Naw, they're pushing the leftist agenda of anti-white, just more obviously now.

the pendulum has been pushed left too far, its gonna sing right soon enough and its gonna swing hard. it already started swinging this past few month

I hope it slams the marxists into dust, feels good man.

multiculturalism and diversity was the right wings plan all along, the only way you can get people on your side is if you expose them first hand to the these savage cultures.
the same way i don't hate aliens because i never met. i think it be awesome to live along side aliens like in mass effect or whatever, but living with them for real might get me to hate them and want all of them dead.
that's why a lot of European country's like Sweden who had it too good for too long have a blurred vision of people, they couldn't comprehend the fact that niggers and Muslims are savage animals and saw them as "innocent oppressed people" so they swings left and thought immigration would be grate and they would leave happily ever after. now they see that life isnt what they had imagined. now they are slowly swinging right again.

people blame jews for immigration and "white genocide" but i hostilely don't think it was them. jews hate muslims. muslims are the biggest threat to jews in europe. mass amount of swedish jews left the country because they were under constant attack. they just killed 3 jews in a jewish store in france last week

Right wing plan was to expose it for what it was. Multiculturalism and diversity was always the plan of cultural subterfuge of western culture, create a dis-unified, low trust society, easily exploited and hard to create rebellion in.

the jews controlled a lot of busnesses and bankis in germany post holocaust. hitler did a good job turning everyone against them... the refugee crises and terror attacks turned a lot of people who were on the fence against Muslims and immigration..
1-2 years ago saying is immigration bad you were labeled a racist. now saying immigration is bad is becoming a valid argument that people are starting to agree on

Of course, everyone knows leftist policy is always suicidal, they will never succeed as long as they continue to push these things, it burns itself out.

and for these feminists.. give them time and they'll die out. the same way the last wave of feminists died out (remember they were trying to get man to stop drinking)
the same way hippies died out, and punk anarchists and any other "movements"

another fact of life is... every generation rebels against whatever their past generation stood for. newer generations will be more right wing than ever... and seeing as these new generation of blacks are the least educated demographic in history since the 1920 and the Muslims as a whole are broken group with no home, no economy and leech off europe defeating them will be days of work

>asking funnyjunk to be anti retardation and pro "stop sticking your dick in every political issue"

good fucking luck.

Leftists push for:
>diversity
>multiculturalism
>miscegenation
>devaluation of native culture and religion

Naw, this is wholly leftist m8.

Okay, so i didn´t found anything wrong with the first 2., as they make sense in an open minded civilization that does not want to discriminait People for where they where Born or in which culture they got intigraited.

The 3. one i had to Google: Miscegenation (/mɪˌsɛdʒɨˈneɪʃən/; from the Latin miscere "to mix" + genus "kind") is the mixing of different racial groups through marriage, cohabitation, sexual relations, or procreation.[1

... Seriously? Wtf is wrong about that? I see absolutly no wrong in doing something like this, nor it´s Promotion, it´s the natural result you get in an diverse and multiculturel Society. Could you explain me what you think is "wrong" about it, as you obviously meant all this things in an negativ view, considering your 4. Point.

>>#96, Here you go m8.

You kinda didn´t answer my question what would be wrong about Miscegenation.

You just told me your obvious biased view over left winged People, and how they going to destroy your cutlure and how they are controled be Extremist and how this does not coun´t for the right wing People and bla bla bla.

I specificly asked you what is wrong about children from mixed racial Groups. You kinda ignored that. And bevor you even start arguing about what i asked:

#92 "... Seriously? Wtf is wrong about that? I see absolutly no wrong in doing something like this, nor it´s Promotion, it´s the natural result you get in an diverse and multiculturel Society. Could you explain me what you think is "wrong" about it, as you obviously meant all this things in an negativ view, considering your 4. Point."

Okay, why is it necessary to have a multi-cultural society, what makes it good? Why is it a positive to have children with no cultural identity? When rape and violent crime goes through the roof with the forced multiculturalism, I see it as a net negative to society. I really want to know why you think it's good? Because you're told it's good? All it does is create low-trust culture and weak national identity.

