Upload
Login or register

vaginalentry

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:12/16/2010
Last Login:12/05/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#4048
Highest Content Rank:#6522
Highest Comment Rank:#4049
Content Thumbs: 460 total,  561 ,  101
Comment Thumbs: 2008 total,  2337 ,  329
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 46 Content: Sammich eater → Level 47 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:2
Content Views:29216
Times Content Favorited:17 times
Total Comments Made:851
FJ Points:2459
Favorite Tags: game (4) | the (4) | other (2)

latest user's comments

#215 - No what I am saying is the majority of the population should d…  [+] (10 replies) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important 0
#219 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
When you have a country as big as the united states a classic true democracy doesn't work. It just doesn't. The people get more and more divided. You are not acknowledging the fact that entire areas of the country will be ignored because they don't have enough voters to matter.
User avatar
#221 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
why do you think that because a president is elected by a majority, that they are going to completely ignote the "minority" (in a pres election its still like 48% of the country mind you)
#226 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Okay so a President makes promises to get votes. He (or she) has values that influences people to vote for them. If a candidate wants to get elected then they have to appease the voters. Now if certain areas have large populations in small areas then they make promises or say their values are values that are important to those people. Now they spend their term doing the things they said they were going to, or they don't. If they don't they might not get re-elected. So if more of the population is in denser areas and all hold the same values. It's just basic knowledge that candidates will always gravitate towards those areas to get their votes because there are more people. Which means those values will naturally become more and more pronounced as more and more people get elected because of those views. Now the rest of the country feels aggrieved because no matter what they do their views don't get addressed.
User avatar
#231 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
Not only that, but the college makes it so that if you vote for someone who isn't highly liked in your state your vote will count for literally nothing. Like right now i'm in CO if i voted for trump my vote would literally mean fuck all because the majority of my state wanted hillary so she got all of the votes for my state
User avatar
#228 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
You keep speaking as if the other part of the country is so much more important, but they are still half of the population, why should the half that live in less dense areas get more of a say than the half that live in dense areas?
#234 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
They aren't MORE important but they are JUST as important. Because if a candidate can campaign in 11 states, and win those 11 states they would be guaranteed the win. Why would somebody choose to expend the energy to campaign in 30+ states when they can choose 11 and guarantee the win. While yes the grey area is the other 50% of the population you also have to remember that the blue isn't for FULL states it is only for counties, so if a candidate is campaigning in one of those states and wins the majority in just one more county than showed. They become president.
User avatar
#239 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
They are more important, what do you not understand about that there is like highschool math able to explain that, And it should be that way, just because there are more people in 11 states doesn't mean that because they campaign there they are going to get all their votes, they still have to invest in the other ares they cant just ignore half the population because no sane adviser or candidate is going to assume they will win every single vote in a certain area
#242 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
but they don't HAVE to win every vote. I'm not going to be bother to do the math but if it was a pure democracy if you win most of the votes in a few states you win the election. And that's simply how it is.

"The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities. Candidates might ignore a small minority in a national election. But groups concentrated in specific areas can have a significant influence in those states. By forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice."

"The Electoral College forces candidates to pay attention to all voters. They can’t just focus on a few big cities. They have to win entire states, and lots of ‘em."

