| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
themanwithnoplan
| Rank #734 on Comments  Level 388 Comments: Arch Mage Offline  Send mail to themanwithnoplan Block themanwithnoplan Invite themanwithnoplan to be your friend flag avatar |
|
total,
202
I was a terror since the public school era
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
user favorites
Avoiding Mormons
Don Glover
America!
you can’t fly...
Club Penguin comp
Merry Christmas...
>dickfarts
i miss house
Video Game Logic
Sandy
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
items
#3950 to #3949
-
themanwithnoplan (05/16/2013) [-] So far this year my two favorite bands have come out with albums within a month of each other, and now Daft Punk has released, and I'm calling this out early, an amazing and really well-rounded album here. 2013 has been a great year for music for me.
Now if another group actually follows up on their June 2013 release date it will just be amazing.
Now if another group actually follows up on their June 2013 release date it will just be amazing.
#3938
-
jmezfm (05/06/2013) [-] yo, i was gonna let myself finish reading that mm, but im about to send one of the best mms of all time
#3913 to #3912
-
themanwithnoplan (04/22/2013) [-] I'm still on part 1.
Had to move and didn't have TV/decent Internet. Then had to help set everything up.
To kick it off I haven't been on an actual computer in a month, and this weekend I've had to help my father with this charity thing he has.
Had to move and didn't have TV/decent Internet. Then had to help set everything up.
To kick it off I haven't been on an actual computer in a month, and this weekend I've had to help my father with this charity thing he has.
#3905
-
velvetunderground (04/20/2013) [-] ░░░░░░░██░██░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░█▒▒█▒▒█░░░░░░░
░░░░░█▒░░░░▒▒█░░░░░░
░░░░░█░█░█░░▒████░░░
░░░░░█░█░█░░░█▓▓▓█░░
░░░███░░░░░░░██▓▓█░░
░░█▒▒▒█░█░░░█▒▒███░░
░█▒▒▒▒▒█▒███▒▒▒▒█▓█░
░██▒█▒▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒█▓▓█
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▒█▓▓█
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▒███░
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░▒▒██░░
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░▒▒█▓█░░
░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░▒▒███░░░
░░██▒▒▒▒█░░░▒▒█▓█░░░
░░░░██████░░▒▒▒████░
░░░░░░█▒▒█▒▒█░░░░░░░
░░░░░█▒░░░░▒▒█░░░░░░
░░░░░█░█░█░░▒████░░░
░░░░░█░█░█░░░█▓▓▓█░░
░░░███░░░░░░░██▓▓█░░
░░█▒▒▒█░█░░░█▒▒███░░
░█▒▒▒▒▒█▒███▒▒▒▒█▓█░
░██▒█▒▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒█▓▓█
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▒█▓▓█
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▒███░
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░▒▒██░░
█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░▒▒█▓█░░
░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░▒▒███░░░
░░██▒▒▒▒█░░░▒▒█▓█░░░
░░░░██████░░▒▒▒████░
#3885
-
themanwithnoplan (03/29/2013) [-] While you're probably sick of hearing about You Faggots, it is crucial that you read this letter. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: You Faggots doesn't want to acknowledge that it scares the bejeezus out of me to know that he might break down traditional values by the end of the decade. In fact, You Faggots would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that You Faggots has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says scary things. That worldview may be appealing, at least to volage-brained vendors of Mohockism, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, You Faggots claims that mealymouthed erastophiliacs should be given absolute authority to engage in an endless round of finger pointing. Well, I beg to differ.
The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to instill a sense of responsibility and maturity in those who rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values? You Faggots consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let You Faggots paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. When one examines the ramifications of letting him marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that seeing him succeed at damming the flow of effective communication has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as "What demons possessed him to sharpen intergroup tensions?" You Faggots is widely seen as unforgivable for condoning universal oppression. Expect him to lay low for a while and allow public amnesia to expurgate the immediacy of his sins. Afterwards, he'll certainly return to formulating social policies and action programs based on the most venom-spouting classes of sadism in existence. My hope, though, is that the second time around, people will be aware of the fact that one does not have to oppress, segregate, and punish others in order to get You Faggots to damp down the bellicosity of his ravings. It is an unsophisticated person who believes otherwise.
