Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: female
Date Signed Up:12/01/2013
Last Login:8/31/2015
Content Thumbs: 557 total,  711 ,  154
Comment Thumbs: 16554 total,  17559 ,  1005
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 44 Content: Sammich eater → Level 45 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 71.1% (711/1000)
Level 314 Comments: Wizard → Level 315 Comments: Wizard
Content Views:49899
Times Content Favorited:20 times
Total Comments Made:26440
FJ Points:7718
>Hitting on me, guise

fucking losers

Text Posts

  • Views: 13207
    Thumbs Up 232 Thumbs Down 41 Total: +191
    Comments: 8
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 05/31/14
    UGUU~! UGUU~!
  • Views: 12272
    Thumbs Up 196 Thumbs Down 34 Total: +162
    Comments: 61
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 06/07/14
    #rekt #rekt
  • Views: 8172
    Thumbs Up 128 Thumbs Down 16 Total: +112
    Comments: 11
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 07/07/14
    Oh god why Oh god why
  • Views: 12135
    Thumbs Up 119 Thumbs Down 34 Total: +85
    Comments: 62
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 07/09/14
    Oh Siiiiinconn. Oh Siiiiinconn.
  • Views: 1617
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +7
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 05/18/14
    The ups and downs of Marriage The ups and downs of Marriage

