Upload
Login or register

trollsbetrollin

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:12/05/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#13251
Highest Content Rank:#13963
Highest Comment Rank:#13249
Content Thumbs: 14 total,  20 ,  6
Comment Thumbs: 412 total,  540 ,  128
Content Level Progress: 30.5% (18/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 139 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 140 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2195
Total Comments Made:193
FJ Points:418

latest user's comments

#96 - Oh it definitely is  [+] (1 reply) 04/26/2014 on Flood +1
#97 - trollsbetrollin (04/26/2014) [-]
#10 - Step 1. Acquire masses of Irn-Bru Step 2. Drink said Irn-B…  [+] (1 reply) 02/25/2014 on travel tips? 0
#11 - captainhobnob (02/25/2014) [-]
Irn-Bru...
#111 - Ok I get what you are saying too. I'll try explain. I…  [+] (1 reply) 11/04/2013 on Thoughts from The Queen 0
User avatar
#138 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
well how i see it is this
wouldn't she also be considered the queen on northern Ireland
(sorry so long i had class)
im not really arguing that shes a separate entity for each more of just wouldn't by definition she also be considered this
..i am interested because Americans do not learn what she is and just go with what they hear (queen of england) no one argues this because its just Americans they are just wrong oh well
and since no one corrects them they jsut grow up wrong
but really is it wrong or just an insult
i think its not wrong she is queen of england but its not her ONLY thing she is queen of all the countries in the UK so as such she can be known as the queen of each
BUT this would be considered insulting because it demotes her power
by saying queen of england you are assuming that is her only power
its right but it shows you assume she is limited
#107 - She is not the Queen of England, just of the UK. The UK does i…  [+] (4 replies) 11/04/2013 on Thoughts from The Queen 0
User avatar
#108 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
ok i understand you and i havnt said your wrong what im saying is
its like if i ruled over all of an area i am the ruler of that area and all it includes
you have stated england is there
so how is she not also the queen of england
shed be like the queen to englands queen (i know that doesnt make much sense)
by definition she rules over england since its part of the uk
i know what your saying is right by WHY is it right
#111 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
Ok I get what you are saying too. I'll try explain.

It is becuase constitutionally England and the UK are the same entity. (England also does not have any devolved power like Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland does, but that is another matter.) The Queen has power over the people and land of England, but only becuase she is the Queen of the UK. Similary she rules over the other countries in the UK, but not as a seperate monarch for each one, but as a single Queen of the UK, as all the parts of the UK are one country.

Incase you're wondering this is all a part of my uni degree which is why i'm arguing it so strongly even though it is just a technicality, but you seem interested so that is good!
User avatar
#138 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
well how i see it is this
wouldn't she also be considered the queen on northern Ireland
(sorry so long i had class)
im not really arguing that shes a separate entity for each more of just wouldn't by definition she also be considered this
..i am interested because Americans do not learn what she is and just go with what they hear (queen of england) no one argues this because its just Americans they are just wrong oh well
and since no one corrects them they jsut grow up wrong
but really is it wrong or just an insult
i think its not wrong she is queen of england but its not her ONLY thing she is queen of all the countries in the UK so as such she can be known as the queen of each
BUT this would be considered insulting because it demotes her power
by saying queen of england you are assuming that is her only power
its right but it shows you assume she is limited
User avatar
#109 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
my main argument is if your the ruler of this area you are the ruler of whats within
so if i rule the country of wizow
and the city of blahblah is inside it
i am the ruler of blahblah
#103 - You are completly wrong. Are you trolling?  [+] (6 replies) 11/04/2013 on Thoughts from The Queen +1
User avatar
#105 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
eh just picking the opposite side of you because agreeing would make a short conversation
as i said tho you havnt deputed the fact that being queen of the uk includes england
also i just woke up and am extremely tired so im not sure if iv actually made sense anyways
#107 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
She is not the Queen of England, just of the UK. The UK does include England but she isn't the Queen of it. England is not a seperate country with it's own monarch.
User avatar
#108 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
ok i understand you and i havnt said your wrong what im saying is
its like if i ruled over all of an area i am the ruler of that area and all it includes
you have stated england is there
so how is she not also the queen of england
shed be like the queen to englands queen (i know that doesnt make much sense)
by definition she rules over england since its part of the uk
i know what your saying is right by WHY is it right
#111 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
Ok I get what you are saying too. I'll try explain.

