x
Click to expand

thegrimreaver

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:10/28/2011
Last Login:8/07/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4183 total,  4920 ,  737
Comment Thumbs: 5583 total,  6666 ,  1083
Content Level Progress: 53% (53/100)
Level 141 Content: Faptastic → Level 142 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 91% (91/100)
Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:288997
Times Content Favorited:491 times
Total Comments Made:1363
FJ Points:9487
Favorite Tags: tags (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#82 - "Yeah, well... You're stupid and you smell!" … 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
#79 - By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted t…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#77 - "An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or &qu…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#74 - Ooh, good use of an ad hominem fallacy. Can't refute my argu…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #76 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
You need to learn what an Ad Hominem fallacy is you tainted dick for brains shit eater.

Ad Hom is only committed if I insult you as a way to prove that your argument is wrong. So if I were to say, you're wrong because you like to fuck your own mother in the ass while licking your father anus (which you do) then that would be an ad hom.

On the other hand if I say, you're wrong and that you are also a dog fucking child rapist. That would be an insult and bad form.

If you're going to try and play the fallacy game you should brush up.
User avatar #77 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."

That's precisely what you did. By claiming that my hygiene routine is inadequate by your standards, you sought to invalidate my earlier arguments.
"You have a smelly dick, so everything you said is wrong."
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#11 - Hey, nice job on deleting my well-informed, and sourced commen…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/16/2014 on godtherapist's profile 0
User avatar #12 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
No problem. Have a nice day.
#71 - Again, 10,000 men is not indicative of the whole male populati…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #72 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Wow, you must have one shitty smelling dirty ass fucking dick if all you do is let water run over it. I feel bad for any one that needs to be near you. You must smell like shit ass and desperate masturbation all the fucking time.
User avatar #74 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Ooh, good use of an ad hominem fallacy. Can't refute my argument, so you insult me.
Mature.

And if you want me to join you on your level, observe:
My circumcised penis is clean enough that water and soap from the rest of my body is sufficient to clean it. However, if it isn't for you, then I must assume that you have to use bleach and steel wool to get yours clean.

See, isn't this fun?
User avatar #76 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
You need to learn what an Ad Hominem fallacy is you tainted dick for brains shit eater.

Ad Hom is only committed if I insult you as a way to prove that your argument is wrong. So if I were to say, you're wrong because you like to fuck your own mother in the ass while licking your father anus (which you do) then that would be an ad hom.

On the other hand if I say, you're wrong and that you are also a dog fucking child rapist. That would be an insult and bad form.

If you're going to try and play the fallacy game you should brush up.
User avatar #77 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."

That's precisely what you did. By claiming that my hygiene routine is inadequate by your standards, you sought to invalidate my earlier arguments.
"You have a smelly dick, so everything you said is wrong."
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#68 - Comment deleted 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
#63 - That's not being a hypocrite, that's simply stating the facts.…  [+] (18 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #103 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
but then the issue os cut people thinking theyre safe just because theyre cut and sticking their dicks into anything because they think a little hot water from a shower will magically save them from cirty girls
User avatar #105 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Well, that's a given. Circumcision isn't a magical replacement for protection and good sex-education, but it does lower the risks of contracting a disease versus an uncircumcised man.
User avatar #109 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
well theres a few simple things guys can do, like bathe regularly, be careful what they stick their dicks into, and ya know...actually use condoms

hell im uncut, ive been with a girl or two who were kinda dodgy...but this magical invention called a fucking condom helped me avoid stds
User avatar #113 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
That's great, and good on you for taking care of your body.

However, there has been evidence shown that if two men, one circumcised, and one not, given the exact same hygiene regimen and use of protection during sex, the circumcised man will have a lesser chance of contracting something.
User avatar #114 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
so all in all we're just meant to cut parts off our body if it means being 'safer'

also, thinking on a tangent here....some tribals in africa cut the clit off little girls before they hit their teens because removing that sensitive part of their body makes them less driven by sex when they become hormonal teens
it is highly likely that circumcision was also begun for that very reason, lower mens sex drive by lowering the power to feel sensation down there

it makes sense as a population control method, given how many empires have had isues with large numbers of the lower classes breeding like rats and threatening the leaders power to control them,....circumcise them so they dont reproduce as fast and then find ways to kill off the excess of adults with a war or two
User avatar #119 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
If I had an extraneous flap of skin that served no biological purpose anywhere else on my body, you bet your ass I'd get it removed if it meant lowering the likelihood of getting a disease later on down the road.

