Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

thraza    

Rank #9576 on Comments
thraza Avatar Level 204 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to thraza Block thraza Invite thraza to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/26/2010
Last Login:10/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9576
Highest Comment Rank:#6981
Comment Thumbs: 1094 total,  1271 ,  177
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 204 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 205 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:385
FJ Points:1107

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#15 - Picture 10/19/2014 on I needs me a new background 0
#1 - finger lick-in good  [+] (2 new replies) 10/15/2014 on I'm Lovin' it +19
#8 - wearethemods (10/15/2014) [-]
#3 - ninjapieguy (10/15/2014) [-]
#24 - its mostly because the quality of his videos are kinda …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/24/2014 on SJW takedown +58
User avatar #34 - rainbowisbestpone (09/24/2014) [-]
His videos are good if you watch one of them and never watch other. Because with second you just see that he stages almost everything I watched like 4 his videos playing some horror games and it felt really unbelievable after watching one.
#272 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/25/2014) [-]
His comment response videos are pretty fun even if his gameplay videos aren't
#6 - oh crime in Canada is huge. the ruthless syrup cartels battle … 09/22/2014 on karma police +21
#237 - its possible the police could shot someone and frame the shot …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/22/2014 on Murica 0
#238 - tjocksnorris (09/22/2014) [-]
yes indeed
#234 - well yea we have to sometimes sombody needs to die and you nee…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Murica -2
#236 - tjocksnorris (09/22/2014) [-]
or yaknow, if it comes to a situation where its his words against someone elses
User avatar #237 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
its possible the police could shot someone and frame the shot as an attack which is certainly an issue. however that's an issue of corruption which should be handled by monitoring police activity with cameras, witness' and, evidence that would suggest that the cop was lying. which is why i think police should be required to have some sort of go-pro or something like that on him or her.
#238 - tjocksnorris (09/22/2014) [-]
yes indeed
#222 - no a gun is a lethal weapon it can be used non-lethally but al… 09/22/2014 on Murica -1
#144 - guns aren't perfectly accurate and hitting individual limbs is…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Murica -2
#169 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
Are you trolling or something? If you can't hit a mans legs, at 10 meter away, then you are simply not supposed to own a firearm.

Also, you are not gonna kill anyone by shooting them repeadetly in the feet, unless you just let them bleed to death like an idiot, but that will take a long time, since the flow of blood in the feet is so weak.

And you are not gonna kill anyone with rubber bullet by shooting them in the legs. Don't kid yourself, you could shoot at small girls with rubber bullets, but if you only hit their legs, nothing of interrest will happen.
User avatar #222 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
no a gun is a lethal weapon it can be used non-lethally but all training with guns encourages "eliminate the threat first" because the survival of the shooter and innocent nearby people is top priority. the threats survival is secondary so center mass is preferred as it minimizes chances of missing and takes down the threat quickly. if you want to take down an opponent. also officers often fire there weapon under stress in not necessarily ideal conditions with their lives and other peoples lives at risk the longer they wait when they are planning to shoot. here is a link on the issues of the topic.
www.pfoa.co.uk/110/shooting-to-wound
#126 - the police are trained to shoot for center mass because 1. leg…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Murica -5
#139 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
1. The police are hopefully trained to actually aim, and not blindly fireing at the heart. They are supposed to serve and protect, not kill. Your justice system, which the police is NOT a part of, is the only instance that can legally sentence people to death.

2. Step one, shoot asswipe in the leg/foot. Step two, beat grap the arm that he have the knife in. Step 3, call ambulance and stop the bleeding.

3. Alternatively, you can shoot him in the legs, and if you are still too scared to go near him, you can keep shooting him in the feet, until he drops the knife.

User avatar #144 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
guns aren't perfectly accurate and hitting individual limbs is not easy especially the ones that move more often. also the risk of missing risks bystanders and protecting them is more important. step two still puts the police officer at risk of being stabbed so no police officer is going to want to get close until the knife is out of his hands and there's an opportunity to kick it away. shooting someone in the legs is a harder target and will likely result in death just a bit slower. shooting someone in the feet may cause them to clench the knife harder and could just end up missing and ricocheting into nearby individuals. also you never are supposed to shoot someone unless you want to kill them as death is a strong possibility even with rubber bullets.
#169 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
Are you trolling or something? If you can't hit a mans legs, at 10 meter away, then you are simply not supposed to own a firearm.

