Upload
Login or register
x

thunderchild

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:10/27/2011
Last Login:1/14/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4396
Comment Ranking:#1525
Highest Content Rank:#4394
Highest Comment Rank:#1529
Content Thumbs: 124 total,  191 ,  67
Comment Thumbs: 2745 total,  3121 ,  376
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 11 Content: New Here → Level 12 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:13599
Times Content Favorited:4 times
Total Comments Made:988
FJ Points:2126

latest user's comments

#117 - Those small solar panels dont put out nearly enough power to c…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/28/2015 on Some cool inventions 0
User avatar
#124 - saxong (11/28/2015) [-]
The non-window one shown only charges a quarter of its battery from the solar panel, the remaining 75% of the internal battery is charged from a standard microUSB cable. The solar charge is nice if you have no more options available, it'll keep you running for long enough to get things done but no longer than that. The full charge will fully recharge your phone though, just needs to be recharged again between uses.

Source: I have one, it's pretty cool, not expensive either.
#40 - Am i the only one that was hoping to see retard vs Devynne. …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/28/2015 on Dick Kick Rick (Part 1) 0
User avatar
#42 - insominus (11/28/2015) [-]
Don't worry, I'll get to that ;)
#142 - lots of organizations mandate use of IE, because many programs… 11/28/2015 on pervy teacher 0
#66 - yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a dies…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
#59 - Okay, I work for a power company and i love talking with engin… 11/27/2015 on energy then and now +2
#64 - Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
#62 - really since its a vehicle engine, you are rarely at full powe…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#63 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm wondering how it stacks up to aviation engines which use fuel/hour when they are operating at their rated hp because that's how they are used. It only gets 31 highway, ~22 city, check that against the tacoma
User avatar
#64 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has a max towing capacity of 3500, the diesel gm can tow 7700 pounds which is more than the tacoma v6 which clocks 21 mpg and tows max of 6800.
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
#43 - I think i remember reading somwhere that we could have one for… 11/27/2015 on Immortal Queen 0
#156 - source  [+] (1 new reply) 11/27/2015 on Them Recent shootings 0
#194 - exstacy (11/27/2015) [-]
colored text if your subscribe.
#155 - yeah, but to prove the point, Detroit is over 80% black.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Them Recent shootings 0
#194 - exstacy (11/27/2015) [-]
colored text if your subscribe.
#60 - could not tell you, im not even sure it has made it to the lots yet.  [+] (7 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#61 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
That's not good, how would anyone be able to check if it's actually more efficient than other engines.
User avatar
#62 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
really since its a vehicle engine, you are rarely at full power. Most people just use the MPG ratings, not perfect but saying it gets 32 mpg compared to a tacoma at 24 is a big difference.
User avatar
#63 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm wondering how it stacks up to aviation engines which use fuel/hour when they are operating at their rated hp because that's how they are used. It only gets 31 highway, ~22 city, check that against the tacoma
User avatar
#64 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has a max towing capacity of 3500, the diesel gm can tow 7700 pounds which is more than the tacoma v6 which clocks 21 mpg and tows max of 6800.
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
#58 - Are you talking about coolant flow? Which engine the 3.8, or 2.8?  [+] (9 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#59 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
the 2.8 diesel, and i mean fuel flow.
User avatar
#60 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
could not tell you, im not even sure it has made it to the lots yet.
User avatar
#61 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
That's not good, how would anyone be able to check if it's actually more efficient than other engines.
User avatar
#62 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
really since its a vehicle engine, you are rarely at full power. Most people just use the MPG ratings, not perfect but saying it gets 32 mpg compared to a tacoma at 24 is a big difference.
User avatar
#63 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm wondering how it stacks up to aviation engines which use fuel/hour when they are operating at their rated hp because that's how they are used. It only gets 31 highway, ~22 city, check that against the tacoma
User avatar
#64 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has a max towing capacity of 3500, the diesel gm can tow 7700 pounds which is more than the tacoma v6 which clocks 21 mpg and tows max of 6800.
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
#54 - Or having your head bolts strip Northstar v8 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip +1
#51 - A lot of them like the brand new 2.8, gm diesal have iron blo…  [+] (12 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip 0
User avatar
#57 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
It's irritating that the gallons per hour/pounds per hour at full power* specs of the engine you mentioned aren't listed as part of the engine specs.

