Because it's much easier to aim and fire one projectile weapon than it is to aim and fire two. Pistols are hard to shoot one-handed. And, again, your wand will never run out of ammo.

Have you ever fired a gun? They're loud, and they have recoil, and bullets travel very linear paths. If you're not aiming, you're likely missing, unless you're like five feet away. Then, add in the complication of a moving target who does not want to get shot or can simply deflect your bullets by yelling some fake-ass Latin. There's a reason gunmen aim for center mass, to reduce the chances of missing.

And, by the same token as your question, what is a gunman without a gun? A wizard without a wand still has magical items that may protect them or function as weapons.

If you've played D&D then you know that a wizard could easily cast Armor, Shield, Stoneskin, and countless other defensive spells to protect themselves from guns. And, spending feats on firearm proficiency might not be a bad idea, but that takes away from feats spent on metamagic or focusing on a particular school.

It's definitely a neat archetype, but it just isn't terribly plausible in the HP universe.
Depends on the D&D in question. 4E, Pathfinder, and 5E have lower-level spells that don't run out. Also, in 3E and Pathfinder, you've got wands with 50 charges, or staves you can repeatedly recharge by casting spells into them.

HP wizards have wands that can shoot death rays with unlimited ammo. Why the hell would they need guns?

Because it's much easier to aim and fire one projectile weapon than it is to aim and fire two. Pistols are hard to shoot one-handed. And, again, your wand will never run out of ammo.

Have you ever fired a gun? They're loud, and they have recoil, and bullets travel very linear paths. If you're not aiming, you're likely missing, unless you're like five feet away. Then, add in the complication of a moving target who does not want to get shot or can simply deflect your bullets by yelling some fake-ass Latin. There's a reason gunmen aim for center mass, to reduce the chances of missing.

And, by the same token as your question, what is a gunman without a gun? A wizard without a wand still has magical items that may protect them or function as weapons.

If you've played D&D then you know that a wizard could easily cast Armor, Shield, Stoneskin, and countless other defensive spells to protect themselves from guns. And, spending feats on firearm proficiency might not be a bad idea, but that takes away from feats spent on metamagic or focusing on a particular school.

It's definitely a neat archetype, but it just isn't terribly plausible in the HP universe.
Depends on the D&D in question. 4E, Pathfinder, and 5E have lower-level spells that don't run out. Also, in 3E and Pathfinder, you've got wands with 50 charges, or staves you can repeatedly recharge by casting spells into them.

Yeah, but you'd either have to be a wizard, or a muggle who knows a lot about magic, in order to develop anti-magic bullets. The HP universe keeps magic secret, so I doubt there's a muggle who knows enough, and if you're a wizard you don't NEED bullets. So, a guy like Emiya just doesn't really fit.

HP wizards have wands that can shoot death rays with unlimited ammo. Why the hell would they need guns?

Because it's much easier to aim and fire one projectile weapon than it is to aim and fire two. Pistols are hard to shoot one-handed. And, again, your wand will never run out of ammo.

Have you ever fired a gun? They're loud, and they have recoil, and bullets travel very linear paths. If you're not aiming, you're likely missing, unless you're like five feet away. Then, add in the complication of a moving target who does not want to get shot or can simply deflect your bullets by yelling some fake-ass Latin. There's a reason gunmen aim for center mass, to reduce the chances of missing.

And, by the same token as your question, what is a gunman without a gun? A wizard without a wand still has magical items that may protect them or function as weapons.

If you've played D&D then you know that a wizard could easily cast Armor, Shield, Stoneskin, and countless other defensive spells to protect themselves from guns. And, spending feats on firearm proficiency might not be a bad idea, but that takes away from feats spent on metamagic or focusing on a particular school.

It's definitely a neat archetype, but it just isn't terribly plausible in the HP universe.
Depends on the D&D in question. 4E, Pathfinder, and 5E have lower-level spells that don't run out. Also, in 3E and Pathfinder, you've got wands with 50 charges, or staves you can repeatedly recharge by casting spells into them.

Magical shield spells that last a long time.
Contingency spells.
And, again, bullet-proof enchanted clothing.