latest user's comments

#2 - I got it, lets ban people!  [+] (131 replies) 08/29/2015 on Gun Control activists +889
#648 - anon (09/05/2015) [-]
Prison is the banned section fool.
#426 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
ill always be against guns. ppl will find all sorts of excuses to keep guns around (either using skewed data or diverting the issue) but the truth is, its worked in other places so it can work here. whether that means tighter restrictions or no guns at all, something has to be done. you people can't honestly say that there's not a single thing wrong with guns right now or else people wouldn't even be debating over it.
#501 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
The problem that I have with the anti-gun movement is it blatantly ignores the people and focuses on the object. As the video stated, guns are inanimate objects. They can't do a damn thing on their own. They also don't influence people one way or another. I own several guns, and I have no desire, no thought, of killing people. I own them because they're interesting, and they're fun to shoot. Another common argument I hear is, "Guns are made ONLY to kill people! Why even own something that's made to kill?!" implying that one can't enjoy shooting as a sport. People who make such arguments never, ironically, make the same argument towards archers, sword collectors, or other ancient weapon enthusiasts, or even martial artists for that matter. Therefore, giving a psychotic person access to a firearm is not what made that person psychotic. I understand the anti-gunners' stance, I really do. I sympathize with it. But that does not mean that I agree with it. Blaming an inanimate object is a disservice to our society, to the victims of shootings, and even to the criminals. Yes, something needs to change. Incidents like Sandy Hook are inexcusable. But I would guarantee you everything I have that if there had not been a person behind that gun, Sandy Hook would have never happened. It cannot be stated with any certainty that an incident like Sandy Hook would have never happened if there were no guns in this country. The greatest massacre at a school in US history occurred in 1927, in Bath Township, Michigan. Thirty-eight children and six adults were killed, and 58 others were injured. This was all done with a bomb.
#560 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
But that's the heart of the issue. Guns are so readily available and easy to come by that anyone who is unstable (and let's face it, America has has a poor mental health track record (medical care *cough* *cough*)) can go get military grade weapons and do what they like when they like. Hell, even Pokémon fans are no exception as was demonstrated by the pair of championship competitors in Boston ( who were caught before they did anything thank god) The fact is, there are many fanatics in the US. And they are all wanting to prove prove a point, all they gotta do is pull they trigger.
User avatar
#351 - moldybreadcrumb (08/30/2015) [-]
We only need to ban assault humans
#343 - phenex (08/30/2015) [-]
**phenex used "*roll picture*"**
**phenex rolled image** Admin already does that from time to time.
User avatar
#307 - suchusername (08/30/2015) [-]
Its called jail brah
User avatar
#210 - tmwb (08/30/2015) [-]
Correct me if i'm wrong but, isn't that just jail/ prison?
User avatar
#196 - yugiohkris (08/30/2015) [-]
That's already my job.
User avatar
#179 - xdiabolicx (08/30/2015) [-]
Hitler tried that remember?
User avatar
#59 - joekooldash (08/30/2015) [-]
I think they call that abotion
#53 - ogdonaldengel (08/30/2015) [-]
Why not just ban guns so that NOBODY can get them? What do people even need guns for? Why not just stop being a pussy and learn how to properly defend yourself if you're that concerned. There is no reason for guns, they really shouldn't be used by anyone for any reason.
#599 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
bang i win.
Go back to ponies troll
#576 - rowdeemunkee (08/30/2015) [-]
Your right, getting rid of guns magically will erase world conflict
#547 - alf (08/30/2015) [-]
People already have guns illegally. What do you suppose banning them is going to do other than take them from the people that need to protect themselves from those that have them illegally?
User avatar
#542 - thatonecommunist (08/30/2015) [-]
why don't we just take it a step further and ban dying all together! then nobody will die!
User avatar
#484 - durkadurka (08/30/2015) [-]
Sorry bud, not everyone living on the planet is a young male in good physical condition. Like the popular saying goes, Samuel Colt made men equal. If grandma wants to stop the hoodrats breaking into her her house, she's gonna need some firepower.
#467 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
I wish this would work. But guess what. The drug dealers, gangs, thieves, illegal aliens, and prostitution rings down the street arent going to say "hey man! I stole these guns! I dont legally own them, but since they arent allowed anymore, I'll turn them in!"
Gun laws dont effect these people. They effect ME and others that have guns for self defense against those assholes down the street legally. The criminals that arent caught, arent idiots. They arent gonna use a gun thats registered under their names for crime.
User avatar
#444 - technobanana (08/30/2015) [-]
Bro don't be anti gun on FJ u get red thumbed to fuck
User avatar
#418 - dekkeret (08/30/2015) [-]
It has nothing to do with defending yourself or being able to go shoot beer cans with Jim-Bob down by the gully. Our right to bear arms exists so that when our government becomes too corrupt and tyrannical that we will be able to forcefully take it back.
An armed citizenry will act as a check in extreme cases. Take that away and feds will have carte blanche. Imagine our founding fathers standing up to the British with pepper spray.
#413 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
even if you make all guns illegal in the US and Canada or wherever else, guns will still get around illegally, you think criminals and drug cartels are all going to adopt a sword and shield? and when even law enforcement is out gunned because they don't have any guns because its the law, then the entire country is buggered
#373 - kristovsky (08/30/2015) [-]
User avatar
#364 - sloar (08/30/2015) [-]
Humanity's entire history has involved war
Guns are the weapons of our age
There is an entirely valid reason for having guns
Just because you think the world owes you a comfy living devoid of conflict, doesn't negate the realities of our world
#363 - profanitizer (08/30/2015) [-]
User avatar
#485 - wtfduud (08/30/2015) [-]
You're the only sensible person here. I'm much more annoyed by the hundreds of butthurt comments I have to scroll by, than one comment that I can just ignore and go past.
User avatar
#355 - skrynox (08/30/2015) [-]
Because if you ban guns then all law-abiding citizens will not have them, while the real criminals won't give a shit about the law, and go on killing sprees without worrying about anyone stopping them.
#340 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Well done with the trolling
#324 - affix (08/30/2015) [-]
Guys. Seriously.
Thumbing down a troll this obvious.

