wltwitch
Rank #299 on Comments
Offline
Send mail to wltwitch Block wltwitch Invite wltwitch to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 7/31/2015 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #2747 |
| Comment Ranking: | #299 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #2750 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #256 |
| Content Thumbs: | 237 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 8268 |
| Content Level Progress: | 40% (4/10) Level 18 Content: New Here → Level 19 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 45% (45/100) Level 260 Comments: Pure Win → Level 261 Comments: Pure Win |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 34218 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 13 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 1027 |
| FJ Points: | 6229 |
| Favorite Tags: | One Punch Man (3) | morty (2) | mr poopybutthole (2) | puri (2) | rick (2) |
latest user's comments
| #1 - ...literally...literally....goddam | 12/19/2015 on i get it | 0 |
| #1 - Seven floors? He'll be alright. | 12/19/2015 on when you just don't care | 0 |
| #59 - That is one ugly ass mother ****** . Someone give him a … [+] (1 new reply) | 12/18/2015 on Small Cringe Compilation | +18 |
| | ||
| #3 - When asked about shkreli being arrested today, Wu-Tang clan sa… | 12/17/2015 on Damn | +53 |
| #4 - You magnificent bastard. I salute you. I do this to my sis… | 12/17/2015 on Christmas Gift | -1 |
| #3 - They somehow get spinner rims on the millenium falcon and swag it out. | 12/17/2015 on WARNING: Star Wars Spoiler | 0 |
| #2 - She hasn't seen the prequels. I'm jealous [+] (1 new reply) | 12/17/2015 on Star wars content | +1 |
| | ||
| #3 - Says you buddy. My ACME blackhole instant paint is the best. | 12/17/2015 on Weapon | 0 |
| #4 - Then I won't tell you that jackie chan is the new emporer who … | 12/17/2015 on I FUCKING HATE SPOILERS | 0 |
| #32 - ***** I know that. That's why I mad it sound stupid. I … [+] (1 new reply) | 12/17/2015 on cute | 0 |
| #111 - I don't think we're reaching the retard. Retardomax is too far… | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | 0 |
| #110 - The 2 sites links you give are a conspiracy theory site and a … [+] (2 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | 0 |
| #113 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Your dad really fucked you up when you didn't know how to do your math homework, huh? #112 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Watch the fucking youtube video. It's testimony from the air controllers. | ||
| #17 - I got halfway through but all I heard was "oink oink oink". | 12/16/2015 on #ProudFeminist | +8 |
| #6 - Rock on crazy diamond star child! | 12/16/2015 on Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel... | 0 |
| #3 - Rock on you wonderful man! | 12/16/2015 on Beams Of Steel, Fuel From Jets | 0 |
| #3 - maybe a movie set? | 12/16/2015 on Brick Facade over Brick | +1 |
| #108 - Comment #102 explained it good already but your kind always wa… [+] (4 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | 0 |
| #109 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] You're a sad asshole. Whatever I write doesn't justify you carrying that vibe. Ok, I read it. He doesn't show evidence of why it should've collapsed. Sky scrapers are built to resist earthquakes. It could've survived that structural damage. Anybody who plays jenga can see that (now, I know that has no validity, but if you re-read it, the guy bases his whole argument on the gush being "bigger than we thought"). He's example if the bridge doesn't count cause it's a diff structure, and the building would serve as an example except he says it wasn't on fire and that's why it didn't collapse. The final picture in which he shows we're the columns collapsed, I don't know about you, but it looks obvious that if you put thermite charges there, you could bring down the building. I doubt fire would do the same. Now, you want to see more evidence other than just the towers? "Rare docu. shares insights of 9/11 Air Traffic Controllers -- specifically, Dave Bottiglia helps contradict the Commission Report . See www.historycommons.org/entity.... and s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/to... for RADAR data and discussion..." www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFNMPk4b_48 The person in that site criticized conspiracy theorist for wanting to hold onto their beliefs but it is you who is doing that. After everything that has happened after 9/11 it is obvious the people in power at that time were the ones to greatly benefit. Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw #113 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Your dad really fucked you up when you didn't know how to do your math homework, huh? #112 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Watch the fucking youtube video. It's testimony from the air controllers. | ||
| #100 - You used free fall so anything else you say is automatically i… [+] (9 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | +1 |
| #101 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Have you seen how WTC building 7 collapsed? without being hit by a plane? How do you explain that? I heard talk about the "tremors from the fall of the two towers" causing it to collapse. If that had been the case (which I seriously doubt) then it would have collapsed in a different manner. #108 -
