I'm sure you still understood what I meant, without being such a technical stickler. Obviously humans are animals, and obviously all "animals" are driven by other instincts than just the need for food. But I figured those facts were obvious enough that people could read my comment and understand what I was talking about, without feeling the need to point them out. The kid is fat as fuck. He is clearly more motivated by the need to eat, than other humans. Not shut up and enjoy the fucking internet.

You're not supposed to enjoy the internet. You're supposed to use it for a few hours, then go cry in a corner because of the horrible things you've seen and because of all the mean people.

LOL U SO PHANNEH. pic unrelated

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

Thats where i watch it too

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

L M O P Q R S T U V W ...?

Im not a smart man...

Oh, ok. Well, that's good that you can trust some smokers. But the fact that I have experienced so many bad things as a result of people being under the influence proves that not all smokers are trust able.

of course not.

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

uhhh....I don't see your point?

you said i can't trust people to use it correctly.

i listed a bunch of people that i can trust to use it correctly.

Oh, ok. Well, that's good that you can trust some smokers. But the fact that I have experienced so many bad things as a result of people being under the influence proves that not all smokers are trust able.

of course not.

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

Well of course not, but you can't trust people to use it correctly.

This is why many developed countries other than the U.S. make it hard to get guns. They aren't dangerous by themselves, but when in the hands of dumbasses, they cause harm.

you're right, i can't trust anybody that smokes weed.

not even myself.
or my mother, father, brother, sister, family friends, other relatives and every other responsible pot smoker in the world.

uhhh....I don't see your point?

you said i can't trust people to use it correctly.

i listed a bunch of people that i can trust to use it correctly.

Oh, ok. Well, that's good that you can trust some smokers. But the fact that I have experienced so many bad things as a result of people being under the influence proves that not all smokers are trust able.

of course not.

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

i understand that you are sure, but i am not

Least harmful to YOU. It's still harmful to others, but the selfish pot smokers can never get that through their head.

Most if not all of the "good" drugs are legal anyway.

it's only harmful to others if you actively seek to harm people while under the influence.

it's not gonna drive you to kill by itself.

Well of course not, but you can't trust people to use it correctly.

This is why many developed countries other than the U.S. make it hard to get guns. They aren't dangerous by themselves, but when in the hands of dumbasses, they cause harm.

you're right, i can't trust anybody that smokes weed.

not even myself.
or my mother, father, brother, sister, family friends, other relatives and every other responsible pot smoker in the world.

uhhh....I don't see your point?

you said i can't trust people to use it correctly.

i listed a bunch of people that i can trust to use it correctly.

Oh, ok. Well, that's good that you can trust some smokers. But the fact that I have experienced so many bad things as a result of people being under the influence proves that not all smokers are trust able.

of course not.

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

i get that, but i am not

i'm pretty sure you are.

i understand that you are sure, but i am not

It's all about ups and downs.

Drugs do a few certain good things, and cause many bad things.

Food does many good things, and causes a few certain bad things.

It's all about weighing the good and the bad. Calling me stupid doesn't change that. I don't call you stupid because you like drugs.

there are far more good drugs than bad ones.

pot is probably the LEAST harmful drug there is.

Least harmful to YOU. It's still harmful to others, but the selfish pot smokers can never get that through their head.

Most if not all of the "good" drugs are legal anyway.

it's only harmful to others if you actively seek to harm people while under the influence.

it's not gonna drive you to kill by itself.

Well of course not, but you can't trust people to use it correctly.

This is why many developed countries other than the U.S. make it hard to get guns. They aren't dangerous by themselves, but when in the hands of dumbasses, they cause harm.

you're right, i can't trust anybody that smokes weed.

not even myself.
or my mother, father, brother, sister, family friends, other relatives and every other responsible pot smoker in the world.

uhhh....I don't see your point?

you said i can't trust people to use it correctly.

i listed a bunch of people that i can trust to use it correctly.

Oh, ok. Well, that's good that you can trust some smokers. But the fact that I have experienced so many bad things as a result of people being under the influence proves that not all smokers are trust able.

of course not.

Of course it does. ALL means 100%. Non trust able smokers exist. Therefore NOT ALL smokers are trust able.

that's what i meant.

of course not all smokers are trustable.

Oh, ok then. We agree on that.

nope

but i think you are.

i get that, but i am not

i'm pretty sure you are.

i understand that you are sure, but i am not

Little Nicky

oh, right.

thanks.