You've fed him so much he's gonna burst.
#321 - phoenixactual (08/30/2015) [-]
Because people are too chickenshit in today's day and age to admit they didn't really buy it for self defense, they just bought it for the fun of shooting. I don't plan on ever killing another person in my life, doesn't stop me from enjoying a day at the range from time to time
#320 - GeneralLeeInsane (08/30/2015) [-]
Being worried about guns, when cars kill more people.
If you're that concerned about guns, get a car... Statistically speaking, your car is more likely to kill a gun, than a gun is to kill you.
#302 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
why not just go kill yourself since you've hit max level..? You have no reason to stay here anymore
#292 - mcmanybucks (08/30/2015) [-]
Seriously, people..this guy.
User avatar
#289 - pwnfrnzy (08/30/2015) [-]
Then criminals will still have guns via the Black Market.
Banning something gets rid of legal means to defend yourself from a man with what is often an illegally obtained firearm, and in doing so, criminals will be able to fuck shit up even more.
You really are retarded and want to die, don't you?
Have fun trying to fisty-cuffs a nig-nog with an automatic rifle.
User avatar
#263 - sesshii (08/30/2015) [-]
Banning guns doesn't reduce murders... They just find other ways of killing people or get hands on guns illegally.
The people, however. Are less protected.
User avatar
#262 - ryrynz (08/30/2015) [-]
Totally with you. Just outlaw them altogether.. you're 100% right, shame there's a huge amount of dumb fucks here downvoting you.. welcome to club smart dude.
#195 - notisac (08/30/2015) [-]
the people who commit crimes will get them anyways. are you gonna try and fight a person with a cocked glock heh nah man
User avatar
#177 - elsenortamatoe (08/30/2015) [-]
This is bait
Why not just ban all drugs so that NOBODY can get them? What do people even need drugs for? Why not stop being a pussy an learn how to properly live with out them if youre concerned. There is no reason for drugs, they really shouldn't be used by anyone for any reason.

Sounds stupid, doesn't it? Drugs are a tool that has a purpose, banning them hurts people. And illegal drugs are illegal, so why do they still exist?
#174 - lodisboeg (08/30/2015) [-]
Well, I mean, in Sweden we've had strict gun control for like ever. You need a license, which is pretty hard to get both to get a gun legally and to shoot a gun legally.

People still get guns and shoot each other, though, so....
(Recently organized crime people have started throwing hand grenades as well. Apparently you get them as a bonus when you buy guns in the balkans)
#266 - theinternetwizard (08/30/2015) [-]
You can thank your immigration laws for that
#168 - hahdumbbirch (08/30/2015) [-]
let me draw it out for you.
User avatar
#490 - wtfduud (08/30/2015) [-]
Why does the bad guy still have a knife when guns are allowed?
User avatar
#640 - hahdumbbirch (08/31/2015) [-]
because knife muggings are still extremely common.
User avatar
#139 - Juigiknows (08/30/2015) [-]
Think i'm the only human here that agrees with you lol.

Even if you're trolling. Canada is perfectly. PERFECTLY. fine without the law.
#136 - shabeetus (08/30/2015) [-]
Are you naturally this retarded or did you get private lessons?
User avatar
#639 - desacabose (08/31/2015) [-]
User avatar
#167 - letsmakeout (08/30/2015) [-]
He's a troll m8
#126 - ehwaz (08/30/2015) [-]
Right...because some prick who doesn't care about the laws will still get one and use it on you. Kind of hard to judo throw someone that's about five to six feet from you.
#108 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Troll of the year award.
User avatar
#107 - sourdough (08/30/2015) [-]
i found the vegan hahaha
User avatar
#98 - stankape (08/30/2015) [-]
The only weapon that humanity ever decided was too much to use was the nuclear bomb, and their's still several nations that keep them around just in case. By making guns illegal, the only thing you will do is stop people who follow laws from being able to defend themselves. Would it be nice to go back and settle all arguments with fist fights? that's still debatable, either way, it'll never happen and their's no point in trying to regress the average person that just wants a way to keep themselves, and their families safe.
#128 - ehwaz (08/30/2015) [-]
The nukes are still around because the nations that have them don't trust each other enough to fully disarm them. M.A.D. is still in place sadly and if one of the crazy shit stains in the middle east get a hold of one things may get really bad really fast.
#101 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
If you're going to defend your point of view in English, at least use the correct forms of "they're", "their", and "there", please.

