Upload
Login or register

tkfourtwoone

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:9/05/2011
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#10370
Highest Content Rank:#372
Highest Comment Rank:#1747
Content Thumbs: 36362 total,  40938 ,  4576
Comment Thumbs: 12424 total,  24163 ,  11739
Content Level Progress: 62.4% (624/1000)
Level 234 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 235 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz
Comment Level Progress: 14% (70/500)
Level 311 Comments: Wizard → Level 312 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:7
Content Views:1454482
Times Content Favorited:2178 times
Total Comments Made:9956
FJ Points:46751
Favorite Tags: diablo (4) | nostalgia (3)

Text Posts

HD Gifs / WebMs

First2[ 12 ]

latest user's comments

#137 - Luke only knew how to do one thing good in Episode IV - piloti…  [+] (12 new replies) 07/27/2016 on trailers +7
User avatar
#138 - captainredfish (07/27/2016) [-]
Vader is leagues better than Ren btw, and lets talk about Luke making a 1 in a million torpedo shot, he was great at piloting yea but he was also dogfighting.. something he didn't have to do much, especially against some of the fastest fighter ships made at the time.. he was a lot better than he should have been.



And comparing vader to Ren would be silly, it would be more like Luke beating Assaj Ventress who has just gone through extreme emotional turmoil and shot in the stomach with a blast that blasted stormtroopers 10 feet back...
User avatar
#188 - walcorn (07/27/2016) [-]
Luke didn't make that shot until after he had gotten a great deal of training with the force from Obi Wan
User avatar
#210 - captainredfish (07/27/2016) [-]
A great deal?? He heard a ghost voice and practiced against a training droid for a few hours... what the fuck are you smoking
User avatar
#211 - walcorn (07/27/2016) [-]
Literally nothing happens off-screen and the movie takes place in the span of 2 hours
User avatar
#213 - captainredfish (07/27/2016) [-]
Okay but im talking about the fact that they weren't on the Falcon for actually that long before they got to the Death Star and Obi Wan Died... Luke had a day or two of training max, hyperdrives motherfucker
User avatar
#215 - walcorn (07/27/2016) [-]
That's still a day or two days' more force training than Rey got, not to mention that as these ghosts have supposedly become one with the force, it makes sense that Obi Wan's ghost could also have a hand in guiding the blast to the Death Star's core
User avatar
#234 - captainredfish (07/28/2016) [-]
If so then Obi Wan's ghost wouldn't have let Luke get his hand chopped off, if you try to go the route of "a ghost can help" then you are making the movies progressivly worse (like the eagles in LOTR) in that, why don;t they help all the fucking time>
User avatar
#250 - walcorn (07/28/2016) [-]
That's a shit counterpoint mate.
He got his hand cut off by another force user.
The missiles or whatever he fired, were not sentient force sensitive people.
Guiding missiles =/= Guiding another person's arms as they're fighting
User avatar
#251 - captainredfish (07/28/2016) [-]
Oh you're right, bad comparison, giving a slight edge in combat to maybe help him win is nowhere near as hard as guiding a torpedo going some 1000+ Km/hr
User avatar
#252 - walcorn (07/28/2016) [-]
Guiding a lifeless projective =/= Controlling a Skywalker
User avatar
#253 - captainredfish (07/28/2016) [-]
Giving someone a force based edge in fighting=/= guiding an extremely fast moving projectile into a really small hole
User avatar
#254 - walcorn (07/28/2016) [-]
I suppose the only thing left to do is agree to disagree
#79 - After: *an attention whore 07/26/2016 on What tumblr does to you 0
#189 - I'd rather be alone than surrounded by false "friends"  [+] (1 new reply) 07/18/2016 on I just want someone to talk... 0
User avatar
#190 - testaburger (07/18/2016) [-]
That's fine, but not everyone does
#149 - Maybe you don't quite get it - if you're the only one performi…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/18/2016 on I just want someone to talk... +2
User avatar
#150 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Meh, you do what works for you, and I will do the same.
User avatar
#155 - xxskoolxx (07/18/2016) [-]
Let's say you always start talking with your "friend" for like two years they never ever start a convo with you. Then suddenly you stop, and wait for them to start a convo. If they don't fuck that person you obviously don't mean that much to them best to make better friends.
User avatar
#192 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Some of my friends, I haven't talked to in years. Heck, I saw one of my friends from high school just last week at Wendies, and we hung out for the rest of the day, because, why not? We haven't spoken since high school, but we're still friends.
User avatar
#196 - neokun (07/19/2016) [-]
But that's not relevant to his point...
#146 - Friendship should work both ways, in terms of effort involved  [+] (6 new replies) 07/18/2016 on I just want someone to talk... +3
User avatar