* 3400RPM connected to an alternator producing ~135KW
User avatar
#58 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Are you talking about coolant flow? Which engine the 3.8, or 2.8?
User avatar
#59 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
the 2.8 diesel, and i mean fuel flow.
User avatar
#60 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
could not tell you, im not even sure it has made it to the lots yet.
User avatar
#61 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
That's not good, how would anyone be able to check if it's actually more efficient than other engines.
User avatar
#62 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
really since its a vehicle engine, you are rarely at full power. Most people just use the MPG ratings, not perfect but saying it gets 32 mpg compared to a tacoma at 24 is a big difference.
User avatar
#63 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm wondering how it stacks up to aviation engines which use fuel/hour when they are operating at their rated hp because that's how they are used. It only gets 31 highway, ~22 city, check that against the tacoma
User avatar
#64 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has a max towing capacity of 3500, the diesel gm can tow 7700 pounds which is more than the tacoma v6 which clocks 21 mpg and tows max of 6800.
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
User avatar
#56 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The pumps are centrifugal, so they don't give a shit, and as long as the seals don't fail that's the only moving part the coolant should ever really come in contact with, and the salt isn't abrasive as long as it's completely dissolved. I didn't know all iron/steel engines were still produced because of the weight, machining, and thermal transfer advantages aluminum has.

Just to be clear I don't think using salt water as engine coolant is a great idea because aluminum still has a corrosion problem that's made worse by salt, just like steel. Unless the radiator is made of stainless or brass that can resist salt then the use of salt in the coolant will result in purchasing a radiator more often, and increased corrosion of all the other metal parts the coolant comes in contact with, which is bad.
#46 - I'd you don't know anything ask a pro (in person) before you d…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip +1
User avatar
#48 - christheace (11/27/2015) [-]
i feel like i'd get fuckin roasted if i asked a mechanic about any of this shit
#55 - anon (11/27/2015) [-]
Just say you don't know squat about cars and ask for help. They'll find it funny you asked, not insult and degrade you. It's worse if you do it and it's horrible, then you are a fool.

Pros: Now you know the truth.
Cons: you could get swindled by con artists.
#45 - Not true, many diesels are not aluminum do to compression my o…  [+] (14 new replies) 11/27/2015 on Pro vehicle tip +1
User avatar
#50 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I said modern, modern diesels are still going to be mostly aluminum by weight, most of the parts are steel, but many of the big parts that make up most of the engine's weight are mostly made of aluminum because it has better thermal transfer capabilities, it's easy to cast and machine, it resists corrosion from weather better than steel and cast iron, and it reduces the weight of the engine. Pretty much all the moving parts and the cylinder walls are still steel because aluminum isn't strong and or durable enough.
User avatar
#51 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
A lot of them like the brand new 2.8, gm diesal have iron blocks. Even still quite a few gas engines like the 3.8 in my gm, are iron block engines. (That engine amd variants were used up to the end of the last generatoon impalla. lot of companies switched to iron block aluminium heads. But a large portion of cars are still highly iron in their engines, which goes back to the point no salt. Also since salt is abrasive it's probably not good for moving parts (water pump etc)
User avatar
#57 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
It's irritating that the gallons per hour/pounds per hour at full power* specs of the engine you mentioned aren't listed as part of the engine specs.

* 3400RPM connected to an alternator producing ~135KW
User avatar
#58 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Are you talking about coolant flow? Which engine the 3.8, or 2.8?
User avatar
#59 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
the 2.8 diesel, and i mean fuel flow.
User avatar
#60 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
could not tell you, im not even sure it has made it to the lots yet.
User avatar
#61 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
That's not good, how would anyone be able to check if it's actually more efficient than other engines.
User avatar
#62 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
really since its a vehicle engine, you are rarely at full power. Most people just use the MPG ratings, not perfect but saying it gets 32 mpg compared to a tacoma at 24 is a big difference.
User avatar
#63 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm wondering how it stacks up to aviation engines which use fuel/hour when they are operating at their rated hp because that's how they are used. It only gets 31 highway, ~22 city, check that against the tacoma
User avatar
#64 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
Tacoma with the 4 cylinder gas engine gets 24 highway, and has a max towing capacity of 3500, the diesel gm can tow 7700 pounds which is more than the tacoma v6 which clocks 21 mpg and tows max of 6800.
User avatar
#65 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The Tacoma uses a regular gas engine instead of a turbo diesel, doesn't it.
User avatar
#66 - thunderchild (11/27/2015) [-]
yes, the Colorado is the only US available midsize with a diesel. I know oranges to apples but you buy the colorado because its cheaper to fuel than the tacoma. kind of like why you (used to) buy a diesel VW over the gas.
User avatar
#69 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
Diesels are more efficient (and therefore more eco friendly and have lower operating costs), and it's not more expensive to make diesel fuel (just taxed more cuz big rigs use it), so why do you think there are still gas engines?
User avatar
#56 - lovot (11/27/2015) [-]
The pumps are centrifugal, so they don't give a shit, and as long as the seals don't fail that's the only moving part the coolant should ever really come in contact with, and the salt isn't abrasive as long as it's completely dissolved. I didn't know all iron/steel engines were still produced because of the weight, machining, and thermal transfer advantages aluminum has.

