Upload
Login or register

wertologist

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/10/2011
Last Login:12/09/2016
Stats
Content Ranking:#5259
Comment Ranking:#476
Highest Content Rank:#956
Highest Comment Rank:#397
Content Thumbs: 4905 total,  5848 ,  943
Comment Thumbs: 25805 total,  28443 ,  2638
Content Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 142 Content: Faptastic → Level 143 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 51.1% (511/1000)
Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:98
Content Views:361447
Times Content Favorited:574 times
Total Comments Made:7055
FJ Points:24296
Favorite Tags: sims (3) | Minecraft (2) | OC (2)
Wertologist or Wert107

latest user's comments

#90 - The mountains are tall. Things get cold on top of mountains. N…  [+] (3 replies) 11/19/2016 on Nooooo 0
#91 - comradewinter (11/19/2016) [-]
And? The topography of Skyrim covers that. The lush forests in Falkreath right about the border, and the hot springs in the Reach. It basically covers all imaginable climates of a Northern area.
User avatar
#92 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
So what are you complaining about if it makes sense? You complained that they added a forest to a tundra when it is actually realistic.
#93 - comradewinter (11/19/2016) [-]
No, I never did such a thing. What I said was that they included topographical zones ranging from lush forest to barren tundra, which is essentially the realistic range of a place that is located far north.
#88 - And tundras can have forests. Skyrim is also right on the bord…  [+] (5 replies) 11/19/2016 on Nooooo 0
#89 - comradewinter (11/19/2016) [-]
Skyrim does border Hammerfell, but its bordering areas involve snowy mountains. You'd have to travel fairly far south of the border before you get any warm areas.
User avatar
#90 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
The mountains are tall. Things get cold on top of mountains. Not surprising that mountains are covered in snow when they are on the cold side of a climate border. The warmer areas of Skyrim are pretty close to warm border countries. It makes sense. The "warm" areas aren't even that warm. It'd still be chilly there. Just not cold enough for water to freeze. The only really warm part would be the hot springs area between windhelm and riften. Even then that still makes sense. Hot springs can exist in cold areas.
#91 - comradewinter (11/19/2016) [-]
And? The topography of Skyrim covers that. The lush forests in Falkreath right about the border, and the hot springs in the Reach. It basically covers all imaginable climates of a Northern area.
User avatar
#92 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
So what are you complaining about if it makes sense? You complained that they added a forest to a tundra when it is actually realistic.
#93 - comradewinter (11/19/2016) [-]
No, I never did such a thing. What I said was that they included topographical zones ranging from lush forest to barren tundra, which is essentially the realistic range of a place that is located far north.
#151 - You mean the message to people who likely don't support what t…  [+] (11 replies) 11/19/2016 on Starbucks Triggering 0
User avatar
#156 - antiponiesuser (11/19/2016) [-]
Starbucks should publicy say that they hold no opinion, and that the opinions of their employees are not the company's.

Also, they should make sure via text that people working at their company would in no way interfere with people who are clients there.

When you are working, you are a peon. If you support Hillary, and I want you to write "Trump" on my cup, you close your mouth and fucking do it, or you leave your job, because apparently your need to state your political opinions are making you unqualified for it.

People should not expect the job to pander to them, they should do what the job requires, or quit altogether.
User avatar
#161 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
The thing is Starbucks hasn't even said anything yet you want to "attack" them. They never made any indication whether they supported it or were against it, but you jumped on the bandwagon of assuming they supported it as if they were right there giving the idiot a badge for doing a good deed.

You're acting like I supported the guy calling the cops. I know full well how an employee should act. You don't need to tell me how he/she should have acted. I'm not defending them. I'm saying you and others are jumping the gun without any indication that Starbucks supported their actions.

Attacking Starbucks because of the idiotic employee is fucking stupid unless Starbucks says they support their actions(which they have not in any way). Would you attack all of McDonald's if a single employee threw food at you? Would you assume McDonald's automatically supports that employee? Do you think they make employees sign a form that says "I will throw food at customers"?

It's moronic.
User avatar
#162 - antiponiesuser (11/19/2016) [-]
In my country, there is a saying.

"Those who are silent, are granting"

If the peaseant says "I kill you in the name of my lord!" and the lord says nothing, the crime was in his name.