#148 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
That's kind of my point. If you just drop off the map for a couple of days you're not putting much effort into your half of the relationship. Why should they be interested in someone who randomly decides to put their friendship to some arbitrary test? If your friends are your friends it's not cool to just randomly decide that you're no longer on speaking terms because they haven't texted you in a week.
User avatar
#149 - tkfourtwoone (07/18/2016) [-]
Maybe you don't quite get it - if you're the only one performing a (conscious or not) effort into maintaining a communications channel, then it's not a two-directional relationship
User avatar
#150 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Meh, you do what works for you, and I will do the same.
User avatar
#155 - xxskoolxx (07/18/2016) [-]
Let's say you always start talking with your "friend" for like two years they never ever start a convo with you. Then suddenly you stop, and wait for them to start a convo. If they don't fuck that person you obviously don't mean that much to them best to make better friends.
User avatar
#192 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Some of my friends, I haven't talked to in years. Heck, I saw one of my friends from high school just last week at Wendies, and we hung out for the rest of the day, because, why not? We haven't spoken since high school, but we're still friends.
User avatar
#196 - neokun (07/19/2016) [-]
But that's not relevant to his point...
#141 - That's how you separate the wheat from the chaff, my friend. …  [+] (11 new replies) 07/18/2016 on I just want someone to talk... +7
User avatar
#188 - testaburger (07/18/2016) [-]
Sure, if you think it's worth it.
User avatar
#189 - tkfourtwoone (07/18/2016) [-]
I'd rather be alone than surrounded by false "friends"
User avatar
#190 - testaburger (07/18/2016) [-]
That's fine, but not everyone does
User avatar
#144 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
So, what? You're just going to stop being a good friend... to find out who your real friends are? I feel like there's a better method. When your friends do something shitty just stop being friends with them.
User avatar
#146 - tkfourtwoone (07/18/2016) [-]
Friendship should work both ways, in terms of effort involved
User avatar
#148 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
That's kind of my point. If you just drop off the map for a couple of days you're not putting much effort into your half of the relationship. Why should they be interested in someone who randomly decides to put their friendship to some arbitrary test? If your friends are your friends it's not cool to just randomly decide that you're no longer on speaking terms because they haven't texted you in a week.
User avatar
#149 - tkfourtwoone (07/18/2016) [-]
Maybe you don't quite get it - if you're the only one performing a (conscious or not) effort into maintaining a communications channel, then it's not a two-directional relationship
User avatar
#150 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Meh, you do what works for you, and I will do the same.
User avatar
#155 - xxskoolxx (07/18/2016) [-]
Let's say you always start talking with your "friend" for like two years they never ever start a convo with you. Then suddenly you stop, and wait for them to start a convo. If they don't fuck that person you obviously don't mean that much to them best to make better friends.
User avatar
#192 - thelastamerican (07/18/2016) [-]
Some of my friends, I haven't talked to in years. Heck, I saw one of my friends from high school just last week at Wendies, and we hung out for the rest of the day, because, why not? We haven't spoken since high school, but we're still friends.
User avatar
#196 - neokun (07/19/2016) [-]
But that's not relevant to his point...
#227 - The Titanic was a tragedy. The earthquake in Malaysia (or wher…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/12/2016 on The Manhattan Project 0
User avatar
#300 - obviousmanperson (07/13/2016) [-]
Instants>

IE, no pain
#229 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
Cruel act as defined does not fit the Japan bombings.
No cruelty was involved with making the decision to end the war with Japan.

One day you will either get that or you won't.
Either way i am done arguing with you.
Good troll.
#237 - anon (07/12/2016) [-]
So murdering tens of thousands of civilians with 2 bombs is not cruelty, whatsoever.

God, the level of stupidity today is quite frankly alarming.

P.S.: Talks about troll, then blocks people trying to have a conversation. Good one, you fucking idiot.
#294 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
>>#227, Many people block trolls.
Stop whining and know that you need to learn the difference between some words.
#224 - Yes, I fully know the theory according to which a full-scale i…  [+] (6 new replies) 07/12/2016 on The Manhattan Project 0
#226 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
a·troc·i·ty
əˈträsədē/
noun
noun: atrocity; plural noun: atrocities

an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.

