Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a 6% commission on everything you buy.

hide menu

trollmetoday    

Rank #14140 on Subscribers
trollmetoday Avatar Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Online
Send mail to trollmetoday Block trollmetoday Invite trollmetoday to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/27/2011
Last Login:8/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#17976
Highest Content Rank:#6027
Highest Comment Rank:#1245
Content Thumbs: 1830 total,  2249 ,  419
Comment Thumbs: 6862 total,  8038 ,  1176
Content Level Progress: 29% (29/100)
Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 19% (19/100)
Level 268 Comments: Pure Win → Level 269 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:5
Content Views:68262
Times Content Favorited:265 times
Total Comments Made:1446
FJ Points:9034

latest user's comments

#50 - I know someone who likes his bacon. 10/17/2011 on true +1
#49 - stupid dumbass ****** ANONS!!!! 10/17/2011 on Epic Facebook Fail 0
#338 - ohhh Primanti's 10/17/2011 on how it is +3
#315 - You probably don't live on the east coast the, correct? Kinda … 10/17/2011 on how it is +2
#41 - **trollmetoday rolls 35** Happy 1,000! 10/16/2011 on True Story Unfortuantely 0
#6 - I agree, I personally don't smoke because I don't feel like I …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/16/2011 on Why weed is illegal 0
User avatar #7 - nixter (10/17/2011) [-]
Yeah no one should feel forced to smoke or feel pressured. I feel yah bro
#1 - I'm not gonna lie, I think that weed should be legal; but to b…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/16/2011 on Why weed is illegal +1
User avatar #3 - nixter (10/16/2011) [-]
Only the people who smoke and talk about it ALL the time, like it's the only thing in their lives are the annoying ones. Most people who smoke weed aren't annoying at all, but they're less obvious to notice... the more obvious smokers tend to be annoying as fuck because they smoke everyday and that's all they talk about, and since they are more obvious to spot that's how stereo types are made.... I smoke once in a while, pacing myself, being responsible, and keeping up my good grades. Weed should just be accepted, is all I'm saying. But people give weed a bad name.
User avatar #6 - trollmetoday (10/16/2011) [-]
I agree, I personally don't smoke because I don't feel like I need to; however weed has no bad effects. I'm fine with the idea of people smoking it, but I just don't want the people who smoke it to tell me about the government's evil agenda and how I should start smoking weed.
User avatar #7 - nixter (10/17/2011) [-]
Yeah no one should feel forced to smoke or feel pressured. I feel yah bro
#67 - Comment deleted 10/16/2011 on El Dubsado 0
#66 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 10/16/2011 on El Dubsado 0
#67 - trollmetoday has deleted their comment.
#136 - What the **** is reddiy? 10/15/2011 on Parenting done right 0
#40 - That awkward moment when OP can't spell friends.  [+] (2 new replies) 10/15/2011 on True Shit! +12
User avatar #56 - thejennifer (10/15/2011) [-]
Maybe he doesn't have any. :(
#45 - dangler (10/15/2011) [-]
#582 - Proof is equal to hard evidence, and you have none. As for hol…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/14/2011 on Funny Religion Comp 0
User avatar #584 - rennat (10/15/2011) [-]
When talking in theoretical terms you can't have hard evidence, but what I have presented is still evidence. Evidence of any kind still tips the balance one way or the other. Now when we are speaking of the big bang I am assuming you are using the older version. The new one is being worked on right now actually. The state the universe was in just before the big bang was a form of matter and chaos theory says that, given time, all possible combinations of matter must exist at some time.This is why the universe was highly compressed. Now the reason it is illogical is because you are thinking in terms of the universe as you see it today. We must see what it was then to understand. As the universe as we know it hadn't come into existence yet, none of our laws of physics yet applied. And as there was no space outside of the highly compressed matter nothing was necessary to hold it up. And there is a very good understanding that the Big Bang produced copious amounts of heat. The trigger for the explosion was mostly likely just a cause of entropy, after the matter was so highly compressed it was forced out by the entropy of the system. In fact many scientists postulate that it may be cycle and that there may have been several universes before and there will likely be more after ours.
#576 - But there is no proof against a deity. Both sides of the argue…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/14/2011 on Funny Religion Comp 0
User avatar #578 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
Look at the evidence i presented to the guy below you in the comments, there is your proof against a deity. And name a couple holes in the arguments against a deity and I will see if I can patch a few.
User avatar #582 - trollmetoday (10/14/2011) [-]
Proof is equal to hard evidence, and you have none. As for holes, i'll take on the big bang theory. It states that a tiny bit of compressed high-density matter exploded with a big bang. What was it made of? What force compressed it to such a high density in the beginning? And if there was nothing in the beginning except this pinpoint of high-density matter, where was it? What was holding it up? What was its container? There must have been something supporting it, correct? Also; if we were to say that there was a high-density force, what triggered it to explode? There was no intense heat and no severe cold. There wasn't even time! How can you explain that? It's completely illogical.



