Is English a second language for you or are you just not reading my responses to you. I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST.

Now read this, and please take your time, I know it is a difficult concept to understand. The following situation is supposed to be hypothetical, sorry for any resemblance to reality it contains.

Say there is a user joesomething123, who posts some content at 12:15 AM on 2/16/13 that he found on Facebook (and says so in description). Now, suppose I too follow the same page that posted that content on Facebook, and I saw the same content at 12:30 AM and immediately posted it to Funnyjunk, saying that I saw it on Facebook. Now, if joesomething123 were to come across my content in the newest uploads, or even more towards the front page, and link to his content, showing that he posted it before I posted it, I would gladly remove my content.

The point is not to remove the content because somebody posted it a while ago and is no longer getting thumbs for it. 2 of those posts were made in 2012, the other 4 were made in 2011. Now two questions must be asked: Were they posted before me? and Are they within the 24 hour front page limit?.

For the first one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the second one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the third one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fourth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fifth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the sixth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.

tl;dr If we removed all reposts from this site, the influx of content would drop from thousands of posts daily to maybe 50-100 posts a day. I just don't want to steal thumbs when somebody posted it very recently before me.

"Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down."
" I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST. "
It doesn't matter how long you waited to post it, it is still a repost(stolen) from the original creator. You just took it so you could get thumbs. Why do you want thumbs so bad if you don't even earn them? I earned all of my thumbs fairly. You stole other peoples creations to get thumbs.

Shall I analyze the front page and report to you how much of it OC and how much is a repost? Why don't you go bugging the other people who posted this before me? Please, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you about this. As would everybody else who reposts content on this site.

You attack me because I offer to remove a post if it was posted at relatively the same time as somebody else. Do you attack Good Samaritans as well? If you came across a man who appeared homeless, but he offered you some water, would you beat him with a stick?

Who cares if it is a repost from two years ago? I doubt the content creators are still making money from it, and if I knew who they were, I'd have linked to them to increase their publicity.

What matters more is that it is funny and made somebody laugh, which based on the number of thumbs it got, it was funny and made multiple people laugh.

I did not "attack" you. I pointed out to you it was a repost because you said you would take it down if it was one, then after giving multiple links to previously uploaded ones, you refused to take it down. Just because people repost reposts, it doesn't mean it's right to do it. Why not focus on creating your own OC and get praised for it (requiring it doesn't suck)

The implication (from previous posts of mine) is that I will take it down if it posted very recently and I am taking somebody's thumbs. I will make that clearer next time.

You fucking retard. You responded to comment #64. More importantly, what does it matter if it was posted a year ago, or even a week ago. That person isn't getting thumbs for it, and they wouldn't be if I hadn't posted it here again. The point is only to remove it if I posted it HERE SLIGHTLY AFTER another member posted it HERE.

Obvious troll is obvious, there is no way somebody is this stupid and still alive.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware you were on the team that did DBZ: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3214858/DBZ+SOPA+Part+2/
Or that you did Eight Crazy Nights: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/4176620/Eight+Crazy+Nights/

I created the SOPA DBZ comic. I used the scenes from the show as the base and edited it. Did I steal the comic from anyone? No, I didn't. I created it myself. If you are still not sure that this is a repost, let me pull up some links for you.
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4054172/Pokemon+Christianity/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3901907/Pokemon+Christian+Version/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3065199/Pokemon+Christian+Rules/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2607536/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2771643/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3036656/pokemon/

These were found by searching "funnyjunk pokemon christian" on Google.

Is English a second language for you or are you just not reading my responses to you. I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST.

Now read this, and please take your time, I know it is a difficult concept to understand. The following situation is supposed to be hypothetical, sorry for any resemblance to reality it contains.

Say there is a user joesomething123, who posts some content at 12:15 AM on 2/16/13 that he found on Facebook (and says so in description). Now, suppose I too follow the same page that posted that content on Facebook, and I saw the same content at 12:30 AM and immediately posted it to Funnyjunk, saying that I saw it on Facebook. Now, if joesomething123 were to come across my content in the newest uploads, or even more towards the front page, and link to his content, showing that he posted it before I posted it, I would gladly remove my content.

