Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

theonlytinman    

Rank #4892 on Comments
theonlytinman Avatar Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to theonlytinman Block theonlytinman Invite theonlytinman to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/25/2012
Last Login:10/31/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4892
Highest Content Rank:#580
Highest Comment Rank:#1875
Content Thumbs: 11341 total,  12448 ,  1107
Comment Thumbs: 3721 total,  4317 ,  596
Content Level Progress: 32% (32/100)
Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 202 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 85% (85/100)
Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:2
Content Views:432940
Times Content Favorited:422 times
Total Comments Made:677
FJ Points:13535
Favorite Tags: no (2) | yes (2)

latest user's comments

#90 - This is so awesome. But its not a game show. Its a reality sho… 10/23/2014 on Game show idea +3
#119 - I didn't say it would decimate her career. I said it can only …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/01/2014 on meanwhile... (desc) 0
User avatar #132 - syrenthra (09/01/2014) [-]
it brings more attention to her, I don't see it hurting her unless she makes a fuss about it, people wont look down on her for it, if they do they look down on anyone who takes nudes. Its normal for girls to take nudes and to get a celebs, I don't see it hurting their image really, other than that image being naked in some people's minds now.
#95 - Getting famous after a sex tape is different than getting famo… 09/01/2014 on meanwhile... (desc) +1
#64 - Those were few and far between. Pretty low quality and normal …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/01/2014 on meanwhile... (desc) 0
#67 - desreversti (09/01/2014) [-]
Oh, I actually haven't seen the jennifer lawrence ones. When the story started I wasn't all that interested but now, it seems the reddit page has been taken down or something so ive now found other links to it
#19 - Let it be noted that I fapped to those leaks like my life depe…  [+] (45 new replies) 09/01/2014 on meanwhile... (desc) +152
User avatar #212 - guidedhand (09/02/2014) [-]
It didnt hurt Monroe's career, if anything, it helped it.
User avatar #188 - wazerwifle (09/02/2014) [-]
post-fap guilt?
#187 - anon (09/02/2014) [-]
actually one of the best choices she could make at this point, aside from waiting around until it's not as big of a deal, is to lean into it and play a leading role where she appears reasonable nude. people will get over the fact that there are nudes of her on the internet, if she appears more or less nude in a movie.
User avatar #150 - edraham (09/01/2014) [-]
I think she have to see the bright side of this thing. If there's nothing to do about it, she should be proud... I mean, this could only make her even more famous, maybe the wise thing for her is to not try to remove it and use it.

That what I'll do. I'll be sad to do so, of course, but he... take advantage!

Anyway, I don't take nude pics so.
User avatar #118 - syrenthra (09/01/2014) [-]
How does that hurt her career though? the only thing this stops is the discussions about when we will get her nudes, this has given her more fame. If she makes a big deal out of it, then it becomes bad, if she just accepts that people now know and lets it just go, then after a few months it will be like most other celeb nudes, they will be fapped to but really nothing else
User avatar #119 - theonlytinman (09/01/2014) [-]
I didn't say it would decimate her career. I said it can only hurt it. It won't really improve it in any way
User avatar #132 - syrenthra (09/01/2014) [-]
it brings more attention to her, I don't see it hurting her unless she makes a fuss about it, people wont look down on her for it, if they do they look down on anyone who takes nudes. Its normal for girls to take nudes and to get a celebs, I don't see it hurting their image really, other than that image being naked in some people's minds now.
User avatar #116 - bobthedilder (09/01/2014) [-]
Scarlett Johansson's nude came out before she was in Iron man and Avengers.
User avatar #98 - commontroll (09/01/2014) [-]
The thing is, everybody knows to be careful about taking nudes and stuff, because it could be spread around. But with celebrities it WILL be spread around. It's not a matter of if but when somebody will deliberately target you for your nudes, and then the whole world will see them because you're famous world-round. Not just spread among your circle of friends.