That's an interesting theory, except there's no tangible correlation between circumcision and loss of feeling. Just anecdotal stories.

Also going off on a tangent here, why would empires want to limit the number of their subjects. More people means more people doing work for the empire, more people paying taxes, and more people to join the military. The only ones who would want less of that, are the nobility that are already unpopular with the people.

Back on track, here's an infographic type post I made, after the OP here deleted the information I'd made in a post.
www.funnyjunk.com/A+mild+rant+followed+by+knowledge/funny-pictures/5143536/
User avatar #121 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
.....cont

hell i had unprotected sex with a hooker, had a nice hot shower after to get clean, and the ONLY problem i suffered was a sad dick that i couldnt afford to hire her every week, as for STD's....not a one
User avatar #120 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
ummmm you were born with it as a natural leftover from the evolutionary change

male mammals have a thing called a sheathe that protects the penis from harm, yes as mankind has changed we have had less use for it due to the development of clothing protecting parts of our body, but cutting parts off simply because we feel we dont need them is ridiculous

you may as well say "we can build face masks, so we dont need our noses to warm air going into our lungs or stop inhaling particles in the air, lets cut our noses off"

limiting numbers of people does come necessary when there may come times of food shortages from overpopulation or in times when the people dangerously outnumbered the army's powers to subdue uprisings against the leadership...

just look at china, they had the worry of overpopulation so began that 1-child policy....or nazi germany not wanting the risk of jews reproducing so forced them to be steralized.....or hell in africa where food is short bcause the apes are shitty farmers and the local warlords steal most food, they need to keep numbers down to make do with what food they can keep

we should also keep an eye open in these times when technology does most things and we dont need that many people to support life anymore....a couple men and a few machines can easily do the work a few hundred used to do, with that in mind it is all too possible for the leadership to cull people and not suffer any drop in production levels

plus for your rant...the 'expert advice' of medical practitioners is suspect.....they make their entire careers out of providing services to sick people...if their advice was true then there would be less sick people aka less patients for them, and they would lose business and money from it....

so kinda step back and think about it Grimmy.......the 'medical experts' just want to lure people into false senses of security so they get sick and come to them for diagnosis and medication at a profit to the doctors
User avatar #69 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
We're not talking about one man. We're talking about tens of thousands of them. Consistently and substantially across the board. So many in fact that there is a whole industry devoted to foreskin restoration.

Also your 'simple logic' makes you a simpleton. Fat people have a harder time cleaning themselves because of mobility and reach. Are you saying that having a foreskin would make it harder for a man to reach his penis?
User avatar #71 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Again, 10,000 men is not indicative of the whole male population. And I would love to see your sources on that.

Absolutely, yes. It requires that extra step in retracting the foreskin to scrub underneath it. If someone's in a rush, or ill-informed in penile hygiene, or just don't care, if they don't retract it, the area underneath simply is not going to get cleaned.

Meanwhile, a circumcised man does not have to preform this step, and can simply let the water running over his penis while cleaning the rest of his body clean it. No extra step, no possibility of mistakes or carelessness.
User avatar #72 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Wow, you must have one shitty smelling dirty ass fucking dick if all you do is let water run over it. I feel bad for any one that needs to be near you. You must smell like shit ass and desperate masturbation all the fucking time.
User avatar #74 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Ooh, good use of an ad hominem fallacy. Can't refute my argument, so you insult me.
Mature.

And if you want me to join you on your level, observe:
My circumcised penis is clean enough that water and soap from the rest of my body is sufficient to clean it. However, if it isn't for you, then I must assume that you have to use bleach and steel wool to get yours clean.

See, isn't this fun?
User avatar #76 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
You need to learn what an Ad Hominem fallacy is you tainted dick for brains shit eater.

Ad Hom is only committed if I insult you as a way to prove that your argument is wrong. So if I were to say, you're wrong because you like to fuck your own mother in the ass while licking your father anus (which you do) then that would be an ad hom.

On the other hand if I say, you're wrong and that you are also a dog fucking child rapist. That would be an insult and bad form.

If you're going to try and play the fallacy game you should brush up.
User avatar #77 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."

That's precisely what you did. By claiming that my hygiene routine is inadequate by your standards, you sought to invalidate my earlier arguments.
"You have a smelly dick, so everything you said is wrong."
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#61 - Same reason it's easier for an in-shape person to stay clean, …  [+] (20 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #62 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Seems like you're being a hypocrite.