that's why it's important. because entire demographics of people would be totally ignored because they don't have enough people to influence an election. and that is a complete fact. If you are trying to dispute that then you're a fucking mentalist. ALSO voter fraud is more destructive in a "true" democracy. It just doesn't work. Countless civilizations have fallen because of the division that a true democracy creates between different demographics of people. I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to somebody who has brain damage any more. Have fun with the electoral college its here to stay because an amendment can only be passed on the constitution with the support of the small states that you are so desperate to silence.
User avatar
#241 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
thats what im trying to say, the electoral college makes these votes more important than others because they live in a more spread out area and that is just flat out unfair to the other half of the population. On top of that it skews votes on a state by state basis, and forces a two party system in which only two main parties ever have a chance because no college member is ever going to vote 3rd party
User avatar
#218 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
It's not like the president is going to make decisions that just completely disregard the half of the population that isnt living in these dense areas, its just shifting the votes into the power of individual people and not based off of population desnity
#211 - HOLY **** yes they do, If i am from california because of the …  [+] (13 replies) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important 0
#214 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
So you're saying that a couple counties of California should decide on the leader for the entire nation, yea that makes sense. If that was the way things worked then the whole country would be upset except for specific counties of specific states. There is no reason why entire states of people should be ignored because of a few dense areas voted against them.
User avatar
#215 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
No what I am saying is the majority of the population should decide the president, like an actual fucking democracy, who gives a shit if they are living in the same area the point of a democracy is everyone has the same say not some people have more of a say because they live in a less densely populated area
#219 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
When you have a country as big as the united states a classic true democracy doesn't work. It just doesn't. The people get more and more divided. You are not acknowledging the fact that entire areas of the country will be ignored because they don't have enough voters to matter.
User avatar
#221 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
why do you think that because a president is elected by a majority, that they are going to completely ignote the "minority" (in a pres election its still like 48% of the country mind you)
#226 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Okay so a President makes promises to get votes. He (or she) has values that influences people to vote for them. If a candidate wants to get elected then they have to appease the voters. Now if certain areas have large populations in small areas then they make promises or say their values are values that are important to those people. Now they spend their term doing the things they said they were going to, or they don't. If they don't they might not get re-elected. So if more of the population is in denser areas and all hold the same values. It's just basic knowledge that candidates will always gravitate towards those areas to get their votes because there are more people. Which means those values will naturally become more and more pronounced as more and more people get elected because of those views. Now the rest of the country feels aggrieved because no matter what they do their views don't get addressed.
User avatar
#231 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
Not only that, but the college makes it so that if you vote for someone who isn't highly liked in your state your vote will count for literally nothing. Like right now i'm in CO if i voted for trump my vote would literally mean fuck all because the majority of my state wanted hillary so she got all of the votes for my state
User avatar
#228 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
You keep speaking as if the other part of the country is so much more important, but they are still half of the population, why should the half that live in less dense areas get more of a say than the half that live in dense areas?
#234 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
They aren't MORE important but they are JUST as important. Because if a candidate can campaign in 11 states, and win those 11 states they would be guaranteed the win. Why would somebody choose to expend the energy to campaign in 30+ states when they can choose 11 and guarantee the win. While yes the grey area is the other 50% of the population you also have to remember that the blue isn't for FULL states it is only for counties, so if a candidate is campaigning in one of those states and wins the majority in just one more county than showed. They become president.
User avatar
#239 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
They are more important, what do you not understand about that there is like highschool math able to explain that, And it should be that way, just because there are more people in 11 states doesn't mean that because they campaign there they are going to get all their votes, they still have to invest in the other ares they cant just ignore half the population because no sane adviser or candidate is going to assume they will win every single vote in a certain area
#242 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
but they don't HAVE to win every vote. I'm not going to be bother to do the math but if it was a pure democracy if you win most of the votes in a few states you win the election. And that's simply how it is.

"The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities. Candidates might ignore a small minority in a national election. But groups concentrated in specific areas can have a significant influence in those states. By forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice."

"The Electoral College forces candidates to pay attention to all voters. They can’t just focus on a few big cities. They have to win entire states, and lots of ‘em."

