I've used both and they both strip super fucking easy.
Take your pick, they've all got problems out the ass.

I dunno man I haven't had a Robertson strip when using impact drivers but had plenty of philips strip from using just a drill.

Then you're probably not using the right screwdriver. Robertsons have a slight taper so they should have a snug fit even when the screw hole has gunk in it, with no room to rotate and tear the walls of the screw.

Then at least press the bit in instead of just letting it rattle around first. Remember it's a taper, so if you only go partway in it can strip the sides.

Our prisons do not rehabilitate inmates very well. Yeah, rehab doesn't always work, but it would work a lot more if it were employed.

Some drugs are very dangerous to the people that use them and those around them. Those drugs have legitimate reasons to be illegal, but that should still reflect the majority opinion in a democratic nation. In regards to marijuana, the majority opinion is that the drug should be acceptable. Now, we can look at some facts regarding marijuana, but whether they qualify as legitimate reasons to ban the substance is still just a matter of opinion and the majority opinion is that they do not. The law should reflect that under a democracy, even a representative democracy (i.e. a Republic) such as the U.S.

Now it gets a little tricky here: While it is true that the majority of Americans support the legalization of marijuana (which I believe should be grounds to legalize), it is only a slim majority. To counter that, however, it should be acknowledged that public support has been trending towards legalization for a while now and doesn't appear to be changing.

At the end of the day, its all just an opinion. My opinion is that any country that calls itself a democracy should adhere to the will of the people, especially over something as trivial as marijuana. That being said, my stance on many other substances is undefined yet because I haven't done the proper research to form an opinion.

This entire comment thread.

Winning

There are legitimate reasons that murder is illegal. Taking a life is rarely justified and someone willing to murder now may choose to do so again in the future, thereby ending another life. That person needs to be confined and rehabilitated. My opinion of this may be different if American prisons were effective means of rehab, but they aren't. They're nothing more than punishment inflicted on those who will then be released back into the wild with no legitimate effort made to deter future recurrence of the offense.

Aside from that, my post doesn't say that the opinions of one person trumps the law, rather that the collective opinion of the majority shouldn't conflict with the law.

There are legitimate reasons drugs are illegal. Justification is not a fact it is an opinion. What you think is right is NOT what everyone else thinks is right. Laws take away the ambiguity of morals and say here's what is okay or not okay. But and society evolves our opinions change and the laws also change to reflect that.

Rehab doesn't work on everyone. There are people who even exploit the rehab system and go out and commit crimes again.

Our prisons do not rehabilitate inmates very well. Yeah, rehab doesn't always work, but it would work a lot more if it were employed.

Some drugs are very dangerous to the people that use them and those around them. Those drugs have legitimate reasons to be illegal, but that should still reflect the majority opinion in a democratic nation. In regards to marijuana, the majority opinion is that the drug should be acceptable. Now, we can look at some facts regarding marijuana, but whether they qualify as legitimate reasons to ban the substance is still just a matter of opinion and the majority opinion is that they do not. The law should reflect that under a democracy, even a representative democracy (i.e. a Republic) such as the U.S.

Now it gets a little tricky here: While it is true that the majority of Americans support the legalization of marijuana (which I believe should be grounds to legalize), it is only a slim majority. To counter that, however, it should be acknowledged that public support has been trending towards legalization for a while now and doesn't appear to be changing.

At the end of the day, its all just an opinion. My opinion is that any country that calls itself a democracy should adhere to the will of the people, especially over something as trivial as marijuana. That being said, my stance on many other substances is undefined yet because I haven't done the proper research to form an opinion.

This entire comment thread.

Winning

Protesting doesn't help and laws take forever to change. If the whole world acknowledges that its a stupid law, are we supposed to shut up and obey for the sake of obedience? I've always had a problem with that. I'll never bow down to someone because they demand it.

So if a murderer disagrees that murder should be illegal, he should just be allowed to commit murder because he thinks it's a stupid law?

There are legitimate reasons that murder is illegal. Taking a life is rarely justified and someone willing to murder now may choose to do so again in the future, thereby ending another life. That person needs to be confined and rehabilitated. My opinion of this may be different if American prisons were effective means of rehab, but they aren't. They're nothing more than punishment inflicted on those who will then be released back into the wild with no legitimate effort made to deter future recurrence of the offense.

Aside from that, my post doesn't say that the opinions of one person trumps the law, rather that the collective opinion of the majority shouldn't conflict with the law.

There are legitimate reasons drugs are illegal. Justification is not a fact it is an opinion. What you think is right is NOT what everyone else thinks is right. Laws take away the ambiguity of morals and say here's what is okay or not okay. But and society evolves our opinions change and the laws also change to reflect that.

Rehab doesn't work on everyone. There are people who even exploit the rehab system and go out and commit crimes again.

Our prisons do not rehabilitate inmates very well. Yeah, rehab doesn't always work, but it would work a lot more if it were employed.

Some drugs are very dangerous to the people that use them and those around them. Those drugs have legitimate reasons to be illegal, but that should still reflect the majority opinion in a democratic nation. In regards to marijuana, the majority opinion is that the drug should be acceptable. Now, we can look at some facts regarding marijuana, but whether they qualify as legitimate reasons to ban the substance is still just a matter of opinion and the majority opinion is that they do not. The law should reflect that under a democracy, even a representative democracy (i.e. a Republic) such as the U.S.

Now it gets a little tricky here: While it is true that the majority of Americans support the legalization of marijuana (which I believe should be grounds to legalize), it is only a slim majority. To counter that, however, it should be acknowledged that public support has been trending towards legalization for a while now and doesn't appear to be changing.

At the end of the day, its all just an opinion. My opinion is that any country that calls itself a democracy should adhere to the will of the people, especially over something as trivial as marijuana. That being said, my stance on many other substances is undefined yet because I haven't done the proper research to form an opinion.

This entire comment thread.

Winning

**turbanmasher used "*roll picture*"**
**turbanmasher rolled image**You're welcome

**Sevenseas used "*roll picture*"**
**Sevenseas rolled image**Thank you for adding so much to the conversation. 10/10 you're an asshole!

**Sevenseas used "*roll picture*"**
**Sevenseas rolled image**

Nope I'm from Alberta. Swell with mountains and prairies.

You're using again aren't you?!?! I found this in your backpack!

Totally didn't see that.