yeah the question mark is there probably to show reference in change of voice pitch at the end of the sentence.

A prisoner who willingly took the place of someone who technically committed a serious crime. From a legal standpoint, the Beast could have killed her and be in the right. And no, having the servants invite the person in, despite the master warning them not to, doesn't count as making it legal, especially when the servants conveniently forgot to tell the Beast that it was all their fault, especially when one of the servants even reminded the others (Cogsworth to the other ones) not to do this stupid thing.

Ayyy, I know what you're talking about mang, I have that cartoon on my dvd

What's it called?

Stockholm Syndrome implies a hostage/kidnapping situation, or at least abuse. Belle was there of her own free will. Yeah, it was to save her father, but that was the fault of the Beast's servants. They knew his personality. They knew that he strictly forbade visitors, but they even put them in his chair. Their hearts were in the right, but their common sense wasn't. They made him look like a trespasser. Even back when there were lots of aristocrats with castles and mansions (and there probably still are out there) if the Master says, "don't bring people in here; I don't give too shits how cold it is" you fucking obey. Imagine you come home one day and some strange person is using your stuff. As for abuse, the worst thing the Beast did to Belle was scream and throw his own personal things. He did not beat her up; he did not destroy her things. While this sort of behavior could turn abusive (I had an abusive ex boyfriend who did similar things), my own view is that the Best didn't quite cross the line. From my own experiences, the abuse is when you make serious threats, to a person's well being. For me, it would be abusive if he threatened actual bodily harm, called her vicious names, or tried to decrease her self worth so that she would feel like she needed him. This was my ex's fav tactic. "You're no good, stupid, bitch! I should kick you out of the house!" He actually did kick me out once, but took me back in and pretended he never did any of it. Even if his actions could be called abusive, Belle did not respond positively to any of that. It was only when the Beast stopped acting like a dick did Belle have any positive feelings toward him. And no, putting her in his castle in the first place is not abuse, because she agreed to it.

A prisoner who willingly took the place of someone who technically committed a serious crime. From a legal standpoint, the Beast could have killed her and be in the right. And no, having the servants invite the person in, despite the master warning them not to, doesn't count as making it legal, especially when the servants conveniently forgot to tell the Beast that it was all their fault, especially when one of the servants even reminded the others (Cogsworth to the other ones) not to do this stupid thing.

>implying north korean women are beautiful

Yeah, quite a few of them are pretty.

They're genetically just "Korean" and there's some hot ass korean chicks. Pic related, north korean babes.