that's why it's important. because entire demographics of people would be totally ignored because they don't have enough people to influence an election. and that is a complete fact. If you are trying to dispute that then you're a fucking mentalist. ALSO voter fraud is more destructive in a "true" democracy. It just doesn't work. Countless civilizations have fallen because of the division that a true democracy creates between different demographics of people. I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to somebody who has brain damage any more. Have fun with the electoral college its here to stay because an amendment can only be passed on the constitution with the support of the small states that you are so desperate to silence.
User avatar
#241 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
thats what im trying to say, the electoral college makes these votes more important than others because they live in a more spread out area and that is just flat out unfair to the other half of the population. On top of that it skews votes on a state by state basis, and forces a two party system in which only two main parties ever have a chance because no college member is ever going to vote 3rd party
User avatar
#218 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
It's not like the president is going to make decisions that just completely disregard the half of the population that isnt living in these dense areas, its just shifting the votes into the power of individual people and not based off of population desnity
User avatar
#212 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
If the electoral college had one vote per ever so many people it would be even but its not at all, if it were california would have like 90 electoral college votes
#208 - That still isn't justification for certain parts of the popula…  [+] (17 replies) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important 0
#210 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
You are misunderstanding, they don't have a LARGER say they have an EQUAL say. It doesn't place bigger states with less population above smaller states with more population, it places them on equal ground.
User avatar
#211 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
HOLY SHIT yes they do, If i am from california because of the immense population there are way more people per electoral college vote, so if my one vote barely influences one vote why should someone elses have a larger impact on one vote
#214 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
So you're saying that a couple counties of California should decide on the leader for the entire nation, yea that makes sense. If that was the way things worked then the whole country would be upset except for specific counties of specific states. There is no reason why entire states of people should be ignored because of a few dense areas voted against them.
User avatar
#215 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
No what I am saying is the majority of the population should decide the president, like an actual fucking democracy, who gives a shit if they are living in the same area the point of a democracy is everyone has the same say not some people have more of a say because they live in a less densely populated area
#219 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
When you have a country as big as the united states a classic true democracy doesn't work. It just doesn't. The people get more and more divided. You are not acknowledging the fact that entire areas of the country will be ignored because they don't have enough voters to matter.
User avatar
#221 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
why do you think that because a president is elected by a majority, that they are going to completely ignote the "minority" (in a pres election its still like 48% of the country mind you)
#226 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Okay so a President makes promises to get votes. He (or she) has values that influences people to vote for them. If a candidate wants to get elected then they have to appease the voters. Now if certain areas have large populations in small areas then they make promises or say their values are values that are important to those people. Now they spend their term doing the things they said they were going to, or they don't. If they don't they might not get re-elected. So if more of the population is in denser areas and all hold the same values. It's just basic knowledge that candidates will always gravitate towards those areas to get their votes because there are more people. Which means those values will naturally become more and more pronounced as more and more people get elected because of those views. Now the rest of the country feels aggrieved because no matter what they do their views don't get addressed.
User avatar
#231 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
Not only that, but the college makes it so that if you vote for someone who isn't highly liked in your state your vote will count for literally nothing. Like right now i'm in CO if i voted for trump my vote would literally mean fuck all because the majority of my state wanted hillary so she got all of the votes for my state
User avatar
#228 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
You keep speaking as if the other part of the country is so much more important, but they are still half of the population, why should the half that live in less dense areas get more of a say than the half that live in dense areas?
#234 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
They aren't MORE important but they are JUST as important. Because if a candidate can campaign in 11 states, and win those 11 states they would be guaranteed the win. Why would somebody choose to expend the energy to campaign in 30+ states when they can choose 11 and guarantee the win. While yes the grey area is the other 50% of the population you also have to remember that the blue isn't for FULL states it is only for counties, so if a candidate is campaigning in one of those states and wins the majority in just one more county than showed. They become president.
User avatar
#239 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
They are more important, what do you not understand about that there is like highschool math able to explain that, And it should be that way, just because there are more people in 11 states doesn't mean that because they campaign there they are going to get all their votes, they still have to invest in the other ares they cant just ignore half the population because no sane adviser or candidate is going to assume they will win every single vote in a certain area
#242 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
but they don't HAVE to win every vote. I'm not going to be bother to do the math but if it was a pure democracy if you win most of the votes in a few states you win the election. And that's simply how it is.

"The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities. Candidates might ignore a small minority in a national election. But groups concentrated in specific areas can have a significant influence in those states. By forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice."

