Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

wafflecopper

wafflecopper Avatar Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to wafflecopper Block wafflecopper Invite wafflecopper to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/31/2010
Last Login:7/27/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 3088 total,  3817 ,  729
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 86% (86/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:712
FJ Points:3062

latest user's comments

#103 - I cant feel any pity Would rather be a hyper talented… 07/27/2013 on That Feel +1
#389 - now We have just descended to calling the other wrong …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/27/2013 on Evolution 0
User avatar #390 - YllekNayr (07/28/2013) [-]
You are lost.
#107 - That glorious moment when you realize the same company owns bo… 07/22/2013 on Ya, woman have it tough +2
#70 - what is this fellow from? I've have seen him a great deal.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/22/2013 on Rather accurate. Thanks japan 0
#189 - kaoknight has deleted their comment.
User avatar #185 - menqudoneix (07/22/2013) [-]
kind of looks like the boondocks-style animation
#387 - And yet you give mine no reasonable court. You only assume min…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/22/2013 on Evolution 0
User avatar #388 - YllekNayr (07/22/2013) [-]
Well that might be the case, yes, but my argument stands as valid even if I am incorrect. Yours will not.
User avatar #389 - wafflecopper (07/27/2013) [-]
now We have just descended to calling the other wrong

You still continue t ignore Hitler's beliefs, and the correct scientific corrections oft he bible, whilst holding the biggoted opinion that you are correct even if you are not correct.
User avatar #390 - YllekNayr (07/28/2013) [-]
You are lost.
#385 - Your point of view assumes one to be absolutely incorrect whil…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/17/2013 on Evolution 0
User avatar #386 - YllekNayr (07/17/2013) [-]
Or a matter of reasonable doubt and probability.
User avatar #387 - wafflecopper (07/22/2013) [-]
And yet you give mine no reasonable court. You only assume mine to be wrong off the bat, insulting and assuming.
User avatar #388 - YllekNayr (07/22/2013) [-]
Well that might be the case, yes, but my argument stands as valid even if I am incorrect. Yours will not.
User avatar #389 - wafflecopper (07/27/2013) [-]
now We have just descended to calling the other wrong

You still continue t ignore Hitler's beliefs, and the correct scientific corrections oft he bible, whilst holding the biggoted opinion that you are correct even if you are not correct.
User avatar #390 - YllekNayr (07/28/2013) [-]
You are lost.
#382 - This is just a matter of perspective then.  [+] (7 new replies) 07/16/2013 on Evolution 0
User avatar #383 - YllekNayr (07/16/2013) [-]
No, it's a matter of egocentricism vs reality. You perceive everything your your religious lens where you understand that your religion is the one true religion, and everything that passes through that lens gets biased and warped to fit that conclusion.
User avatar #385 - wafflecopper (07/17/2013) [-]
Your point of view assumes one to be absolutely incorrect whilst the other is correct. Assuming I am correct than it was as was stated. Assuming you are correct, than it is as what you stated. Since neither is proven beyond a doubt it therefore becomes a matter of perspective.
User avatar #386 - YllekNayr (07/17/2013) [-]
Or a matter of reasonable doubt and probability.
User avatar #387 - wafflecopper (07/22/2013) [-]
And yet you give mine no reasonable court. You only assume mine to be wrong off the bat, insulting and assuming.
User avatar #388 - YllekNayr (07/22/2013) [-]
Well that might be the case, yes, but my argument stands as valid even if I am incorrect. Yours will not.
User avatar #389 - wafflecopper (07/27/2013) [-]
now We have just descended to calling the other wrong

You still continue t ignore Hitler's beliefs, and the correct scientific corrections oft he bible, whilst holding the biggoted opinion that you are correct even if you are not correct.
User avatar #390 - YllekNayr (07/28/2013) [-]
You are lost.
#381 - Well that gets places. You are literally just saying I'm wrong…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/16/2013 on Evolution 0
User avatar #384 - YllekNayr (07/16/2013) [-]
I've spent enough time doing that to realize it's fruitless.
#2 - In pollandball comics the English is purposefully awful … 07/15/2013 on Dirty Countries +1
#378 - Actually it does in the form of no adultery (rape is considere… 07/15/2013 on Evolution -1

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #12 - YllekNayr (07/04/2013) [-]
That still leaves every other non-christian denomination out there to contend with. Thousands of religions over the course of milennia, and you still say, "Well atheism has the least chance." Atheism doesn't believe there's ANY chance, and that difference in chance between atheism and christian sects, compared with all the religions the world has ever had, and ever WILL have, is so small of an amount, you can't possibly think that will convince anyone.

