when did I ever say only having the intent can destroy one? Neville used the sword of gryffindor to behead Nagini, which was used to kill the Basilisk and used to destroy 2 other horcruxes. Voldemort used the killing curse the only spell known to destroy a horcrux. Even if this theory is incorrect when applied to living beings, it's plausible that, had she been killable with the conventional weapon, the body may have remained a Horcrux. There is nothing to indicate in any way that the V's soul fragment was in any way tethered to the "alive" part of the snake.

If i rip the pages out by hand, it would not be destroyed and only I could rip the pages as I am the creator. In Deathly Hallows the Diadem was cracking, Suggesting it has been damaged, but the horcrux was still intact. If the diadem was split in half one wishing to destroy it would have to get both pieces in order to destroy it. As I said before Harry AND Nagini even are great resources for my theory. Both can be wounded or hurt and even killed, but the horcrux would remain until destroyed by the means you listed.

the diadem was cracking possibly before it was made into a horcrux,

you almost can't count harry and nagini as they are living and heal through time, the only way to destroy the horcrux within them is through death...

and no, destroying with or without the intention of hurting the horcrux is irrelevant, neville killed off nagini without the intention of killing a horcrux, he was only instructed to kill it "whatever it takes" voldemort was used to kill harry the last horcrux without his knowledge that he (harry) was a horcrux and the willingness to kill a horcrux, and please god no you can't rip out the pages with your own hand, it needs real powerful magic or curse to do so unless you are implying that wanking off that much cursed you hands or something.

when did I ever say only having the intent can destroy one? Neville used the sword of gryffindor to behead Nagini, which was used to kill the Basilisk and used to destroy 2 other horcruxes. Voldemort used the killing curse the only spell known to destroy a horcrux. Even if this theory is incorrect when applied to living beings, it's plausible that, had she been killable with the conventional weapon, the body may have remained a Horcrux. There is nothing to indicate in any way that the V's soul fragment was in any way tethered to the "alive" part of the snake.

It can be 0.00% because 600 people in a country most probably inhabited by millions would look more like this. 0.000001%

The number is so insignificant that OP rounded it off to 0.00%

It adds effect.

They work on the secretservices of the North korea. The south has many times acused the North to be hacking in to banks and other goverment properties in the south. Thats wheire i guess where it is.

Anon stop being a fucking chode.

im pointing out at a fair logical point of view...

0 = nothing

from the last time i remembered

It can be 0.00% because 600 people in a country most probably inhabited by millions would look more like this. 0.000001%

maybe the actual figure is 0.003% and they just decided to round it off to 0.00% for dramatic effect. like in math class for example where the professor might want an answer to be rounded to the nearest tenth or hundredth.

I got the same idea too, but if you have at least one person, you can't round it to zero. It doesn't reflect the reality.

THOSE NUMBERS HAVE FEELINGS TOO!!!!!!!!!! SHOW THEM FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!!!!

Two decimal points, rounded downwards.

It is so little, that it is rounded downwards.

The Horcrux is made by tethering a piece of soul to a something.

That tethering is broken when Horcrux is destroyed completely.

The best illustration of that is in the movie, when the diary needs to be stabbed several times by the Basilisk fang in order to completely destroy the soul fragment manifesting itself as Riddle.

It's less obvious but can be fairly clearly inferred from CoS book:

Harry seized the basilisk fang on the floor next to him and plunged it straight into the heart of the book. There was a long, dreadful, piercing scream. Ink spurted out of the diary in torrents, streaming over Harry's hands, flooding the floor. Riddle was writhing and twisting, screaming and flailing and then... He had gone. Harry's wand fell to the floor with a clatter and there was silence

As you can see, it was a process of destruction, not something instantaneous.

Moreover, the fact that the fang was struck "through the heart" of the book may be significant - it's possible that simply ripping one page with a fang or scratching a corner would have done some damage but not destroyed the Horcrux outright.


so my statement is still true.

"best illustration"...and you gave the actual words from the book which ironically contradicts it, all it needed was a stab, poof, dead, no series of hateful stabbing, you do know that the use of "heart of the book" is not literal right?

If i rip the pages out by hand, it would not be destroyed and only I could rip the pages as I am the creator. In Deathly Hallows the Diadem was cracking, Suggesting it has been damaged, but the horcrux was still intact. If the diadem was split in half one wishing to destroy it would have to get both pieces in order to destroy it. As I said before Harry AND Nagini even are great resources for my theory. Both can be wounded or hurt and even killed, but the horcrux would remain until destroyed by the means you listed.

the diadem was cracking possibly before it was made into a horcrux,

you almost can't count harry and nagini as they are living and heal through time, the only way to destroy the horcrux within them is through death...

and no, destroying with or without the intention of hurting the horcrux is irrelevant, neville killed off nagini without the intention of killing a horcrux, he was only instructed to kill it "whatever it takes" voldemort was used to kill harry the last horcrux without his knowledge that he (harry) was a horcrux and the willingness to kill a horcrux, and please god no you can't rip out the pages with your own hand, it needs real powerful magic or curse to do so unless you are implying that wanking off that much cursed you hands or something.

when did I ever say only having the intent can destroy one? Neville used the sword of gryffindor to behead Nagini, which was used to kill the Basilisk and used to destroy 2 other horcruxes. Voldemort used the killing curse the only spell known to destroy a horcrux. Even if this theory is incorrect when applied to living beings, it's plausible that, had she been killable with the conventional weapon, the body may have remained a Horcrux. There is nothing to indicate in any way that the V's soul fragment was in any way tethered to the "alive" part of the snake.