wltwitch (12/16/2015) [-] Comment #102 explained it good already but your kind always wants proof even though you throw most of it out the window because it is not the "proof" you wanted. Here you go, dummy. Caution they contain real facts: www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/ Now read that while you back over there with the rest of the retards. And dont forget your dunce cap. #109 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] You're a sad asshole. Whatever I write doesn't justify you carrying that vibe. Ok, I read it. He doesn't show evidence of why it should've collapsed. Sky scrapers are built to resist earthquakes. It could've survived that structural damage. Anybody who plays jenga can see that (now, I know that has no validity, but if you re-read it, the guy bases his whole argument on the gush being "bigger than we thought"). He's example if the bridge doesn't count cause it's a diff structure, and the building would serve as an example except he says it wasn't on fire and that's why it didn't collapse. The final picture in which he shows we're the columns collapsed, I don't know about you, but it looks obvious that if you put thermite charges there, you could bring down the building. I doubt fire would do the same. Now, you want to see more evidence other than just the towers? "Rare docu. shares insights of 9/11 Air Traffic Controllers -- specifically, Dave Bottiglia helps contradict the Commission Report . See www.historycommons.org/entity.... and s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/to... for RADAR data and discussion..." www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFNMPk4b_48 The person in that site criticized conspiracy theorist for wanting to hold onto their beliefs but it is you who is doing that. After everything that has happened after 9/11 it is obvious the people in power at that time were the ones to greatly benefit. Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw #113 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Your dad really fucked you up when you didn't know how to do your math homework, huh? #112 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Watch the fucking youtube video. It's testimony from the air controllers. #102 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] caught fire from flaming debris. The interior burned for several hours. Weaker supports failed. What happens when supports fail? The building falls. Have you ever seen a house collapse after taking enough fire damage? Jesus christ you people are stupid. This has literally been proven by hundreds of architects and engineers. | ||
| #89 - You used the free fall "evidence". You already lost … [+] (12 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | +1 |
| #95 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] and btw, what a way to disregard everything else completely. Holding onto an opinion much? #101 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Have you seen how WTC building 7 collapsed? without being hit by a plane? How do you explain that? I heard talk about the "tremors from the fall of the two towers" causing it to collapse. If that had been the case (which I seriously doubt) then it would have collapsed in a different manner. #108 -
wltwitch (12/16/2015) [-] Comment #102 explained it good already but your kind always wants proof even though you throw most of it out the window because it is not the "proof" you wanted. Here you go, dummy. Caution they contain real facts: www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/ Now read that while you back over there with the rest of the retards. And dont forget your dunce cap. #109 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] You're a sad asshole. Whatever I write doesn't justify you carrying that vibe. Ok, I read it. He doesn't show evidence of why it should've collapsed. Sky scrapers are built to resist earthquakes. It could've survived that structural damage. Anybody who plays jenga can see that (now, I know that has no validity, but if you re-read it, the guy bases his whole argument on the gush being "bigger than we thought"). He's example if the bridge doesn't count cause it's a diff structure, and the building would serve as an example except he says it wasn't on fire and that's why it didn't collapse. The final picture in which he shows we're the columns collapsed, I don't know about you, but it looks obvious that if you put thermite charges there, you could bring down the building. I doubt fire would do the same. Now, you want to see more evidence other than just the towers? "Rare docu. shares insights of 9/11 Air Traffic Controllers -- specifically, Dave Bottiglia helps contradict the Commission Report . See www.historycommons.org/entity.... and s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/to... for RADAR data and discussion..." www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFNMPk4b_48 The person in that site criticized conspiracy theorist for wanting to hold onto their beliefs but it is you who is doing that. After everything that has happened after 9/11 it is obvious the people in power at that time were the ones to greatly benefit. Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw #113 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Your dad really fucked you up when you didn't know how to do your math homework, huh? #112 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Watch the fucking youtube video. It's testimony from the air controllers. #102 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] caught fire from flaming debris. The interior burned for several hours. Weaker supports failed. What happens when supports fail? The building falls. Have you ever seen a house collapse after taking enough fire damage? Jesus christ you people are stupid. This has literally been proven by hundreds of architects and engineers. | ||
| #2 - what the **** is this **** ? | 12/16/2015 on The force is strong all of... | 0 |