"The Electoral College forces candidates to pay attention to all voters. They can’t just focus on a few big cities. They have to win entire states, and lots of ‘em."

that's why it's important. because entire demographics of people would be totally ignored because they don't have enough people to influence an election. and that is a complete fact. If you are trying to dispute that then you're a fucking mentalist. ALSO voter fraud is more destructive in a "true" democracy. It just doesn't work. Countless civilizations have fallen because of the division that a true democracy creates between different demographics of people. I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to somebody who has brain damage any more. Have fun with the electoral college its here to stay because an amendment can only be passed on the constitution with the support of the small states that you are so desperate to silence.
User avatar
#241 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
thats what im trying to say, the electoral college makes these votes more important than others because they live in a more spread out area and that is just flat out unfair to the other half of the population. On top of that it skews votes on a state by state basis, and forces a two party system in which only two main parties ever have a chance because no college member is ever going to vote 3rd party
User avatar
#218 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
It's not like the president is going to make decisions that just completely disregard the half of the population that isnt living in these dense areas, its just shifting the votes into the power of individual people and not based off of population desnity
User avatar
#212 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
If the electoral college had one vote per ever so many people it would be even but its not at all, if it were california would have like 90 electoral college votes
User avatar
#209 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
The issue with the electoarl college is it gives certain people MORE of a say on who the president is just because of where they live, that should not be the case in an actual democracy. In this version large portions of the population are being discounted because they live in dense areas
#200 - This is a system in place for only the president of the countr…  [+] (19 replies) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important 0
#205 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
That's why I said people elected AND policies chosen. And for the most part things that only effect one state are generally voted for in state law not federal. This is more about things that effect the nation as a whole. The issue here is that these small areas of the country with a lot of people completely negate multiple states. Which silences many different demographics of Americans. The people in the grey's vote shouldn't be worth more because of how much land they have it should be worth more because they don't have the population to contend with other places. And before you say "then they need more people" think about the areas with vast farmland where the country as a whole gets most of its food from. Where its not really even possible to build cities or bigger communities. Or where the environment is so hostile that its not really possible to wire utilities and sewer systems there for a big city. So then should the views of our farmers be less important than the views of the millennial college students of New York just because they live in an area that isn't densely populated?
User avatar
#208 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
That still isn't justification for certain parts of the population to have a larger say in who becomes the president of this country though
#210 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
You are misunderstanding, they don't have a LARGER say they have an EQUAL say. It doesn't place bigger states with less population above smaller states with more population, it places them on equal ground.
User avatar
#211 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
HOLY SHIT yes they do, If i am from california because of the immense population there are way more people per electoral college vote, so if my one vote barely influences one vote why should someone elses have a larger impact on one vote
#214 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
So you're saying that a couple counties of California should decide on the leader for the entire nation, yea that makes sense. If that was the way things worked then the whole country would be upset except for specific counties of specific states. There is no reason why entire states of people should be ignored because of a few dense areas voted against them.
User avatar
#215 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
No what I am saying is the majority of the population should decide the president, like an actual fucking democracy, who gives a shit if they are living in the same area the point of a democracy is everyone has the same say not some people have more of a say because they live in a less densely populated area
#219 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
When you have a country as big as the united states a classic true democracy doesn't work. It just doesn't. The people get more and more divided. You are not acknowledging the fact that entire areas of the country will be ignored because they don't have enough voters to matter.
User avatar
#221 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
why do you think that because a president is elected by a majority, that they are going to completely ignote the "minority" (in a pres election its still like 48% of the country mind you)
#226 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Okay so a President makes promises to get votes. He (or she) has values that influences people to vote for them. If a candidate wants to get elected then they have to appease the voters. Now if certain areas have large populations in small areas then they make promises or say their values are values that are important to those people. Now they spend their term doing the things they said they were going to, or they don't. If they don't they might not get re-elected. So if more of the population is in denser areas and all hold the same values. It's just basic knowledge that candidates will always gravitate towards those areas to get their votes because there are more people. Which means those values will naturally become more and more pronounced as more and more people get elected because of those views. Now the rest of the country feels aggrieved because no matter what they do their views don't get addressed.
User avatar
#231 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
Not only that, but the college makes it so that if you vote for someone who isn't highly liked in your state your vote will count for literally nothing. Like right now i'm in CO if i voted for trump my vote would literally mean fuck all because the majority of my state wanted hillary so she got all of the votes for my state
User avatar
#228 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
You keep speaking as if the other part of the country is so much more important, but they are still half of the population, why should the half that live in less dense areas get more of a say than the half that live in dense areas?
#234 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
They aren't MORE important but they are JUST as important. Because if a candidate can campaign in 11 states, and win those 11 states they would be guaranteed the win. Why would somebody choose to expend the energy to campaign in 30+ states when they can choose 11 and guarantee the win. While yes the grey area is the other 50% of the population you also have to remember that the blue isn't for FULL states it is only for counties, so if a candidate is campaigning in one of those states and wins the majority in just one more county than showed. They become president.
User avatar
#239 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
They are more important, what do you not understand about that there is like highschool math able to explain that, And it should be that way, just because there are more people in 11 states doesn't mean that because they campaign there they are going to get all their votes, they still have to invest in the other ares they cant just ignore half the population because no sane adviser or candidate is going to assume they will win every single vote in a certain area
#242 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
but they don't HAVE to win every vote. I'm not going to be bother to do the math but if it was a pure democracy if you win most of the votes in a few states you win the election. And that's simply how it is.