The point is not to remove the content because somebody posted it a while ago and is no longer getting thumbs for it. 2 of those posts were made in 2012, the other 4 were made in 2011. Now two questions must be asked: Were they posted before me? and Are they within the 24 hour front page limit?.

For the first one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the second one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the third one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fourth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fifth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the sixth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.

tl;dr If we removed all reposts from this site, the influx of content would drop from thousands of posts daily to maybe 50-100 posts a day. I just don't want to steal thumbs when somebody posted it very recently before me.

"Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down."
" I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST. "
It doesn't matter how long you waited to post it, it is still a repost(stolen) from the original creator. You just took it so you could get thumbs. Why do you want thumbs so bad if you don't even earn them? I earned all of my thumbs fairly. You stole other peoples creations to get thumbs.

Shall I analyze the front page and report to you how much of it OC and how much is a repost? Why don't you go bugging the other people who posted this before me? Please, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you about this. As would everybody else who reposts content on this site.

You attack me because I offer to remove a post if it was posted at relatively the same time as somebody else. Do you attack Good Samaritans as well? If you came across a man who appeared homeless, but he offered you some water, would you beat him with a stick?

Who cares if it is a repost from two years ago? I doubt the content creators are still making money from it, and if I knew who they were, I'd have linked to them to increase their publicity.

What matters more is that it is funny and made somebody laugh, which based on the number of thumbs it got, it was funny and made multiple people laugh.

I did not "attack" you. I pointed out to you it was a repost because you said you would take it down if it was one, then after giving multiple links to previously uploaded ones, you refused to take it down. Just because people repost reposts, it doesn't mean it's right to do it. Why not focus on creating your own OC and get praised for it (requiring it doesn't suck)

The implication (from previous posts of mine) is that I will take it down if it posted very recently and I am taking somebody's thumbs. I will make that clearer next time.

Did you even read comment #64 before responding with a flood of retardation? The point is, in the scenario that I and another member of this site found the post at approximately the same time, and he posted it here before me, that I would remove the post so that he got the thumbs he deserved for uploading before me.

Also, it would greatly help your argument if you would quote in entirety, rather than pick the snippets you want to see. Not taken out of context, it says, "Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down," clearly implying that if somebody posted it slightly before me, I would remove it so as to not steal their thumbs.

tl;dr read before you comment.

Because normally one would read all the comments before posting right? There shouldn't be conditions for removing stolen content, you just shouldn't do it in the first place. You took someone's work then said you would take it down if someone reposted it before you(which multiple people have) or the OP told you to. You shouldn't have conditions. Don't snap at me for not searching through the comments when you couldn't bother search "pokemon christian" in the search bar

You fucking retard. You responded to comment #64. More importantly, what does it matter if it was posted a year ago, or even a week ago. That person isn't getting thumbs for it, and they wouldn't be if I hadn't posted it here again. The point is only to remove it if I posted it HERE SLIGHTLY AFTER another member posted it HERE.

Obvious troll is obvious, there is no way somebody is this stupid and still alive.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware you were on the team that did DBZ: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3214858/DBZ+SOPA+Part+2/
Or that you did Eight Crazy Nights: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/4176620/Eight+Crazy+Nights/

I created the SOPA DBZ comic. I used the scenes from the show as the base and edited it. Did I steal the comic from anyone? No, I didn't. I created it myself. If you are still not sure that this is a repost, let me pull up some links for you.
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4054172/Pokemon+Christianity/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3901907/Pokemon+Christian+Version/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3065199/Pokemon+Christian+Rules/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2607536/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2771643/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3036656/pokemon/

These were found by searching "funnyjunk pokemon christian" on Google.

Is English a second language for you or are you just not reading my responses to you. I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST.

Now read this, and please take your time, I know it is a difficult concept to understand. The following situation is supposed to be hypothetical, sorry for any resemblance to reality it contains.

Say there is a user joesomething123, who posts some content at 12:15 AM on 2/16/13 that he found on Facebook (and says so in description). Now, suppose I too follow the same page that posted that content on Facebook, and I saw the same content at 12:30 AM and immediately posted it to Funnyjunk, saying that I saw it on Facebook. Now, if joesomething123 were to come across my content in the newest uploads, or even more towards the front page, and link to his content, showing that he posted it before I posted it, I would gladly remove my content.