"Theirs" implies ownership, you should have used "there's", which means there is.
User avatar
#130 - OsamaBinLadenz (08/30/2015) [-]
"There's" means there is what? Complete your sentence or put quotation marks around "there is" in your sentence, please. One should never correct others unless they are sure of their capability to do so properly. Correcting this was just annoying, pointless, pedantic, and, if one were to ask me, rather condescending. I've grown past my grammar Nazi days, and I encourage you to follow suit.

There are 3 instances in which I allow myself to correct others' English now. The first instance is when someone wants to be corrected, so as to improve their skills in English. The second instance is when someone types so incorrectly that it genuinely disgusts me, and even then I will let it slide if they aren't being a dipshit. The third and current instance is when someone, such as yourself, feels a dire need to take it upon oneself to correct another person's English, resulting in what amounts to a bothersome experience for all, maybe excluding the corrector. In your instance of correction, no instance of the three above instances applies

Your comments were pedantic, bothersome, and, if I were asked, slightly condescending. In, in the future, simply ignore small mistakes and continue browsing the internet instead of being a generally displeasing person to encounter, please and thank you.
User avatar
#134 - OsamaBinLadenz (08/30/2015) [-]
As a continuation, I also am lenient to those who correct their own English after noticing a mistake. For example, I accidentally included a second instance of "in" within my previous comment, which I had intended to correct, but missed when revising the sentence, it would seem. However, I'm correcting that in a fair amount of time, which would've been okay had you done so, yourself.
User avatar
#102 - stankape (08/30/2015) [-]
Sorry man, I missed that, but the points still stand. Do you have any answer to that or did you just come to attack a mistake I made in my grammar?
#105 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
A correction isn't an attack. I don't really care enough about your topic to discuss it, but I do feel proper grammar is important and should be learned. Granted, mine isn't perfect, but I do try and am open to criticism.
User avatar
#106 - stankape (08/30/2015) [-]
Ok, thanks for correcting me. now shoo fly.
#94 - bluwizard (08/30/2015) [-]
**bluwizard used "*roll picture*"**
**bluwizard rolled image** This is bait, I know this is bait. But:

We can't stop people getting weapons. We cant stop people from crossing our borders what makes you think weapons wont be smuggled illegally?

Now they guys that want to do whatever they want have weapons, and you don't.

The police you say? They have literally declared that they are not here to protect the individual, they are here to protect society. You will call them, you will be shot and they will take your shit (or do whatever it is they want to), the cops will find them and either imprison them or kill them, but you will be dead, or severely wounded.

Now if you had a gun, you could have defended your home.

Even better, if they knew you, and everyone around you had weapons. They may not feel so bold as to try and come up to you and try shit.

But what keeps people from panicking or crazy people from going postal? Well for one, as long as you don't act like a fidgety paranoid psychotic, things will go just fine. They did in the west (despite the western movies depictions there was rarely any gunfights). As for the psychotics, any of these recent people would gotten maybe half the clip off before taking a shot from 9 or 10 other people (if they were properly trained to use the firearm, which they should be).

Hook, line and sinker. Let's see if I can reel you in instead.
User avatar
#268 - ryrynz (08/30/2015) [-]
Show me all the people that have died by gun crimes that were saved by the law stating they could own a gun.. Oh wait....
#83 - brisineo (08/30/2015) [-]
#82 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Because the information is already out there and theres no stopping that you retarded sack of shit and waste of fucking oxygen. Kill yourself.
User avatar
#78 - spaghettivase (08/30/2015) [-]
How did you get out of my hide all?
#76 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
And I suppose you're going to crack down on illegal arms sales like the government? Because we've seen how that works. Anti-gun laws only work on law-abiding citizens. You're not eliminating crime. You're only making it harder for law-abiding citizens to properly defend themselves.
#67 - ScottishMinor (08/30/2015) [-]
Look at Australia and France. Why guns when no guns allowed?
#601 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Guns aren't completely banned in AUS, but since the heavier regulations came in, they've not had a single school shooting.

