Upload
Login or register
x

tobyonekenoby

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/23/2013
Last Login:1/12/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7392
Highest Content Rank:#10253
Highest Comment Rank:#3966
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  8 ,  5
Comment Thumbs: 1518 total,  1724 ,  206
Content Level Progress: 10.16% (6/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 60% (30/50)
Level 211 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2272
Total Comments Made:987
FJ Points:1182

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#7 - Single Fist Faggot. 01/11/2016 on FITNESS TRAINERS HATE HIM +1
#71 - If he had thrown it, he would probably miss. I think it takes … 01/11/2016 on Arguments make me hard 0
#67 - I just don't think it would be a great idea to introduce guns …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Arguments make me hard 0
User avatar
#69 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
But what if would thrown it?

I can see why denmark doesnt need guns now, we dont have that many armed psychopaths here. The problem is just, how will it all proceed? If it stays the same, no problem, but after things like Charlie Hebdo, Krudttønden and Paris, i seriously would advise to teach more people to handle guns, and evt. extend the law to include semiautomatics. I dont say that we should give everyone a fucking gun. The weaponslicense and minimumsage, and a clean straffeattest must still be there.

Or allow women, homosexuals and other "hated" groups to carry non lethal weapons (tåregas, slagstokke gummiprojektiler) just to keep everyone more save. Of course, non lethal weapons will not help in a massshooting, but in general attacks.
User avatar
#71 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
If he had thrown it, he would probably miss. I think it takes a lot of training to throw a knife not made for throwing so it hits with the blade.

Yea if it is controlled it would probably be okay, but i don't think we need semi outamtics. Just basic pistols would be enough i think. Maybe we should not give "hated" groups slagstokke and gummiprojektiler, (a weaker tårgass i am totally fine with) because they can still do some serious damage. and migrants would probably be a part of the "hated" groups. Or there should just be some controle with the non-lethal weapons too. Then it would be fine i guess.
#63 - Yea probably in those countries it is a great idea. Maybe it i…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Arguments make me hard 0
User avatar
#65 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
I live in denmark too, but i think no matter what country you live in, it can always fall apart, luckily, in denmark there are natural borders to keep the different "people" from each other (og sjællander jokes aside). Bigger cities can always fall (because they are cultural meltingpots), while the countryside often gets easier away (because they are often cultural more uniform, and often have a tighter personal bond to each other).

Sjælland would probably be the first thing to fall, considering its closeness to malmö and its ghettos. Most of jylland would just look and say, "meh".
User avatar
#67 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
I just don't think it would be a great idea to introduce guns to Denmark in this day and age. When i was 10 years old (getting bullied) someone drew a knife on me, i was able to run away (with only a slight cut to the arm, nothing serious just like if you caught your finger while making food) because the attacker was fat. if that fucktard had pulled a gun on me, i would probably be dead.
User avatar
#69 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
But what if would thrown it?

I can see why denmark doesnt need guns now, we dont have that many armed psychopaths here. The problem is just, how will it all proceed? If it stays the same, no problem, but after things like Charlie Hebdo, Krudttønden and Paris, i seriously would advise to teach more people to handle guns, and evt. extend the law to include semiautomatics. I dont say that we should give everyone a fucking gun. The weaponslicense and minimumsage, and a clean straffeattest must still be there.

Or allow women, homosexuals and other "hated" groups to carry non lethal weapons (tåregas, slagstokke gummiprojektiler) just to keep everyone more save. Of course, non lethal weapons will not help in a massshooting, but in general attacks.
User avatar
#71 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
If he had thrown it, he would probably miss. I think it takes a lot of training to throw a knife not made for throwing so it hits with the blade.

Yea if it is controlled it would probably be okay, but i don't think we need semi outamtics. Just basic pistols would be enough i think. Maybe we should not give "hated" groups slagstokke and gummiprojektiler, (a weaker tårgass i am totally fine with) because they can still do some serious damage. and migrants would probably be a part of the "hated" groups. Or there should just be some controle with the non-lethal weapons too. Then it would be fine i guess.
#37 - I have heard about the country, but i have not heard about how…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Arguments make me hard 0
User avatar
#60 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
Well in the war as good as everyone tried to get their hand on a gun to defend their family, of course prices rocketed, and those without defenses where often those who where decimated first. Today its probably the region in europe (we look away from switzerland) with the most armed civillians, although in some parts it is totally illegal.

news.yahoo.com/yugoslav-wars-left-population-heavily-armed-181229601.html

And it is understandable that many dont want to give their weapon away, because the surviv once, often because they could defend or hunt, and probably did that during the war.
User avatar
#63 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
Yea probably in those countries it is a great idea. Maybe it is just because i live in Denmark and i can't see Denmark falling apart that fast..., unless all of the migrants from Sweden or Germany suddenly invades Denmark. So my point of view is quite colored.
User avatar
#65 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
I live in denmark too, but i think no matter what country you live in, it can always fall apart, luckily, in denmark there are natural borders to keep the different "people" from each other (og sjællander jokes aside). Bigger cities can always fall (because they are cultural meltingpots), while the countryside often gets easier away (because they are often cultural more uniform, and often have a tighter personal bond to each other).

