Yes lets kill all the children, kill the children for giving them weapons.

Plus campaign funding is practically money for ads, it has little to no effect on whether they get elected or not.

"favored" I just said that they were the safer option, in no way did I say I liked them as candidates

Except lobbyists go to congress, not the president.
The president only controls the execution of law, and can only "advise" congress on what's written.

You do know that your favored politicians such as Jeb and Bernie are paid for by their donors, the same people that the lobbyists come from.

Plus campaign funding is practically money for ads, it has little to no effect on whether they get elected or not.

"favored" I just said that they were the safer option, in no way did I say I liked them as candidates

Well just leads to a conflict of interests. Can we trust him to choose public interests over those of his businesses? Every decision would be a question of "what does he gain from this?"

lets take what you said and re-apply it: if he say, lowered the tax rate for businesses with factories of over 1,000 workers, and then moved them all to America, he will have successfully done something great for his business while also bringing jobs to America and helping out people. Owning all these big companies he knows what it'll take to fix the system so they bring more factories here.

Escept the president doesn't control taxation, congress does.

*except

republican controlled house +trump = lower taxes

So basically every single politician that has been voted in the past 50 years.

At least we won't have to deal with Trump following what the lobbyists say, since he's funding his own campaign with his own money.

Except lobbyists go to congress, not the president.
The president only controls the execution of law, and can only "advise" congress on what's written.

You do know that your favored politicians such as Jeb and Bernie are paid for by their donors, the same people that the lobbyists come from.

Plus campaign funding is practically money for ads, it has little to no effect on whether they get elected or not.

"favored" I just said that they were the safer option, in no way did I say I liked them as candidates