no no no...that's a bratwurst.

No shit, Watson

Yeah that's a real numbersystem mainly used in computer science
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octal

goddamn it i wish i tought of it before the other guy kidding ofcourse.

Mine is the top left corner.

That girl in the picture is totally obese dude.

I'm pretty sure I understand you. But that doesn't matter. It's okay too look like that mannequin. It's better to be okay with your own body rather than trying to improve it all the time. A little fat isn't bad for you, and someone with that body is a perfectly healthy woman.
It's good to have muscles but we're not hunter/gatherers any more, and we don't really need to look like them.
Again, the idea is not to make people think it's okay to be fat. Just that it's okay to be normal, because most people aren't as thin as those ridiculous old mannequins.

No, not anymore.
What, are you seriously saying that gays don't exist?
...

As uncivilized ... animals, it was ideal to have a fat woman because she could keep herself warm, she could feed the baby with plenty of milk and so on.
Since they don't hunt.

Why do you think females gain fat easier than men? Because they naturally needed that.

you know what. im not ever going to win this seeing people just get offended.
No i dont say gays dont exist

im saying

there are already lots of obese people, dont deny it doenst have health risks.
if we make it oke to be a bit fatter, more and more people will get fat and that is not a good thing

im not saying, hey lets put fat people in a concentrationcamp. not at all.
im just saying that we shouldnt change the view of whats ideal to whats realistic.

That girl in the picture is totally obese dude.

But that mannequin isn't fat. It's just realistic, that's the whole point. They're not trying to tell people to be fat, they're saying that it's okay to look normal and not like a skeleton.

you're still not getting what were trying to say
people already, the most extream case is the US, are very abstract to , what is the "perfect body"
im not saying the bodytype of the mannequin is fat. it is fatter than the regulair ones

is world peace realistic?
no.
should we strave for it.
YES!
see what im saying
having a perfeclty healthy body is not having to much acces fat. is having actual fucking muscle define your body structre instead of fat.
we already underachieve and are oke with it, if we lower the bar we wil still have the same but then even worse
idk how to explain to you that you're trying to get people to play easy mode when they should move towards whats harder to get.

I'm pretty sure I understand you. But that doesn't matter. It's okay too look like that mannequin. It's better to be okay with your own body rather than trying to improve it all the time. A little fat isn't bad for you, and someone with that body is a perfectly healthy woman.
It's good to have muscles but we're not hunter/gatherers any more, and we don't really need to look like them.
Again, the idea is not to make people think it's okay to be fat. Just that it's okay to be normal, because most people aren't as thin as those ridiculous old mannequins.

You only have to exercise for about 20 minutes a day to stay healthy and fit*, and most people get that from just being awake and doing daily stuff. Two hours a day is overkill and would weaken most people since their bodies can't build enough muscle.

*you can't gorge on sweets and shit but you can still eat quite a lot of stuff.

Well, that body is pretty healthy.
I mean, it's just your point of view of what is the ideal body.
Some people like that body type better than the skinny one.

It's really hard to determine what's the ideal body.
I mean, the ideal body ages ago was being fat because that was a sign of wealth.
Today, we can't judge from that kind of angle.

well. no.. actually it isnt
i dont mean any offence but you're wrong
see, we still are but human.
and still get unconcient stimulans from certain body parts of a women.
we want a bit wider hips because that was what could bare our child better.
we want bigger breasts because thats what would nurse the childe better.
we want thigter body parts cause thats better trained, and preforms better. it is what would make it survive better in nature.
thats what makes us like alll dat
im not saying that we wouldnt like to bone a fat chick.
but in the end, what makes awomen attrective is what is left from our days as uncivilized ... animals.

No, not anymore.
What, are you seriously saying that gays don't exist?
...

As uncivilized ... animals, it was ideal to have a fat woman because she could keep herself warm, she could feed the baby with plenty of milk and so on.
Since they don't hunt.

