Upload
Login or register

wertologist

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/10/2011
Last Login:12/08/2016
Stats
Content Ranking:#5260
Comment Ranking:#481
Highest Content Rank:#956
Highest Comment Rank:#397
Content Thumbs: 4904 total,  5847 ,  943
Comment Thumbs: 25776 total,  28403 ,  2627
Content Level Progress: 68% (68/100)
Level 142 Content: Faptastic → Level 143 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 48.2% (482/1000)
Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:98
Content Views:361438
Times Content Favorited:574 times
Total Comments Made:7035
FJ Points:24264
Favorite Tags: sims (3) | Minecraft (2) | OC (2)
Wertologist or Wert107

latest user's comments

#31 - I remember people were getting banned on gta online for perfor…  [+] (1 reply) 11/26/2016 on unban 0
#34 - unmentorable (11/26/2016) [-]
Any sort of modding for gta online can get you banned. I don't think people should be doing it, regardless of how innocent it may seem. If there is even a tiny window of opportunity for a cheater to bypass the VAC system, they will abuse the shit out of it.
#24 - From what I hear it's very easy. I've read that people using o…  [+] (5 replies) 11/26/2016 on unban +2
#33 - unmentorable (11/26/2016) [-]
Most people who are incorrectly VAC banned have them manually removed. Also it's widely known that modding files can cause you to get banned, since a lot of cheats also do that, so I would argue that sure, it's not exactly cheating, but it is doing something that valve doesn't actually want you to do so it would indeed be a correct VAC ban. I've read about them telling people not to modify game files, yet people still do it. It's not worth the risk in my opinion.
#30 - talldumbdork (11/26/2016) [-]
This one gets better. This guy digs into his account stats. The guy in question states it's his first time playing the game ever, gets caught most likely using aimassist programming. We could make a FJ compilation of these forums!
#29 - talldumbdork (11/26/2016) [-]
Eh, that is kinda troubling to someone trying to improve graphics or something that doesn't effect gameplay or give advantage. Hopefully it is more accurate. However, there are still people like this who think they were wrongfully accused because they didnt think a cheat engine was a true cheat haha.
User avatar
#31 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
I remember people were getting banned on gta online for performance mods. The smallest mods got them banned.
#34 - unmentorable (11/26/2016) [-]
Any sort of modding for gta online can get you banned. I don't think people should be doing it, regardless of how innocent it may seem. If there is even a tiny window of opportunity for a cheater to bypass the VAC system, they will abuse the shit out of it.
#167 - "Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that wh…  [+] (1 reply) 11/26/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
#38 - I called it. I knew they'd either try to change the votes or t…  [+] (1 reply) 11/26/2016 on Breaking News: Hillary... +1
User avatar
#41 - Toshiro (11/26/2016) [-]
He'd be labeled a racist and xenophobe
#164 - That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it. …  [+] (6 replies) 11/26/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#162 - I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was s…  [+] (8 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#160 - I'm going to call ******** that you intended that in sarcasm. …  [+] (10 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#158 - You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole comm…  [+] (12 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#156 - "Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COM…  [+] (14 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.