prices. Government would only fine them. And depending how much that corporation is lobbying for the government, the fines they receive may not be very hefty.
User avatar
#120 - soulstealerr (08/16/2013) [-]
I agree. Social engineering can be lefts to the states as it was meant to be. If you do not like the way the state is run, you can move and give your tax money to a state you want to support.
#105 - pebar has deleted their comment.
#107 - xheavymetalx (08/16/2013) [-]
Tbh I was just trying to make light of the situation with a bit of humor (hell, I can take a joke about my political beliefs). But most libertarians that actually think that Ayn Rand is a genius are basically saying they don't need society and that government should stay out of their lives. And that should include public services like the fire department, police, education, etc, shouldn't it? It seems unfair to pick and choose.

I'm not saying all libertarians are Ayn Rand supporters or that all of them think like that, but I get the impression that a lot do. Correct me if I'm wrong, though. I'd be glad to hear things from a different point of view.
User avatar
#114 - soulstealerr (08/16/2013) [-]
I don't know any Libertarians that believe in not having a government. Government is needed for infrastructure and public works. We just don't believe that the government should regulate every faucet of our lives. Social engineering, nanny states, these are not needed. Personal responsibility above all else.
User avatar
#134 - angelusprimus (08/16/2013) [-]
Look, I'm ok with moderate libertarians, like you seem to be.
Problem is libertarian party is not led by moderates, and republican libertarians are neither moderate nor libertarian (how someone dares to call themselves libertarian and think that government has a right to regulate sexuality is beyond me).
If you check the libertarian party program they want to completely cut federal funding for education and put it on states.
Except most states can't afford it. So tremendous cuts would have to be done, which would fuck our education for those that can't afford private schools to standards enjoyed by such educational superpowers like Cameroon or Congo.
I very much support idea of a smaller more efficient government, but i think that agenda that Objectivist libertarians, who are running the movement at the moment, are trying to push would bring us back to 19th century, without settlement of the west as an economic safety valve.
User avatar
#110 - pebar (08/16/2013) [-]
Still, only the anarchist factions would want to get rid of the police and fire department, etc... Tax funded things like that and roads would still exist under a libertarian government.
#106 - pebar has deleted their comment.
#98 - Did you really just compare 9/11 to centuries of slavery? …  [+] (2 replies) 08/16/2013 on Liberals.... -3
User avatar
#142 - dudeyouisnasty (08/16/2013) [-]
We found our liberal.
User avatar
#109 - disturbedmaster (08/16/2013) [-]
he didn't but feminazi's do
#16 - That's the most retarded logic I've ever heard. So if someone …  [+] (1 reply) 08/16/2013 on alpha -6
User avatar
#22 - Nihatclodra (08/16/2013) [-]
Most people who respond to "You're beautiful" negatively are just attention whores. That's why we responded like that. If she was insecure about herself, she would have likely responded in a manner more like "You don't mean that".

Of course, this is not always the case, but considering that the 2 people in the content know each other well enough to be texting each-other: he would have likely also known her well enough to know which it was.
#60 - You wouldn't be saying that if you were one of the people he w…  [+] (2 replies) 08/14/2013 on bored -4
#61 - crotchlesshotpants (08/14/2013) [-]
Wouldn't Shmouldn't
User avatar
#85 - sinclairr (08/14/2013) [-]
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
#54 - I find it funny how so many of these people are defending Puti…  [+] (18 replies) 08/14/2013 on bored +4
#118 - anon (08/15/2013) [-]
Well.. at least Russia won't have Arabic immigrants like the ones I hear you guys complaining about in Europe.
#115 - anon (08/15/2013) [-]
But hes right on all accounts. You cant blame him for being right.
User avatar
#113 - pajsor (08/15/2013) [-]
He did not pass it personally, this law was voted for in national assembly or something, it wasn't probably even his idea.

You must understand that is just the way slavic mentality works, in Serbia (I'm from Serbia) similar law could be enforced (because people want it) . Serbs and Russians share a specific mentality (call it backwards or primitive I don't care).
It's not like we are against gay people they ,we just want gays to be more discrete, not kissing in public, not going to parades, nobody cares what they do in their bedrooms. Even legalizing gay marriage is ok. But when I see a gay couple kissing, it makes me sick (I want to puke). That doesn't happen because gays are too scared to do something like this because somebody would beat the crap outta them (even an old lady with a stick beat a gay couple once)
Ask anyone in Russia/Serbia they will tell you being gay is sick, some (actually most) people consider it an illness. That's just the way things are here.

I am also bothered by the fact that every fucking show has to have a gay/lesbian couple it's just fucking annoying. It's like in the movies there is always an unnecessary black guy who always dies first.



#122 - crotchlesshotpants (08/15/2013) [-]
Your last comparison made me laugh
Unnecessary Homos^^
But you're right - They are unnecessary
and only in because of "diversity"
User avatar
#109 - whatshisnutz (08/15/2013) [-]
In Soviet Russia Sense makes YOU
User avatar
#99 - chiefrunnyjeans (08/14/2013) [-]
He's funny and he's a badass. I don't care. And I think he is referring to Arabs, specifically Muslims, as primitive. Which I'm completely fine with. Those Islamic ragheads have been waging a war against Russia for years.
User avatar
#77 - theracistpanda (08/14/2013) [-]
Although that may be true, he's funny. That's all that really matters on here.
User avatar
#75 - yorker (08/14/2013) [-]
Your name is really stupid.
#69 - anon (08/14/2013) [-]
Fuck admins, yourself included.
User avatar
#68 - pioneermhm (08/14/2013) [-]
NOBODY GIVES A FUCK! It's a joke, calm the fuck down. We come to funnyjunk for funny, and when someone does something funny, let it be Gaddafi or Putin, we share it. Same thing goes with other jokes such as Zimmerman, Muslims, black people, Mexicans etc. We're not hating or liking them, we're just sharing funny stuff. Now, could all of you calm the fuck down.
#65 - marlton (08/14/2013) [-]
User avatar
#58 - crotchlesshotpants (08/14/2013) [-]
He is a Leader and a Patriot.
As Russian Leader he does the things he is supposed to do to get Russia out of its misery. He has to cope with many problems and he solves them with radical policies.
Every Country should be ruled by a Putin.
And no, I'm not trolling.
Greetings from Germany
User avatar
#104 - SognaVetr (08/15/2013) [-]
Get the fuck off my planet.
User avatar
#121 - crotchlesshotpants (08/15/2013) [-]
Planet Asshat? Are you writing from Outerspace?
Because on Earth, everybody can choose for himself where he wants to stay
Fascist Bitch...
User avatar
#124 - SognaVetr (08/15/2013) [-]
I always find people who take random internet comments too serious a bit... funny.
#60 - xheavymetalx (08/14/2013) [-]
You wouldn't be saying that if you were one of the people he was criticizing and discriminating against.
#61 - crotchlesshotpants (08/14/2013) [-]
Wouldn't Shmouldn't
User avatar
#85 - sinclairr (08/14/2013) [-]
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
#51 - Comment deleted 08/14/2013 on bored 0
#153 - Really? If someone was following you around at night you'd TAL…  [+] (1 reply) 08/13/2013 on Switch to directv +2
User avatar
#155 - derpyhoovezz (08/13/2013) [-]
I said nothing about it being at night, and i said "I would either get the fuck out of there, or confront them"

It all depends on the situation, if my natural instinct is telling me something is off about them, im probably going to get the fuck out of there