Upload
Login or register

toensix

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:2/21/2013
Last Login:12/09/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#9066
Highest Content Rank:#3397
Highest Comment Rank:#2488
Content Thumbs: 1225 total,  1438 ,  213
Comment Thumbs: 4685 total,  5497 ,  812
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 93 Content: Srs Business → Level 94 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 239 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:2
Content Views:90097
Times Content Favorited:32 times
Total Comments Made:2242
FJ Points:4690

latest user's comments

#168 - It isn't. No is banning dogs. Someone just dropped some leafle…  [+] (1 reply) 08/12/2016 on Trumper Comp9 +4
#169 - burntmywater (08/12/2016) [-]
Ah, the source hadnt been posted yet when I last commented. Thank you for letting me know.å
#241 - Sure but Trump isn't proven innocent of everything you listed …  [+] (2 replies) 08/11/2016 on Trump and Hillary +3
User avatar
#244 - thegamepixel (08/11/2016) [-]
And to be clear, I'm sure he's done some bad stuff in the past, but in America it's innocent until proven guilty.
User avatar
#242 - thegamepixel (08/11/2016) [-]
No, but I don't condemn people without evidence. I think regardless of the outcome at this point Trump is innocent in the Trump U case. All the evidence points to it. If you haven't watched the video I linked, I highly recommend it.
#237 - Most of the criticisms of Hillary being a criminal haven't bee…  [+] (5 replies) 08/11/2016 on Trump and Hillary +11
User avatar
#238 - thegamepixel (08/11/2016) [-]
The difference is that the Trump claim function on claims, whereas the Clinton ones have evidence. She actually was guilty for the emails and Comey admitted it, he just disagrees that there should be a charge for extreme negligence when it has only been tried once in 100 years. She has clearly committed perjury and with the others, there's tons of evidence.
#245 - dyelfagget (08/11/2016) [-]
Comey disagreed with the FBI charging her for attempting to purposefully distribute the information to foriegn threats. He basically said it was not the FBI's juristiction because it was not an attempt to give away information and just her being incompetent and people still go nuts expecting the FBI to do shit it doesn't have the powers to do. People really like checks and balances until it means they have to wait a few more months to see if Hillary will get in trouble.
User avatar
#241 - toensix (08/11/2016) [-]
Sure but Trump isn't proven innocent of everything you listed either. The lawsuits concerning Trump university are still going as far as I could find.
User avatar
#244 - thegamepixel (08/11/2016) [-]
And to be clear, I'm sure he's done some bad stuff in the past, but in America it's innocent until proven guilty.
User avatar
#242 - thegamepixel (08/11/2016) [-]
No, but I don't condemn people without evidence. I think regardless of the outcome at this point Trump is innocent in the Trump U case. All the evidence points to it. If you haven't watched the video I linked, I highly recommend it.
#293 - Although I enjoyed C&C 3, it wasn't good in any stretch of…  [+] (1 reply) 08/10/2016 on Hitler's Wish 0
User avatar
#294 - repostforlife (08/10/2016) [-]
it was, I remember playing one of the red alerts when I was younger and just, having so much fun. when I played 3 it was like "wtf is this?" it felt so wrong and out of place
#99 - Then what did they know but didn't use? Scaled armour? Scales …  [+] (1 reply) 08/08/2016 on West stahp! 0
User avatar
#100 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
Germanic and Roman armour crafting technology didn't get lost, it got improved. They knew those armour styles, they've seen byzantine and arabian armour style, but still they kept theirs. Why? Because it was the one that offered the biggest amount of protection. That's my point.
#97 - But what other variants were in use at that time apart from pl…  [+] (3 replies) 08/08/2016 on West stahp! 0
User avatar
#98 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
None but my point was exactly that, the technology difference and the evolution. It's not like they didn't know other armours, but they used those because they were better.
User avatar
#99 - toensix (08/08/2016) [-]
Then what did they know but didn't use? Scaled armour? Scales aren't bad armour at all.
User avatar
#100 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
Germanic and Roman armour crafting technology didn't get lost, it got improved. They knew those armour styles, they've seen byzantine and arabian armour style, but still they kept theirs. Why? Because it was the one that offered the biggest amount of protection. That's my point.
#92 - Gotta disagree with you there on chainmail. Chainmail is amazi…  [+] (5 replies) 08/08/2016 on West stahp! +2
User avatar
#93 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
I never claimed chainmail was shit, I just said it was the shittiest armour avaliable in Europe (ignore leather and variants, I meant metal armours, should've pointed that out earlier) at that time, which is not the same.

Okay, I didn't know that, thanks for the information. I wonder how popular those armours were, though. I'm not a Japanese history expert, but to my understanding, most of their armours worked like I stated above. I may be wrong, though, as I said I'm not an expert.
User avatar
#97 - toensix (08/08/2016) [-]
But what other variants were in use at that time apart from plate and leather?
User avatar
#98 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
None but my point was exactly that, the technology difference and the evolution. It's not like they didn't know other armours, but they used those because they were better.
User avatar
#99 - toensix (08/08/2016) [-]
Then what did they know but didn't use? Scaled armour? Scales aren't bad armour at all.
User avatar
#100 - arandomanon (08/08/2016) [-]
Germanic and Roman armour crafting technology didn't get lost, it got improved. They knew those armour styles, they've seen byzantine and arabian armour style, but still they kept theirs. Why? Because it was the one that offered the biggest amount of protection. That's my point.