Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:4/08/2011
Last Login:4/09/2015
Content Thumbs: 232 total,  288 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 2488 total,  3430 ,  942
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 23 Content: Peasant → Level 24 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 36% (36/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Content Views:6944
Times Content Favorited:11 times
Total Comments Made:943
FJ Points:2695
Favorite Tags: Cleverbot (3) | stalker (2)

latest user's comments

#35 - Let me guess, you watch FOX news right? Welfare only …  [+] (25 replies) 05/05/2013 on Tax Money +3
#38 - schutzstaffel has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#219 - keiishiyama (05/06/2013) [-]
I'M a Libertarian, you douche. Don't even think about comparing yourself to me. Taxes and government are necessary to the survival and prosperity of the human race, and everyone here knows it.
User avatar
#40 - pebar (05/05/2013) [-]
You're not a libertarian, you're an anarchist. No government regulation leads to gangs which tear apart communities, and predatorial business practices which create monopolies.

Libertarians preach minimal government involvement, not none at all.
User avatar
#49 - tomayto (05/05/2013) [-]
Government is the ultimate monopoly, scrub. And limited government is the most farcical utopia of all.
User avatar
#54 - pebar (05/05/2013) [-]
That's why I'm not socialist... but what's wrong with strictly limited government?
User avatar
#56 - tomayto (05/05/2013) [-]
There's nothing wrong with it... the problem is it doesn't stay limited... as the Constitution has shown.
User avatar
#59 - pebar (05/05/2013) [-]
Yet the constitution still points out the need for government.
We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.
Even the founders agree government is necessary. They knew the risks which is why things like the second amendment exist. Government has grown considerably and recent polls say 29% of people with an armed revolution might be necessary in the future. However just because government has the potential to grow out of hand doesn't mean a government is not beneficial. Governments need regulation too.
User avatar
#67 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
It also states that if the government get's corrupt and lazy then armed revolt is in order. I'd take up arms without a second thought. Would you? If not, then shut the fuck up.

tomayto, same for you if you live in the US. Otherwise, carry on. The Constitution doesn't apply to you.
User avatar
#79 - tomayto (05/05/2013) [-]
I do. Let's go.
User avatar
#97 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
Shit, man, sorry. I got you confused with tha schultsfucker or whatever his name was.
User avatar
#85 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
Taxation would still be necessary to rebuild the government, meaning that you would be useless after the revolution.
User avatar
#88 - taxation (05/05/2013) [-]
Would a revolution not be quickly and easily quelled, due to much of America's taxes heading to various defense forces which would already be armed and trained to deal with threats such as unorganized fools with rifles?
#100 - anon (05/05/2013) [-]
"You will kill 10 of our men, and we will kill 1 of yours, and in the end it will be you who tire of it."
-Ho Chi Minh (North Vietnam)
User avatar
#96 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
No. I will not explain it to you, either.
User avatar
#98 - taxation (05/05/2013) [-]
Well what the fuck then, you think a bunch of redneck motherfuckers with AR15's can take down the entire fucking National Guard?
#104 - iamkagji has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#111 - taxation (05/05/2013) [-]
Okay I'm just gonna assume that you plan on secretly amassing a large group of U.S. citizens with views similar to your own and by either force (unlikely to succeed) or guerilla tactics (more likely but still, fat chance mate) dismantling the entire government.
#113 - iamkagji has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#102 - pebar (05/05/2013) [-]
implying the national guard & the army would follow orders to massacre American citizens under the orders of the government
User avatar
#108 - taxation (05/05/2013) [-]
I don't think they would, unless they were actually given reason to. I'm fairly sure though, there's people strong enough in their beliefs to shoot a National Guard member who would stand in their way, and if that happened there's a chance, low as it may be, that what was a standoff would devolve into nation-wide shooting matches.
User avatar
#105 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
There's that, too.
#82 - iamkagji has deleted their comment.
#69 - pebar (05/05/2013) [-]
Yes I would, hence the profile pic
Government has gotten too big and I agree that it's bad. This whole argument is about no government vs tiny government.
User avatar
#72 - iamkagji (05/05/2013) [-]
Good man.
#43 - schutzstaffel has deleted their comment.
#101 - Well that's true. He didn't push it on them. It was just like that.  [+] (1 reply) 04/30/2013 on Take 60 Minutes to Think +1
User avatar
#103 - flixoe (04/30/2013) [-]
Hey everybody look! Someone made sense!
#108 - Dammit...  [+] (2 replies) 04/30/2013 on DOUBLE WIN 0
User avatar
#110 - Nightelfbane (04/30/2013) [-]
**Nightelfbane rolls 313** like so!
#112 - xheavymetalx (04/30/2013) [-]
Fuck, you were actually pretty close -_-
#107 - **xheavymetalx rolls 425** COME ON 333  [+] (3 replies) 04/30/2013 on DOUBLE WIN 0
#108 - xheavymetalx (04/30/2013) [-]
User avatar
#110 - Nightelfbane (04/30/2013) [-]
**Nightelfbane rolls 313** like so!
#112 - xheavymetalx (04/30/2013) [-]
Fuck, you were actually pretty close -_-
#266 - The issue with that is... what if there are no other options? …  [+] (6 replies) 04/29/2013 on The way it should be 0
User avatar
#283 - mikepetru (04/29/2013) [-]
Just because your other options aren't easy, this does not mean you have no other options
#280 - mikepetru (04/29/2013) [-]
If that is truly their only option, then obviously that boss is pretty generous. He values their labor the most out of any other employer. If any other employer were offering them better pay for the work they are doing, do you think they would be working for this boss? If they are working for this boss, then the workers feel that the money earned is worth more than how much time and effort they spent working. Just because you believe you work hard does not mean others should place a higher value on your labor. If you feel your time and effort is worth more than what you are being paid, then quit. However, if no one is willing to pay you what you think you should be paid, then maybe your labor is not worth as much to others as it is to you. You have at least two choices at this point: Create a more realistic personal value of your labor and accept the pay you have earned, or find a new skill and pursue a different career.
User avatar
#292 - snobley (04/29/2013) [-]
It is the difference between Chattel and Wage Slavery.... Being a slave to your wages is very different than being owned by another.
User avatar
#312 - mikepetru (04/29/2013) [-]
Believers of wage slavery are not slaves to their wages, they are slaves to their own unhappiness
User avatar
#310 - mikepetru (04/29/2013) [-]
People who have a concept of what they want and understand that they must work in order to achieve it are living proof that wage slavery is an illusion. Believers of wage slavery hate the fact that in order to receive gratification, they must give up something of equal value to the person they are receiving gratification from. Believers of wage slavery do not gain satisfaction form the money they earned because they have no concept of what they want, so they blame money for their unhappiness. Believers of wage slavery hate work itself, which is foolish because there is no escaping the universal truth that in order to survive, human beings must work, and not necessarily for another person.
"So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.” - Ayn Rand
User avatar
#437 - snobley (04/30/2013) [-]
Then Consider the Following: A man cannot have what he wants, IE a full belly and a shelter from the weather without giving up 1/3 of his life or more to a job that coudnt care less about him. If he is unhappy and does not want to go to work, he will starve, conversely, if he is to work his whole life in order to survive, he will be unhappy but alive.