Our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to do what needs to be done. Look, of course that's going to be tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how You Faggots operates. Nevertheless, like other footling, pernicious know-nothings, You Faggots has a finely honed ability to take credit for others' accomplishments. You Faggots vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would because in this case, the obvious solution is also the correct one. But it goes further than that; cowardice, irresponsibility, and gnosticism are inextricably wedded in his stratagems. To say anything else would be a lie.
I plan to work within the system to persuade my fellow citizens that whenever I ask You Faggots for proof of his claim that revolting fefnicutes make the best scoutmasters and schoolteachers, he runs and hides, not because I lack the courage for more drastic steps but because his intent is to prevent us from asking questions. You Faggots doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. I may be questioning the regnant conventional wisdom by stating this but maybe it's debatable whether he, serving as judge, jury, and executioner, has decreed that he is a man of peace. However, no one can disagree that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more vexatious, discourteous, and stroppy society, all thanks to You Faggots's obloquies.
You Faggots may be sincere, but he is also sincerely unpatriotic. Why is he controlling Web content that he deems politically or morally objectionable? He says he's doing it for some worthy cause. In reality, You Faggots is doing it because one of his apostles keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. The studies are full of "if"s, "possibly"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that You Faggots wants nothing less than to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. His adulators then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with uneducated, petulant antagonists who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that You Faggots's latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining but certainly not informative. Sorry for babbling so much, but I am surely not ashamed to admit that our future is hopeless indeed if we do not expose some of You Faggots's more dubious financial dealings.
The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to instill a sense of responsibility and maturity in those who rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values? You Faggots consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let You Faggots paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. When one examines the ramifications of letting him marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that seeing him succeed at damming the flow of effective communication has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as "What demons possessed him to sharpen intergroup tensions?" You Faggots is widely seen as unforgivable for condoning universal oppression. Expect him to lay low for a while and allow public amnesia to expurgate the immediacy of his sins. Afterwards, he'll certainly return to formulating social policies and action programs based on the most venom-spouting classes of sadism in existence. My hope, though, is that the second time around, people will be aware of the fact that one does not have to oppress, segregate, and punish others in order to get You Faggots to damp down the bellicosity of his ravings. It is an unsophisticated person who believes otherwise.
Our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to do what needs to be done. Look, of course that's going to be tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how You Faggots operates. Nevertheless, like other footling, pernicious know-nothings, You Faggots has a finely honed ability to take credit for others' accomplishments. You Faggots vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would because in this case, the obvious solution is also the correct one. But it goes further than that; cowardice, irresponsibility, and gnosticism are inextricably wedded in his stratagems. To say anything else would be a lie.
I plan to work within the system to persuade my fellow citizens that whenever I ask You Faggots for proof of his claim that revolting fefnicutes make the best scoutmasters and schoolteachers, he runs and hides, not because I lack the courage for more drastic steps but because his intent is to prevent us from asking questions. You Faggots doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. I may be questioning the regnant conventional wisdom by stating this but maybe it's debatable whether he, serving as judge, jury, and executioner, has decreed that he is a man of peace. However, no one can disagree that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more vexatious, discourteous, and stroppy society, all thanks to You Faggots's obloquies.
You Faggots may be sincere, but he is also sincerely unpatriotic. Why is he controlling Web content that he deems politically or morally objectionable? He says he's doing it for some worthy cause. In reality, You Faggots is doing it because one of his apostles keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. The studies are full of "if"s, "possibly"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that You Faggots wants nothing less than to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. His adulators then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with uneducated, petulant antagonists who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that You Faggots's latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining but certainly not informative. Sorry for babbling so much, but I am surely not ashamed to admit that our future is hopeless indeed if we do not expose some of You Faggots's more dubious financial dealings.
#3886 to #3885
-
themanwithnoplan (03/29/2013) [-] If you've been following the news recently, you know that there is documentary proof that You Faggots has managed to elude any direct ties to specific acts of negligence—no small feat considering its history. However, you might not know that You Faggots often uses the phrase, "Studies show that…", to introduce statements that wind up being chiefly about ideology, hunch, or preference. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a snappish jerk who was insisting that brain-damaged criminal masterminds (especially the vindictive type) should be given absolute authority to spawn delusions of jujuism's resplendence. I tried to convince this rash ivory-tower academic that the first thing we need to do is to get You Faggots to admit that it has a problem. It should be counseled to recite the following:
I, You Faggots, am a lamebrained, virulent babbler.
I have been a participant in a giant scheme to lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people.