Yeah, but you'd either have to be a wizard, or a muggle who knows a lot about magic, in order to develop anti-magic bullets. The HP universe keeps magic secret, so I doubt there's a muggle who knows enough, and if you're a wizard you don't NEED bullets. So, a guy like Emiya just doesn't really fit.

HP wizards have wands that can shoot death rays with unlimited ammo. Why the hell would they need guns?

Because it's much easier to aim and fire one projectile weapon than it is to aim and fire two. Pistols are hard to shoot one-handed. And, again, your wand will never run out of ammo.

Have you ever fired a gun? They're loud, and they have recoil, and bullets travel very linear paths. If you're not aiming, you're likely missing, unless you're like five feet away. Then, add in the complication of a moving target who does not want to get shot or can simply deflect your bullets by yelling some fake-ass Latin. There's a reason gunmen aim for center mass, to reduce the chances of missing.

And, by the same token as your question, what is a gunman without a gun? A wizard without a wand still has magical items that may protect them or function as weapons.

If you've played D&D then you know that a wizard could easily cast Armor, Shield, Stoneskin, and countless other defensive spells to protect themselves from guns. And, spending feats on firearm proficiency might not be a bad idea, but that takes away from feats spent on metamagic or focusing on a particular school.

It's definitely a neat archetype, but it just isn't terribly plausible in the HP universe.
Depends on the D&D in question. 4E, Pathfinder, and 5E have lower-level spells that don't run out. Also, in 3E and Pathfinder, you've got wands with 50 charges, or staves you can repeatedly recharge by casting spells into them.

Nah, man. Magical shield spells and bullet-proof robe enchantments and such.

Magical shield spells that last a long time.
Contingency spells.
And, again, bullet-proof enchanted clothing.

Yeah, but you'd either have to be a wizard, or a muggle who knows a lot about magic, in order to develop anti-magic bullets. The HP universe keeps magic secret, so I doubt there's a muggle who knows enough, and if you're a wizard you don't NEED bullets. So, a guy like Emiya just doesn't really fit.

HP wizards have wands that can shoot death rays with unlimited ammo. Why the hell would they need guns?

Because it's much easier to aim and fire one projectile weapon than it is to aim and fire two. Pistols are hard to shoot one-handed. And, again, your wand will never run out of ammo.

Have you ever fired a gun? They're loud, and they have recoil, and bullets travel very linear paths. If you're not aiming, you're likely missing, unless you're like five feet away. Then, add in the complication of a moving target who does not want to get shot or can simply deflect your bullets by yelling some fake-ass Latin. There's a reason gunmen aim for center mass, to reduce the chances of missing.

And, by the same token as your question, what is a gunman without a gun? A wizard without a wand still has magical items that may protect them or function as weapons.

If you've played D&D then you know that a wizard could easily cast Armor, Shield, Stoneskin, and countless other defensive spells to protect themselves from guns. And, spending feats on firearm proficiency might not be a bad idea, but that takes away from feats spent on metamagic or focusing on a particular school.

It's definitely a neat archetype, but it just isn't terribly plausible in the HP universe.
Depends on the D&D in question. 4E, Pathfinder, and 5E have lower-level spells that don't run out. Also, in 3E and Pathfinder, you've got wands with 50 charges, or staves you can repeatedly recharge by casting spells into them.

Vodka solves all problems.

Vodka solves all problems.

I have several questions
1. Why is this a gif and not a picture
2. Why isn't it automatically converted into a video?

Vodka solves all problems.

It looks like a car's differential made out of zen magnets

Still looks pretty cool

Guess you noticed my profile pic letriggs?

no I'm currently drunk and replied to the wrong comment

at the same time british muffafucking waffle sare awesome

More like don't stand

I'd rather drift around on a mobility scooter and die violently then have to walk that slowly.

It looks like a car's differential made out of zen magnets

Still looks pretty cool

Guess you noticed my profile pic letriggs?

no I'm currently drunk and replied to the wrong comment

at the same time british muffafucking waffle sare awesome

"You wanna heist ? I've got mask down here. And drills."