User avatar #584 - rennat (10/15/2011) [-]
When talking in theoretical terms you can't have hard evidence, but what I have presented is still evidence. Evidence of any kind still tips the balance one way or the other. Now when we are speaking of the big bang I am assuming you are using the older version. The new one is being worked on right now actually. The state the universe was in just before the big bang was a form of matter and chaos theory says that, given time, all possible combinations of matter must exist at some time.This is why the universe was highly compressed. Now the reason it is illogical is because you are thinking in terms of the universe as you see it today. We must see what it was then to understand. As the universe as we know it hadn't come into existence yet, none of our laws of physics yet applied. And as there was no space outside of the highly compressed matter nothing was necessary to hold it up. And there is a very good understanding that the Big Bang produced copious amounts of heat. The trigger for the explosion was mostly likely just a cause of entropy, after the matter was so highly compressed it was forced out by the entropy of the system. In fact many scientists postulate that it may be cycle and that there may have been several universes before and there will likely be more after ours.
#569 - Prove to me that there is no deity in existence  [+] (5 new replies) 10/13/2011 on Funny Religion Comp 0
User avatar #575 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
The burden of proof falls on those making the claim. It is not possible to prove that something doesn't exist, but if the person making the claim wants people to believe them that something does then they have to provide enough evidence to convince people that it is likely that it does exist.
User avatar #576 - trollmetoday (10/14/2011) [-]
But there is no proof against a deity. Both sides of the arguement have holes in them that can't be explained to this day, so why then are so many people out to prove that ones beliefs are false when they simply cannot?
User avatar #578 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
Look at the evidence i presented to the guy below you in the comments, there is your proof against a deity. And name a couple holes in the arguments against a deity and I will see if I can patch a few.
User avatar #582 - trollmetoday (10/14/2011) [-]
Proof is equal to hard evidence, and you have none. As for holes, i'll take on the big bang theory. It states that a tiny bit of compressed high-density matter exploded with a big bang. What was it made of? What force compressed it to such a high density in the beginning? And if there was nothing in the beginning except this pinpoint of high-density matter, where was it? What was holding it up? What was its container? There must have been something supporting it, correct? Also; if we were to say that there was a high-density force, what triggered it to explode? There was no intense heat and no severe cold. There wasn't even time! How can you explain that? It's completely illogical.