The point is not to remove the content because somebody posted it a while ago and is no longer getting thumbs for it. 2 of those posts were made in 2012, the other 4 were made in 2011. Now two questions must be asked: Were they posted before me? and Are they within the 24 hour front page limit?.

For the first one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the second one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the third one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fourth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fifth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the sixth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.

tl;dr If we removed all reposts from this site, the influx of content would drop from thousands of posts daily to maybe 50-100 posts a day. I just don't want to steal thumbs when somebody posted it very recently before me.

"Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down."
" I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST. "
It doesn't matter how long you waited to post it, it is still a repost(stolen) from the original creator. You just took it so you could get thumbs. Why do you want thumbs so bad if you don't even earn them? I earned all of my thumbs fairly. You stole other peoples creations to get thumbs.

Shall I analyze the front page and report to you how much of it OC and how much is a repost? Why don't you go bugging the other people who posted this before me? Please, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you about this. As would everybody else who reposts content on this site.

You attack me because I offer to remove a post if it was posted at relatively the same time as somebody else. Do you attack Good Samaritans as well? If you came across a man who appeared homeless, but he offered you some water, would you beat him with a stick?

Who cares if it is a repost from two years ago? I doubt the content creators are still making money from it, and if I knew who they were, I'd have linked to them to increase their publicity.

What matters more is that it is funny and made somebody laugh, which based on the number of thumbs it got, it was funny and made multiple people laugh.

I did not "attack" you. I pointed out to you it was a repost because you said you would take it down if it was one, then after giving multiple links to previously uploaded ones, you refused to take it down. Just because people repost reposts, it doesn't mean it's right to do it. Why not focus on creating your own OC and get praised for it (requiring it doesn't suck)

The implication (from previous posts of mine) is that I will take it down if it posted very recently and I am taking somebody's thumbs. I will make that clearer next time.

What are you talking about? Nowhere did I say it was a repost on this site, nor did I ever check to see if it was.

You found it on facebook. That means you did not create it so it is a repost

Did you even read comment #64 before responding with a flood of retardation? The point is, in the scenario that I and another member of this site found the post at approximately the same time, and he posted it here before me, that I would remove the post so that he got the thumbs he deserved for uploading before me.

Also, it would greatly help your argument if you would quote in entirety, rather than pick the snippets you want to see. Not taken out of context, it says, "Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down," clearly implying that if somebody posted it slightly before me, I would remove it so as to not steal their thumbs.

tl;dr read before you comment.

Because normally one would read all the comments before posting right? There shouldn't be conditions for removing stolen content, you just shouldn't do it in the first place. You took someone's work then said you would take it down if someone reposted it before you(which multiple people have) or the OP told you to. You shouldn't have conditions. Don't snap at me for not searching through the comments when you couldn't bother search "pokemon christian" in the search bar

You fucking retard. You responded to comment #64. More importantly, what does it matter if it was posted a year ago, or even a week ago. That person isn't getting thumbs for it, and they wouldn't be if I hadn't posted it here again. The point is only to remove it if I posted it HERE SLIGHTLY AFTER another member posted it HERE.

Obvious troll is obvious, there is no way somebody is this stupid and still alive.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware you were on the team that did DBZ: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3214858/DBZ+SOPA+Part+2/
Or that you did Eight Crazy Nights: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/4176620/Eight+Crazy+Nights/

I created the SOPA DBZ comic. I used the scenes from the show as the base and edited it. Did I steal the comic from anyone? No, I didn't. I created it myself. If you are still not sure that this is a repost, let me pull up some links for you.
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4054172/Pokemon+Christianity/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3901907/Pokemon+Christian+Version/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3065199/Pokemon+Christian+Rules/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2607536/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2771643/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3036656/pokemon/

These were found by searching "funnyjunk pokemon christian" on Google.

Is English a second language for you or are you just not reading my responses to you. I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST.

