Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

thegorn    

Rank #10449 on Subscribers
thegorn Avatar Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to thegorn Block thegorn Invite thegorn to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/25/2010
Last Login:10/31/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11284
Highest Content Rank:#1222
Highest Comment Rank:#6749
Content Thumbs: 5951 total,  6529 ,  578
Comment Thumbs: 1450 total,  1821 ,  371
Content Level Progress: 52% (52/100)
Level 159 Content: Faptastic → Level 160 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 13% (13/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:7
Content Views:129842
Times Content Favorited:249 times
Total Comments Made:347
FJ Points:7434
Favorite Tags: facebook (2) | Life (2) | tags (2) | the (2)
If you get the new xbox, I feel bad for ya son.
I got 99 problems with the xbox one.

latest user's comments

#47 - Picture 04/10/2014 on FATALITY! +1
#99 - Unfortunately, she'll only be the second person in the white h…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/10/2014 on Mind = Blown +5
User avatar #107 - kanatana (03/10/2014) [-]
Heh. As if he started with Monica.
#8 - More like a blackalaika  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2014 on Mumford and Sons +1
#9 - aytoktonik (02/13/2014) [-]
contra balalaika only for tru russian men !
#37 - ireallylikepotatoe (02/14/2014) [-]
Oh yeah?
#68 - the metapod is level 100 dumbass 12/04/2013 on Float like a cacoon? 0
#57 - Ok, so bald eagles sound like ******* seagulls. Y…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/14/2013 on The Lion king roars +16
#90 - jeetster (08/14/2013) [-]
Actually Bald Eagles sound like freedom.
User avatar #79 - meganinja (08/14/2013) [-]
correction, they only sound like that to non-Americans. For only a true citizen of the USA can comprehend the sound of Freedom.
#75 - dedaluminus (08/14/2013) [-]
"For my own part I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen the Representative of our Country. He is a Bird of bad moral Character. He does not get his Living honestly. You may have seen him perched on some dead Tree near the River, where, too lazy to fish for himself, he watches the Labour of the Fishing Hawk; and when that diligent Bird has at length taken a Fish, and is bearing it to his Nest for the Support of his Mate and young Ones, the Bald Eagle pursues him and takes it from him. For the Truth the Turkey is in Comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America... He is besides, though a little vain & silly, a Bird of Courage, and would not hesitate to attack a Grenadier of the British Guards who should presume to invade his Farm Yard with a red Coat on."

Decisions made by a committee generally suck ass.
#84 - Well maybe your questions will be answered when the ***…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/28/2013 on Why I'm going to get watchdogs -1
#92 - lankyman (06/28/2013) [-]
I dont like your tone of voice sir