User avatar #584 - rennat (10/15/2011) [-]
When talking in theoretical terms you can't have hard evidence, but what I have presented is still evidence. Evidence of any kind still tips the balance one way or the other. Now when we are speaking of the big bang I am assuming you are using the older version. The new one is being worked on right now actually. The state the universe was in just before the big bang was a form of matter and chaos theory says that, given time, all possible combinations of matter must exist at some time.This is why the universe was highly compressed. Now the reason it is illogical is because you are thinking in terms of the universe as you see it today. We must see what it was then to understand. As the universe as we know it hadn't come into existence yet, none of our laws of physics yet applied. And as there was no space outside of the highly compressed matter nothing was necessary to hold it up. And there is a very good understanding that the Big Bang produced copious amounts of heat. The trigger for the explosion was mostly likely just a cause of entropy, after the matter was so highly compressed it was forced out by the entropy of the system. In fact many scientists postulate that it may be cycle and that there may have been several universes before and there will likely be more after ours.
#444 - Or maybe it's because people want to have faith in something. …  [+] (19 new replies) 10/13/2011 on Funny Religion Comp -1
User avatar #467 - rennat (10/13/2011) [-]
Except that the penalty of believing in Religion is when it is taught to children. They are taught that faith is a virtue, so even when something they believe in has every scrap of evidence available against it, they should still believe because they have "faith" in it. It is like saying that you believe the earth is flat. We have hundreds of people who can contradict it, massive stacks of evidence against it and none for it but I want to believe it is true, so it is. Teaching an entire generation not to care about evidence even if it is blatantly right is going to cause massive problems in the future when we are trying to actually study new things and people are still grasping to what we used to think was true rather than what we now know is true.
User avatar #569 - trollmetoday (10/13/2011) [-]
Prove to me that there is no deity in existence
User avatar #575 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
The burden of proof falls on those making the claim. It is not possible to prove that something doesn't exist, but if the person making the claim wants people to believe them that something does then they have to provide enough evidence to convince people that it is likely that it does exist.
User avatar #576 - trollmetoday (10/14/2011) [-]
But there is no proof against a deity. Both sides of the arguement have holes in them that can't be explained to this day, so why then are so many people out to prove that ones beliefs are false when they simply cannot?
User avatar #578 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
Look at the evidence i presented to the guy below you in the comments, there is your proof against a deity. And name a couple holes in the arguments against a deity and I will see if I can patch a few.
User avatar #582 - trollmetoday (10/14/2011) [-]
Proof is equal to hard evidence, and you have none. As for holes, i'll take on the big bang theory. It states that a tiny bit of compressed high-density matter exploded with a big bang. What was it made of? What force compressed it to such a high density in the beginning? And if there was nothing in the beginning except this pinpoint of high-density matter, where was it? What was holding it up? What was its container? There must have been something supporting it, correct? Also; if we were to say that there was a high-density force, what triggered it to explode? There was no intense heat and no severe cold. There wasn't even time! How can you explain that? It's completely illogical.