Just to be clear I don't think using salt water as engine coolant is a great idea because aluminum still has a corrosion problem that's made worse by salt, just like steel. Unless the radiator is made of stainless or brass that can resist salt then the use of salt in the coolant will result in purchasing a radiator more often, and increased corrosion of all the other metal parts the coolant comes in contact with, which is bad.
#76 - Roshi, teaches Marshall arts, to goku before he uses ki, so I'… 11/26/2015 on Whos Your Master? -1
#28 - I legit thought patrick stewart was bs, mofo really is 75. 11/26/2015 on Age 0
#77 - 50% Germanic, 20% french, then idk 11/25/2015 on Chinese, Japanese, Dirty... +7
#24 - I'd like to visit the UAE but I'm gay 11/25/2015 on (untitled) -1
#23 - What I was getting at is it said whites are the ONLY people th… 11/25/2015 on (untitled) -1
#31 - It's his father 11/24/2015 on really now 0
#6 - Much of early European technological advances came as a result…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/24/2015 on (untitled) +6
User avatar
#7 - nywrestler (11/24/2015) [-]
What do you mean when you say "being involved doesn't make you responsible"? It seems like you're directly contradicting yourself by saying that the US is responsible for ruining nations that it has been involved in (Iraq, Vietnam) while simultaneously not giving credit for helping nations that it was involved in the rebuilding of (Japan, South Korea).

Western nations are directly responsible from bringing Japan out of the dictatorship that it was living under and for saving South Korea from falling into the hands of one. You can keep going back in time and finding earlier causes like the Silk Road expanding European knowledge of technology, but if you really want to do that there is no end to how far back you can take it.
User avatar
#9 - thevaulthunter (11/24/2015) [-]
I think the point is that we prosper when we interact, instead of hating a single group.
#4 - By that logic, we owe our success to the Chinese because of th…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/24/2015 on (untitled) +9
User avatar
#5 - nywrestler (11/24/2015) [-]
How so? South Korea wouldn't even exist without American led UN forces assisting with the war against North Korea and the USSR.
User avatar
#6 - thunderchild (11/24/2015) [-]
Much of early European technological advances came as a result of trade with ancient China.

The point I'm making is that every culture has influenced another culture. Being involved doesn't make you responsible if it did Iraq, Vietnam, Cuba ... and a whole mess of countries would be better. The US has ruined it's fair share of nations in the last century.
User avatar
#7 - nywrestler (11/24/2015) [-]
What do you mean when you say "being involved doesn't make you responsible"? It seems like you're directly contradicting yourself by saying that the US is responsible for ruining nations that it has been involved in (Iraq, Vietnam) while simultaneously not giving credit for helping nations that it was involved in the rebuilding of (Japan, South Korea).

Western nations are directly responsible from bringing Japan out of the dictatorship that it was living under and for saving South Korea from falling into the hands of one. You can keep going back in time and finding earlier causes like the Silk Road expanding European knowledge of technology, but if you really want to do that there is no end to how far back you can take it.
User avatar
#9 - thevaulthunter (11/24/2015) [-]
I think the point is that we prosper when we interact, instead of hating a single group.
#2 - Not to poke a hole, but Japan and south Korea are doing alright.  [+] (43 new replies) 11/24/2015 on (untitled) +164
#74 - animesource (11/25/2015) [-]
Yellow is more white than black so yeh.
#72 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
BLOODCIRKULATION IS A FUCKING FAGGOT WHO BLOCKED ME