Sjælland would probably be the first thing to fall, considering its closeness to malmö and its ghettos. Most of jylland would just look and say, "meh".
User avatar
#67 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
I just don't think it would be a great idea to introduce guns to Denmark in this day and age. When i was 10 years old (getting bullied) someone drew a knife on me, i was able to run away (with only a slight cut to the arm, nothing serious just like if you caught your finger while making food) because the attacker was fat. if that fucktard had pulled a gun on me, i would probably be dead.
User avatar
#69 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
But what if would thrown it?

I can see why denmark doesnt need guns now, we dont have that many armed psychopaths here. The problem is just, how will it all proceed? If it stays the same, no problem, but after things like Charlie Hebdo, Krudttønden and Paris, i seriously would advise to teach more people to handle guns, and evt. extend the law to include semiautomatics. I dont say that we should give everyone a fucking gun. The weaponslicense and minimumsage, and a clean straffeattest must still be there.

Or allow women, homosexuals and other "hated" groups to carry non lethal weapons (tåregas, slagstokke gummiprojektiler) just to keep everyone more save. Of course, non lethal weapons will not help in a massshooting, but in general attacks.
User avatar
#71 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
If he had thrown it, he would probably miss. I think it takes a lot of training to throw a knife not made for throwing so it hits with the blade.

Yea if it is controlled it would probably be okay, but i don't think we need semi outamtics. Just basic pistols would be enough i think. Maybe we should not give "hated" groups slagstokke and gummiprojektiler, (a weaker tårgass i am totally fine with) because they can still do some serious damage. and migrants would probably be a part of the "hated" groups. Or there should just be some controle with the non-lethal weapons too. Then it would be fine i guess.
#21 - just suddenly saying guns are illegal does not work. I believe…  [+] (8 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Arguments make me hard 0
User avatar
#26 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
No but it can start really fast. Have, for example, heard about Yugoslavia?
User avatar
#37 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
I have heard about the country, but i have not heard about how the handle guns/gun control.
User avatar
#60 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
Well in the war as good as everyone tried to get their hand on a gun to defend their family, of course prices rocketed, and those without defenses where often those who where decimated first. Today its probably the region in europe (we look away from switzerland) with the most armed civillians, although in some parts it is totally illegal.

news.yahoo.com/yugoslav-wars-left-population-heavily-armed-181229601.html

And it is understandable that many dont want to give their weapon away, because the surviv once, often because they could defend or hunt, and probably did that during the war.
User avatar
#63 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
Yea probably in those countries it is a great idea. Maybe it is just because i live in Denmark and i can't see Denmark falling apart that fast..., unless all of the migrants from Sweden or Germany suddenly invades Denmark. So my point of view is quite colored.
User avatar
#65 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
I live in denmark too, but i think no matter what country you live in, it can always fall apart, luckily, in denmark there are natural borders to keep the different "people" from each other (og sjællander jokes aside). Bigger cities can always fall (because they are cultural meltingpots), while the countryside often gets easier away (because they are often cultural more uniform, and often have a tighter personal bond to each other).

Sjælland would probably be the first thing to fall, considering its closeness to malmö and its ghettos. Most of jylland would just look and say, "meh".
User avatar
#67 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
I just don't think it would be a great idea to introduce guns to Denmark in this day and age. When i was 10 years old (getting bullied) someone drew a knife on me, i was able to run away (with only a slight cut to the arm, nothing serious just like if you caught your finger while making food) because the attacker was fat. if that fucktard had pulled a gun on me, i would probably be dead.
User avatar
#69 - hetzerdk (01/11/2016) [-]
But what if would thrown it?

I can see why denmark doesnt need guns now, we dont have that many armed psychopaths here. The problem is just, how will it all proceed? If it stays the same, no problem, but after things like Charlie Hebdo, Krudttønden and Paris, i seriously would advise to teach more people to handle guns, and evt. extend the law to include semiautomatics. I dont say that we should give everyone a fucking gun. The weaponslicense and minimumsage, and a clean straffeattest must still be there.

Or allow women, homosexuals and other "hated" groups to carry non lethal weapons (tåregas, slagstokke gummiprojektiler) just to keep everyone more save. Of course, non lethal weapons will not help in a massshooting, but in general attacks.
User avatar
#71 - tobyonekenoby (01/11/2016) [-]
If he had thrown it, he would probably miss. I think it takes a lot of training to throw a knife not made for throwing so it hits with the blade.

Yea if it is controlled it would probably be okay, but i don't think we need semi outamtics. Just basic pistols would be enough i think. Maybe we should not give "hated" groups slagstokke and gummiprojektiler, (a weaker tårgass i am totally fine with) because they can still do some serious damage. and migrants would probably be a part of the "hated" groups. Or there should just be some controle with the non-lethal weapons too. Then it would be fine i guess.
#97 - Yes 01/03/2016 on uno er dos +6
#164 - Yea you can see there is a spike missing after he touches the …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/02/2016 on Stupid is as stupid does 2 0
#215 - captaindeath (01/03/2016) [-]
Yeah I think we can agree no matter where it went in, it would hurt like a bloody bitch!
#9 - That is not okay. 12/27/2015 on kidnapping +2
#21 - One mention to go please. 12/15/2015 on Aftertale AU: 9 0

user's friends

Comments(0):

Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)