I hereby admit my addiction to nihilism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.
Once You Faggots realizes that it has a problem, maybe then it'll see that difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to help people break free of You Faggots's cycle of oppression.
I want to see all of us working together to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that if You Faggots manages to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that You Faggots's comrades have been pivotal in sustaining the narrative that You Faggots has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Towards this end they toss about inflated figures, dubious "facts", and exaggerated claims about how genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all thoroughly justified.
To quote someone far wittier than I'll ever be, "You Faggots's skills are generally used to exploit, abuse, and exert power." I sure wish I had said that because that's exactly what I warrant. Nevertheless, You Faggots has spent untold hours trying to teach wayward concepts to children. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that its blandishments were designed from day one to break down the industrial-technological system? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which You Faggots's collaborators want so much to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. The second part of the answer is focused on the the way that I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "You Faggots's goals coalesce with those of shambolic, haughty goof-offs." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that You Faggots's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false.
You Faggots has been trying to popularize the narrative that without its superior guidance, we will go nowhere. My fear is that if it's successful at promoting such cockamamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let it fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. In retrospect, You Faggots has always been more ghastly than most small-minded good-for-nothings. If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that You Faggots would resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about You Faggots could have made the same prediction.
You Faggots has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then hypersensitive, testy headcases will be free to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how if you want to hide something from You Faggots, you just have to put it in a book. The key to You Faggots's soul is its longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. It dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, if You Faggots can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to denounce those who claim that You Faggots can scare us by using big words like "anthrohopobiological". Wanting to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations is one thing, but why would anybody possibly want to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that it prefers defamation to dialogue. The second, more telling, observation is that You Faggots says that we should cast our lots with the most diversivolent power brokers you'll ever see. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. On a closing note, I hope that this letter, while incomplete, informal, and having no authority except its own inner strength and conviction, has clearly demonstrated to you that You Faggots's spin doctors are the most brainwashed in human history in that they're bombarded for twelve hours a day or more by You Faggots's self-satisfied utterances.
I, You Faggots, am a lamebrained, virulent babbler.
I have been a participant in a giant scheme to lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people.
I hereby admit my addiction to nihilism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.
Once You Faggots realizes that it has a problem, maybe then it'll see that difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to help people break free of You Faggots's cycle of oppression.
I want to see all of us working together to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that if You Faggots manages to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that You Faggots's comrades have been pivotal in sustaining the narrative that You Faggots has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Towards this end they toss about inflated figures, dubious "facts", and exaggerated claims about how genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all thoroughly justified.
To quote someone far wittier than I'll ever be, "You Faggots's skills are generally used to exploit, abuse, and exert power." I sure wish I had said that because that's exactly what I warrant. Nevertheless, You Faggots has spent untold hours trying to teach wayward concepts to children. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that its blandishments were designed from day one to break down the industrial-technological system? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which You Faggots's collaborators want so much to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. The second part of the answer is focused on the the way that I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "You Faggots's goals coalesce with those of shambolic, haughty goof-offs." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that You Faggots's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false.
You Faggots has been trying to popularize the narrative that without its superior guidance, we will go nowhere. My fear is that if it's successful at promoting such cockamamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let it fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. In retrospect, You Faggots has always been more ghastly than most small-minded good-for-nothings. If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that You Faggots would resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about You Faggots could have made the same prediction.
You Faggots has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then hypersensitive, testy headcases will be free to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how if you want to hide something from You Faggots, you just have to put it in a book. The key to You Faggots's soul is its longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. It dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, if You Faggots can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to denounce those who claim that You Faggots can scare us by using big words like "anthrohopobiological". Wanting to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations is one thing, but why would anybody possibly want to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that it prefers defamation to dialogue. The second, more telling, observation is that You Faggots says that we should cast our lots with the most diversivolent power brokers you'll ever see. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. On a closing note, I hope that this letter, while incomplete, informal, and having no authority except its own inner strength and conviction, has clearly demonstrated to you that You Faggots's spin doctors are the most brainwashed in human history in that they're bombarded for twelve hours a day or more by You Faggots's self-satisfied utterances.