You can argue that guns don't kill people, people kill people, all you want, but you can't argue with the statistical fact that tighter gun control lowers spree shootings.
User avatar
#608 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
At the cost of raising all other crimes, way to go. You didn't even try any other solutions, you live on a continent where 97% percent of the fauna is lethal but you're afraid of guns and give in to a knee jerk reaction.
User avatar
#349 - halefall (08/30/2015) [-]
guns, but less guns. but still guns
#64 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
We do know how to properly defend ourselves, it's called shooting the bad guy.
#432 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
you do realise gun control doesnt have to be about *taking guns away permanently*. but at the very least, you can agree that there needs to be tighter restrictions right? don't mock the entire gun control movement without understanding what the term "gun control" even means.
User avatar
#436 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
When you say tighter restriction what you mean is banning aesthetic features (scary looking guns) and making it more expensive for people to excesses their rights. Fact is the new restrictions that get proposed don't deal in reality
#285 - ducktalez (08/30/2015) [-]
*shooting the nigga
*shooting yourself by accident with daddys weapon
*shooting your family accidentally with daddys weapon
User avatar
#429 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
Accidental deaths are incredibly rare if you ever bothered to look at the actual numbers
User avatar
#155 - mynameiswut (08/30/2015) [-]
So why are there more good people killed every time than bad people? I mean come on look at other countries that do have guns and (almost) nothing happens there because of different rules they have. Either ban it, or get your shit together murica.
#549 - alf (08/30/2015) [-]
More good people die than bad, because of people that believe in gun control and therefore don't own one. If everyone carried all the time, no one would ever try anything because they would know every one around them has a fucking gun too.
#342 - captaincapital (08/30/2015) [-]
and how do you know more good people are killed than bad people? I'd liek some statistics there mate instead of baseless assumptions

