|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #4526 on CommentsLevel 246 Comments: Doinitrite
OfflineSend mail to thegirlyoudespise Block thegirlyoudespise Invite thegirlyoudespise to be your friend flag avatar
- Views: 50597dammit god
1867 140 Total: +1727
- Views: 29300Problems
1107 131 Total: +976
- Views: 15338Morbid for bronies.
438 120 Total: +318
- Views: 5091Tech impaired duck
110 19 Total: +91
- Views: 1460Oh fj comments, you so silly
30 8 Total: +22
- Views: 1482socially awkward penguinette
27 7 Total: +20
latest user's comments
|#266 - the only thing im envious about missing is the music||03/07/2014 on (untitled)||0|
|#179 - Im all for women with curves, but this is just...sad.. …||03/07/2014 on Health at every size||+10|
|#64 - pics please||03/06/2014 on Relish||0|
|#79 - i appreciate my ******* more than i did before …||03/05/2014 on Private School Nip Slip||+14|
|#151 - 'tis not a problem i hate it when people disagree in …||03/03/2014 on Truth hurts||+3|
|#147 - To each his own i agree with it, you may not and thats ok. [+] (2 new replies)||03/03/2014 on Truth hurts||+3|
|#23 - morals are of course going to change if social norms do||03/02/2014 on Truth hurts||+1|
|#18 - if you wouldn't take medical advice from 200 years ago, why ta… [+] (37 new replies)||03/02/2014 on Truth hurts||+6|
#133 - nommonsterbaa (03/03/2014) [-]
That's a horrible comparison. Medical advice is something that is going to constantly be changing as our technological capabilities do, and making it better and better for the treatment of people, etc. People are still people, and the people 200 years ago likely would have loved to have the 'medical advice' we do today, but. It wasn't available to them, even if it would have been useful. Same medical needs. The people 2000 years ago, and the people today, are still people. There's obvious differences in the societies, but the same morals should apply. And just because something happened back then and not today doesn't mean it was to be considered totally acceptable then. Some comment below mentions genocide, as if that's something that each and every individual human has contributed to.
#22 - 2scared2login (03/02/2014) [-]
Do morals change? I believe its just social norms that have changed. God is constant, 2000 years ago and present, so if what he calls just and unjust 2000 years ago, they must still be just and unjust today.
#39 - 2scared2login (03/02/2014) [-]
"Being gay is bad."
Guess which one you need to do?
#211 - 2scared2login (03/03/2014) [-]
By judging they don't mean do not discern what is right and wrong. they mean do not judge to make yourself higher, or think you are better than someone. I think a lot of people don't realize that Christans are supposed to believe that Gayness (the act) is wrong, not gay people themselves. gayness is supposed to be wrong like lying, cheating, immorality, etc in Christians eyes. However they are not meant to hate gays because that would mean they would have to hate all sinners (aka everyone including themselves).
Side note: A lot of people think Gayness is part of a person like a body part or skin color ( they are just born with it) yet it has not been proven and many people become gay (not gay their entire life) . Source: (life experience with gay friends
#142 - nommonsterbaa (03/03/2014) [-]
God was pure, and made man pure. They were tainted by sin, and because of it the rest of humanity from then on was as well. People weren't worshiping him, but they were also full of sin, and hateful people. Correct me if I'm wrong on that, assuming you've done any reading of the bible and could correct me (not that it's bad if you haven't). So god made the flood, and made the promise never to do so again. The world was filled with sin once again though, and man returned to having parts not worship him. But god had made the promise not to create the flood again. Because there was going to be sin, Jesus died so that even if there is sin, it can be forgiven because of the sacrifice he made.
#236 - okamiterasu (03/03/2014) [-]
But the thing that everyone seems to forget is that god is supposedly all knowing. He knows the past, the future, and everything in between. Therefore he knew exactly what was going to happen to mankind before he even created them. it would've been impossible for him to not know that Satan would've corrupted humanity, and he did absolutely nothing to try and prevent it. Same thing with the flood. it would be impossible for him to not know that humanity would start to turn away from him, and again, he did absolutely nothing to prevent it. He could've shown his power by changing the color of the sky, or instantaneously changed the mental state of all the evil people, or even made Satan not exist in the first place. Literally no story in the bible involving god makes any fucking sense from the story of job to the whole "life is a test of your worthiness of heaven" shit because god knew/knows exactly what was going to happen. the only two scenarios in which this makes sense are: 1) God doesn't exist, and the bible was written by a bunch of asinine storytellers smoking camel shit. or 2) God is such an evil and sadistic fuck that it escapes all forms of logic and sense why any reasonable person want to worship him Assuming, of course, a literal interpretation of the Bible
#141 - nommonsterbaa (03/03/2014) [-]
"I made you that way
I hate you because of it"
When god created man, they weren't sinful or corrupt. God created them in his image. And then satan tempted Eve, and then from her Adam, to eat from the tree they were forbidden to eat from (Tree of knowledge if I'm correct). Man was without knowledge, and didn't take it as evil to eat from the tree anyways, simply following one word instead of another (Just like people following one religion or another, or none at all, doesn't make them evil). And from then, man had sinned, and been tainted by it, and was no longer the way god had made them, because of satan. To be fair, satan was a creation of god as well, but. The angels weren't as man, and without knowledge.
#180 - tkfourtwoone (03/03/2014) [-]
I don't have to throw money at churches. Because our Government is so kind it feeds the Church from taxpayers money. Along with all its "donations" requests. Including a completely megalomaniac project of possibly the world's largest cathedral, which would cost somewhere about.... 500 million euros. More or less, I may be wrong about the correct number of the hundreds of millions...
#188 - tkfourtwoone (03/03/2014) [-]
Mate, you don't know half of it...
#48 - 2scared2login (03/03/2014) [-]
its not but its still isn't as bad as hearing atheists bring it up all the fucking time.
shut the fuck up you piece of shit.
|#16 - i did||03/01/2014 on mistake||+4|
|#37 - meh i guess. i just like a little variety, ya know?||03/01/2014 on The Necks of Pawn Stars||0|
Join Subscribe arthur-comics
Join Subscribe dirty-secrets
Join Subscribe morbid-channel
Join Subscribe ponytime