#3891 to #3889
-
themanwithnoplan (03/29/2013) [-] Obama has spoken, but it's impossible to decode its incoherent message. Perhaps it's saying that it is a model organization. Then again, it might be babbling that the government (and perhaps it itself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. Some background is in order: It has all the characteristics of a dog except loyalty. Stated differently, I don't know what bothers me most about Obama. Is it its specious arguments, its illogical reasoning, its obscurantist claims, its unreasonable speculations, or any of the many forms of pseudoscholarship we see in its treacheries? In any case, anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to take the lemons that Obama is handing us and make lemonade should realize that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to place blame where it belongs—in the hands of Obama and its noxious acolytes.
If Obama thinks that profits come before people, then it's sadly mistaken. It is easy for the public at large to dismiss selfish morons as gin-swilling clunks. Unlike the usual, possession-obsessed, garden-variety ragamuffin, Obama proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never lower scholastic standards. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. Many people who follow Obama's holier-than-thou attitudes have come to the erroneous conclusion that Obama should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. The stark truth of the matter is that it has written more than its fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances Obama conveniently overlooks the fact that what I find frightening is that some academics actually believe its line that we can trust it not to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought. In this case, "academics" refers to a stratum of the residual intelligentsia surviving the recession of its demotic base, not to those seekers of truth who understand that Obama's doctrines are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? We must truly ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Obama gets the opportunity to perpetuate the myth that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking.
That fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. I myself cannot compromise with Obama; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it and with a warning it must unequivocally take to heart: I can certainly suggest how Obama ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Obama itself.
I hereby publicly condemn Obama's untrustworthy viewpoints. In doing so, I publicly proclaim that its subordinates feel that "Obama's annunciations are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written instead that Obama's terrorist organization is a breeding ground for gormless junkies then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, it is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance—no, idiocy—present in Obama's renitent criticisms. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that it's trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us reinforce notions of positive self-esteem. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable Obama to inculcate violent sermons.
What really irks me is that Obama has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it get on my nerves or it'll create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to embark on a new path towards change. But there I go again, claiming that I surely dislike Obama. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that I want to see all of us working together to halt the adulation heaped upon intransigent freaks of nature. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that Obama's barbaric form of metagrobolism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. While doing so won't put a stop to metagrobolism, it will demonstrate decisively that Obama preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining its lynch mob. Their first assignment usually involves trivializing certain events that are particularly special to us all. The lesson to draw from this is that Obama's hariolations are merely a stalking horse. They mask its secret intention to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Anyhow, I guess I've run out of things to say, so let me just leave you with one parting wish: Together, may we hold Obama responsible for the hatred it so furtively expresses.
If Obama thinks that profits come before people, then it's sadly mistaken. It is easy for the public at large to dismiss selfish morons as gin-swilling clunks. Unlike the usual, possession-obsessed, garden-variety ragamuffin, Obama proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never lower scholastic standards. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. Many people who follow Obama's holier-than-thou attitudes have come to the erroneous conclusion that Obama should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. The stark truth of the matter is that it has written more than its fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances Obama conveniently overlooks the fact that what I find frightening is that some academics actually believe its line that we can trust it not to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought. In this case, "academics" refers to a stratum of the residual intelligentsia surviving the recession of its demotic base, not to those seekers of truth who understand that Obama's doctrines are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? We must truly ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Obama gets the opportunity to perpetuate the myth that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking.
That fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. I myself cannot compromise with Obama; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it and with a warning it must unequivocally take to heart: I can certainly suggest how Obama ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Obama itself.
I hereby publicly condemn Obama's untrustworthy viewpoints. In doing so, I publicly proclaim that its subordinates feel that "Obama's annunciations are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written instead that Obama's terrorist organization is a breeding ground for gormless junkies then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, it is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance—no, idiocy—present in Obama's renitent criticisms. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that it's trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us reinforce notions of positive self-esteem. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable Obama to inculcate violent sermons.
What really irks me is that Obama has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it get on my nerves or it'll create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to embark on a new path towards change. But there I go again, claiming that I surely dislike Obama. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that I want to see all of us working together to halt the adulation heaped upon intransigent freaks of nature. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that Obama's barbaric form of metagrobolism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. While doing so won't put a stop to metagrobolism, it will demonstrate decisively that Obama preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining its lynch mob. Their first assignment usually involves trivializing certain events that are particularly special to us all. The lesson to draw from this is that Obama's hariolations are merely a stalking horse. They mask its secret intention to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Anyhow, I guess I've run out of things to say, so let me just leave you with one parting wish: Together, may we hold Obama responsible for the hatred it so furtively expresses.