I was just merely testing the temperature of the water sir

so to speak sir

nothing wrong with questions sir

sir sir sir
#58 - That's what she said  [+] (6 new replies) 06/27/2013 on USA 1 x North Korea 0 -1
User avatar #59 - tarekmig (06/27/2013) [-]
Did you even watch the video faggot, He had 10 guns. Try "that's what she said" joke now.
User avatar #80 - sabcy (06/27/2013) [-]
me gusta.
User avatar #81 - tarekmig (06/27/2013) [-]
what
User avatar #83 - sabcy (06/27/2013) [-]
if gun is to penis, do the math.
User avatar #84 - tarekmig (06/27/2013) [-]
I am deeply thinking of what you just said.
User avatar #85 - sabcy (06/27/2013) [-]
ten guns= 10 penises, all of varying lengths, thickness, and caliber.
#27 - That kid should make an album called "North" The… 06/26/2013 on North West 0
#7 - Comment deleted  [+] (8 new replies) 06/25/2013 on Cucumber -43
User avatar #79 - jajathezombie (06/25/2013) [-]
Well my vagina has the structural integrity to support a cucumber so you can just suck on that you nay-sayer.
User avatar #9 - utaelilya (06/25/2013) [-]
it says "cucumbers"
User avatar #24 - localcatbarber (06/25/2013) [-]
Even if he filled a pool with cucumbers and tried to walk on it he would just break the cucumbers and hit the bottom.
#32 - zombiegorilla (06/25/2013) [-]
The large amounts of cucumbers would keep him up and even if he stepped on it the wrong way, he wouldn't fall to the bottom.
User avatar #76 - localcatbarber (06/25/2013) [-]
But cucumbers are super squishy. I doubt they would be able to hold a man.
#25 - utaelilya (06/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #27 - localcatbarber (06/25/2013) [-]
How would you walk on cucumbers, if I may ask?
User avatar #66 - tesarrior (06/25/2013) [-]
by walking on them?
#21 - So that's how Darwinism works! 06/24/2013 on Dinos 0
#241 - We got the æ ø å! 06/21/2013 on Congratulations America! -1
#265 - You misunderstand. When the ball is in contact with the winegl…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/21/2013 on Possible? 0
#273 - kinglev (06/21/2013) [-]
the friction is counter-productive. it slows it down when it is contact with the glass. yes friction is accelerating the ball. but in the opposite direction of which the ball is moving, therefore slowing it down. If friction were there the ball would eventually lose energy and stop the loop. the acceleration that matters is gravity which deccelerates and accelerates the ball so that it stays in loop
#73 - yes, that would be the only way  [+] (1 new reply) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
User avatar #74 - herebemonstars (06/20/2013) [-]
I thought it might
#69 - Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would conti…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#67 - Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary… 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
#66 - You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics …  [+] (4 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? +1
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#64 - imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the moto…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
#60 - unless you have a stationary core.  [+] (6 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#54 - nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary w…  [+] (13 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? -1
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#51 - notice how that's not a ******* ball?  [+] (15 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
User avatar #52 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Then put it in a ball instead of a tire. Should work the same.
User avatar #54 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary while the rest spins. In a ball the whole thing must spin
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#49 - yes i see know. But it would be impossible to give a rotating …  [+] (18 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
#76 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
So add that in to the question when you are placing the items. I am sure that if you know how to design a motor and put it into a ball, you can change the items that it is rolling in.
#50 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Thiese things work don't they?
User avatar #51 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
notice how that's not a fucking ball?
User avatar #52 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Then put it in a ball instead of a tire. Should work the same.
User avatar #54 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary while the rest spins. In a ball the whole thing must spin
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#47 - and how the **** do you plan to turn potential en… 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
#45 - i was refering to: "why everyone is saying only without f…  [+] (21 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
#75 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
Because it may work for one rotation with friction, but it would slow the ball and thus cause the ball to be unable to make it to the point it needs to be.
#48 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
My english is not the best. There were suggestions like no friction, vacuum etc. But what if we put a motor inside?
User avatar #49 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
yes i see know. But it would be impossible to give a rotating ball kinetic energy from an internal motor without altering the trajectory
#76 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
So add that in to the question when you are placing the items. I am sure that if you know how to design a motor and put it into a ball, you can change the items that it is rolling in.
#50 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Thiese things work don't they?
User avatar #51 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
notice how that's not a fucking ball?
User avatar #52 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Then put it in a ball instead of a tire. Should work the same.
User avatar #54 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary while the rest spins. In a ball the whole thing must spin
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#43 - I can't even decipher that sentence, come again?  [+] (27 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? 0
User avatar #72 - herebemonstars (06/20/2013) [-]
Would a gyro Help?
User avatar #73 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
yes, that would be the only way
User avatar #74 - herebemonstars (06/20/2013) [-]
I thought it might
User avatar #44 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
A motor -Something, such as a machine or an engine, that produces or imparts motion.
Inside the ball.
User avatar #47 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
and how the fuck do you plan to turn potential energy from a motor inside a ball into kinetic energy in the ball?
User avatar #45 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