You said absolute morals decrease crime, and yet sharia law IS absolute morals. Then you go to say "well, not those. They have to be THESE morals." So it's not a matter of absolute morals. It's a matter of YOUR morals.
User avatar #13 to #12 - wafflecopper (07/05/2013) [-]
Of course that is what I always meant about absolute values, do I really have to specify every time? Sharia is bad, atheism is bad, satanism is bad, Hinduism is bad, etc. There have been several religions over the course of existence, but only a few of them have any much of a following, and atheism still loses, in every single scenario. The chance isn't that incredibly small, Christianity has been the most popular religion for a long time, and it still is.

Regardless, historically, every single atheist country with power has committed horrible acts that rival, (and in some cases far surpass) Hitler. Bar none.
User avatar #14 to #13 - YllekNayr (07/05/2013) [-]
Right. "Almost every other religion is bad"

That's not a baised outlook at all. This isn't even about atheism. This is you saying "MY way of thinking is the only thing preventing the world's societies from collapsing."

And it's incredibly arrogant, and just flat out wrong. Humanity got along fine without Christianity before it existed, and it will get along fine without once it is eventually forgotten like the egyptian gods of old.
User avatar #15 to #14 - wafflecopper (07/06/2013) [-]
Every other religion is bad, elsewise you would partake in every other religion.

Morality is the only thing keeping the world from collapsing. Morality is only valid assuming there is objective morality.

If you can call pagan ceremonies "fine". I fear the world will not do well once objective morality is lost, historically it never has.
User avatar #16 to #15 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
Historically we've never lost our morality, and we never needed "objective morality".

I'm glad I was able to get t the heart of the issue. This isn't a conversation about the effects of atheism. This isn't even a conversation of absolute morality. It's apologetics for your religion, and circular fallacies about why your religion is superior to all others. If you could consider for a moment that your religion could be wrong, we could get somewhere and actually have a conversation.

But you can't.

So this is pointless.
User avatar #17 to #16 - wafflecopper (07/07/2013) [-]
The essence of apologetics is considering that your religion may be wrong.

Its funny because christian apologists recognize that they are the poorest Christians. I can of course consider that my religion is wrong, elsewise I wouldn't care to debate.
User avatar #18 to #17 - YllekNayr (07/07/2013) [-]
You say that here, but the rest of your words say otherwise, considering much of your argument hinges on already being correct, rather than the validity of your actual statements.
User avatar #19 to #18 - wafflecopper (07/08/2013) [-]
The apologist considers that he is wrong, which is why he thinks about it at all, as opposed to just accepting life as it goes.
Of course I imagine my points to be correct, elsewise I wouldn't care to debate because it would be meaningless because there is no point to existing without a God.
User avatar #20 to #19 - YllekNayr (07/09/2013) [-]
Well that's very nihilisitc. And a good debater can debate a point objectively without needing to attach himself to it. Saying you believe it's true because you debate it means nothing but you hold a bias.
#4 - neutrino (03/08/2013) [-]
Looking through your comments (particularly those posted in religious debates), I must say that, although we disagree on several points, you have come to earn my intellectual respect.
This will inevitably sound self-important (and it is -- I'm an arrogant person), but that's hard to do.
Anyway, keep being awesome.
#1 - Natelawl (06/25/2012) [-]
you're welcome hahahha :p
you're welcome hahahha :p
#3 to #2 - sealofapproval (09/08/2012) [-]
just went through that thread again goddamn is it brilliant
just went through that thread again goddamn is it brilliant
 Friends (0)