Claiming that you can just "know" something is easier to clean but you can't just "know" something is more pleasurable by virtue of having more nerve endings.

As for your example, yes that is exactly what has been done.
User avatar #63 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not being a hypocrite, that's simply stating the facts.

Simply logic: Less surface area = less effort to clean

Also, pleasure is subjective. Just because one man says that it felt better when he had foreskin, doesn't make it universally true.
User avatar #103 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
but then the issue os cut people thinking theyre safe just because theyre cut and sticking their dicks into anything because they think a little hot water from a shower will magically save them from cirty girls
User avatar #105 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Well, that's a given. Circumcision isn't a magical replacement for protection and good sex-education, but it does lower the risks of contracting a disease versus an uncircumcised man.
User avatar #109 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
well theres a few simple things guys can do, like bathe regularly, be careful what they stick their dicks into, and ya know...actually use condoms

hell im uncut, ive been with a girl or two who were kinda dodgy...but this magical invention called a fucking condom helped me avoid stds
User avatar #113 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
That's great, and good on you for taking care of your body.

However, there has been evidence shown that if two men, one circumcised, and one not, given the exact same hygiene regimen and use of protection during sex, the circumcised man will have a lesser chance of contracting something.
User avatar #114 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
so all in all we're just meant to cut parts off our body if it means being 'safer'

also, thinking on a tangent here....some tribals in africa cut the clit off little girls before they hit their teens because removing that sensitive part of their body makes them less driven by sex when they become hormonal teens
it is highly likely that circumcision was also begun for that very reason, lower mens sex drive by lowering the power to feel sensation down there

it makes sense as a population control method, given how many empires have had isues with large numbers of the lower classes breeding like rats and threatening the leaders power to control them,....circumcise them so they dont reproduce as fast and then find ways to kill off the excess of adults with a war or two
User avatar #119 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
If I had an extraneous flap of skin that served no biological purpose anywhere else on my body, you bet your ass I'd get it removed if it meant lowering the likelihood of getting a disease later on down the road.

That's an interesting theory, except there's no tangible correlation between circumcision and loss of feeling. Just anecdotal stories.

Also going off on a tangent here, why would empires want to limit the number of their subjects. More people means more people doing work for the empire, more people paying taxes, and more people to join the military. The only ones who would want less of that, are the nobility that are already unpopular with the people.

Back on track, here's an infographic type post I made, after the OP here deleted the information I'd made in a post.
www.funnyjunk.com/A+mild+rant+followed+by+knowledge/funny-pictures/5143536/
User avatar #121 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
.....cont

hell i had unprotected sex with a hooker, had a nice hot shower after to get clean, and the ONLY problem i suffered was a sad dick that i couldnt afford to hire her every week, as for STD's....not a one
User avatar #120 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
ummmm you were born with it as a natural leftover from the evolutionary change

male mammals have a thing called a sheathe that protects the penis from harm, yes as mankind has changed we have had less use for it due to the development of clothing protecting parts of our body, but cutting parts off simply because we feel we dont need them is ridiculous

you may as well say "we can build face masks, so we dont need our noses to warm air going into our lungs or stop inhaling particles in the air, lets cut our noses off"

limiting numbers of people does come necessary when there may come times of food shortages from overpopulation or in times when the people dangerously outnumbered the army's powers to subdue uprisings against the leadership...

just look at china, they had the worry of overpopulation so began that 1-child policy....or nazi germany not wanting the risk of jews reproducing so forced them to be steralized.....or hell in africa where food is short bcause the apes are shitty farmers and the local warlords steal most food, they need to keep numbers down to make do with what food they can keep

we should also keep an eye open in these times when technology does most things and we dont need that many people to support life anymore....a couple men and a few machines can easily do the work a few hundred used to do, with that in mind it is all too possible for the leadership to cull people and not suffer any drop in production levels

plus for your rant...the 'expert advice' of medical practitioners is suspect.....they make their entire careers out of providing services to sick people...if their advice was true then there would be less sick people aka less patients for them, and they would lose business and money from it....

so kinda step back and think about it Grimmy.......the 'medical experts' just want to lure people into false senses of security so they get sick and come to them for diagnosis and medication at a profit to the doctors
User avatar #69 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
We're not talking about one man. We're talking about tens of thousands of them. Consistently and substantially across the board. So many in fact that there is a whole industry devoted to foreskin restoration.