"The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities. Candidates might ignore a small minority in a national election. But groups concentrated in specific areas can have a significant influence in those states. By forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice."

"The Electoral College forces candidates to pay attention to all voters. They can’t just focus on a few big cities. They have to win entire states, and lots of ‘em."

that's why it's important. because entire demographics of people would be totally ignored because they don't have enough people to influence an election. and that is a complete fact. If you are trying to dispute that then you're a fucking mentalist. ALSO voter fraud is more destructive in a "true" democracy. It just doesn't work. Countless civilizations have fallen because of the division that a true democracy creates between different demographics of people. I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to somebody who has brain damage any more. Have fun with the electoral college its here to stay because an amendment can only be passed on the constitution with the support of the small states that you are so desperate to silence.
User avatar
#241 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
thats what im trying to say, the electoral college makes these votes more important than others because they live in a more spread out area and that is just flat out unfair to the other half of the population. On top of that it skews votes on a state by state basis, and forces a two party system in which only two main parties ever have a chance because no college member is ever going to vote 3rd party
User avatar
#218 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
It's not like the president is going to make decisions that just completely disregard the half of the population that isnt living in these dense areas, its just shifting the votes into the power of individual people and not based off of population desnity
User avatar
#212 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
If the electoral college had one vote per ever so many people it would be even but its not at all, if it were california would have like 90 electoral college votes
User avatar
#209 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
The issue with the electoarl college is it gives certain people MORE of a say on who the president is just because of where they live, that should not be the case in an actual democracy. In this version large portions of the population are being discounted because they live in dense areas
#198 - if something is so impactful to just one state it should be de…  [+] (1 reply) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important 0
#206 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Right but presidential candidates campaign with goals in mind. Promises they make in exchange for votes. And if they make promises that only cater to one group of people then the rest of the country slowly gets forgotten.
#195 - Thats true but that isn't the point of a democracy, a democrac…  [+] (2 replies) 11/12/2016 on Why it's important +1
User avatar
#198 - vaginalentry (11/12/2016) [-]
if something is so impactful to just one state it should be decided by the state, this is the electoral college it is in place ONLY FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
#206 - randomzdude (11/12/2016) [-]
Right but presidential candidates campaign with goals in mind. Promises they make in exchange for votes. And if they make promises that only cater to one group of people then the rest of the country slowly gets forgotten.
#11 - true but after 8 hours and 12 hours im pretty sure everyone ge…  [+] (3 replies) 11/12/2016 on NYPD goes on vacation +4
#73 - oslikriko (11/12/2016) [-]
No, that's not true at all. Like he said, it completely depends on the state. In VA you have to work 40 hours before any time and a half kicks in.
#42 - notafunnyguy (11/12/2016) [-]
Up here 12 hour shifts are the regular. You work 3 shifts in a row, get 4 days off, work 4 shifts, get 3 days off, then work 4 and so on. OT is only paid on stat holidays or after a 44 hour work week IF you're full time (everyone starts out as on-call casuals, gets into part time, and eventually fulltime)

Our RCMP officers clear 100,000$ a year easy. In my province the average salary is 30,000 so its good money.
User avatar
#14 - altairibnlaahad (11/12/2016) [-]
OT after daily hours depends on the state, for example here in Missouri we don't have any requirements, but federally you're required OT after 40 hours per week.