Upload
Login or register

tulioandmiguel

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:5/30/2012
Last Login:5/13/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4842 total,  6066 ,  1224
Comment Thumbs: 5415 total,  6069 ,  654
Content Level Progress: 28% (28/100)
Level 148 Content: Faptastic → Level 149 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 25% (25/100)
Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:5
Content Views:217423
Times Content Favorited:364 times
Total Comments Made:1801
FJ Points:348
Favorite Tags: aang (2) | avatar (2) | funny (2) | OC (2) | sonata arctica (2)

latest user's comments

#25 - Comment deleted 11/23/2013 on Do you think this is a... 0
#21 - oh **** lol . thanks 11/22/2013 on Nailed It 0
#17 - Mind if I ask what was it?  [+] (2 new replies) 11/22/2013 on Nailed It 0
User avatar
#18 - greenthegunstar (11/22/2013) [-]
It was a picture of a guy's fingers nailed together with a single nail. With the caption "Nailed It"
User avatar
#21 - tulioandmiguel (11/22/2013) [-]
oh fuck lol .

thanks
#2101 - k added back 11/22/2013 on Friend safari thread: RIP... 0
#118 - wat 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
#114 - That first statement is not true, sex IS pleasurable because o… 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
#102 - You don't need to be sexually attracted to a gender to reprodu…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
User avatar
#110 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
Most animals just have sex with the sole purpose of creating a new generation. Unlike humans, few cases like dolphins do feel pleasure from it.

And dysfunctions ARE unnatural. They are disabilities caused by failures in hormonal or reproductive systems.
User avatar
#114 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
That first statement is not true, sex IS pleasurable because of biological reasons, it has to be so the race can keep on living, most animals do it because of the pleasure, reproducing not the only reason, but actually the result.

Then condoms and any other anti-reproductive methods are completely unnatural as well ( and they are pretty much taken for granted, almost everyone uses them and nobody questions the fact that they are actually making it impossible to reproduce while having sex, making it essentially point-less, expect for the pleasure ).

As rational beings we know the difference between reproducing and having sex for pleasure.

We as a race are already over-populated, that's why we are controlling birth rates with condoms and other methods, imagine if nobody cared about that and every time they had sex it was unprotected? As we are we already don't have enough jobs for everyone, and having more children wouldn't be necessarily good anymore.

I see your point at saying it's unnatural, I have actually pondered about that for quite some time, when I first thought about it, it felt as if I was broken, not meant to pass down my genes, going against the sole purpose of living, but now that I know that I have more options to reproduce other than having heterosexual sex, and that it's not an issue at all ( it even isn't and issue for other "irrational" animals ), so it shouldn't be necessarily something bad, or unnatural.

Being gay It's just as unnatural as being black on a place with low sun-light, or white on a place with bright sun-light... And I don't think that's unnatural, just NOT PERFECT.
#93 - What seems off about it? Being gay is not unnatural, …  [+] (4 new replies) 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
User avatar
#96 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
It is, because in our biological make up, we do not normally reproduce by going male X male or female X female.

Sure, we are animals too, but our reproductive habits are different than bonobos or giraffes.
User avatar
#102 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
You don't need to be sexually attracted to a gender to reproduce.

Swans for example have only one partner for their whole lives, and if there is a gay swan he or she would have sex with one swan of the other gender JUST for reproducing and then go back to it's partner.

As a human, you have many options, you can either adopt, or donate sperm/eggs, or even recur to artificial insemination.

You can also not reproduce at all, many people have dysfunctions and can't biologically reproduce, following this logic having a dysfunction like that is more unnatural than being gay.

(btw I'm not the one down-voting your comments)
User avatar
#110 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
Most animals just have sex with the sole purpose of creating a new generation. Unlike humans, few cases like dolphins do feel pleasure from it.

And dysfunctions ARE unnatural. They are disabilities caused by failures in hormonal or reproductive systems.
User avatar
#114 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
That first statement is not true, sex IS pleasurable because of biological reasons, it has to be so the race can keep on living, most animals do it because of the pleasure, reproducing not the only reason, but actually the result.

Then condoms and any other anti-reproductive methods are completely unnatural as well ( and they are pretty much taken for granted, almost everyone uses them and nobody questions the fact that they are actually making it impossible to reproduce while having sex, making it essentially point-less, expect for the pleasure ).

As rational beings we know the difference between reproducing and having sex for pleasure.

We as a race are already over-populated, that's why we are controlling birth rates with condoms and other methods, imagine if nobody cared about that and every time they had sex it was unprotected? As we are we already don't have enough jobs for everyone, and having more children wouldn't be necessarily good anymore.

I see your point at saying it's unnatural, I have actually pondered about that for quite some time, when I first thought about it, it felt as if I was broken, not meant to pass down my genes, going against the sole purpose of living, but now that I know that I have more options to reproduce other than having heterosexual sex, and that it's not an issue at all ( it even isn't and issue for other "irrational" animals ), so it shouldn't be necessarily something bad, or unnatural.

Being gay It's just as unnatural as being black on a place with low sun-light, or white on a place with bright sun-light... And I don't think that's unnatural, just NOT PERFECT.
#51 - Welp, beeing gay is about as normal as beeing left handed ( th…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
User avatar
#52 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
I suppose so, although somethings seems off about that comparison.

User avatar
#93 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
What seems off about it?

