The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

Who? Saddam Hussein? I believe he was one of the best leaders that there ever was. He's viewed as a horrible person because of the fact that the media wants it that way so the U.S has an excuse to go to Iraq and sponsor a war for oil. Saddam Hussein kept the union together. He was strong.

We don't need your help. And don't blame other countries for your shitty economy. Your economy sucks because your leaders are fucking retards.

I can't believe this even has to be debated. He was fucking insane.
Between his genocide against the Kurds and his clear inability to hold true to the cease-fire that had been agreed on, there was no choice but to take control of the situation. Then he did nothing but prove to everyone exactly how malevolent his actions were. instead of trying to make peace with the UN, he decided to hide behind his own forces.
Also, Ill blame anyone who is to blame. Yes, our leaders need to try harder to fix our economy. But they wouldnt have to if everyone else had their shit together. Its clear exactly how mislead you are.

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

Helping you out? Thanks a lot for killing over 1 million Iraqis. We never needed your help in the first place. Your "help" just ruined it. I've been to Iraq and I've seen it with my own eyes. Especially in the slums of Iraq. That's where I saw hundreds of kids in the streets who were helpless.

Well maybe next time, you'll just hand over your insane leader instead of making us have to mow down soldiers by the hundreds to get him. Sounds more like a leadership issue than anything.

Who? Saddam Hussein? I believe he was one of the best leaders that there ever was. He's viewed as a horrible person because of the fact that the media wants it that way so the U.S has an excuse to go to Iraq and sponsor a war for oil. Saddam Hussein kept the union together. He was strong.

We don't need your help. And don't blame other countries for your shitty economy. Your economy sucks because your leaders are fucking retards.

I can't believe this even has to be debated. He was fucking insane.
Between his genocide against the Kurds and his clear inability to hold true to the cease-fire that had been agreed on, there was no choice but to take control of the situation. Then he did nothing but prove to everyone exactly how malevolent his actions were. instead of trying to make peace with the UN, he decided to hide behind his own forces.
Also, Ill blame anyone who is to blame. Yes, our leaders need to try harder to fix our economy. But they wouldnt have to if everyone else had their shit together. Its clear exactly how mislead you are.

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

whenever my named gets mentioned its people talking about real shit on the internet.

Well, you chose a name that is obviously going to be used frequently in conversations.

The only reason these countries are doing so bad are because of United States' interference.

Sorry, brother. Gonna have to disagree on this one. America is too busy helping you out to worry about itself. Thus why other places are thriving, and our economy is garbage.

Helping you out? Thanks a lot for killing over 1 million Iraqis. We never needed your help in the first place. Your "help" just ruined it. I've been to Iraq and I've seen it with my own eyes. Especially in the slums of Iraq. That's where I saw hundreds of kids in the streets who were helpless.

Well maybe next time, you'll just hand over your insane leader instead of making us have to mow down soldiers by the hundreds to get him. Sounds more like a leadership issue than anything.

Who? Saddam Hussein? I believe he was one of the best leaders that there ever was. He's viewed as a horrible person because of the fact that the media wants it that way so the U.S has an excuse to go to Iraq and sponsor a war for oil. Saddam Hussein kept the union together. He was strong.

We don't need your help. And don't blame other countries for your shitty economy. Your economy sucks because your leaders are fucking retards.

I can't believe this even has to be debated. He was fucking insane.
Between his genocide against the Kurds and his clear inability to hold true to the cease-fire that had been agreed on, there was no choice but to take control of the situation. Then he did nothing but prove to everyone exactly how malevolent his actions were. instead of trying to make peace with the UN, he decided to hide behind his own forces.
Also, Ill blame anyone who is to blame. Yes, our leaders need to try harder to fix our economy. But they wouldnt have to if everyone else had their shit together. Its clear exactly how mislead you are.

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

whenever my named gets mentioned its people talking about real shit on the internet.

Well, you chose a name that is obviously going to be used frequently in conversations.

I'd rather be in Afghan than in Africa :/

Depends on what part. Kabul and Herat are a no-no

The only reason these countries are doing so bad are because of United States' interference.

Sorry, brother. Gonna have to disagree on this one. America is too busy helping you out to worry about itself. Thus why other places are thriving, and our economy is garbage.

Helping you out? Thanks a lot for killing over 1 million Iraqis. We never needed your help in the first place. Your "help" just ruined it. I've been to Iraq and I've seen it with my own eyes. Especially in the slums of Iraq. That's where I saw hundreds of kids in the streets who were helpless.

Well maybe next time, you'll just hand over your insane leader instead of making us have to mow down soldiers by the hundreds to get him. Sounds more like a leadership issue than anything.

Who? Saddam Hussein? I believe he was one of the best leaders that there ever was. He's viewed as a horrible person because of the fact that the media wants it that way so the U.S has an excuse to go to Iraq and sponsor a war for oil. Saddam Hussein kept the union together. He was strong.

We don't need your help. And don't blame other countries for your shitty economy. Your economy sucks because your leaders are fucking retards.