It is becuase constitutionally England and the UK are the same entity. (England also does not have any devolved power like Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland does, but that is another matter.) The Queen has power over the people and land of England, but only becuase she is the Queen of the UK. Similary she rules over the other countries in the UK, but not as a seperate monarch for each one, but as a single Queen of the UK, as all the parts of the UK are one country.

Incase you're wondering this is all a part of my uni degree which is why i'm arguing it so strongly even though it is just a technicality, but you seem interested so that is good!
User avatar
#138 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
well how i see it is this
wouldn't she also be considered the queen on northern Ireland
(sorry so long i had class)
im not really arguing that shes a separate entity for each more of just wouldn't by definition she also be considered this
..i am interested because Americans do not learn what she is and just go with what they hear (queen of england) no one argues this because its just Americans they are just wrong oh well
and since no one corrects them they jsut grow up wrong
but really is it wrong or just an insult
i think its not wrong she is queen of england but its not her ONLY thing she is queen of all the countries in the UK so as such she can be known as the queen of each
BUT this would be considered insulting because it demotes her power
by saying queen of england you are assuming that is her only power
its right but it shows you assume she is limited
User avatar
#109 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
my main argument is if your the ruler of this area you are the ruler of whats within
so if i rule the country of wizow
and the city of blahblah is inside it
i am the ruler of blahblah
#101 - England is part of UK, but the country is the United Kingdom o…  [+] (8 replies) 11/04/2013 on Thoughts from The Queen +2
User avatar
#102 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
if her mom had the same name and wasnt a queen shes till the second (i dont know much about the royal family)
but as you said england is part of the uk and she is queen of the uk so she is queen of england
jsut like obama is president of florida
#103 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
You are completly wrong. Are you trolling?
User avatar
#105 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
eh just picking the opposite side of you because agreeing would make a short conversation
as i said tho you havnt deputed the fact that being queen of the uk includes england
also i just woke up and am extremely tired so im not sure if iv actually made sense anyways
#107 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
She is not the Queen of England, just of the UK. The UK does include England but she isn't the Queen of it. England is not a seperate country with it's own monarch.
User avatar
#108 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
ok i understand you and i havnt said your wrong what im saying is
its like if i ruled over all of an area i am the ruler of that area and all it includes
you have stated england is there
so how is she not also the queen of england
shed be like the queen to englands queen (i know that doesnt make much sense)
by definition she rules over england since its part of the uk
i know what your saying is right by WHY is it right
#111 - trollsbetrollin (11/04/2013) [-]
Ok I get what you are saying too. I'll try explain.

It is becuase constitutionally England and the UK are the same entity. (England also does not have any devolved power like Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland does, but that is another matter.) The Queen has power over the people and land of England, but only becuase she is the Queen of the UK. Similary she rules over the other countries in the UK, but not as a seperate monarch for each one, but as a single Queen of the UK, as all the parts of the UK are one country.

Incase you're wondering this is all a part of my uni degree which is why i'm arguing it so strongly even though it is just a technicality, but you seem interested so that is good!
User avatar
#138 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
well how i see it is this
wouldn't she also be considered the queen on northern Ireland
(sorry so long i had class)
im not really arguing that shes a separate entity for each more of just wouldn't by definition she also be considered this
..i am interested because Americans do not learn what she is and just go with what they hear (queen of england) no one argues this because its just Americans they are just wrong oh well
and since no one corrects them they jsut grow up wrong
but really is it wrong or just an insult
i think its not wrong she is queen of england but its not her ONLY thing she is queen of all the countries in the UK so as such she can be known as the queen of each
BUT this would be considered insulting because it demotes her power
by saying queen of england you are assuming that is her only power
its right but it shows you assume she is limited
User avatar
#109 - quotes (11/04/2013) [-]
my main argument is if your the ruler of this area you are the ruler of whats within
so if i rule the country of wizow
and the city of blahblah is inside it
i am the ruler of blahblah