Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?

No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?

Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

I did that ?
Since your way to see the things isn't universal it's called your opinion.

"You can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck" "I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs." Yes, you did do that. Care to try again or do you need some time to Google a real argument, seeing as your brain can't even keep track of what you say.

So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?

No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?

Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

Excuse me sir, you're talking like i said that i believed in god or anyshit like this. I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs. If you do then spread it all over the world my friend.

I find it funny that you defended the story of Adam and Eve with the "insufficient proof" argument. Irony at it's best, no?

I did that ?
Since your way to see the things isn't universal it's called your opinion.

"You can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck" "I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs." Yes, you did do that. Care to try again or do you need some time to Google a real argument, seeing as your brain can't even keep track of what you say.

So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?

No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?

Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

No one knows, you can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck

I have more proof that it didn't than you do that it did! Seriously, while some can argue that the stories of the bible were meant to be read for their values and not historical validity (a cop out, in my opinion) they have a much higher grounds for worship on your holy book than believing that the earth was created 6,000 years ago. I suggest you stop being so gullible as to believe everything everyone has ever told you piecemeal. Let's try an easy one: It was Johannes Kepler established the heliocentric model of the solar system.

Excuse me sir, you're talking like i said that i believed in god or anyshit like this. I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs. If you do then spread it all over the world my friend.

I find it funny that you defended the story of Adam and Eve with the "insufficient proof" argument. Irony at it's best, no?

I did that ?
Since your way to see the things isn't universal it's called your opinion.

"You can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck" "I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs." Yes, you did do that. Care to try again or do you need some time to Google a real argument, seeing as your brain can't even keep track of what you say.

So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?

No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?

Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

Opinions, opinions everywhere.

Saying an event with absolutely no proof of its happening, not to mention evidence against it never happened. Told it's an opinion. lol.

No one knows, you can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck

I have more proof that it didn't than you do that it did! Seriously, while some can argue that the stories of the bible were meant to be read for their values and not historical validity (a cop out, in my opinion) they have a much higher grounds for worship on your holy book than believing that the earth was created 6,000 years ago. I suggest you stop being so gullible as to believe everything everyone has ever told you piecemeal. Let's try an easy one: It was Johannes Kepler established the heliocentric model of the solar system.

Excuse me sir, you're talking like i said that i believed in god or anyshit like this. I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs. If you do then spread it all over the world my friend.

I find it funny that you defended the story of Adam and Eve with the "insufficient proof" argument. Irony at it's best, no?

I did that ?
Since your way to see the things isn't universal it's called your opinion.

"You can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs shitfuck" "I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs." Yes, you did do that. Care to try again or do you need some time to Google a real argument, seeing as your brain can't even keep track of what you say.

So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?

No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?

Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.

No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend

I clicked random by mistake, and spent too long going along old content by mistake.

(it's not the same guy responding)

The real feat here is you finding these comments

I clicked random by mistake, and spent too long going along old content by mistake.