Also your 'simple logic' makes you a simpleton. Fat people have a harder time cleaning themselves because of mobility and reach. Are you saying that having a foreskin would make it harder for a man to reach his penis?
User avatar #71 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Again, 10,000 men is not indicative of the whole male population. And I would love to see your sources on that.

Absolutely, yes. It requires that extra step in retracting the foreskin to scrub underneath it. If someone's in a rush, or ill-informed in penile hygiene, or just don't care, if they don't retract it, the area underneath simply is not going to get cleaned.

Meanwhile, a circumcised man does not have to preform this step, and can simply let the water running over his penis while cleaning the rest of his body clean it. No extra step, no possibility of mistakes or carelessness.
User avatar #72 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Wow, you must have one shitty smelling dirty ass fucking dick if all you do is let water run over it. I feel bad for any one that needs to be near you. You must smell like shit ass and desperate masturbation all the fucking time.
User avatar #74 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Ooh, good use of an ad hominem fallacy. Can't refute my argument, so you insult me.
Mature.

And if you want me to join you on your level, observe:
My circumcised penis is clean enough that water and soap from the rest of my body is sufficient to clean it. However, if it isn't for you, then I must assume that you have to use bleach and steel wool to get yours clean.

See, isn't this fun?
User avatar #76 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
You need to learn what an Ad Hominem fallacy is you tainted dick for brains shit eater.

Ad Hom is only committed if I insult you as a way to prove that your argument is wrong. So if I were to say, you're wrong because you like to fuck your own mother in the ass while licking your father anus (which you do) then that would be an ad hom.

On the other hand if I say, you're wrong and that you are also a dog fucking child rapist. That would be an insult and bad form.

If you're going to try and play the fallacy game you should brush up.
User avatar #77 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."

That's precisely what you did. By claiming that my hygiene routine is inadequate by your standards, you sought to invalidate my earlier arguments.
"You have a smelly dick, so everything you said is wrong."
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#59 - Personally, I think cut penises are better. Easier to keep cle…  [+] (22 new replies) 05/16/2014 on "Clean Cut" 0
User avatar #60 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
How do you know it's easier to clean?
User avatar #61 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Same reason it's easier for an in-shape person to stay clean, than a heavily obese person with rolls of fat: less surface area, and no regions of overlapping skin.
User avatar #62 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Seems like you're being a hypocrite.

Claiming that you can just "know" something is easier to clean but you can't just "know" something is more pleasurable by virtue of having more nerve endings.

As for your example, yes that is exactly what has been done.
User avatar #63 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not being a hypocrite, that's simply stating the facts.

Simply logic: Less surface area = less effort to clean

Also, pleasure is subjective. Just because one man says that it felt better when he had foreskin, doesn't make it universally true.
User avatar #103 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
but then the issue os cut people thinking theyre safe just because theyre cut and sticking their dicks into anything because they think a little hot water from a shower will magically save them from cirty girls
User avatar #105 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Well, that's a given. Circumcision isn't a magical replacement for protection and good sex-education, but it does lower the risks of contracting a disease versus an uncircumcised man.
User avatar #109 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
well theres a few simple things guys can do, like bathe regularly, be careful what they stick their dicks into, and ya know...actually use condoms

hell im uncut, ive been with a girl or two who were kinda dodgy...but this magical invention called a fucking condom helped me avoid stds
User avatar #113 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
That's great, and good on you for taking care of your body.

However, there has been evidence shown that if two men, one circumcised, and one not, given the exact same hygiene regimen and use of protection during sex, the circumcised man will have a lesser chance of contracting something.
User avatar #114 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
so all in all we're just meant to cut parts off our body if it means being 'safer'

also, thinking on a tangent here....some tribals in africa cut the clit off little girls before they hit their teens because removing that sensitive part of their body makes them less driven by sex when they become hormonal teens
it is highly likely that circumcision was also begun for that very reason, lower mens sex drive by lowering the power to feel sensation down there

it makes sense as a population control method, given how many empires have had isues with large numbers of the lower classes breeding like rats and threatening the leaders power to control them,....circumcise them so they dont reproduce as fast and then find ways to kill off the excess of adults with a war or two
User avatar #119 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
If I had an extraneous flap of skin that served no biological purpose anywhere else on my body, you bet your ass I'd get it removed if it meant lowering the likelihood of getting a disease later on down the road.

That's an interesting theory, except there's no tangible correlation between circumcision and loss of feeling. Just anecdotal stories.

Also going off on a tangent here, why would empires want to limit the number of their subjects. More people means more people doing work for the empire, more people paying taxes, and more people to join the military. The only ones who would want less of that, are the nobility that are already unpopular with the people.

