Ah, didn't quite grasp the situation, then. I thought it was from some movie or another. I can definitely see a bit more annoyance with a show.

At this point that's your fault, not anyone else's.

But after a few years have passed, it can stop being expected for things to be put under spoiler.

You don't see people talking about older films very often, so the likelihood of running across spoilers of them is pretty low compared to a show, like The Flash, that came out, I think, two years ago. And it doesn't help that it's an ongoing television show either. Plot points about season three get spoiled when you're just half-way through season one. At least with a movie, assuming it's not apart of a series, is it's own contained story, and you don't really have to invest a lot of time into it; whereas with a aT.V. show you have to invest HOURS, and if someone comes along just to spoil something, keep in mind this is an ongoing show, not one that's finished, or a movie, you feel like you've been cheated of experiencing that reveal for yourself. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because the spoiler isn't to far into the show.

Ah, didn't quite grasp the situation, then. I thought it was from some movie or another. I can definitely see a bit more annoyance with a show.

This.


The fucking media and people would have a field day.

Protip: No matter what you do as president, everyone will tell you you're wrong.

I don't have the video but basically it's a regular commercial and it ends- but then it jumps back to the two people enjoying coffee's parents walking in and having an argument then turning into a person's worst nightmare because the 2 loving people are actually brother and sister. It's a shitty run-down about it but that's basically the jist of it.

"perfect system of self driving"
self driving cars aren't perfect, if they were though than navigation fuck up wouldn't be a problem.
The main problem with self driving cars are ethics. should it kill one human and save three or kill one human and save one.

shit, forgot to log in

>implying thumbs have any value or meaning
>implying

yeah, I just don't like anons. always makes me think someone was too cowardly to log in or is samefagging. I guess since both comments are at 0 it doesn't matter either way

Watched the video, previous statement redacted.

I made a mistake, I meant kill 1 save 3 or kill 3 save 1
but still the point stands, even my former comment: whose life is more important? who is to blame in a crash?

I think this video sums it up nicely.

Honestly, it should always go for the option that will cause the least amount of casualties, no matter the situation or reasoning.

Sure, some situations will be fucked up because of this, but at least more people will be alive because of it.