Okay, 1. why are you suddenly throwing Counter questions against me in an way that every fool with 2 function brain cells would consider chewbacca defense building? Are you trying to find answers from me, so you could Twist them? Or do you have no answers to my 1!!!!!!! 1 single question, which was what is wrong about multicultured children?

2. An multicultural Society is not necessary, but think about it: Why does humankind has still conflicts? To an part its because we are greedy resource horders. But to an far more important part it´s the Problem, that humankind sees itself in different Groups... and thats shit, because we humans want to protect or Familys. We are Family animals. If we see in each racial Group an different Family it will just Keep going with stupid races wars that are completly unnecessary and redicilous.

Also i am very sure lefties do not "push" multicultured children, as they are pretty much an natural conclusion of an multicultural Society. So what you build up there is pretty much an no brainer, as one is the Logical conclussion to the other and would Need just Promotion of the 1. (multiculralism) to get promoted itself (multicultred children).

And what does that mean? They get no cultural identity? They get pretty much the identity of both. They just get confused about which one they should go, once People come with viewpoints like yours and ask them questions their Young insecure minds can´t answer for sure, instead of accepting that they are part of both cultures, and should just take the best of both.

And now you build up an fuckign strawman with the raping. You completly try to Chance the subject at this Point. The question was about multicultured children ffs. not about rape.

Btw "national identity" has often lead to bigger shit then it brought good. You may look at: UDSSR ; das 3. Deutsche Reich ; The Japense during the 2. world war ; The KKK Problem in the USA. Thing is, you can´t have to much from both, but living in your enclosed Society like in an bunker will lead to your cultural death.

Yes, societys died, because they though it´s an great idea to culturaly enclose themself and build an Castle around it. Once it corrupted and incested itself to death their empire was always pretty much dead. If we want an united Human Society, we will Need to at least be open about our culturs, and addapt the best from each of them.

Also you know... GLOBALISATION, made the though of an NON-multiculteral Society pretty much impossible, unless you want to live with censored Internet and VERY obvious Propaganda News. You know, North corea and that shit.

And I never asserted that sharing between cultures is bad, but the idea of multi-multiculturalism is insane, one culture will always subsume another, there is no cohabitation of two tribes, there is no example of this working once in history, it always falls apart to bulkanization or genocide.

Oh? And you think then building an Castle around your culture will save it from beeing overthrown? If your culture Needs and fucking Castle to survive, maybe it´s not that supperiour? Maybe you should then reconsidering why the other cultur manages it to be so popular or not beeing able to be erased from history in this case.

The Moment you exchance and share between cultures, it will come to multiculturalism and to globalisation. It´s absolutly impossible to not have this. Globalisation Speeds the process up, you can just prepare Society for it and try to make sure the part of your culture survives along with it, to produce the best of it.

Multiculturalism as it is defined today necessitates two or more cultures inhabiting the same political sphere. And through this deprives that culture political presence on the international stage, that is my objection, I believe I've made that obvious. And forcing cultures to compete in one political sphere, founded by the initial culture while the other feed off of it is asinine.

Globalization is an agenda, not a necessary reality lmao. And everyone will continue to see themselves as separate peoples, it is natural subconscious thought through basic pattern recognition, no amount of forcing more people of a different tribe into a nation will change that. And ya, rape and crime does have to do with it, when you see a clear trend in immigration and the rise in these occurrences, it's a logical conclusion to make that immigration at these levels is a poor decision. And it's not a strawman lmao, its a generalization made from reasonable observation. And back to your point on conflict, it will continue to occur, just internally now, and with it you will lose the ability to have a high functioning society, because with out a cohesive culture you lose the ability to have a high trust society. It is literally cultural and economic suicide to have multiculturalism,a and the only argument for it is your baseless assertion.

Globalisation happens through internation trading, the Internet and it´s possebilty to communicait with any Person on this god forsaken rock instantly, and beeing able to travel around half the world in less then an fucking day.

Unless you would now stop the internation trading; the Internet and the Airport System, you would never even able to stop this. Which would make any Country an second North Korea in less then 3 decades.

Btw i was right about that you just builded up fucking Chewbacca defense instead of honestly answering my question in your own words.

"it is literally cultural and economic suicide to have multiculturalism, and the only Argument for it is your baseless Assertion."