| #87 - Picture [+] (14 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | +1 |
| #95 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] and btw, what a way to disregard everything else completely. Holding onto an opinion much? #101 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Have you seen how WTC building 7 collapsed? without being hit by a plane? How do you explain that? I heard talk about the "tremors from the fall of the two towers" causing it to collapse. If that had been the case (which I seriously doubt) then it would have collapsed in a different manner. #108 -
wltwitch (12/16/2015) [-] Comment #102 explained it good already but your kind always wants proof even though you throw most of it out the window because it is not the "proof" you wanted. Here you go, dummy. Caution they contain real facts: www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/ Now read that while you back over there with the rest of the retards. And dont forget your dunce cap. #109 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] You're a sad asshole. Whatever I write doesn't justify you carrying that vibe. Ok, I read it. He doesn't show evidence of why it should've collapsed. Sky scrapers are built to resist earthquakes. It could've survived that structural damage. Anybody who plays jenga can see that (now, I know that has no validity, but if you re-read it, the guy bases his whole argument on the gush being "bigger than we thought"). He's example if the bridge doesn't count cause it's a diff structure, and the building would serve as an example except he says it wasn't on fire and that's why it didn't collapse. The final picture in which he shows we're the columns collapsed, I don't know about you, but it looks obvious that if you put thermite charges there, you could bring down the building. I doubt fire would do the same. Now, you want to see more evidence other than just the towers? "Rare docu. shares insights of 9/11 Air Traffic Controllers -- specifically, Dave Bottiglia helps contradict the Commission Report . See www.historycommons.org/entity.... and s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/to... for RADAR data and discussion..." www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFNMPk4b_48 The person in that site criticized conspiracy theorist for wanting to hold onto their beliefs but it is you who is doing that. After everything that has happened after 9/11 it is obvious the people in power at that time were the ones to greatly benefit. Also, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw #113 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Your dad really fucked you up when you didn't know how to do your math homework, huh? #112 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Watch the fucking youtube video. It's testimony from the air controllers. #102 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] caught fire from flaming debris. The interior burned for several hours. Weaker supports failed. What happens when supports fail? The building falls. Have you ever seen a house collapse after taking enough fire damage? Jesus christ you people are stupid. This has literally been proven by hundreds of architects and engineers. | ||
| #62 - not in front of the kids, man. not in front of the kids. | 12/16/2015 on No mercy | +8 |
| #86 - I watch conspiracy theory shows for the pure comedy gold. | 12/16/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 | 0 |
| #1 - I thought she was having a seizure. Someone shove a wallet dow… [+] (22 new replies) | 12/16/2015 on cute | +103 |
| #27 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] You have no risk of biting your tongue to the degree you do damage. As well, it is impossible to swallow it. What you do is clear space and provide cushioning for their head, besides that it's mostly watching. #10 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] the wallet in the mouth is so they dont bit their tongue not swollow it. Wtf kind of medical knowledge, or even BASIC knowledge do you have!? Try looking in the mirror now, open your mouth, lift up your tongue and what do you see between your tongue and the base of your mouth? That strand of meat/tissue makes sure the tongue stays put. With your logic, how come people don't choke on their tongues when they sleep? Nigga I know that. That's why I mad it sound stupid. I didnt take to account that there are alot of naturally stupid people who believe a wallet in the mouth is a good idea. A wallet in the throat? You don't want to choke the poor person. As an epileptic I've had someone do that to me in college. A wallet in the mouth, not the throat. Supposedly the bitch was a registered nurse too. She told me it was so I wouldn't swallow my tongue. Another person who did that shit to me said it was so I wouldn't bite my tongue off. I've heard both of those reasons for why they put a wallet in the mouth. They are both stupid reasons and anyone ask what to do if I have a seizure, I make sure that they understand DO NOT PUT A WALLET IN MY MOUTH. No wallet, no fingers, or whatever. Just make sure my head's cushioned, time how long it is, and if you hear something break to call the ambulance. Unfortunately the shoving a wallet in your mouth or another large object was actually something people really believed was necessary. Some old people that have never been told otherwise still believe that... I can't convince my uncle that it doesn't fucking work like that, as you said, the tongue can't just be swallowed like that. I really fucking hope he never encounters someone who gets a seizure. | ||
| #2 - It's true. I hate BET. The only time I have to watch it is at … | 12/16/2015 on BET Is Not Our Channel! | +1 |