Back on track, here's an infographic type post I made, after the OP here deleted the information I'd made in a post.
www.funnyjunk.com/A+mild+rant+followed+by+knowledge/funny-pictures/5143536/
User avatar #121 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
.....cont

hell i had unprotected sex with a hooker, had a nice hot shower after to get clean, and the ONLY problem i suffered was a sad dick that i couldnt afford to hire her every week, as for STD's....not a one
User avatar #120 - konradkurze (05/16/2014) [-]
ummmm you were born with it as a natural leftover from the evolutionary change

male mammals have a thing called a sheathe that protects the penis from harm, yes as mankind has changed we have had less use for it due to the development of clothing protecting parts of our body, but cutting parts off simply because we feel we dont need them is ridiculous

you may as well say "we can build face masks, so we dont need our noses to warm air going into our lungs or stop inhaling particles in the air, lets cut our noses off"

limiting numbers of people does come necessary when there may come times of food shortages from overpopulation or in times when the people dangerously outnumbered the army's powers to subdue uprisings against the leadership...

just look at china, they had the worry of overpopulation so began that 1-child policy....or nazi germany not wanting the risk of jews reproducing so forced them to be steralized.....or hell in africa where food is short bcause the apes are shitty farmers and the local warlords steal most food, they need to keep numbers down to make do with what food they can keep

we should also keep an eye open in these times when technology does most things and we dont need that many people to support life anymore....a couple men and a few machines can easily do the work a few hundred used to do, with that in mind it is all too possible for the leadership to cull people and not suffer any drop in production levels

plus for your rant...the 'expert advice' of medical practitioners is suspect.....they make their entire careers out of providing services to sick people...if their advice was true then there would be less sick people aka less patients for them, and they would lose business and money from it....

so kinda step back and think about it Grimmy.......the 'medical experts' just want to lure people into false senses of security so they get sick and come to them for diagnosis and medication at a profit to the doctors
User avatar #69 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
We're not talking about one man. We're talking about tens of thousands of them. Consistently and substantially across the board. So many in fact that there is a whole industry devoted to foreskin restoration.

Also your 'simple logic' makes you a simpleton. Fat people have a harder time cleaning themselves because of mobility and reach. Are you saying that having a foreskin would make it harder for a man to reach his penis?
User avatar #71 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Again, 10,000 men is not indicative of the whole male population. And I would love to see your sources on that.

Absolutely, yes. It requires that extra step in retracting the foreskin to scrub underneath it. If someone's in a rush, or ill-informed in penile hygiene, or just don't care, if they don't retract it, the area underneath simply is not going to get cleaned.

Meanwhile, a circumcised man does not have to preform this step, and can simply let the water running over his penis while cleaning the rest of his body clean it. No extra step, no possibility of mistakes or carelessness.
User avatar #72 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
Wow, you must have one shitty smelling dirty ass fucking dick if all you do is let water run over it. I feel bad for any one that needs to be near you. You must smell like shit ass and desperate masturbation all the fucking time.
User avatar #74 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
Ooh, good use of an ad hominem fallacy. Can't refute my argument, so you insult me.
Mature.

And if you want me to join you on your level, observe:
My circumcised penis is clean enough that water and soap from the rest of my body is sufficient to clean it. However, if it isn't for you, then I must assume that you have to use bleach and steel wool to get yours clean.

See, isn't this fun?
User avatar #76 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
You need to learn what an Ad Hominem fallacy is you tainted dick for brains shit eater.

Ad Hom is only committed if I insult you as a way to prove that your argument is wrong. So if I were to say, you're wrong because you like to fuck your own mother in the ass while licking your father anus (which you do) then that would be an ad hom.

On the other hand if I say, you're wrong and that you are also a dog fucking child rapist. That would be an insult and bad form.

If you're going to try and play the fallacy game you should brush up.
User avatar #77 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument."