1. oh my the fucking irony sir, good Job, 2. You want to stop multiculturalism? You have to stop Globalisation. You want to stop Globalisation? Prepare for your cultural and economical death then. 100 of Empires can Attest you that the idea of isolating yourself in the Long run will bring just your decadence of your Nation faster.

>>#195, It is, I'm deifining multiculturalism as here, not as in international trade of ideas, are you thick?

Yes, you read right, USA is actuelly nothing more then the total result of an gigantic Multicultural melting pot Experiment, as are Canada and Australia.

>majority 93%+ western europen whites in USA until 1965
>US is result of multiculturalism

kek

Only in the mountains in California lol, and all those non-western Europeans still only consisted of less than 10% of the population. Look up any pre-1965 US immigration law, and you'll see what I mean lmao.

Nice response m8.

www.fairus.org/facts/us_laws

You need to form a coherent sentence m8, I'm having trouble understanding.

"Multiculturalism describes the existence, acceptance, or promotion of multiple cultural traditions within a single jurisdiction, usually considered in terms of the culture associated with an ethnic group. This can happen when a jurisdiction is created or expanded by amalgamating areas with two or more different cultures (e.g. French Canada and English Canada) or through immigration from different jurisdictions around the world (e.g. Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, United States, United Kingdom, and many other countries)."

There is a different between globalization and the leftist ideal of multiculturalism. Globalization = different nations mixing as a result of trade. Leftist multiculturalism = importing thousands of immigrants from the middle east/africa and encouraging interracial breeding of white women with brown men.

Honestly, it's the Wests fault for failing to control women. You don't see these problems in Africa/Middle East because they actually control their women there. Women in the west see this and want this kind of control in their lives. Feminism killed the west.

It's not bait. You may want to be blinded and ignore logic and reason but I live in reality. Feminism has killed the west. If you think feminism is a good thing you are either a fucking fool or someone who has benefited from the pussification of the West.

Yeah you're right. I heard if you support feminism enough you might get to maybe hold a girls hand one day and be her white knight after shes been railed by 30+ guys. GG no re cuck

"Globalization = different nations mixing as a result of trade." ... And you honestly think, that this will not cause multiculturalism in any way you fool?... Like you know, exchance of ideas, ideals, inventions, cultural norms, you know... multiculturalism? ... No? okay.

Also you may want to test your dictionery:

Multiculturalism describes the existence, acceptance, or promotion of multiple cultural traditions within a single jurisdiction, usually considered in terms of the culture associated with an ethnic group. This can happen when a jurisdiction is created or expanded by amalgamating areas with two or more different cultures (e.g. French Canada and English Canada) or through immigration from different jurisdictions around the world (e.g. Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, United States, United Kingdom, and many other countries).

"leftist ideal of multiculturalism"

Are you illiterate?

More like you are illiterate, if you can´t even use the fucking dictornary to read the meaning of an term, and isntead put just negativ critic onto something. But yeah, sure... i am the illiterate, the guy that uses the fucking dictornary... Also maybe you havent read the Thing fully:

"or through immigration from different jurisdictions around the world (e.g. Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, United States, United Kingdom, and many other countries)."

Let me clarify like I am talking to a child. You looked up in the dictionary the definition of multiculturalism, good job buddy you get a gold star. Although that is the dictionary definition, the left (the liberals) have coopted the term as a means to push for mass immigration of brown people. Thats why I prefaced the term with "leftist ideal" and didn't just say multiculturalism. If I wanted to just say multiculturalism I wouldn't have prefaced it with anything to indicate I wasn't referring to the dictionary definition. Does that make sense to you? If you think about it really hard I think you can understand it.

"Let me clarify like I am talking to a child." <--- 1. step of not how to be taking seriously.

2. step getting ignored.

3. The meaning of illiterate:

adjective


1. unable to read and write: an illiterate group.

2. having or demonstrating very little or no education.

3. showing lack of culture, especially in language and literature.

4. displaying a marked lack of knowledge in a particular field

You are illiterate considering you just take Multiculturalism and say it´s just absolutly negativ, while it brought great countrys into existence, just listening to the Problems it can bring.