Also, as for it "only hurting your career," there's a saying that people in the entertainment industry use a lot. "There's no such thing as bad publicity." If it has you on the minds of the people you are in their wallets. Kim Kardashian was a nobody until she released a sex tape. It's basically a trope to make a sex tape when you're fading from relevance.

If you're in the spot light, you need to be more careful, unfortunately.
#91 - anon (09/01/2014) [-]
Well i dont know about only hurting one's career. Kim Kardashian's fame wouldn't have lasted this long had her sex tape not got released.
User avatar #95 - theonlytinman (09/01/2014) [-]
Getting famous after a sex tape is different than getting famous and acquiring the worlds respect, then having leaked photos.
User avatar #70 - largeheadphones (09/01/2014) [-]
Yep, on my hardrive now, those are never going away.
#61 - desreversti (09/01/2014) [-]
Weren't Scarlett Johannson's nudes leaked a few months ago? It seems to have died down pretty quickly without any long lasting consequences
User avatar #81 - prototypedaytona (09/01/2014) [-]
She has appeared nude in some indie-film. Her nudes mean nothing anymore.
#82 - desreversti (09/01/2014) [-]
Yup "Under the skin" the scenes weren't that great
User avatar #64 - theonlytinman (09/01/2014) [-]
Those were few and far between. Pretty low quality and normal stuff. You can't straight faced tell me that its even close to the level of what just got leaked.
#67 - desreversti (09/01/2014) [-]
Oh, I actually haven't seen the jennifer lawrence ones. When the story started I wasn't all that interested but now, it seems the reddit page has been taken down or something so ive now found other links to it
#46 - anon (09/01/2014) [-]
The thing is, those pics could have been leaked even if her iCloud wasn't hacked. She could have lost her phone, or her and her bf could have had a nasty break up. These are things you have to consider before you take nude pics.

Not to mention, you can protect yourself by not including your face in racier pics, not using a device connected to the internet, etc.
#41 - cookiedude (09/01/2014) [-]
First, she didn't need to take the photos, and second, people really need to disable any form of cloud backup for their photos.

If these people didn't automatically backup their photos in iCloud, then these leaks never would have happened.

In other words, sucks to suck.
User avatar #32 - bothemastaofall (09/01/2014) [-]
Yeah she did. She didn't have to take those pictures of herself.
#38 - Jowi (09/01/2014) [-]
I agree with the poster below. Nothing wrong with sharing some nude photos with the people you love.
Why does being a celebrity mean you're not allowed to have fun?
User avatar #44 - ProWig (09/01/2014) [-]
you are allowed to take thoese pics but dont get upset if they get shared
#58 - Jowi (09/01/2014) [-]
They weren't shared. Her account was hacked and they were stolen
User avatar #114 - ProWig (09/01/2014) [-]
shared meaning traded among people. i know her account was hacked
User avatar #34 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
What's wrong with having nude photos of yourself? Quit trying to shame people for enjoying their bodies. If you don't like nude photos, don't take any.
User avatar #40 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
You just answered your own question... If you take nude photos of yourself, you run the risk of them being seen. If you don't want damage like this, then don't take nude photos in the first place. It's not like there's a limit to how much you can look at yourself nude otherwise.
#141 - splitalterego (09/01/2014) [-]
While the existence of the nude photos allowed this to happen I see don't see it as her fault. If it was shared by someone she gave it too or some accident showed the photos it would be too bad for her but those are the risks that normally come with taking nudes. Being hacked and having the photos taken from a notable service is not a normal risk.
User avatar #164 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
I never said anything about it being her fault. She didn't openly release the photos by any means, and would otherwise not have allowed them to have gone public. The point I'm making here is that by creating the photos or allowing them to be created, she also created an asset at risk that somehow, the photos would be leaked to the public.