If he wants to be purged, he should clarify that he accept no responsibility for it.

Here is the same.

Starbucks went out of their way to hire that guy. Then, those 2 have a close relationship.

Now, if one acts in the name of the other, the other should clarify how he is not acting in his name.

Actually, i realize how pointless is to discuss this with such a retard like you. Get back to school, 14 something kiddo. When you work, come back and discuss.

The last 4 jobs I was at, they did NOT allow you to dress the job's uniform outside of the firm, because you did NOT represent them there, out in the street, in your free time.

Firms are SPECIFICALLY GOING AGAiNST THEIR REPRESENTATION when people are not working.

And if you ever saw a contract in your life, you would have seen that when your sign, it says "You represent our fucking firm dipshit, you better not be an asshole when treating with potential clients" only in a fancy way.

Grow up, kiddo.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
Are you daft? I literally said I don't support the idiot calling the cops.

"Those who are silent, are granting"

They likely would never have heard about this unless idiots like you "boycotted" them. Do you not realize how many Starbucks there are? It'd be damn near impossible to micro manage every single store. They have managers to do that. If I worked at McDonald's and threw food at you, would you attack McDonald's unless they immediately took a stance?

As of May 2015, there are over 23,000 Starbucks in America. A small isolated incident happens in just one store and you want Starbucks to burn for not hearing about it fast enough? They likely will make a statement now that they heard about it. I know it may be hard to believe, but Starbucks isn't omniscient. They don't know about every situation that happens in their stores unless their told about it. What you and others are doing is "attacking" them before they even had a chance to release a fucking statement. You're "attacking" people because of a fucking assumption before they even say their actual stance. What are you, a fucking child?

"Starbucks went out of their way to hire that guy. Then, those 2 have a close relationship"

Are you retarded? Do you think the entire company went to that specific person then asked them to work for them? That person filled out an application to work for them. A manager of a single store hired them. Starbucks didn't go out of their way. That's hilarious that you think that.

"The last 4 jobs I was at, they did NOT allow you to dress the job's uniform outside of the firm, because you did NOT represent them there, out in the street, in your free time."

That's a well known and common practice. That's also what happened here.

Starbucks has never given any indication on their stance in this situation, but you automatically assume they sided with the employee. When an employee does something stupid like this, they are usually fired or reprimanded. Odds are with the publicity, they will get fired. I never worked at Starbucks, but I'm willing to bet it doesn't say to call the cops because they asked you to write a name in the guidelines. They likely don't condone their actions, but you still jumped to the conclusion that they do without anything to support it.

They probably haven't even heard about the situation or maybe they just heard about it. Yet you still want to throw full blame onto them right away.

The employee is supposed to represent the company, but when they don't they get punished. The thing is you don't know how the company wanted this handled, but assume they support them.

"Hurr durr they didn't respond fast enough to a small isolated case. They must support them durr"
User avatar
#179 - antiponiesuser (11/19/2016) [-]
>If I worked at McDonald's and threw food at you, would you attack McDonald's unless they immediately took a stance?

stopped reading there to reply to this. Yes, yes I would. After I punch his face, I would demand the firm, who, in the last instance, are the ones who are hiring, and then placing each hired person into different McDonalds across the land. Continue reading.

> A manager of a single store hired them.

I don't know where you are living, but the people usually hired are called for a group interview, especially in social palces like Starbucks or similar, where people have to be very open with the clients.

AFTER they pass the group interview, they will be granted a private interview with the interviewer, and if they are hired, they will be placed into a Starbucks.

Managers ask for more people. Human Resources interview and provide those people.

I may ask for a job, but if you give it to me, we are both doin 50/50, it's not all my doing.

>Starbucks has never given any indication on their stance in this situation

Well they are too late. They should state their stance in 0.0 seconds, just so we know they are not liberal dipshits. Otherwise, assume the worst and set fire to establishments.

>Yet you still want to throw full blame onto them right away.

Yes. Yes I do. FUck them, they are rich enough. Let's give them some trouble at least. Especially since they hire some libtard cuckservative who should be gassed.

> but when they don't they get punished.

Well? We are still waiting.meme
User avatar
#185 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
So the exact second I threw food at you, you would expect a public statement from McDonald's saying they don't condone that behavior? Oh, my sweet child.