Aww, it sounds like you are upset little buddy. Hey its OK, big boy ideas can be hard to understand. I know two step thinking is really tough. But, you get two gold stars today for looking up two dictionary definitions. Isn't that great!

Your comments are stupid ergo they deserve downvotes. Stop making stupid comments about dictionary definitions and you don't get downvoted, simple as that

Here's the thing, the only thing you want to argue on is that I didn't use the dictionary definition of multiculturalism when I quite clearly indicated I wasn't intending to use the dictionary definition. Therefore I can only assume you have the mind of a child and are unable to comprehend an idea as complex as using a word outside its dictionary definition.

I've never seen nor heard a lefty push for miscegenation. I'm sure a typical left leaning person would be happy to see it happen but it's not exactly something you can enforce.

Eh, they push for it, encourage it, sure you can't enforce it, but they sure like to propagandize it.

What do you mean by "they"? I can believe that there might be a small group of lunatics who would support this, but it's certainly not something any credible leftist would campaign for, and I'm certain the majority don't. Racial integration sure, but not that.

They I say as way to encapsulate the leftist zeitgeist, thought it is mostly spoken by the extremists, extremists usually set the narrative over the long run. Does that make sense?

It makes sense but I have to disagree. Extremists are called extremists for a reason, they don't represent the majority in any way, they simply get more media coverage because they make for a better story.

Historically though, just looking back to the early 20th century, you can see how the extremists set the course for nations and the tone of political discourse, really.

Well going by that logic, all right wingers are fascist and nazis.

You can't deny that today, both sides are having the discussion pulled farther in their respective direction. I'd say yes, neo-reactionaries are taking the narrative of he right wing under their control, just as the Marxists had done with the leftist parties since the 60's.

I agree that support for extremism has risen slightly, as it always does during times of uncertainty. However, I'd still say it's far away from becoming mainstream politics.

I guess we'll see, France's elections are coming up, and as of now it looks like National Front will win, just saying.

I knew they had been gaining support but didn't realise it was to that extent, that's fairly disturbing. I was thinking more in terms of where I'm from (UK) where extremism is still in the minority, but I agree that some countries are slipping towards it. Either way, this has been a fairly civilised debate for funnyjunk, so thanks.

No problem I know UKIP didn't get many seats, but did they not get a very, very significant portion of the vote? Also , eastern Europe has pretty much all gone far right, Ukraine is essentially fascist, Bulgaria and Poland have elected their far right parties in landslides, etc.

They did get a significant minority vote when you look at it as a whole, but I'd still say it was a minority. I dread to think how much support they'll receive in light of recent events, though. I still stand by my original point, I don't think even extreme left parties would "push" for miscegenation.

>expecting logic in politics

lol

No. That would require them to not paint the other side as extremists.

This is a fake Trump account that you are taking so seriously.

don't care who it is, they are terrible and they should feel terrible

yeah people have a tendency to be too bilateral. It's always good vs evil, there's no middle with them. you're either a SJW or a hardcore nazi

my waifu is prisciilla

please tell me you're not talking about the main villain of Claymore.

ay. Claymore. or Berzerker Pre Berzerker as I like to call it

Oh ok , just for a second there I thought you had a shit taste in waifus

you'd be surprised

chicks dig a man in red and yellow

that's kind of sad

101 push-ups
101 sit-ups
101 squats
11KM running
every hour

"I can tell from seeing quite a few shops in my time"

Its all in the pixels, man

Ye. I had graphics design class stuff, so I think I know a bit more about it myself.

And I was just referencing, didn't mean to come off as mocking or etc

Just got done playing RE4 actually. This is my 8th playthrough

He's a candidate running for the president of the United States.

You saying "he's just a meme" is your attempt to trivialize his statement, and goals. Trivializing it does not counter the argument in any way.

Wow I don't think there is a way to show how ignorant you are better than saying "he's a fucking meme." That just shows everything you know about Trump is from memes. Fucking retards on this site I swear, its gotten so bad.

He is a meme though. Reality TV has forgotten him so he had to find some way to try and stay in the public eye. Just because Trump isn't quite as stupid as his detractors say he is doesn't make him a genius.

This is a fake Trump account that you are taking so seriously.

don't care who it is, they are terrible and they should feel terrible