And in western society legally you're on the same level as anyone else. The perception that some men have towards women is not fair but that's not something you can change, because that would be encroaching on their free speech. We can only teach the next generation to look at people as people and not things to be put into pre-judged categories. Now the Middle east, India, Africa, and a lot of Asia definitely do need feminism or some kind of equalizer. More girls like Malala Yousafzi, although getting shot in the head should be avoided.

hey, you can ask a bug what the temperature is outside. you just gotta do some maths.

"Do your research "

I have. and I've discovered that no transitional fossils exist

You are the stupidest FJ user i've encounterd so far. Pleas just shut up!

Then you aren't looking in the right places

Where should I be looking?

So far there have been over fifty human transitional fossils found. The most recent was artiopithicus ( don't know if that's spelled right). A transitional fossil that shows aspects of primate, Neanderthal and human.

Australopithecus is not a transitional fossil

Can you explain why you KNOW that this is not a transitional fossil?

you're shifting the burden of proof. YOU have to demonstrate why it's transitional

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus

And there are many more pages basically saying the same thing.

ok, so supposedly or genus evolved 2 million years ago from Australopithecus. now show me the fossils that demonstrate this transition, and explain how they demonstrate it

our genus*

Artiopticious, again sorry about the spelling, that's the winged dinosaur with feathers. Asturliapithicious is a transitional fossil as recognized by the scientific community. It has transitional aspects pertaining to primates, Neanderthals, and humans. That is a transitional fossil. But it doesn't matter what I say or give as an example. You're going to deny everything I say.

I think it's spelled Australopithecus.

But how do you know it's transitional, similarities in DNA and physical features right? Well i interpret this is as proof of a common designer.

It's funny how people like you seem to be quite competent yet you let your religion hit you in the back of your head with a retard hammer.

I guess it would be easiest to discuss with you if we said god did exist.

so let's say god exists, and he created human mankind, then why would he do that and then never interfere again as he is doing? is that not obvious? Because he made us as he wished and didn't need to pamper more with it, since we would fix things ourself. That is enough proof of evolution, actually I find evolution to be as big proof for religion as it is against, not that I'm religious or anything.

In addition to that, our lives would have no meaning without evolution, so if you religious monkeys really believe that evolution is not true, then you should just go die and greet this "God" of ours in the afterlife.

Like I said, I give you examples and you'll just deny. Physics dictates that there is no need for a designer.

"Physics dictates that there is no need for a designer."

That's cute.

Seems right in this case

HA! topical!