>kill thousands of people (soul ripped to shit)
>put one soulpiece in every page
>....
>profit

too much work

but voldemort has killed 100s

technically in canon he's only killed 16 people personally.

maybe he can make it from a childrens book

if you can write with ink on a horcrux, drink from a horcrux, wear a horcrux, be a horcrux. harry got hurt and cut even lost his bones and voldemort was unaffected. SO infact you CAN. only the owner and creator of a horcrux can fully bend, mend and use the horcrux

horcuxes can only be destroyed by very limited means (let's please exempt harry) , extremely powerful spell, enchanted weapons, cursed things, im not sure what else, using such means to rip away parts of the books can possibly kill the horcrux itself, imagine using any / all of those methods to tear away pages of the book

The Horcrux is made by tethering a piece of soul to a something.

That tethering is broken when Horcrux is destroyed completely.

The best illustration of that is in the movie, when the diary needs to be stabbed several times by the Basilisk fang in order to completely destroy the soul fragment manifesting itself as Riddle.

It's less obvious but can be fairly clearly inferred from CoS book:

Harry seized the basilisk fang on the floor next to him and plunged it straight into the heart of the book. There was a long, dreadful, piercing scream. Ink spurted out of the diary in torrents, streaming over Harry's hands, flooding the floor. Riddle was writhing and twisting, screaming and flailing and then... He had gone. Harry's wand fell to the floor with a clatter and there was silence

As you can see, it was a process of destruction, not something instantaneous.

Moreover, the fact that the fang was struck "through the heart" of the book may be significant - it's possible that simply ripping one page with a fang or scratching a corner would have done some damage but not destroyed the Horcrux outright.


so my statement is still true.

"best illustration"...and you gave the actual words from the book which ironically contradicts it, all it needed was a stab, poof, dead, no series of hateful stabbing, you do know that the use of "heart of the book" is not literal right?

If i rip the pages out by hand, it would not be destroyed and only I could rip the pages as I am the creator. In Deathly Hallows the Diadem was cracking, Suggesting it has been damaged, but the horcrux was still intact. If the diadem was split in half one wishing to destroy it would have to get both pieces in order to destroy it. As I said before Harry AND Nagini even are great resources for my theory. Both can be wounded or hurt and even killed, but the horcrux would remain until destroyed by the means you listed.

the diadem was cracking possibly before it was made into a horcrux,

you almost can't count harry and nagini as they are living and heal through time, the only way to destroy the horcrux within them is through death...

and no, destroying with or without the intention of hurting the horcrux is irrelevant, neville killed off nagini without the intention of killing a horcrux, he was only instructed to kill it "whatever it takes" voldemort was used to kill harry the last horcrux without his knowledge that he (harry) was a horcrux and the willingness to kill a horcrux, and please god no you can't rip out the pages with your own hand, it needs real powerful magic or curse to do so unless you are implying that wanking off that much cursed you hands or something.

when did I ever say only having the intent can destroy one? Neville used the sword of gryffindor to behead Nagini, which was used to kill the Basilisk and used to destroy 2 other horcruxes. Voldemort used the killing curse the only spell known to destroy a horcrux. Even if this theory is incorrect when applied to living beings, it's plausible that, had she been killable with the conventional weapon, the body may have remained a Horcrux. There is nothing to indicate in any way that the V's soul fragment was in any way tethered to the "alive" part of the snake.

>kill thousands of people (soul ripped to shit)
>put one soulpiece in every page
>....
>profit

too much work

but voldemort has killed 100s

technically in canon he's only killed 16 people personally.

maybe he can make it from a childrens book

True.

I dunno last time i got a text book from school some asshole had drawn dicks all over every page "both sides" and it made the book very hard to read so i had to erase them to read it.

the book is not vandalized or anything and the eraser is barely touched which suggests it's not been used....

You and your hirsute fettish.

Yeah, it's more like 50 idiots.

34 is if you can think of it, there's porn of it.

63 is if you can think of someone, there is a gender-swapped version of it.

im thinking of you right now though...

You and your hirsute fettish.

you can only get one notification from a comment.
weapsycho
weapsycho
weapsycho

my bad...but still if someone corrects another for using grammer that should have counted him out of the 101 idiots...

Yeah, it's more like 50 idiots.