No, thats the swedish age of consent, turns out the age of consent in japan is 13, so inklings are adults by the definition of both.

... age of consent in JAPAN, not sweden

No, thats the swedish age of consent, turns out the age of consent in japan is 13, so inklings are adults by the definition of both.

Did you make that shit up?

not to my knowledge, possible i've been missinformed

Well fine, neither do tumblr feminists.

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

Pfft, what depraved, primitive and unevolved country of savage meat-heads must that be then? America? North Korea? BELGIUM???!

No on all three accounts.(altough i do have extended family in 2 of those 3 locations)

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

I shall look forward to it.

Well, you dont have to wait, couse i just realized, translated it in my head, name of steak and beef is the same in my home country, and i was tired enough to run with it. Nevermind me.

Pfft, what depraved, primitive and unevolved country of savage meat-heads must that be then? America? North Korea? BELGIUM???!

No on all three accounts.(altough i do have extended family in 2 of those 3 locations)

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

But it is steak (not stake). It's kangaroo steak.

... i've forgotten what my point was. It's way to tired for this, i'll make another comment tomorow if i remember what i was on about.

I shall look forward to it.

Well, you dont have to wait, couse i just realized, translated it in my head, name of steak and beef is the same in my home country, and i was tired enough to run with it. Nevermind me.

Pfft, what depraved, primitive and unevolved country of savage meat-heads must that be then? America? North Korea? BELGIUM???!

No on all three accounts.(altough i do have extended family in 2 of those 3 locations)

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

What crime?

Claiming this was a compilation of stake, which it was not. It was however a compilation of red meat.

But it is steak (not stake). It's kangaroo steak.

... i've forgotten what my point was. It's way to tired for this, i'll make another comment tomorow if i remember what i was on about.

I shall look forward to it.

Well, you dont have to wait, couse i just realized, translated it in my head, name of steak and beef is the same in my home country, and i was tired enough to run with it. Nevermind me.

Pfft, what depraved, primitive and unevolved country of savage meat-heads must that be then? America? North Korea? BELGIUM???!

No on all three accounts.(altough i do have extended family in 2 of those 3 locations)

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

Actually it's kangaroo steak you dirty scrub.

Hot damn, you are right, but still, in your eagerness to prove me wrong, you have confessed your crime! Shame on your house and neighbour as well!

What crime?

Claiming this was a compilation of stake, which it was not. It was however a compilation of red meat.

But it is steak (not stake). It's kangaroo steak.

... i've forgotten what my point was. It's way to tired for this, i'll make another comment tomorow if i remember what i was on about.

I shall look forward to it.

Well, you dont have to wait, couse i just realized, translated it in my head, name of steak and beef is the same in my home country, and i was tired enough to run with it. Nevermind me.

Pfft, what depraved, primitive and unevolved country of savage meat-heads must that be then? America? North Korea? BELGIUM???!

No on all three accounts.(altough i do have extended family in 2 of those 3 locations)

Nah you're from belgium, I can tell by the accent.

I said no on all three accounts, im not some pretender for the throne of chocolates!(altough, i can accept that their beer is okay)

No you're from Belgium shut up

... FINE! SEE IF I CARE, YOU KLOOTZAK!

I think you care very much. As does your Mother.

It says not advised, rather than incorrect. It's apparently a debated issue.

B-b-but my social studies classes clearly told me everything is striclty black and white! how can somethign not be absolutely decided!?

Yeah, seems that way, ah well, my point still stands, less is acceptable when talking about weeks, which would make Stannis a terrible grammar nazi and also father but we all knew that .

I think you fucked up your post a little there. You refer to 4 thing with "both", and I assume you've put '"less weeks" is wrong' rather than '"fewer weeks" is wrong'.

But yeah, you're right that "less than x units" is grammatically but so is "fewer than x units", according to Wikipedia.

Yeah, see post #9

and according to wikipedia
" "less" is recommended in front of counting nouns that denote distance, amount, or time. For example, "we go on holiday in fewer than four weeks" and "he can run the 100 m in fewer than ten seconds" are not advised."
So, wikipedia agrees with me.

It says not advised, rather than incorrect. It's apparently a debated issue.

B-b-but my social studies classes clearly told me everything is striclty black and white! how can somethign not be absolutely decided!?

Yeah, seems that way, ah well, my point still stands, less is acceptable when talking about weeks, which would make Stannis a terrible grammar nazi and also father but we all knew that .

wait... sorry i fucked up, that "fewer weeks"

Less sand, fewer grains of sand (units of sand).
Less time, fewer weeks (units of time).

I got both Wikipedia, oxford dictionary, merriam webster dictionary, and dictionary.com agreeing with me that "less weeks" is wrong. And i've got a minimum of 2 people on funnyjunk thinking it's right. I think i'll go with less.

I think you fucked up your post a little there. You refer to 4 thing with "both", and I assume you've put '"less weeks" is wrong' rather than '"fewer weeks" is wrong'.

But yeah, you're right that "less than x units" is grammatically but so is "fewer than x units", according to Wikipedia.

Yeah, see post #9

and according to wikipedia
" "less" is recommended in front of counting nouns that denote distance, amount, or time. For example, "we go on holiday in fewer than four weeks" and "he can run the 100 m in fewer than ten seconds" are not advised."
So, wikipedia agrees with me.

It says not advised, rather than incorrect. It's apparently a debated issue.

B-b-but my social studies classes clearly told me everything is striclty black and white! how can somethign not be absolutely decided!?

Yeah, seems that way, ah well, my point still stands, less is acceptable when talking about weeks, which would make Stannis a terrible grammar nazi and also father but we all knew that .

wait... sorry i fucked up, that "fewer weeks"

meh, fair enough, i can't remember how deep the pool was in any area, due to the drunkards spending all day in there, i stayed out.

No, measurements and numbers use less. At least, thats what the oxford dictionary says.

Less sand, fewer grains of sand (units of sand).
Less time, fewer weeks (units of time).

I got both Wikipedia, oxford dictionary, merriam webster dictionary, and dictionary.com agreeing with me that "less weeks" is wrong. And i've got a minimum of 2 people on funnyjunk thinking it's right. I think i'll go with less.

I think you fucked up your post a little there. You refer to 4 thing with "both", and I assume you've put '"less weeks" is wrong' rather than '"fewer weeks" is wrong'.

But yeah, you're right that "less than x units" is grammatically but so is "fewer than x units", according to Wikipedia.

Yeah, see post #9

and according to wikipedia
" "less" is recommended in front of counting nouns that denote distance, amount, or time. For example, "we go on holiday in fewer than four weeks" and "he can run the 100 m in fewer than ten seconds" are not advised."
So, wikipedia agrees with me.

It says not advised, rather than incorrect. It's apparently a debated issue.

B-b-but my social studies classes clearly told me everything is striclty black and white! how can somethign not be absolutely decided!?

Yeah, seems that way, ah well, my point still stands, less is acceptable when talking about weeks, which would make Stannis a terrible grammar nazi and also father but we all knew that .

wait... sorry i fucked up, that "fewer weeks"

Actually, that is a possibilitty, but riddle me this, how could they sit there drinking for 12 hours straight with no toilet breaks?

meh, fair enough, i can't remember how deep the pool was in any area, due to the drunkards spending all day in there, i stayed out.