Again, there are over 23,000 Starbucks. Do you really expect them to constantly monitor every single individual that works for them? No sane person would. That's why they have managers and supervisors to do that for them. When something happens, one of them will file a report. The thing is that with over 23,000 stores, it's damn near impossible to immediately respond to one particular write up when thousands are probably ahead of it in line. You're acting like they have complete surveillance over every single person and can react instantly should something happen. That's unbelievably asinine.

When I worked at my local airport, I only ever had one interview. The second job there I never even met with my boss until after I was officially hired. Both jobs were customer service. Never had or heard of a group interview. Had friends who worked in fast food chains. Just regular interviews. My cousin was a fucking manager at McDonald's. Just regular interviews.

I figure you probably don't know this, but not every store is directly linked to the franchise. The McDonald's and Dunkin Donuts at my local airport were not directly connected with their respective franchises. They just paid for the license to use their shit. They didn't/couldn't use coupons because they weren't technically part of the official chain. They had different menus as well. Dunkin uses Pepsi to provide drinks, but since this one wasn't officially in the chain they could use whatever they wanted(like coke. I even got the manager to put grape fanta, a coke product, on their shelves).

"They should state their stance in 0.0 seconds, just so we know they are not liberal dipshits. Otherwise, assume the worst and set fire to establishments"

So you're not even giving them a chance to even fucking hear about it before you try to burn them? This is why you wear a helmet to cross the street.

"Yes. Yes I do. FUck them, they are rich enough. Let's give them some trouble at least."

So you automatically hate anyone who is rich? Nice Napoleon complex you got there.

Keep in mind that this likely just fucking happened. Starbucks will very likely give a statement shortly, but you're still wanting them to burn before they even had the chance. That makes you a douche nozzle. For all you know, they want them fired and agree that they were in the wrong, but you still want to act as if they sided with them. They could agree with you and you would still want them to burn. That makes you a child.

User avatar
#188 - antiponiesuser (11/19/2016) [-]
So, how did the news got hold of this so fast, then? News get stupid stories faster than the ones in charge of the corporation?

Also, yes, here the only thing which exists are group interviews (except if you are trying for a real job)

You want to work at Burger King, maccas or Starbucks, you get in with 12 people, do some shit social test, and only the most social and inteligent pass. It's a filter for the retards.

Also, yes, I hate everyone, And you more than anyone. Fuck you, I hope those red pinkies give you cancer in your sleep.
User avatar
#195 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
Because the guy went to fucking twitter before he went to Starbucks you retard.

So my two customer service jobs weren't real? I had to pass security tests to even get hired. My whole job was dealing with passengers. I guess it's not a real job because I didn't have a group interview though, right?

"...only the most social and inteligent pass. It's a filter for the retards."

So everyone who works in fast food is intelligent? I've met people who worked at McDonald's who literally could not even read. You're argument is flawed.

You're arguing with emotion and unrealistic expectations. That's why you have no credible stance. I don't give a fuck about thumbs, but you're acting like someone else thumbed me down instead of you. I don't give a shot about your opinion, it's obviously asinine. You should get back to your yard wrangler.
User avatar
#198 - antiponiesuser (11/19/2016) [-]
>(except if you are trying for a real job)

You have to do them EXCEPT if you are going for a real job! Illiterate idiot.

If you go for a high end job of course the just interview you personally. If you are going for McDonalds cashier, they do the group interviews. (To filter out people like you)

>You're arguing with emotion and unrealistic expectations. That's why you have no credible stance.

SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UPSHUT UP SHUT UP
#265 - wertologist (11/20/2016) [-]
>"hurr durr ur stupid"
> groop inturvews sort owt stoopid peepel
> won on won inturvews r reel jobs.

You basically are saying I'm too stupid to work fast food, but not enough to get a real job? Your logic has quite a few holes in it.