Now read this, and please take your time, I know it is a difficult concept to understand. The following situation is supposed to be hypothetical, sorry for any resemblance to reality it contains.

Say there is a user joesomething123, who posts some content at 12:15 AM on 2/16/13 that he found on Facebook (and says so in description). Now, suppose I too follow the same page that posted that content on Facebook, and I saw the same content at 12:30 AM and immediately posted it to Funnyjunk, saying that I saw it on Facebook. Now, if joesomething123 were to come across my content in the newest uploads, or even more towards the front page, and link to his content, showing that he posted it before I posted it, I would gladly remove my content.

The point is not to remove the content because somebody posted it a while ago and is no longer getting thumbs for it. 2 of those posts were made in 2012, the other 4 were made in 2011. Now two questions must be asked: Were they posted before me? and Are they within the 24 hour front page limit?.

For the first one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the second one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the third one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fourth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fifth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the sixth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.

tl;dr If we removed all reposts from this site, the influx of content would drop from thousands of posts daily to maybe 50-100 posts a day. I just don't want to steal thumbs when somebody posted it very recently before me.

"Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down."
" I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST. "
It doesn't matter how long you waited to post it, it is still a repost(stolen) from the original creator. You just took it so you could get thumbs. Why do you want thumbs so bad if you don't even earn them? I earned all of my thumbs fairly. You stole other peoples creations to get thumbs.

Shall I analyze the front page and report to you how much of it OC and how much is a repost? Why don't you go bugging the other people who posted this before me? Please, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you about this. As would everybody else who reposts content on this site.

You attack me because I offer to remove a post if it was posted at relatively the same time as somebody else. Do you attack Good Samaritans as well? If you came across a man who appeared homeless, but he offered you some water, would you beat him with a stick?

Who cares if it is a repost from two years ago? I doubt the content creators are still making money from it, and if I knew who they were, I'd have linked to them to increase their publicity.

What matters more is that it is funny and made somebody laugh, which based on the number of thumbs it got, it was funny and made multiple people laugh.

I did not "attack" you. I pointed out to you it was a repost because you said you would take it down if it was one, then after giving multiple links to previously uploaded ones, you refused to take it down. Just because people repost reposts, it doesn't mean it's right to do it. Why not focus on creating your own OC and get praised for it (requiring it doesn't suck)

The implication (from previous posts of mine) is that I will take it down if it posted very recently and I am taking somebody's thumbs. I will make that clearer next time.

Well, truly the meaning behind it is to remove it if I accidentally posted it shortly after somebody else (within the 24 hour limit for sure), so I was not getting thumbs they should be getting.

You openly admitted to it being a repost, are you going to keep your word and remove it?

What are you talking about? Nowhere did I say it was a repost on this site, nor did I ever check to see if it was.

You found it on facebook. That means you did not create it so it is a repost

Did you even read comment #64 before responding with a flood of retardation? The point is, in the scenario that I and another member of this site found the post at approximately the same time, and he posted it here before me, that I would remove the post so that he got the thumbs he deserved for uploading before me.

Also, it would greatly help your argument if you would quote in entirety, rather than pick the snippets you want to see. Not taken out of context, it says, "Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down," clearly implying that if somebody posted it slightly before me, I would remove it so as to not steal their thumbs.

tl;dr read before you comment.

Because normally one would read all the comments before posting right? There shouldn't be conditions for removing stolen content, you just shouldn't do it in the first place. You took someone's work then said you would take it down if someone reposted it before you(which multiple people have) or the OP told you to. You shouldn't have conditions. Don't snap at me for not searching through the comments when you couldn't bother search "pokemon christian" in the search bar

You fucking retard. You responded to comment #64. More importantly, what does it matter if it was posted a year ago, or even a week ago. That person isn't getting thumbs for it, and they wouldn't be if I hadn't posted it here again. The point is only to remove it if I posted it HERE SLIGHTLY AFTER another member posted it HERE.