Also, you are not gonna kill anyone by shooting them repeadetly in the feet, unless you just let them bleed to death like an idiot, but that will take a long time, since the flow of blood in the feet is so weak.

And you are not gonna kill anyone with rubber bullet by shooting them in the legs. Don't kid yourself, you could shoot at small girls with rubber bullets, but if you only hit their legs, nothing of interrest will happen.
User avatar #222 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
no a gun is a lethal weapon it can be used non-lethally but all training with guns encourages "eliminate the threat first" because the survival of the shooter and innocent nearby people is top priority. the threats survival is secondary so center mass is preferred as it minimizes chances of missing and takes down the threat quickly. if you want to take down an opponent. also officers often fire there weapon under stress in not necessarily ideal conditions with their lives and other peoples lives at risk the longer they wait when they are planning to shoot. here is a link on the issues of the topic.
www.pfoa.co.uk/110/shooting-to-wound
#115 - the purpose of the police is to uphold the law and protect the…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Murica -4
#119 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
Yes, but even the most inexperienced shooter would be able to disable a man on point blank range with a gun.
When you are a dozen full grown men against 1, and all he have is a fucking IKEA knife, then there is NO excuse to not kill him.

You don't even need the guns, just beat him with your sticks or something.
User avatar #126 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
the police are trained to shoot for center mass because 1. leg shot do leave a high chance of bleeding out and the criminal may still be able to take action 2. all other limbs would either be to risky to shoot due to being a smaller target with the risk of missing and the bullet hitting someone else. a crazy man with a knife can do a lot of damage to the police if they get close which risks the lives of the police officers and they would not want to risk their own lives for the sake of a mad man.
#139 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
1. The police are hopefully trained to actually aim, and not blindly fireing at the heart. They are supposed to serve and protect, not kill. Your justice system, which the police is NOT a part of, is the only instance that can legally sentence people to death.

2. Step one, shoot asswipe in the leg/foot. Step two, beat grap the arm that he have the knife in. Step 3, call ambulance and stop the bleeding.

3. Alternatively, you can shoot him in the legs, and if you are still too scared to go near him, you can keep shooting him in the feet, until he drops the knife.

User avatar #144 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
guns aren't perfectly accurate and hitting individual limbs is not easy especially the ones that move more often. also the risk of missing risks bystanders and protecting them is more important. step two still puts the police officer at risk of being stabbed so no police officer is going to want to get close until the knife is out of his hands and there's an opportunity to kick it away. shooting someone in the legs is a harder target and will likely result in death just a bit slower. shooting someone in the feet may cause them to clench the knife harder and could just end up missing and ricocheting into nearby individuals. also you never are supposed to shoot someone unless you want to kill them as death is a strong possibility even with rubber bullets.
#169 - shadowgandalf (09/22/2014) [-]
Are you trolling or something? If you can't hit a mans legs, at 10 meter away, then you are simply not supposed to own a firearm.

Also, you are not gonna kill anyone by shooting them repeadetly in the feet, unless you just let them bleed to death like an idiot, but that will take a long time, since the flow of blood in the feet is so weak.

And you are not gonna kill anyone with rubber bullet by shooting them in the legs. Don't kid yourself, you could shoot at small girls with rubber bullets, but if you only hit their legs, nothing of interrest will happen.
User avatar #222 - thraza (09/22/2014) [-]
no a gun is a lethal weapon it can be used non-lethally but all training with guns encourages "eliminate the threat first" because the survival of the shooter and innocent nearby people is top priority. the threats survival is secondary so center mass is preferred as it minimizes chances of missing and takes down the threat quickly. if you want to take down an opponent. also officers often fire there weapon under stress in not necessarily ideal conditions with their lives and other peoples lives at risk the longer they wait when they are planning to shoot. here is a link on the issues of the topic.
www.pfoa.co.uk/110/shooting-to-wound
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1100

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - grandtheftkoala **User deleted account** (12/21/2013) [-]
1st XDDDDD
1st XDDDDD
 Friends (0)