It did not happen out of cruelty nor was it extremely wicked.
It happened to end their war machine and to save lives.
And act done to save lives is not wicked or cruel.
The reason to do it was not wicked or cruel.

trag·e·dy
ˈtrajədē/
noun
noun: tragedy; plural noun: tragedies

1.
an event causing great suffering, destruction, and distress, such as a serious accident, crime, or natural catastrophe.

Oh look. Tragedy fits perfectly.
Now go back to school and learn something.
User avatar
#227 - tkfourtwoone (07/12/2016) [-]
The Titanic was a tragedy. The earthquake in Malaysia (or wherever it was) some years ago was a tragedy. The fucking Pompei volcano eruption was a tragedy.

And if you honestly do not consider the instant vaporization of several thousand/tens of thousand people, along with irradiating the survivors, as an actual ATROCITY and a CRUEL act, then you're far gone, my friend.
User avatar
#300 - obviousmanperson (07/13/2016) [-]
Instants>

IE, no pain
#229 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
Cruel act as defined does not fit the Japan bombings.
No cruelty was involved with making the decision to end the war with Japan.

One day you will either get that or you won't.
Either way i am done arguing with you.
Good troll.
#237 - anon (07/12/2016) [-]
So murdering tens of thousands of civilians with 2 bombs is not cruelty, whatsoever.

God, the level of stupidity today is quite frankly alarming.

P.S.: Talks about troll, then blocks people trying to have a conversation. Good one, you fucking idiot.
#294 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
>>#227, Many people block trolls.
Stop whining and know that you need to learn the difference between some words.
#215 - You're just being delusional, dude... Hiroshima &…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/12/2016 on The Manhattan Project +1
#220 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
tragedies....maybe
Atrocities no.
The atrocity would have been invading japan in a ground war that would have killed more people that the bombs did. And it would have taken years.

Japanese then were very patriotic and traditional. We would have to kill nearly every one of them to end the war.

But you go on thinking that a couple bombs that took out their war machine was the greatest loss they could have faced.
User avatar
#224 - tkfourtwoone (07/12/2016) [-]
Yes, I fully know the theory according to which a full-scale invasion of Japan would have cost many more lives.

However, that does NOT mean that nuking Japan was NOT an atrocity.
Just like the tens of millions of soldiers that have died all over Europe is also an atrocity.


#226 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
a·troc·i·ty
əˈträsədē/
noun
noun: atrocity; plural noun: atrocities

an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.

It did not happen out of cruelty nor was it extremely wicked.
It happened to end their war machine and to save lives.
And act done to save lives is not wicked or cruel.
The reason to do it was not wicked or cruel.

trag·e·dy
ˈtrajədē/
noun
noun: tragedy; plural noun: tragedies

1.
an event causing great suffering, destruction, and distress, such as a serious accident, crime, or natural catastrophe.

Oh look. Tragedy fits perfectly.
Now go back to school and learn something.
User avatar
#227 - tkfourtwoone (07/12/2016) [-]
The Titanic was a tragedy. The earthquake in Malaysia (or wherever it was) some years ago was a tragedy. The fucking Pompei volcano eruption was a tragedy.

And if you honestly do not consider the instant vaporization of several thousand/tens of thousand people, along with irradiating the survivors, as an actual ATROCITY and a CRUEL act, then you're far gone, my friend.
User avatar
#300 - obviousmanperson (07/13/2016) [-]
Instants>

IE, no pain
#229 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
Cruel act as defined does not fit the Japan bombings.
No cruelty was involved with making the decision to end the war with Japan.

One day you will either get that or you won't.
Either way i am done arguing with you.
Good troll.
#237 - anon (07/12/2016) [-]
So murdering tens of thousands of civilians with 2 bombs is not cruelty, whatsoever.

God, the level of stupidity today is quite frankly alarming.

P.S.: Talks about troll, then blocks people trying to have a conversation. Good one, you fucking idiot.
#294 - Glitched (07/12/2016) [-]
>>#227, Many people block trolls.
Stop whining and know that you need to learn the difference between some words.
#116 - Maybe because it was short & intense. But then ag… 07/10/2016 on relationships 0