if ur talking about criminal shootings you know very fucking well banning guns will do nothing, they'll still acquire it.
#322 - randomzdude (08/30/2015) [-]
Maybe because "good" people aren't shooting to kill and really are just trying to DEFEND themselves.
#256 - legomant (08/30/2015) [-]
Mass shootings take place in gun free zones and because law abiding citizens by definition obey the law, they aren't carrying in the areas that are targeted by mass shooters.
#257 - legomant (08/30/2015) [-]
And to follow up, you don't hear about mass shootings stopped by someone carrying because if a person in the area targeted is carrying, the shooting tends to be stopped before it is classified as a "mass shootings"
#192 - urmomsagrot (08/30/2015) [-]
You rarely if ever hear about the "good guy" shooting the "bad guy" in defense. Nobody (anti-gun) cares because they can't push their agenda with it. Why are more good people killed? Because you almost always have to wait till the act is underway before you can react. "Good guys" can't just go into Chicago and start removing kebab. And don't start this "other countries with guns!" shit. Those other countries that people always throw into the statistics with America have 1/3 or less of a population than we do. Of course we are going to have more occurrences as well as more coverage with the way our Media works.
User avatar
#190 - fuelnfire (08/30/2015) [-]
Different rules? If guns are legal, they're legal. Switzerland, Canada, have fairly similar gun laws ( canada more so with california) and nothing happens. More good people are killed, because good guys dont walk around looking to kill people. That's like saying muggers steal from more people than good guys. Like, no shit.
#169 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Because the bad guy usually shoots first and there's not always a good guy who has a gun to shoot back with.
#159 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
User avatar
#296 - anusraper (08/30/2015) [-]
looks like very accurate and exact statistics pulled straight out of someones ass
User avatar
#517 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
Scroll down, there are more.
User avatar
#629 - anusraper (08/31/2015) [-]
are all americans so retarded that they don't even get sarcasm that an 11yr old child would get ?
#630 - containlettersonly (08/31/2015) [-]
User avatar
#632 - anusraper (08/31/2015) [-]
because the majority of americans are dumb and obnoxious as fuck, nothing to be proud of m8 ;)
#633 - containlettersonly (08/31/2015) [-]
User avatar
#634 - anusraper (08/31/2015) [-]
it's funny how every reply you make proves my point )) now go play outside inbred ;)
#635 - containlettersonly (08/31/2015) [-]
#636 - anusraper (08/31/2015) [-]
User avatar
#250 - cannibalvegan (08/30/2015) [-]
I used to be antiguns because it makes it easier for people to kill, but then I heard someone say that the criminals will still obtain guns even it they are outlawed and if normal citizen can't have guns the criminals will basically rule everything because they are the one's with the guns. That really made sense to me so now I'm all for guns.
User avatar
#631 - anusraper (08/31/2015) [-]
how fucking old are you kid ? look at other civilized countries and then name a place where "criminaks rule everything"
#603 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
80%~ of all firearms used in shootings are stolen from people who purchased them legally. Tighter gun regs would result in lower gun crime. This is a fact compounded by literally every other country in the world that's changed its gun regulations in the last century.
User avatar
#613 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
Your focus is only on gun crime though, that's the problem, tunnel vision
User avatar
#596 - Brouwera (08/30/2015) [-]
In Holland if a gun is fired by a cop, it's news. The cop doens't even need to have killed anyone. I think the problem is not that guns are legal, but that they are ingrained in American culture. Banning guns could be a step towards changing that.
User avatar
#611 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
The true problem is our politically motivated dishonest media who are shills for the democrat party
User avatar
#625 - Brouwera (08/30/2015) [-]
Could you clarify that statement for me?
User avatar
#626 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
They have an antigun agenda, over 80% of the media identify as democrat/liberal, so whenever they do cover guns it is always in a negative light, ehcne you never hear of the 500k times a year they are used for defense.
User avatar
#627 - Brouwera (08/30/2015) [-]

I reckon it's also not very sensational news maybe
User avatar
#628 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
True enough for hard news, but the opinion shows are where they really hammer their agenda, look at piers morgan
#435 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
the problem with that is banned guns = higher gun prices on the black market. if the criminal can dish out that amount of money (which is likely very high) then i dont see why he should even be a criminal in the first place. sounds like you just formed an opinion based off what someone else said rather than doing the research yourself.
User avatar
#508 - cannibalvegan (08/30/2015) [-]
Like previously said, there are already tones of guns in circulation anyway and big time criminals like the maffia has plenty of money.
#463 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
The guns are already out there, they have no need for the black market to obtain them.....so your point may apply to a few up and comers, but not to established criminals. Also, cops wont be allowed to go door to door. Accepting the current situation and proliferation of guns in America is the first step towards finding a happy medium. Banning guns will only prevent gun sales and shut down gun stores to new owners, once again making it difficult for good, legal owners to defend themselves.
User avatar
#448 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
They would still have them though, and the gangs already have plenty. So the rest of us would be at their mercy. You want to create a monopoly on force.
#297 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
I'm glad you see that. Sadly, this is what most people for "banning all guns" don't realize. "Ban guns" does sound good, but it basically just takes the guns out of law abiding citizens. In fact, when raids are done on gangs, a lot of the time the guns they own (pistols, assault rifles) weren't obtained legally.
User avatar
#588 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
only 4 percent of guns used in crimes are purchased legally
User avatar
#243 - chrizzle (08/30/2015) [-]
Guns were not banned in Australia. They just require you get a firearms liscence to own one. the same as if you want to drive a boat or drive a car
#589 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
But you got rid of the fun ones
#158 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
#157 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
User avatar
#160 - mynameiswut (08/30/2015) [-]
well, the other option was get your shit together. EDUCATE people and make sure they are mentally stable for a "piece of metal and plastic"
User avatar
#164 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
Lets break down the numbers from the CDC

There are roughly 32,000 deaths a year is the US and declining from Gun Violence

60% Are suicides thats 19,200
3% are accidentals that's 960
4% are justified that's 1,280
33% are homicides that's 10,560
80% of homicides are gang related. That's 8,448
>That leaves 2,112 in a society of 312 million people.