"Shuddup"

Now I'm thinking you're a troll. If so then you got me, we'll played. If you're being serious, don't have kids.
User avatar
#267 - antiponiesuser (11/20/2016) [-]
Now I will have kids just to rue you.
#20 - I don't know if light level would affect the curse. I think wh…  [+] (15 replies) 11/19/2016 on Damn Nature You Scary +1
User avatar
#22 - jacksipian (11/19/2016) [-]
Damn it, what does a guy have to do to fuck a gorgon and not get turned to stone???
User avatar
#23 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
Just blindfold her or yourself and you're good. As long as you don't look directly in her eyes you will be fine.
User avatar
#25 - jacksipian (11/19/2016) [-]
I'll just give her some rad sunglasses. she'll look fly as fuck
User avatar
#26 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
I don't think sunglasses would work either. You're still kind of looking directly into her eyes. Like if you were both under water you'd still turn to stone. If you looked at her through a glass window I bet you'd still turn to stone.

What happened with Perseus is that he used her reflection to fight her. Never truly looking into her eyes. With sunglasses, it's just a lens. You're still looking right at her. You're gazes would meet and you'd turn to stone. A reflection is safe because it's not a direct line of sight to her eyes. It gets angled and that's what I think was the technical loop hole. You could argue than a lens could be a loophole, but I sincerely doubt it would work.

A blindfold would be the better solution .
User avatar
#27 - jacksipian (11/19/2016) [-]
Hmm, well then i guess we'll just have to go catch a gorgon and put this all to the test. We'll be like mythbusters, but for figuring out which monsters you can fuck and how
User avatar
#28 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
We already got the first episode down. Medusa the Gorgon and Charybdis/Amy schumer. On next week's episode, we'll discuss the dangers of fucking centaurs and Phoenixes.

Centaur women are generally safe, while centaur men are only safe if they're bottom bitches. Phoenixes are not safe in most sexual relationships. They'll leave you with a burning sensation when you pee. They are however safe to have cyber sex with, but due to the lack of fingers their responses would be delayed and unintelligible.
User avatar
#30 - jacksipian (11/19/2016) [-]
We'll be the next hit show, and coincidentally, it was all inspired by someone who's spirit animal is a unicorn.
User avatar
#31 - wertologist (11/19/2016) [-]
I'm hopefully going to learn animation soon. I want to create my own show. I might even do this as a side show. Seems like it'd be easy to do. Nothing graphic. Just a typical TV educational show.
User avatar
#33 - jacksipian (11/19/2016) [-]
That's cool, i'd watch it if it was made
User avatar
#38 - wertologist (11/20/2016) [-]
The show would need a name.

I'm thinking something like "mythhumpers" or "can you pull a Zeus?"

Any other ideas?
User avatar
#40 - jacksipian (11/20/2016) [-]
i like mythhumpers personally
User avatar
#58 - wertologist (11/20/2016) [-]
My renditions of the Greek legends I told you made me want to do more. I may make a few posts about it here. Each upload will be a humorous telling of a legend. I'll try to get some work on it done in a few days and upload a more fleshed out Medusa.
User avatar
#60 - jacksipian (11/20/2016) [-]
That's awesome, mention me if you do them because i definitely want to see them
User avatar
#55 - wertologist (11/20/2016) [-]
My best friend does one of those YouTube blogs. He's got the proper equipment for filming. I wish I could do it in animation, but I don't know animation yet. My cousin said he would teach me what he knows if I could learn basic coding which he then said Minecraft has coding in it and which I have poured countless hours with coding command blocks and other things for a big project. If you're curious about the project, I can link you to it. It's zombie related. Pictures included .

When I learn animation, my main focus will be to create my main show(an anime styled show with serious plots). This show has been slowly evolving in my mind for years. Ever since I was young and played with toys. My favorite thing to play was this idea and that's where I molded the concept into an idea. Later, my intense love of vidya games and good stories refined what my idea of what a good story was. I took bits and pieces from my favorite games and books and merged them with my idea. Now I have it and just need to put it on paper, draw up the characters, learn animation, create a teaser trailer, and see how it goes. My main concern would be advertising it. I'm thinking of starting here, but afterwards I have no idea.

That project is number one priority, but it's on hold until I learn animation. In the meantime I can try to do Mythhumpers and just film myself. Hopefully it'll get some traction and build my name up a bit. More viewers, the better.

I would hope to get some income or some form of a job out of this as I'm dirt poor.
User avatar
#56 - jacksipian (11/20/2016) [-]
That would b pretty cool, I'm sure you'll get good at animating so you can make the show, but yeah if it catches on, hopefully you can at least make some money from it