Why do you think females gain fat easier than men? Because they naturally needed that.

you know what. im not ever going to win this seeing people just get offended.
No i dont say gays dont exist

im saying

there are already lots of obese people, dont deny it doenst have health risks.
if we make it oke to be a bit fatter, more and more people will get fat and that is not a good thing

im not saying, hey lets put fat people in a concentrationcamp. not at all.
im just saying that we shouldnt change the view of whats ideal to whats realistic.

That girl in the picture is totally obese dude.

'The ideal'? Have you ever actually seen most mannequins? I've worked in several clothing stores, and so have quite a few pals. The mannequins average about a UK size 6 in most, less in some others. Very few I have seen have larger.

A UK size 6 is VERY small. That's not 'ideal', nor would it be perfectly healthy for most women. The mannequin pictured looks about a 12, a size that unless you are very, very short is usually a healthy one.

Some women like very skinny women, most I know like something in the middle. That would be about a UK 10 or 12.

I'm a female, and I work out for an hour to an hour and a half 6 days a week (don't have time to workout anymore than that. I've got bills to pay and college courses to pass, after all), and I don't eat any more than 1300 calories a day. I'm 5'5 and 120 pounds...and I will never, ever look like a mannequin. Ever. When I was anorexic and 75 pounds several years ago, my thighs still touched and I still had broader shoulders than a mannequin. Why? Because thats how I'm built. It is my bone structure.

And if youre going to argue your point with "science," (which you are, by stating that all men want wider hips, bigger boobs, blah blah blah), you might want to do your research a little bit better. The average mannequin represents the body of a woman who is underweight. What happens when a women is underweight? She loses her period and therefore her ability to bear children. And she loses it because she "exercises more than 2 hours a day and doesn't eat much." Therefore, those mannequins don't represent a man's "ideal women." Also, small boobs nurse children just as well as big boobs. Dumbass.

Well, because people want to wear realistic things.
I mean, who would want to wear something two sizes too small or too big?
It's not that comfortable.

i didnt talk about not selling the other sizes.
what i meant was
the mannequens have the "perfect body"
what (most) men prefer in a womens body, what i still think women are suposed to strave towards. the healthy body that gets more then 2 hours of exersize a day and doesnt eat to much.
beeing nice is oke, but there is something to strave towards, and its not easy to achieve. but lowering the bar is not a solution.

You only have to exercise for about 20 minutes a day to stay healthy and fit*, and most people get that from just being awake and doing daily stuff. Two hours a day is overkill and would weaken most people since their bodies can't build enough muscle.

*you can't gorge on sweets and shit but you can still eat quite a lot of stuff.

Well, that body is pretty healthy.
I mean, it's just your point of view of what is the ideal body.
Some people like that body type better than the skinny one.

It's really hard to determine what's the ideal body.
I mean, the ideal body ages ago was being fat because that was a sign of wealth.
Today, we can't judge from that kind of angle.

well. no.. actually it isnt
i dont mean any offence but you're wrong
see, we still are but human.
and still get unconcient stimulans from certain body parts of a women.
we want a bit wider hips because that was what could bare our child better.
we want bigger breasts because thats what would nurse the childe better.
we want thigter body parts cause thats better trained, and preforms better. it is what would make it survive better in nature.
thats what makes us like alll dat
im not saying that we wouldnt like to bone a fat chick.
but in the end, what makes awomen attrective is what is left from our days as uncivilized ... animals.

No, not anymore.
What, are you seriously saying that gays don't exist?
...

As uncivilized ... animals, it was ideal to have a fat woman because she could keep herself warm, she could feed the baby with plenty of milk and so on.
Since they don't hunt.

Why do you think females gain fat easier than men? Because they naturally needed that.

you know what. im not ever going to win this seeing people just get offended.
No i dont say gays dont exist

im saying

there are already lots of obese people, dont deny it doenst have health risks.
if we make it oke to be a bit fatter, more and more people will get fat and that is not a good thing

im not saying, hey lets put fat people in a concentrationcamp. not at all.
im just saying that we shouldnt change the view of whats ideal to whats realistic.

That girl in the picture is totally obese dude.

wich becomes a fact as soon as we accept it.