YOUR REGARDS, ENLIGHTEDNATZIE
#41 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
psst
they're not black
User avatar
#38 - whatareyouon (11/25/2015) [-]
i don't see it as a hole
the whiter you are = the more civilized and prosperous
User avatar
#31 - richardastley (11/25/2015) [-]
Two countries highly influenced by America.
User avatar
#29 - shinycharizard (11/25/2015) [-]
Because they're a homogeneous capitalist meritocracy. Just like America should be.
User avatar
#26 - Bobtheblob (11/25/2015) [-]
South Korea and Japan are heavily based off of America, since America made them into the countries they are today.
User avatar
#25 - shitshitshit (11/25/2015) [-]
and guess who the fuck built them up
User avatar
#47 - imdan (11/25/2015) [-]
uhhh.........the Vietnamese?
#69 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
lol like the Vietnamese aren't the punching bags of South-East Asia.
User avatar
#39 - meganinja (11/25/2015) [-]
Japan.
#70 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
Half right.
#22 - robuntu (11/25/2015) [-]
According to random shit I found on the internet, Japan is the 10th safest country in the world, and the only 'not mostly white' one on the list.

Japan is pretty awesome though, but lots of Asian countries aren't bad. But black and brown countries....not so much.
User avatar
#24 - thunderchild (11/25/2015) [-]
I'd like to visit the UAE but I'm gay
User avatar
#23 - thunderchild (11/25/2015) [-]
What I was getting at is it said whites are the ONLY people that can build advanced civs.
#19 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
Actually, and this isn't a serious argument I just like talking about it, Japan during it's imperial era very much subscribed to "white-man's burden" ideology. i.e. it was the responsibility of whites (the Japanese, they considered themselves white and the slightly darker [according to the Japanese] Koreans and Chinese non-white) to go out and bring "civilization" to other countries, mostly because white man's burden was just sort of accepted as a means of basically taking over another country's infrastructure without the rest of the world raising a big stink and forcing you to stop.

This of course led to a large amount of repression and general unpleasantness and was considered by the portions of east Asia not named Japan to be a solid dick move. This has led to a situation where, due to Japan's government having total control over textbook selection for schools, (something that is totally not okay in literally every other western country besides Japan) Japanese students are often left with a great big hole in their history education in regards to roughly the 80 years prior to WWII as well as the war and reconstruction after.

I am not exaggerating, I can't remember if it was the current history textbook for high school students or the last version but World War II was literally summarized in less than five paragraphs. With no other information required as part of the curriculum. I have a friend who teaches English in Japan and he has actually met students who believed Pearl Harbor happened in response to the nukes being dropped.

Very interesting subject, both ridiculous (a government obsessed with covering-up past errors to avoid the embarrassment) and quite enlightening (imperial Japan looks quite different when you look at it as a student to the preexisting methods of colonization)
User avatar
#18 - IamWhoIam (11/25/2015) [-]
South Korea is currently in a state of vast social unrest. Numerous protests, media lockouts, ect. Japan is also experiencing negative population growth which isn't a good thing. Figure may have changed since last I looked.
User avatar
#43 - meganinja (11/25/2015) [-]
They're both better off than say, Poland, which is pretty damn white.

The thing people fail to understand is that it's not like the white people are superior, it's that European ideals led to the industrial revolution and colonialization. The problem is that most Asian countries were too proud to accept western ideals, and the African nations too proud and too poor. I'm not a weeb or anything but I have the utmost respect of Japan for modernizing itself as fast as it did only about a century and a half ago, and it's now the 3rd wealthiest nation on the planet.
#52 - IamWhoIam (11/25/2015) [-]
Basically the main cause of the Meiji Restoration was because Japanese leaders realized that only a unified, modernized, and Imperialistic Japan could even have a chance to stand against the West, who had the advantage of time to modernize first. When Commodore Perry arrived with 4 warships and steamed into Edo unopposed after other Western nations had already flexed their muscles (Portugal and the Netherlands) they realized what needed to be done. But yes. It was an astounding feat, even if my Grandfathers had to fight them after it.
User avatar
#15 - lgninjaleetful (11/25/2015) [-]
isnt there issues in south korea atm?

also japan has a shit ton more suicides than american. like more than double the rate.