Being gay is not unnatural, there are hundreds of different animals species that can be gay, there are some species of animals that consist MOSTLY of gays, like giraffes.

The same thing with being left handed, many animal species have some left handed animals, and some ( like eagles ) are 100% left handed...
User avatar
#96 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
It is, because in our biological make up, we do not normally reproduce by going male X male or female X female.

Sure, we are animals too, but our reproductive habits are different than bonobos or giraffes.
User avatar
#102 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
You don't need to be sexually attracted to a gender to reproduce.

Swans for example have only one partner for their whole lives, and if there is a gay swan he or she would have sex with one swan of the other gender JUST for reproducing and then go back to it's partner.

As a human, you have many options, you can either adopt, or donate sperm/eggs, or even recur to artificial insemination.

You can also not reproduce at all, many people have dysfunctions and can't biologically reproduce, following this logic having a dysfunction like that is more unnatural than being gay.

(btw I'm not the one down-voting your comments)
User avatar
#110 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
Most animals just have sex with the sole purpose of creating a new generation. Unlike humans, few cases like dolphins do feel pleasure from it.

And dysfunctions ARE unnatural. They are disabilities caused by failures in hormonal or reproductive systems.
User avatar
#114 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
That first statement is not true, sex IS pleasurable because of biological reasons, it has to be so the race can keep on living, most animals do it because of the pleasure, reproducing not the only reason, but actually the result.

Then condoms and any other anti-reproductive methods are completely unnatural as well ( and they are pretty much taken for granted, almost everyone uses them and nobody questions the fact that they are actually making it impossible to reproduce while having sex, making it essentially point-less, expect for the pleasure ).

As rational beings we know the difference between reproducing and having sex for pleasure.

We as a race are already over-populated, that's why we are controlling birth rates with condoms and other methods, imagine if nobody cared about that and every time they had sex it was unprotected? As we are we already don't have enough jobs for everyone, and having more children wouldn't be necessarily good anymore.

I see your point at saying it's unnatural, I have actually pondered about that for quite some time, when I first thought about it, it felt as if I was broken, not meant to pass down my genes, going against the sole purpose of living, but now that I know that I have more options to reproduce other than having heterosexual sex, and that it's not an issue at all ( it even isn't and issue for other "irrational" animals ), so it shouldn't be necessarily something bad, or unnatural.

Being gay It's just as unnatural as being black on a place with low sun-light, or white on a place with bright sun-light... And I don't think that's unnatural, just NOT PERFECT.
#48 - What do you mean by normal?  [+] (8 new replies) 11/21/2013 on It's true 0
User avatar
#49 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
Biologically normal.

As in, thinking they are as "average" as any straight person.
User avatar
#51 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
Welp, beeing gay is about as normal as beeing left handed ( the odds are about the same as well, about 1/10 ).

User avatar
#52 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
I suppose so, although somethings seems off about that comparison.

User avatar
#93 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
What seems off about it?

Being gay is not unnatural, there are hundreds of different animals species that can be gay, there are some species of animals that consist MOSTLY of gays, like giraffes.

The same thing with being left handed, many animal species have some left handed animals, and some ( like eagles ) are 100% left handed...
User avatar
#96 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
It is, because in our biological make up, we do not normally reproduce by going male X male or female X female.

Sure, we are animals too, but our reproductive habits are different than bonobos or giraffes.
User avatar
#102 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
You don't need to be sexually attracted to a gender to reproduce.

Swans for example have only one partner for their whole lives, and if there is a gay swan he or she would have sex with one swan of the other gender JUST for reproducing and then go back to it's partner.

As a human, you have many options, you can either adopt, or donate sperm/eggs, or even recur to artificial insemination.

You can also not reproduce at all, many people have dysfunctions and can't biologically reproduce, following this logic having a dysfunction like that is more unnatural than being gay.

(btw I'm not the one down-voting your comments)
User avatar
#110 - dalokan (11/21/2013) [-]
Most animals just have sex with the sole purpose of creating a new generation. Unlike humans, few cases like dolphins do feel pleasure from it.

And dysfunctions ARE unnatural. They are disabilities caused by failures in hormonal or reproductive systems.
User avatar
#114 - tulioandmiguel (11/21/2013) [-]
That first statement is not true, sex IS pleasurable because of biological reasons, it has to be so the race can keep on living, most animals do it because of the pleasure, reproducing not the only reason, but actually the result.

Then condoms and any other anti-reproductive methods are completely unnatural as well ( and they are pretty much taken for granted, almost everyone uses them and nobody questions the fact that they are actually making it impossible to reproduce while having sex, making it essentially point-less, expect for the pleasure ).

As rational beings we know the difference between reproducing and having sex for pleasure.

We as a race are already over-populated, that's why we are controlling birth rates with condoms and other methods, imagine if nobody cared about that and every time they had sex it was unprotected? As we are we already don't have enough jobs for everyone, and having more children wouldn't be necessarily good anymore.

I see your point at saying it's unnatural, I have actually pondered about that for quite some time, when I first thought about it, it felt as if I was broken, not meant to pass down my genes, going against the sole purpose of living, but now that I know that I have more options to reproduce other than having heterosexual sex, and that it's not an issue at all ( it even isn't and issue for other "irrational" animals ), so it shouldn't be necessarily something bad, or unnatural.

Being gay It's just as unnatural as being black on a place with low sun-light, or white on a place with bright sun-light... And I don't think that's unnatural, just NOT PERFECT.