Obvious troll is obvious, there is no way somebody is this stupid and still alive.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware you were on the team that did DBZ: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3214858/DBZ+SOPA+Part+2/
Or that you did Eight Crazy Nights: www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/4176620/Eight+Crazy+Nights/

I created the SOPA DBZ comic. I used the scenes from the show as the base and edited it. Did I steal the comic from anyone? No, I didn't. I created it myself. If you are still not sure that this is a repost, let me pull up some links for you.
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4054172/Pokemon+Christianity/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3901907/Pokemon+Christian+Version/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3065199/Pokemon+Christian+Rules/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2607536/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2771643/Pokemon/
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3036656/pokemon/

These were found by searching "funnyjunk pokemon christian" on Google.

Is English a second language for you or are you just not reading my responses to you. I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST.

Now read this, and please take your time, I know it is a difficult concept to understand. The following situation is supposed to be hypothetical, sorry for any resemblance to reality it contains.

Say there is a user joesomething123, who posts some content at 12:15 AM on 2/16/13 that he found on Facebook (and says so in description). Now, suppose I too follow the same page that posted that content on Facebook, and I saw the same content at 12:30 AM and immediately posted it to Funnyjunk, saying that I saw it on Facebook. Now, if joesomething123 were to come across my content in the newest uploads, or even more towards the front page, and link to his content, showing that he posted it before I posted it, I would gladly remove my content.

The point is not to remove the content because somebody posted it a while ago and is no longer getting thumbs for it. 2 of those posts were made in 2012, the other 4 were made in 2011. Now two questions must be asked: Were they posted before me? and Are they within the 24 hour front page limit?.

For the first one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the second one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the third one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fourth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the fifth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.
For the sixth one: Yes, it was posted before me, but no it is not within the 24 hour limit.

tl;dr If we removed all reposts from this site, the influx of content would drop from thousands of posts daily to maybe 50-100 posts a day. I just don't want to steal thumbs when somebody posted it very recently before me.

"Found on facebook, will remove if repost here and OP wants it down."
" I AM AWARE THIS IS A REPOST. "
It doesn't matter how long you waited to post it, it is still a repost(stolen) from the original creator. You just took it so you could get thumbs. Why do you want thumbs so bad if you don't even earn them? I earned all of my thumbs fairly. You stole other peoples creations to get thumbs.

Shall I analyze the front page and report to you how much of it OC and how much is a repost? Why don't you go bugging the other people who posted this before me? Please, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you about this. As would everybody else who reposts content on this site.

You attack me because I offer to remove a post if it was posted at relatively the same time as somebody else. Do you attack Good Samaritans as well? If you came across a man who appeared homeless, but he offered you some water, would you beat him with a stick?

Who cares if it is a repost from two years ago? I doubt the content creators are still making money from it, and if I knew who they were, I'd have linked to them to increase their publicity.

What matters more is that it is funny and made somebody laugh, which based on the number of thumbs it got, it was funny and made multiple people laugh.

I did not "attack" you. I pointed out to you it was a repost because you said you would take it down if it was one, then after giving multiple links to previously uploaded ones, you refused to take it down. Just because people repost reposts, it doesn't mean it's right to do it. Why not focus on creating your own OC and get praised for it (requiring it doesn't suck)

The implication (from previous posts of mine) is that I will take it down if it posted very recently and I am taking somebody's thumbs. I will make that clearer next time.

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

The first spell is the flame spell
The sword morphed due to you're use of the fire spell
Theres only like 4 different morphs. Such BS
Legendary weapons in that game are practically worthless.

My hero sword always gets morphed into a bone handle because i end up killing so many hollowmen because that's what they make you fight in the beginning. I hate the morphs. You can't decide what they are

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

I hated that. Those stupid annoying things who became basically a mascot to the series. The new one tried to be too humorous. It made the dark parts not dark enough.

Also, I hated the morphing weapons. I liked there to be a choice in a ton of regular weapons and then legendary. If every weapon is special, none of them are

The first spell is the flame spell
The sword morphed due to you're use of the fire spell
Theres only like 4 different morphs. Such BS
Legendary weapons in that game are practically worthless.

My hero sword always gets morphed into a bone handle because i end up killing so many hollowmen because that's what they make you fight in the beginning. I hate the morphs. You can't decide what they are

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

Don't. it's the worst piece of shit to call itself a Fable game. Most of it's spent staring at a horse's ass and when you're not you're waving your arms around throwing spells at hobbes. How it got 8.0 /10 rating I'll never know.