just sayin
#42 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
Hunter gatherers have the lowest suicide rates in the world.
So eh.....
Good theory you had there
#20 - Bacabed (11/25/2015) [-]
Iirc, the suicide difference is mostly due to cultural differences and not indicative of the nation being a shithole. From what I understand, they're less open to asking for help with issues that might lead to suicide and there's less of a stigma regarding suicide than in America.
#50 - internetnick (11/25/2015) [-]
But couldn't that be seen as a failure? The only way to build a society as amazing as theirs is to basically have too much expected of you, while you have no support system.
#53 - Bacabed (11/25/2015) [-]
I mean it depends on what you're classifying as a failure. Since the OP referenced violent and impoverished nations I'd argue that Japan isn't a failure, against that metric.

Does it have it's problems, yeah but so does every country. If we want to include everything then every nation has failed in some way, but the OP was going after specific nations so I think it's safe to assume the discussion should regard its failures and how other nations compare to it.
User avatar
#21 - drldrl (11/25/2015) [-]
It's also do to how fucked up they are when it comes to work. A lot of them literally work themselves to death. Not manual labor either, desk jobs. Males in Japan are expected to put all their effort in life into their jobs.
User avatar
#16 - shadowstepone (11/25/2015) [-]
It's still doing pretty well all in all. America has way more violence than japan, japan has higher productivity per citizen and better physical health, but they have worse overall mental health and personal satisfaction. They're both doing significantly better than most islamic nations or the countries in central asia, and there are things to learn from both of their policies.
#51 - internetnick (11/25/2015) [-]
Japan has a huge molestation problem.
User avatar
#17 - lgninjaleetful (11/25/2015) [-]
gonna need some legit sources for the whole "higher productivity" thing there bud.

also, japan has a fuck ton of violence, dont even try to deny that, perhaps american slightly more, but japan has no gun rights and i think that contributes to a large portion of their violence.
#48 - wahremacht (11/25/2015) [-]
www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Japan/United-States/Crime

nice try buddy, gun laws seem to be awful right
#73 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
Yeah, I'm not gonna trust a list that says Japan is "23th" in number of police officers. That hardly seems reputable.
#37 - wahremacht (11/25/2015) [-]
Theres no need to ask for source considering how fucking false that is rofl
#35 - someoneforamoment (11/25/2015) [-]
[citation needed]
User avatar
#28 - Ruspanic (11/25/2015) [-]
source
User avatar
#13 - severepwner (11/24/2015) [-]
True, but some of the other Asian countries are "moderately fucked up" but not like "Africa level fucked up"
#3 - anon (11/24/2015) [-]
Ahh yes, those two countries Europe and the U.S. never had anything to do with, ever.
#46 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
pretty awful argument considering we are also helping other nations even more and they still live in mud huts, these are just good countries and not the ones that the post actually meant obviously and it just proves it isn't about race just a way of thinking muslims are currently living in their dark middle age that we got from christianity
#10 - anon (11/24/2015) [-]
yesss this. thank you
User avatar
#4 - thunderchild (11/24/2015) [-]
By that logic, we owe our success to the Chinese because of the silk road.
User avatar
#5 - nywrestler (11/24/2015) [-]
How so? South Korea wouldn't even exist without American led UN forces assisting with the war against North Korea and the USSR.
User avatar
#6 - thunderchild (11/24/2015) [-]
Much of early European technological advances came as a result of trade with ancient China.

The point I'm making is that every culture has influenced another culture. Being involved doesn't make you responsible if it did Iraq, Vietnam, Cuba ... and a whole mess of countries would be better. The US has ruined it's fair share of nations in the last century.
User avatar
#7 - nywrestler (11/24/2015) [-]
What do you mean when you say "being involved doesn't make you responsible"? It seems like you're directly contradicting yourself by saying that the US is responsible for ruining nations that it has been involved in (Iraq, Vietnam) while simultaneously not giving credit for helping nations that it was involved in the rebuilding of (Japan, South Korea).

Western nations are directly responsible from bringing Japan out of the dictatorship that it was living under and for saving South Korea from falling into the hands of one. You can keep going back in time and finding earlier causes like the Silk Road expanding European knowledge of technology, but if you really want to do that there is no end to how far back you can take it.
User avatar
#9 - thevaulthunter (11/24/2015) [-]
I think the point is that we prosper when we interact, instead of hating a single group.

Comments(0):

Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)