i was refering to: "why everyone is saying only without friction"
#75 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
Because it may work for one rotation with friction, but it would slow the ball and thus cause the ball to be unable to make it to the point it needs to be.
#48 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
My english is not the best. There were suggestions like no friction, vacuum etc. But what if we put a motor inside?
User avatar #49 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
yes i see know. But it would be impossible to give a rotating ball kinetic energy from an internal motor without altering the trajectory
#76 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
So add that in to the question when you are placing the items. I am sure that if you know how to design a motor and put it into a ball, you can change the items that it is rolling in.
#50 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Thiese things work don't they?
User avatar #51 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
notice how that's not a fucking ball?
User avatar #52 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Then put it in a ball instead of a tire. Should work the same.
User avatar #54 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary while the rest spins. In a ball the whole thing must spin
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.
#40 - If you scroll down everyone is like: without friction, yes. …  [+] (32 new replies) 06/20/2013 on Possible? +2
#80 - kinglev (06/20/2013) [-]
the friction gives it a negative acceleration slowing it down. what keeps it in the loop is acceleration due to gravity and centripetal force. it would still change trajectory and it is possible to have a surface with little or no friction
User avatar #265 - thegorn (06/21/2013) [-]
You misunderstand. When the ball is in contact with the wineglass the wineglass is accelerating the ball, which isn't possible without friction. And gravity and centripetal on a whole through the loop would neither give the ball more or less speed, because they are accelerating it at some points and decelerating it at other points.
#273 - kinglev (06/21/2013) [-]
the friction is counter-productive. it slows it down when it is contact with the glass. yes friction is accelerating the ball. but in the opposite direction of which the ball is moving, therefore slowing it down. If friction were there the ball would eventually lose energy and stop the loop. the acceleration that matters is gravity which deccelerates and accelerates the ball so that it stays in loop
#42 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Why everyone is saying only without friction? If the ball has built in motor?
User avatar #43 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
I can't even decipher that sentence, come again?
User avatar #72 - herebemonstars (06/20/2013) [-]
Would a gyro Help?
User avatar #73 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
yes, that would be the only way
User avatar #74 - herebemonstars (06/20/2013) [-]
I thought it might
User avatar #44 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
A motor -Something, such as a machine or an engine, that produces or imparts motion.
Inside the ball.
User avatar #47 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
and how the fuck do you plan to turn potential energy from a motor inside a ball into kinetic energy in the ball?
User avatar #45 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
i was refering to: "why everyone is saying only without friction"
#75 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
Because it may work for one rotation with friction, but it would slow the ball and thus cause the ball to be unable to make it to the point it needs to be.
#48 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
My english is not the best. There were suggestions like no friction, vacuum etc. But what if we put a motor inside?
User avatar #49 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
yes i see know. But it would be impossible to give a rotating ball kinetic energy from an internal motor without altering the trajectory
#76 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
So add that in to the question when you are placing the items. I am sure that if you know how to design a motor and put it into a ball, you can change the items that it is rolling in.
#50 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Thiese things work don't they?
User avatar #51 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
notice how that's not a fucking ball?
User avatar #52 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Then put it in a ball instead of a tire. Should work the same.
User avatar #54 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
nope. The reason that works is that part of it is stationary while the rest spins. In a ball the whole thing must spin
#77 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
The hole thing doesn't have to spin. The outside has to spin. You can make the inside stay stationary.
User avatar #62 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
Why?
User avatar #64 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
imagine a car. the whole car is stationary, including the motor, which spins a bar attached to two wheels. If the motor was also spinning it wouldn't work. It has to spin relatively to something
User avatar #65 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
what if the motor was suspended inside the ball by a bar
User avatar #67 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, if you were able to figure out a way to have a stationary core that could work, but in your example if the ball was spinning it would cause the bar and thus the motor to spin at an equal rate.
User avatar #59 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
So you are telling me that if you put a ball instead of a tyre on that thing it will not move?
User avatar #60 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
unless you have a stationary core.
User avatar #63 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
well it would be relatively stationary ass the mass would tend to be in the bottom.
User avatar #66 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
You're a relatively stationary ass. Look I'll discuss physics with you when you learn to write decipherable sentences in English.
User avatar #70 - xMCxSkillz (06/20/2013) [-]
HA That was the best comment I have read in a long time!
#68 - SleepingDragon (06/20/2013) [-]
Not being an englishman I think my skill are enough to maintain a conversation.
User avatar #69 - thegorn (06/20/2013) [-]
Not for a discussion of mechanical physics. Look I would continue but I have no idea what you were trying to say in comment 63
#78 - anon (06/20/2013) [-]
For someone who is trying to be intelligent, you seem to be unable to decipher sentences that are incredibly easy to understand, even if the concept in them happens to be wrong.

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)