Whether it was a hacker or if she sent them to someone who then leaked them without her approval, it's practically the same.
User avatar #45 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
I sincerely doubt those were nude photos for herself. There is nothing inherently wrong with taking photos for a partner(s) or even for yourself if that's really the case, and it shouldn't be a big deal if people see them because there shouldn't be anything wrong with the pictures existing in the first place. But obviously Jennifer Lawrence deserves backlash if she dares to have an active, interesting sex life. How dare she? You mean she wasn't sitting on a block of ice???? Awful. She absolutely deserves every ounce of bad press she gets from this.
User avatar #104 - commontroll (09/01/2014) [-]
Jesus man, you sound like Tumblr freaking out over "slut-shaming." We're saying that she's responsible for taking them and that as a celebrity that is a huge risk because you're targeted, especially since the internet is obsessed with her.

I bet you that Emma Watson is very careful about what kinds of pictures she takes of herself because she knows the internet is obsessed with her, Lawrence should have realized the same thing. And now she, and dozens of other celebrities are learning that lesson the hard way.
User avatar #106 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
"Learning that lesson" do you not see the problem here? That she should have to "learn a lesson" about not having a free body to do with as she pleases? That's very, very fucked up.
User avatar #107 - commontroll (09/01/2014) [-]
Holy fuck dude. Take the dildo out of your ass and actually read what I'm saying. I'm not saying these should have been leaked. I'm saying she should have known that they would be leaked. If you're a celebrity who wants a good image, then nudes of yourself are not wise to give to people. Because they can get angry or they can get hacked. It's as simple as that.

Again, go back to Tumblr, you'll fit right in and I'm not making a joke. You legitimately sound like a SJW.
User avatar #112 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
And you literally are not understanding what I'm saying. Yes, there will be backlash. I get that. But there should be no reason for there to be. That is a fucked up thing about all of this, regardless of who took pics of who and who shared them and whatever. They're just pictures of a human body and should not be something that threatens to terminate a career.

I couldn't care less how much like an SJW you may think I sound, I'm not there, I'm here, as I have been for years, and will continue to be.
User avatar #113 - commontroll (09/01/2014) [-]
>2014
>Thinking that nudes will harm somebody's career in Hollywood.

Nigga please she's going to be more successful now. Happens with every leak. May even take nude roles now that everybody knows what she looks like naked. And thanks for assuming I think it's okay. You were totally wrong, but that's unsurprising since you've got your head up your ass. I definitely think it's a shame that stuff like this happens, and I think it's horrible that there's no real way to delete things like this. But we need to start teaching celebs and regular young adults that things on the internet are NOT safe or secure, and even after being deleted the traces can still be found.
User avatar #55 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
No matter who you take the photos for, the fact that the photos exist is what creates the risk. Whether it's for her sex life or whatever, her reasons don't matter. Whether she deserves the backlash or whatever, that doesn't matter either. The point of it is that she took the risk of those photos being leaked and lost, and now she's paying the consequence. Simple as that.
User avatar #56 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
You seem to not be understanding how this is blaming the victim though. There's nothing wrong with her having those photos. There's nothing wrong with sexuality and the human body. And yet she will be shamed and humiliated. Her career may be severely impacted. Because she was naked in some pictures. That somehow not fucked up to you?
User avatar #60 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
No, I perfectly understand here. I AM blaming the victim because it was HER DECISION (or at least under her consent) to take those photos, and just because she didn't recognize or acknowledge the risk, it doesn't mean that she's exempted from the consequences.

Whether or not she "deserves" the backlash is subjective. Whatever her intentions were with the photos is her own prerogative and irrelevant to the point.

Action (taking photos) --> Risk (possibility of leak) --> consequence (backlash)
everything else is just noise.
User avatar #105 - TonHyukOTP (09/01/2014) [-]
Hah, anon had a good point. I'm trying to express that the entire idea of someone ever needing to be careful about something like having nude shots is fucking asinine. Is it Jennifer Lawrence's fault her body is sexualized by most consumer audiences?
User avatar #154 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
No, but she lives as part of a society and this is how our society works. Complaining about one aspect just because it's inconvenient, aside from being selfish, is useless. Men like to sexualize women, and no matter what your opinion is on that, the matter of the fact is that it's an existing concept and it needs to be recognized and considered when you're talking about risk.