>That leaves a 0.00010256410256 chance of death by gun.
>0.000009846153846 if you don't hang out in the hood, are not planning on committing suicide, and not planning a crime.

Our shit is mostly together, the places with tight restrictions on gun rights and big one party governments seem to be our problem spots.
#310 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
The "gun control vs. gun freedom" part seems misleading. Murder rates have been dropping nation-wide for years across the board (as the demographic says), so when a state like Texas or Florida drops by 30% and the nationwide drop is 28%, it's hard to say without going back to the original data whether that's within the margin of error. I'm on the fence for gun control or not, and think that the decision should be based on sound data.

TLDR: Not all of the stats listed above are convincing arguments for de-regulation.
User avatar
#431 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
How about detriot and Chicago that recently had their laws against concealed carry revoked and saw massive decreases in crime
#156 - containlettersonly (08/30/2015) [-]
#58 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
Except that by banning guns, you're basically telling criminals, "hey, we don't want these guns, take them!"
User avatar
#267 - ryrynz (08/30/2015) [-]
Doesn't make sense.. I haven't been held at gunpoint.. I'll never need a gun.

Guns within city limits should mean instant death sentence IMO.
User avatar
#466 - talldumbdork (08/30/2015) [-]
I've never crashed a car, I don't need a seatbelt.
User avatar
#641 - ryrynz (08/31/2015) [-]
That's fucking stupid and not even the same sort of thing.
#280 - makeman (08/30/2015) [-]
Are you insane? I think you need to work out your morals if you think carrying a weapon is as bad of an offense as killing people. A car for example is plenty more dangerous than a weapon in the wrong hands.
User avatar
#290 - ryrynz (08/30/2015) [-]
I don't need to carry a fucking gun.. and neither do you.....
#332 - makeman (08/30/2015) [-]
You missed my point entirely. I neither pro gun nor anti gun. Guns need to be regulated more in the US, but banning them outright is stupid. Death sentence for carrying a weapon? I hope you were exaggerating. And besides, I need a gun for hunting.
User avatar
#642 - ryrynz (08/31/2015) [-]
You don't need to be carrying or own deadly force in a properly set up society..
It's obvious gun control doesn't work... what's your solution?
User avatar
#25 - zerua (08/30/2015) [-]
last time we tried it they called it 'apartheid'
#22 - anon (08/30/2015) [-]
#96 - misterkuma (08/30/2015) [-]
Dayyyuuuuum XD
User avatar
#21 - optimussum (08/30/2015) [-]
User avatar
#19 - clavatnine (08/30/2015) [-]
We can't put people in prisons anymore without people from irrelevant European countries complaining about how the US has a lot of people in prisons while simultaneously glorifying their government who won't even put down a mass murderer.
#4 - anon (08/29/2015) [-]
That's the best goddamn idea I've heard in a loooooooong time
#1 - Ew, A glock.  [+] (2 replies) 08/28/2015 on 4chan Watches the News +1
#4 - anon (08/28/2015) [-]
whats wrong with a glock?
#10 - anon (08/28/2015) [-]
He prefers cocks as he handles the loads really well
#3 - What game is this?  [+] (2 replies) 08/27/2015 on Wake Up America 0
#4 - snoopzedogg (08/28/2015) [-]
Cow Revolution, it's a mobile game
#5 - snoopzedogg (08/28/2015) [-]
#2 - So.... No ****** mermaid?  [+] (1 reply) 08/27/2015 on vid is tmw. but have this -1
User avatar
#3 - vbss (08/27/2015) [-]
none of them
#4 - Picture 08/26/2015 on Taylor Swift Nudes +1