I don't even have Kinect. I knew it would be a piece of shit and have no games what so ever. I was pissed in 3 that the smallest weakest enemies(the hobbes) became such a fearsome fighting monster that dodged and blocked constantly to the point you would say "Fuck the sword" and whip out the pistol and fire/lightning

I hated that. Those stupid annoying things who became basically a mascot to the series. The new one tried to be too humorous. It made the dark parts not dark enough.

Also, I hated the morphing weapons. I liked there to be a choice in a ton of regular weapons and then legendary. If every weapon is special, none of them are

The first spell is the flame spell
The sword morphed due to you're use of the fire spell
Theres only like 4 different morphs. Such BS
Legendary weapons in that game are practically worthless.

My hero sword always gets morphed into a bone handle because i end up killing so many hollowmen because that's what they make you fight in the beginning. I hate the morphs. You can't decide what they are

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

I made the mistake of playing the second one before the first and I just never got into it. But all 3 are still better than the Kinect game.

Never played it. Never will....

Don't. it's the worst piece of shit to call itself a Fable game. Most of it's spent staring at a horse's ass and when you're not you're waving your arms around throwing spells at hobbes. How it got 8.0 /10 rating I'll never know.

I don't even have Kinect. I knew it would be a piece of shit and have no games what so ever. I was pissed in 3 that the smallest weakest enemies(the hobbes) became such a fearsome fighting monster that dodged and blocked constantly to the point you would say "Fuck the sword" and whip out the pistol and fire/lightning

I hated that. Those stupid annoying things who became basically a mascot to the series. The new one tried to be too humorous. It made the dark parts not dark enough.

Also, I hated the morphing weapons. I liked there to be a choice in a ton of regular weapons and then legendary. If every weapon is special, none of them are

The first spell is the flame spell
The sword morphed due to you're use of the fire spell
Theres only like 4 different morphs. Such BS
Legendary weapons in that game are practically worthless.

My hero sword always gets morphed into a bone handle because i end up killing so many hollowmen because that's what they make you fight in the beginning. I hate the morphs. You can't decide what they are

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.

Aurora was pretty badass. I liked the Sentinels. But I have to say Fable 2 was 20X better.

Lost Chapters kicks the shit out of both. I liked 2 though, but Lost chapters is the best

I made the mistake of playing the second one before the first and I just never got into it. But all 3 are still better than the Kinect game.

Never played it. Never will....

Don't. it's the worst piece of shit to call itself a Fable game. Most of it's spent staring at a horse's ass and when you're not you're waving your arms around throwing spells at hobbes. How it got 8.0 /10 rating I'll never know.

I don't even have Kinect. I knew it would be a piece of shit and have no games what so ever. I was pissed in 3 that the smallest weakest enemies(the hobbes) became such a fearsome fighting monster that dodged and blocked constantly to the point you would say "Fuck the sword" and whip out the pistol and fire/lightning

I hated that. Those stupid annoying things who became basically a mascot to the series. The new one tried to be too humorous. It made the dark parts not dark enough.

Also, I hated the morphing weapons. I liked there to be a choice in a ton of regular weapons and then legendary. If every weapon is special, none of them are

The first spell is the flame spell
The sword morphed due to you're use of the fire spell
Theres only like 4 different morphs. Such BS
Legendary weapons in that game are practically worthless.

My hero sword always gets morphed into a bone handle because i end up killing so many hollowmen because that's what they make you fight in the beginning. I hate the morphs. You can't decide what they are

I hated that. Too many flaws. RIP the Fable series 1996-2010. Damn you Peter Molyneux. I trusted you.

I have platinum edition of Fable 2 so I run around with my Hal's Rifle and mow down everything. Lost Chapters and Fable 2 are THE only Fable. I do not consider "Fable" 3 to be a Fable game

And the other 2 fable games, Journey and Heroes shouldn't even be called games.

I heard Heroes was fun in a arcade kind of way, but I never played it

I suppose it was alright. But Lionhead talked about it like it was their best thing ever.