I'd also like fire not to kill me because I like looking at it flicker, or snow not to make me cold and sick because I like playing in it. That doesn't mean that if I go play in either of them, I'm suddenly immune to consequences because of my opinion.
#97 - anon (09/01/2014) [-]
You're essentially saying "to not get burgled, don't own any possessions"
User avatar #157 - menqudoneix (09/01/2014) [-]
No, if the case was that someone had taken nude photos of her without consent, then that would be comparable. In that case, anyone with malicious intent can steal, damage or destroy you and your assets, and it becomes a matter of defending yourself. In this case, she allowed photos to be taken of her. It's clearly different.
User avatar #108 - commontroll (09/01/2014) [-]
No, "To not be burglarized, then install locks on your door. To really really make sure you don't, have a dog, bullet proof windows, locks and a gun." It's not that hard to not take nudes. It's tempting to take them, but in order to not, all you have to do is anything but.

It's the risk of the information age.
User avatar #24 - aherorising (09/01/2014) [-]
this includes:
-potentially dissapointed parents
-family
-friends
- classmates (?)
- her own manager
- that one down's syndrome youth friend that always supported her

jfc I'd feel like shit tho.
User avatar #75 - articulate (09/01/2014) [-]
haha i forgot about the down syndrome kid. I wonder if he'll see them.
User avatar #122 - dabugman (09/01/2014) [-]
Out of any of us, he deserves to see them the most. Retards fap to you know.
#8 - How I would cry to piss her off 08/31/2014 on Husband +2
#36 - Picture 08/31/2014 on He once fingered a girl. +3
#17 - Awkward moment when my last name is Gay. I will forever be Mr.…  [+] (14 new replies) 08/30/2014 on How could you Nintendo?! I... +156
#72 - anon (08/30/2014) [-]
shhhh no tears, only dreams now.
#65 - anon (08/30/2014) [-]
At least your not richard gay.
User avatar #53 - mydogpikachu (08/30/2014) [-]
Duuuuuude, i have a science teacher with the last name of Gay but, i guess me saying that is pointless and all the girls in my school get wet from him
User avatar #44 - wiredguy (08/30/2014) [-]
My name is Richard and I am, myself, gay.

So I know a similar feeling.
#60 - kameken (08/30/2014) [-]
User avatar #61 - wiredguy (08/30/2014) [-]
this exact comic

this comix so much
#47 - murphyslawtesties (08/30/2014) [-]
"similar feeling"
User avatar #45 - rollmeanddie (08/30/2014) [-]
Hey, Dick, what's up?
User avatar #36 - bjornkrage (08/30/2014) [-]
Hey, my name isn't richard!
#33 - frostbeard (08/30/2014) [-]
Forever happy
User avatar #25 - grogovic (08/30/2014) [-]
Awkward moment when my last name is Dick. I will forever be Mr. Dick. Thanks for reminding me. Poop.
My last name is not Dick.
#20 - kiaserzerg (08/30/2014) [-]
no, it looks like you are the one getting Dick
#18 - romanlettuce (08/30/2014) [-]
#21 - I can't tell if you're baiting or just a tumblr-fag who found … 08/30/2014 on Gangsta 0
#20 - Outstanding. Green thumb for you. 08/30/2014 on master of all four alcohols +7
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - instalation (01/23/2013) [-]
Comment virginity taken! But on another note, you're like the first guy on FJ who says he is religious and doesn't get raped with red thumbs.
User avatar #2 to #1 - theonlytinman (01/23/2013) [-]
Its because I dont cram it down everyone's throat, except like, on previous comment boards. but those are less to try and change minds, and more along the lines of me getting insight on how people see things.
User avatar #3 to #2 - instalation (01/23/2013) [-]
I don't either, but then again I don't ever post on it.
 Friends (0)