Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:6/23/2013
Last Login:12/07/2016
Comment Ranking:#5602
Highest Content Rank:#1459
Highest Comment Rank:#279
Content Thumbs: 3084 total,  3501 ,  417
Comment Thumbs: 13598 total,  14590 ,  992
Content Level Progress: 72% (72/100)
Level 123 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 124 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 304 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 305 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Content Views:181569
Times Content Favorited:242 times
Total Comments Made:2449
FJ Points:12822
Favorite Tags: game (2) | supernatural (2)

latest user's comments

#25 - It actually stands for pansexual. It means attraction to peopl…  [+] (15 replies) 06/29/2016 on LGBTQP extremists +61
User avatar
#118 - redragond (06/29/2016) [-]
How's that different from bisexual though? I'm confus
User avatar
#315 - munchlord (06/30/2016) [-]
Bisexual isn't snowflake enough for some.
User avatar
#259 - metacobalion (06/30/2016) [-]
They need to be more special than bisexuals
#156 - tomatoesauce (06/29/2016) [-]
Bisexual is attraction to those who identify as male/female.
Pansexual is attraction to those who identify as male/female/intergender/agender/genderfluid/genderwhatever.
User avatar
#312 - niceguyjon (06/30/2016) [-]
What about us who identify as battle ships
#311 - anon (06/30/2016) [-]
Pansexual here, couldn't be attracted to anyone who wasn't male or female (if hermaphrodites are actually a third gender then them too)

The personality of someone who identifies as nonbinary, gender fluid, whatever else you listed there reeks of special snowflake syndrome and it's all about me attitudes.

Pansexual just means personality over looks and gender and if aliens came down I guess species as well. That does not mean a pansexual would date someone with a "great" personality who is morbidly obese because your weight is an extension of your personality (to a point). Obese says their personality is lazy and without self control, over eating is substance abuse too. This can also be applied to bone thin people, people who have zero hygiene.

Your looks say a lot more about your personality than you may think, for example you can tell that by how I wear the anon name, that I am a total faggot.
User avatar
#369 - popnotes (06/30/2016) [-]
Pansexual means everyone. Demisexual means attraction to personality and intelligence, which is also a stupid thing because that's how everyone works.
#319 - anon (06/30/2016) [-]
Raging retard here* corrected it for you
User avatar
#147 - harbingerwolf (06/29/2016) [-]
Its not, try telling that to a bunch of furries, i did, spoilers it didnt 32nd well.
User avatar
#136 - blackmageewizardt (06/29/2016) [-]
they would fuck also Things that are not People.
User avatar
#124 - trollzoll (06/29/2016) [-]
I don't know. I just googled it and that's what it said.
#123 - anon (06/29/2016) [-]
Attraction based on personality rather than genatalia or physical attributes
User avatar
#341 - alleksi (06/30/2016) [-]
So, bisexuality.
#125 - anon (06/29/2016) [-]
So, the way people SHOULD be attracted to each other?

I dont see that as a qualifier for a sexuality, if anything, thats just knowing that you like people's personalities that mesh with yours.
#245 - skyguyseven (06/30/2016) [-]
**skyguyseven used "*roll picture*"**
**skyguyseven rolled image** Because... Reasons!
#1457652 - Is Civ 5 good if you want to get into strategy type games?  [+] (9 replies) 06/26/2016 on Video Games 0
User avatar
#1457685 - desacabose (06/26/2016) [-]
One of gamespot's reviewers said gone home was better ;)
User avatar
#1457676 - gibusernamepls (06/26/2016) [-]
idk, I read on Kotaku that a lot of games are better than Civ 5, even with the Brave New World expansion pack
User avatar
#1457672 - sannukas (06/26/2016) [-]
It's great.
Just make sure to get the complete edition.
User avatar
#1457741 - trollzoll (06/26/2016) [-]
Yeah, I'm already addicted. Send help
User avatar
#1457656 - thechosentroll (06/26/2016) [-]
It's not good, regardless of what you're into.
User avatar
#1457732 - oxidoferroso (06/26/2016) [-]
You can't just say that and don't explain why
User avatar
#1457737 - thechosentroll (06/26/2016) [-]
As a strategy game, it's shit cause there's next to no depth. Economics are simple, armies are simple, politics are simple (murder everyone), it requires very little strategy other than "bumrush Stonehenge" or "play as Russia". And even if it were a good strategy game, it stops being fun after an hour, when you're micromanaging 500 things and you keep forgetting what your strategy or plan was, because each turn takes 5 real life years to finish, so by the end you're just spamming nuclear robots all over the place and not giving a fuck about anything other than finishing the game, because it's been 5 hours and you're getting tired of the games' shit. Also, impossible to play with friends, because after about an hour everyone just opts we go play something else.
User avatar
#1457747 - oxidoferroso (06/26/2016) [-]
Fair enough, I enjoyed it for a couple of games, but it's true it doesn't have much substance to it
Doesn't help the AI is dumb as a brick
Have you played the pervious Civilizations? I was thinking about trying them out, but if it's going to be more of the same...
User avatar
#1457752 - thechosentroll (06/26/2016) [-]
Only IV and it was a bit better, but not much.
#97 - Why not just shoot them instead?  [+] (1 reply) 06/26/2016 on Brutal animal attack 0
#98 - tomatoesauce (07/02/2016) [-]
Where's the fun?