I can't believe this even has to be debated. He was fucking insane.
Between his genocide against the Kurds and his clear inability to hold true to the cease-fire that had been agreed on, there was no choice but to take control of the situation. Then he did nothing but prove to everyone exactly how malevolent his actions were. instead of trying to make peace with the UN, he decided to hide behind his own forces.
Also, Ill blame anyone who is to blame. Yes, our leaders need to try harder to fix our economy. But they wouldnt have to if everyone else had their shit together. Its clear exactly how mislead you are.

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

whenever my named gets mentioned its people talking about real shit on the internet.

Well, you chose a name that is obviously going to be used frequently in conversations.

I'm Middle Eastern, and life in the Middle East is really easy. Is it as great as America? No, but Dubai is awesome.

And another thing, living in Dubai or any of the emirates if you aren't a national citizen sucks grandly, due to the fact that private schools are atrocious and the government greatly discriminates certain races.

Dubai or any of the countries in the khaleeg (Saudi Arabia, Oman, UAE) are well known to be very rich and prosperous. Living in the rest of the middle east is a lot more difficult (Syrian, originally from palestine here, living in Canada)

Note the Half that I said

I'd rather be in Afghan than in Africa :/

Depends on what part. Kabul and Herat are a no-no

The only reason these countries are doing so bad are because of United States' interference.

Sorry, brother. Gonna have to disagree on this one. America is too busy helping you out to worry about itself. Thus why other places are thriving, and our economy is garbage.

Helping you out? Thanks a lot for killing over 1 million Iraqis. We never needed your help in the first place. Your "help" just ruined it. I've been to Iraq and I've seen it with my own eyes. Especially in the slums of Iraq. That's where I saw hundreds of kids in the streets who were helpless.

Well maybe next time, you'll just hand over your insane leader instead of making us have to mow down soldiers by the hundreds to get him. Sounds more like a leadership issue than anything.

Who? Saddam Hussein? I believe he was one of the best leaders that there ever was. He's viewed as a horrible person because of the fact that the media wants it that way so the U.S has an excuse to go to Iraq and sponsor a war for oil. Saddam Hussein kept the union together. He was strong.

We don't need your help. And don't blame other countries for your shitty economy. Your economy sucks because your leaders are fucking retards.

I can't believe this even has to be debated. He was fucking insane.
Between his genocide against the Kurds and his clear inability to hold true to the cease-fire that had been agreed on, there was no choice but to take control of the situation. Then he did nothing but prove to everyone exactly how malevolent his actions were. instead of trying to make peace with the UN, he decided to hide behind his own forces.
Also, Ill blame anyone who is to blame. Yes, our leaders need to try harder to fix our economy. But they wouldnt have to if everyone else had their shit together. Its clear exactly how mislead you are.

lol. Saddam Hussein killed 150 people during his reign. Why, you ask? Because almost every Iraqi leader was assassinated. Saddam Hussein was nearly assassinated by a bunch of Kurds who he knew were a part of a small town. He said that if the assassins did not come out, he would kill every one of the civilians in that town. But because they're pussies, the assassins just didn't want to come out, so he killed everyone in that area as an example.

Iraq is a relatively small country. And what he didn't want was everyone splitting it into many different regions. He united Iraq in a similar way to the way that Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union.

Do you honestly believe that Saddam Hussein killed as many people as you think? The United States killed over 1 million Iraqis... but NOOOOoooo... nobody mentions them!

I do like how you conveniently ignored the rest of the reasons I gave, focused on the only one on which you had a leg to stand on, then tried to turn the focus instead onto the fault of Americans. Its a poor debate strategy.
All the same, Saddam Hussein willingly and with full knowledge, murdered the innocents in that town. American doctrine for law of land warfare forbids the killing of whoever is unarmed. There were minimal civilian casualties. Every Iraqi that died by american hands knew what he was dying for, no matter how futile.

AHEM... in 2007, a group of US army officers killed 12 civilians and injured 2 children. They were unarmed, and the officers knew that they were civilians yet they used the fact that two of them were holding cameras as an excuse to engage.

Dude, I don't have to explain it to you... just Google how many Iraqis died in the war.

Again, civilian casualties were minimal. They happened and some fairly enraged soldiers decided that they could do what they wanted. Doesn't change what Saddam Hussein did.

The amount of civilian deaths that occurred as a result of the carelessness of the US army exceeds the amount of civilians that Saddam Hussein has killed by so much, that I don't think we even need to discuss this topic.


Why is it okay for a US soldier to kill a civilian and not any other person? I don't give a fuck if you are the most respected soldier on Earth. If you're going to kill an UNARMED CIVILIAN you deserve to be punished severely.

Don't bother replying to me. I'm done talking to you. If you are so blind that you cannot see the evil within this war, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Said the pot to the kettle

whenever my named gets mentioned its people talking about real shit on the internet.

Well, you chose a name that is obviously going to be used frequently in conversations.

Afghanistan isn't the only country in the ME.

No, but its the one that I felt needed to be pointed out above the others.