That's precisely what you did. By claiming that my hygiene routine is inadequate by your standards, you sought to invalidate my earlier arguments.
"You have a smelly dick, so everything you said is wrong."
User avatar #78 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
So point out to me where I rejected your argument.
User avatar #79 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
By not attempting to refute my argument, and simply resorted to throwing lame and immature insults at me.
User avatar #80 - godtherapist (05/16/2014) [-]
That's not a rejection of an argument. That's a refusal to continue to participate.
User avatar #82 - thegrimreaver (05/16/2014) [-]
"Yeah, well...
You're stupid and you smell!"
That's pretty much how you reacted.
#33 - A closer example would be the server for Wikipedia, basically … 05/16/2014 on Facts Galore 0
#24 - "...I got one of the early ones." 05/15/2014 on Farcry 6 +10
#19 - Could I have a video sauce on this?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/14/2014 on buddies 0
#28 - siswai (05/14/2014) [-]
Leopard loves getting petted.
Here you go.
#21 - Sure, so long as we stop posting Doctor Who, My Little Pony, S… 05/13/2014 on CC not making it easy +4
#34 - Also, not all cancer can be amputated or killed off. For examp… 05/10/2014 on Cancer under electron... 0
#108 - No, since the heart's function is almost entirely mechanical i…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2014 on It's True 0
User avatar #204 - masterofshakes (05/11/2014) [-]
Well I have also read elsewhere that they can grow body parts in labs so your liver goes bad you get plop in a new one. I am sure it is not perfect yet but one day we will be there.
#33 - Not necessarily true. Other parts of your body start failing b…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/09/2014 on It's True +1
User avatar #39 - huntergriff (05/09/2014) [-]
in theory, wouldn't it be possible to do the same with other parts of your body?
User avatar #108 - thegrimreaver (05/09/2014) [-]
No, since the heart's function is almost entirely mechanical in nature. You wouldn't be able to just squeeze your liver to make it keep working.

Though, now that I think about it, I'm not even sure that just squeezing the heart would work, since that's doing nothing to regulate the opening and closing of the valves. Unless they have a way of controlling that, you could end up sending the blood backwards through your veins.
User avatar #204 - masterofshakes (05/11/2014) [-]
Well I have also read elsewhere that they can grow body parts in labs so your liver goes bad you get plop in a new one. I am sure it is not perfect yet but one day we will be there.
#62 - Huh. I did not know that. Source?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2014 on fuck da police 0
User avatar #63 - fukkentyranitar (05/09/2014) [-]
Look up the Ford RS200. Rally cars like these were so dangerous for spectators and drivers that the Group B was shut down in the mid eighties. Imagine a bunch of fire breathing, ear drum rupturing, 700 hp, 1800 lb monsters doing 130 mph on a narrow dirt path meant for horses and buggies. That was group B.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDRkHXMHqFo
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDCE4FjVHOU
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6F88KcIhnA
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-oFv-_ypd0
#60 - Linked for gore. 05/09/2014 on fuck da police 0
#59 - No, but the fuel tank is. And when that ruptures, amidst grind…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/09/2014 on fuck da police 0
User avatar #61 - fukkentyranitar (05/09/2014) [-]
Actually, the car was mid engined and the tank is in the front.
User avatar #62 - thegrimreaver (05/09/2014) [-]
Huh. I did not know that.
Source?
User avatar #63 - fukkentyranitar (05/09/2014) [-]
Look up the Ford RS200. Rally cars like these were so dangerous for spectators and drivers that the Group B was shut down in the mid eighties. Imagine a bunch of fire breathing, ear drum rupturing, 700 hp, 1800 lb monsters doing 130 mph on a narrow dirt path meant for horses and buggies. That was group B.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDRkHXMHqFo
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDCE4FjVHOU
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6F88KcIhnA
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-oFv-_ypd0
#68 - Specifically, the Family Guy porn parody.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2014 on awesome +3
User avatar #69 - darthblam (05/09/2014) [-]
It uh.. doesn't happen to involve an attractive Lois, does it?
#68 - "...she quivered slightly as she bet over infront of me. … 05/08/2014 on Random Fact Comp. 27 +1
#13 - Except he was killed by the Rebels in the early stages of the …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/08/2014 on Monk 0
User avatar #14 - huntergriff (05/08/2014) [-]
actually, the wiki doesn't list him as dead nor alive...i mean yeah, it says the garrison at tamira city were wiped out, but the wiki doesn't list him as dead.
#30 - This gives the rest of furries a bad name. I'd still … 05/07/2014 on Fox n' Friends +4
#162 - Either the radioactive fallout, or the ensuing nuclear winter …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/07/2014 on 'Murica 0
User avatar #163 - thebobinito (05/07/2014) [-]
But he's not harming anyone there, he's living his own life on his own little island.

items

Total unique items point value: 712 / Total items point value: 1906
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - fistoftheaxis (04/22/2014) [-]
Yes, thank you! It was her bra that was yellow huh?
 Friends (0)