You can't filter out the salt with pots like that.
You could with reverse osmosis but that doesn't happen in a clay pot with sand

yes you can, need damn fine sand though.

Bullshit, You'd need pores of ca 0,1 nanometer.
That's some fine ass sand you need there.

That's what i said, damn fine sand. Honestly, it's like you didn't even look at my image.

Every fucking time something involving some sort of math or science comes up, one of you niggas always pops up and starts using measurements I had no clue even existed

You shouldn't have dropped out of middle school then

He could go back and then you both would be school buddies.

For the record I did pass High school lol

And here I was complementing you....

Source?

nah, lupin mentioned it to harry, looked it up just before getting back on funnyjunk, but yeah i was wrong, they show up under their real names.

Well yeah, the spell changed his identity, but the map was made when they were in their seventh year, at which point they'd all been animagi for two years, and had the nicknames for who knows how long, it'd only make sense for them to use their nicknames in the map as they referred to themselves by their nicknames on the map. Turns out i was wrong about this one though, looked it up and the map shows their real names.

Well no, i doubt trying to crack a kids skull is legal, but keep in mind that the books are written from the perspective of a, at that point, 12 year old. We don't know from the text what exactly is meant by a "heavy blow", seeing how harry was convinced that, for example, a boa constrictor would be able to squeeze Vernons car into the general size of a garbage can, he might have exaggerated the situation quiet handily.

However, since she only did so once(to our knowledge) with no witnesses(aside from possibly Dudley), it wouldn't have been enough to put her in prison(even if she had hit). The entire point i was trying to make is that the Dursleys never did anything bad enough to be illegal in the 1990's in England.

By British law, trying to hit a kid with a frying pan is technically legal, as it is not stated as abuse, of course, had she hit, it would have been. And making a kid work in the sun all day(as a form of punishment), is perfectly legal under British law. So i don't think they ever actually did anything directly illegal, except maybe when Vernon threatened Hagrid with a rifle, but to be fair, Hagrid did break into their cabin, curse their child and steal their boat.

Now, the way the kids are treated at Hogwarts however, that's completely different. I mean, a teacher accidentally removes a students arm, and he receives no form of punishment at all? A teacher force-feeds a students pet what both of them think is poison, and the student is the one punished? Sending 4 eleven year-olds into a forest filled with dangerous creatures to hunt down something that is actively killing unicorns? Allowing an 11 year old boy to play a game played on broomstick traveling upwards to 150 mp/h through the air with no safety net?

Hogwarts would get shut down in a second if ever that place got inspected.

Well no, i doubt trying to crack a kids skull is legal, but keep in mind that the books are written from the perspective of a, at that point, 12 year old. We don't know from the text what exactly is meant by a "heavy blow", seeing how harry was convinced that, for example, a boa constrictor would be able to squeeze Vernons car into the general size of a garbage can, he might have exaggerated the situation quiet handily.

However, since she only did so once(to our knowledge) with no witnesses(aside from possibly Dudley), it wouldn't have been enough to put her in prison(even if she had hit). The entire point i was trying to make is that the Dursleys never did anything bad enough to be illegal in the 1990's in England.

Yeah, it was a frying pan, and not a skillet, and the first quote is the punishment mentioned in the second one. I never said it was in any way GOOD for a 12 year old, but making a kid do chores as a punishment is perfectly legal. But yeah, had she actually hit him with the frying pan, that'd have been child abuse.

By British law, trying to hit a kid with a frying pan is technically legal, as it is not stated as abuse, of course, had she hit, it would have been. And making a kid work in the sun all day(as a form of punishment), is perfectly legal under British law. So i don't think they ever actually did anything directly illegal, except maybe when Vernon threatened Hagrid with a rifle, but to be fair, Hagrid did break into their cabin, curse their child and steal their boat.

Now, the way the kids are treated at Hogwarts however, that's completely different. I mean, a teacher accidentally removes a students arm, and he receives no form of punishment at all? A teacher force-feeds a students pet what both of them think is poison, and the student is the one punished? Sending 4 eleven year-olds into a forest filled with dangerous creatures to hunt down something that is actively killing unicorns? Allowing an 11 year old boy to play a game played on broomstick traveling upwards to 150 mp/h through the air with no safety net?

Hogwarts would get shut down in a second if ever that place got inspected.

Well no, i doubt trying to crack a kids skull is legal, but keep in mind that the books are written from the perspective of a, at that point, 12 year old. We don't know from the text what exactly is meant by a "heavy blow", seeing how harry was convinced that, for example, a boa constrictor would be able to squeeze Vernons car into the general size of a garbage can, he might have exaggerated the situation quiet handily.

However, since she only did so once(to our knowledge) with no witnesses(aside from possibly Dudley), it wouldn't have been enough to put her in prison(even if she had hit). The entire point i was trying to make is that the Dursleys never did anything bad enough to be illegal in the 1990's in England.

KARMA, BITCHES

yeah, couldn't remember which was which year, so i neglected to mention them, thanks m80.

Well, in the first book, they state that being grounded for 2 weeks(well, from 23'd of June to the summer holiday) was the longest punishment he ever got, and there was no mention of physical abuse at that point. In the second one they made him do a bunch of chores and clearly underfed him, but it's also stated that he'd never starved. But i seem to recall marge trying to hit him with a skillet in one of the books, which would definitely constitute assault, and they didn't seem to mind abandoning him on kings cross in the first book.

Oh, and they did nothing to stop Dudley from... well anything, and Vernon DID assault Arthur in the fourth book. They'd certainly lose custody because of neglect charges though, but i doubt it's severe enough for prison.

Yeah, it was a frying pan, and not a skillet, and the first quote is the punishment mentioned in the second one. I never said it was in any way GOOD for a 12 year old, but making a kid do chores as a punishment is perfectly legal. But yeah, had she actually hit him with the frying pan, that'd have been child abuse.

By British law, trying to hit a kid with a frying pan is technically legal, as it is not stated as abuse, of course, had she hit, it would have been. And making a kid work in the sun all day(as a form of punishment), is perfectly legal under British law. So i don't think they ever actually did anything directly illegal, except maybe when Vernon threatened Hagrid with a rifle, but to be fair, Hagrid did break into their cabin, curse their child and steal their boat.

Now, the way the kids are treated at Hogwarts however, that's completely different. I mean, a teacher accidentally removes a students arm, and he receives no form of punishment at all? A teacher force-feeds a students pet what both of them think is poison, and the student is the one punished? Sending 4 eleven year-olds into a forest filled with dangerous creatures to hunt down something that is actively killing unicorns? Allowing an 11 year old boy to play a game played on broomstick traveling upwards to 150 mp/h through the air with no safety net?

Hogwarts would get shut down in a second if ever that place got inspected.

Well no, i doubt trying to crack a kids skull is legal, but keep in mind that the books are written from the perspective of a, at that point, 12 year old. We don't know from the text what exactly is meant by a "heavy blow", seeing how harry was convinced that, for example, a boa constrictor would be able to squeeze Vernons car into the general size of a garbage can, he might have exaggerated the situation quiet handily.

However, since she only did so once(to our knowledge) with no witnesses(aside from possibly Dudley), it wouldn't have been enough to put her in prison(even if she had hit). The entire point i was trying to make is that the Dursleys never did anything bad enough to be illegal in the 1990's in England.

It's not just straight up squid to kid though, they get feet long before that.

oh, that makes sense. I admit I'm not that into splatoon, mostly as i haven't bothered to buy a console since the ps1.

Nope, vivat Britain motherfucker.

how the fuck did i misspell "honouring" that badly? the world may never know.

Nope, vivat Britain motherfucker.