User avatar #584 - rennat (10/15/2011) [-]
When talking in theoretical terms you can't have hard evidence, but what I have presented is still evidence. Evidence of any kind still tips the balance one way or the other. Now when we are speaking of the big bang I am assuming you are using the older version. The new one is being worked on right now actually. The state the universe was in just before the big bang was a form of matter and chaos theory says that, given time, all possible combinations of matter must exist at some time.This is why the universe was highly compressed. Now the reason it is illogical is because you are thinking in terms of the universe as you see it today. We must see what it was then to understand. As the universe as we know it hadn't come into existence yet, none of our laws of physics yet applied. And as there was no space outside of the highly compressed matter nothing was necessary to hold it up. And there is a very good understanding that the Big Bang produced copious amounts of heat. The trigger for the explosion was mostly likely just a cause of entropy, after the matter was so highly compressed it was forced out by the entropy of the system. In fact many scientists postulate that it may be cycle and that there may have been several universes before and there will likely be more after ours.
User avatar #472 - harryboom (10/13/2011) [-]
there is no evidence ether for or against the existence of a deity
User avatar #474 - rennat (10/13/2011) [-]
Except that the very concept of a deity is a logical contradiction and physically impossible in our universe.
User avatar #477 - harryboom (10/13/2011) [-]
whether it is imposable or not depends on how you define a deity
User avatar #481 - rennat (10/13/2011) [-]
Well if we follow the judeo-christian model of a deity than it is a contradiction. Omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnibenevolent. Omnipotence means he can do anything, meaning he could ristrict his own powers making him not omnipotent, or he can't restrict his own powers and thus never was omnipotent. If he were omnibenevolent then it would be impossible for him to send anyone to Hell or allow Satan to exist. So he is either non-existent or evil.
User avatar #494 - harryboom (10/13/2011) [-]
there is more than one religion dumb-ass
User avatar #501 - rennat (10/13/2011) [-]
No shit. You want me to carefully dissect every known religion for its flaws at 1 AM? Just do a fucking google search and go to reputable site or use the basic tool of logic. And besides, I would literally have to write several full length essays to properly cover even a dozen of the other religions. I chose the judeo-christian religion because it is most likely the one you and the other readers are more familiar with.
User avatar #504 - harryboom (10/13/2011) [-]
so other religions don't count then because they are better structured
User avatar #520 - rennat (10/13/2011) [-]
That is exactly not what I said. I said I chose this religion over the others because you and others were more likely to be familiar with it. And I could write many such essays on Christianity but I simply chose to cover one point. I could have gone over the atrocities committed in the Bible, the constant contradictions, or the illogical/disgusting story of "Adam and Eve" when you consider that Christians believe that we descended from them, and that they only had sons. Which means that the only way that it could be explained (assuming it is true) is that they bred with their mother. A terrible story to be teaching children, I think.
User avatar #565 - harryboom (10/13/2011) [-]
well as i said there is more than one way of interpreting a deity
User avatar #574 - rennat (10/14/2011) [-]
And I gave you the logical interpretation of the text.
User avatar #580 - harryboom (10/14/2011) [-]
of the judo Christian text
i am not talking about any specific deity
User avatar #583 - rennat (10/15/2011) [-]
When trying to prove a point about a broad term one must break it down as far as possible in one direction. I am not saying all deities abide by what I said. It would be like me asking you to prove religion exists without citing any specific religion. It isn't possible.
#115 - daaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 10/13/2011 on iz mine. +1
#97 - **trollmetoday rolls 4** plus this? 10/12/2011 on Scumbag Steve vs. GGG 0
#95 - **trollmetoday rolls 7** minus this  [+] (1 new reply) 10/12/2011 on Scumbag Steve vs. GGG 0
User avatar #97 - trollmetoday (10/12/2011) [-]
**trollmetoday rolls 4** plus this?
#93 - **trollmetoday rolls 04** just sucked the biggest cock of all time!  [+] (2 new replies) 10/12/2011 on Scumbag Steve vs. GGG 0
User avatar #95 - trollmetoday (10/12/2011) [-]
**trollmetoday rolls 7** minus this
User avatar #97 - trollmetoday (10/12/2011) [-]
**trollmetoday rolls 4** plus this?
#5174 - **trollmetoday rolls 179** 10/12/2011 on Pokemon for FunnyJunk (desc) 0
#5120 - **trollmetoday rolls 957** 10/12/2011 on Pokemon for FunnyJunk (desc) 0
#5030 - Bond? James Bond? 10/12/2011 on Pokemon for FunnyJunk (desc) +1
#4969 - **trollmetoday rolls 126** 10/12/2011 on Pokemon for FunnyJunk (desc) 0
#156 - **trollmetoday rolls 29** LET THERE BE BACON! 10/11/2011 on I am expecting thumbs 0
#180 - Picture 10/11/2011 on Dubs to the third power +1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 750

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - zameckis (10/29/2012) [-]
do troll me today
User avatar #12 to #11 - trollmetoday ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
No
User avatar #8 - badboywantsu (01/05/2012) [-]
hello fellow pittsburgh resident, i saw your comment.
uh what's up?
User avatar #9 to #8 - trollmetoday ONLINE (02/16/2012) [-]
Taking a month to reply ftw! Nothing much, and you?
User avatar #10 to #9 - badboywantsu (02/16/2012) [-]
work, losing 20 pounds, working out, looking for people to hang out with.

User avatar #6 - ihaventsleptyetfml (12/18/2011) [-]
i rolled your username because a post told me so. well here you go happy fapmas http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlvgBxtLgI
User avatar #2 - hotvagina (11/24/2011) [-]
Nope, why don't you drive right on over to the good old capital of Canada just to take me out for a coffee?
User avatar #3 to #2 - trollmetoday ONLINE (11/24/2011) [-]
I'll be there in about 10 hours
User avatar #4 to #3 - hotvagina (11/24/2011) [-]
Sounds good, person whose age I don't even know, let alone anything else! Lol, but seriously, where are you from? It snowed here today :)
User avatar #5 to #4 - trollmetoday ONLINE (11/24/2011) [-]
I'm from Pennsylvania, it's pretty cold here. But nothing like when i was in Qubec and Ontario
User avatar #1 - TheSuperHobo (10/18/2011) [-]
You are amazing. Keep it up, bro.
 Friends (0)