x
Click to expand

thebtardist

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:11/03/2010
Last Login:2/28/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#35829
Highest Content Rank:#1555
Highest Comment Rank:#3681
Content Thumbs: 2881 total,  3189 ,  308
Comment Thumbs: 1308 total,  1852 ,  544
Content Level Progress: 78% (78/100)
Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 34% (34/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:16
Content Views:19225
Times Content Favorited:160 times
Total Comments Made:738
FJ Points:4241
Favorite Tags: b (5) | Stoner (5) | btardist (4) | funny (3) | chan (2) | colours (2) | internet (2) | the (2) | thegame (2)

latest user's comments

#192 - You obviously have never touched nevermind read a single book … 01/18/2014 on Many probably thought this... 0
#10 - Butthurt...? 01/16/2014 on Top Gear 0
#9 - Half life 2 is ten years old  [+] (4 new replies) 01/16/2014 on Did You Know Gaming... +18
User avatar #28 - fightforfate (01/16/2014) [-]
almost
#17 - anonexplains (01/16/2014) [-]
it will b in 2 years...
User avatar #29 - fightforfate (01/16/2014) [-]
no it will be tens years old this year
#23 - lordmandy has deleted their comment.
#60 - Russia ball iz bst ball 01/16/2014 on Russia Sochi 2014 +1
#51 - Its the absolute disbelief in any deities. Not the lack of bel…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/14/2014 on (untitled) -1
#55 - anonexplains (01/14/2014) [-]
Lack implies it isn't fucking there you fucking retard
lack
lak/
noun
noun: lack; plural noun: lacks

1.
the state of being without or not having enough of something.
It's called fucking google
#39 - Then what are you implying, how is atheism a channel devoted t…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/14/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #40 - snakefire (01/14/2014) [-]
Atheism IS devoted to a lack of something.

A lack of a belief in god.
User avatar #51 - thebtardist (01/14/2014) [-]
Its the absolute disbelief in any deities. Not the lack of belief of "god". Lack implies theirs not enough of it.
#55 - anonexplains (01/14/2014) [-]
Lack implies it isn't fucking there you fucking retard
lack
lak/
noun
noun: lack; plural noun: lacks

1.
the state of being without or not having enough of something.
It's called fucking google
#43 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
Wrong Atheism is dedicated to the belief of science.
User avatar #44 - snakefire (01/14/2014) [-]
Wut.
#45 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
You say all Atheism is, is a lack of belief in gods, but deeply rooted in atheism is the dedication to science. If science were to prove the existence of gods most atheist would become Theist (Not join any religion, merely being theist).
User avatar #46 - nustix (01/14/2014) [-]
That's being agnostic. Atheism is just about saying there is not god.
An agnostic atheist thinks there is no god but doesn't state it until it is proven. This is the closest you can get to a scientific view. But science and religion are in no way related.
#49 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
Wrong Agnostecism is the thought that there is no way to know or not whether there is any gods. However even if i don't believe in god does not mean i can't speculate about them or discuss religion.. Atheism isn't merely a religious belief in no gods it is also the certainty that science is correct.
And they are related because when it comes to the legality of gods it is important to consider whether they are real, and also whether if they are real the message really is theirs or if it has been twisted by man.
#42 - kaboomz (01/14/2014) [-]
#37 - >Implying Atheism is an anti-christianity channel …  [+] (11 new replies) 01/14/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #38 - snakefire (01/14/2014) [-]
I didn't imply any such thing.
User avatar #39 - thebtardist (01/14/2014) [-]
Then what are you implying, how is atheism a channel devoted to a lack of something? And why cant we have a channel devoted to what we think? You have churches, no?
User avatar #40 - snakefire (01/14/2014) [-]
Atheism IS devoted to a lack of something.

A lack of a belief in god.
User avatar #51 - thebtardist (01/14/2014) [-]
Its the absolute disbelief in any deities. Not the lack of belief of "god". Lack implies theirs not enough of it.
#55 - anonexplains (01/14/2014) [-]
Lack implies it isn't fucking there you fucking retard
lack
lak/
noun
noun: lack; plural noun: lacks

1.
the state of being without or not having enough of something.
It's called fucking google
#43 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
Wrong Atheism is dedicated to the belief of science.
User avatar #44 - snakefire (01/14/2014) [-]
Wut.
#45 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
You say all Atheism is, is a lack of belief in gods, but deeply rooted in atheism is the dedication to science. If science were to prove the existence of gods most atheist would become Theist (Not join any religion, merely being theist).
User avatar #46 - nustix (01/14/2014) [-]
That's being agnostic. Atheism is just about saying there is not god.
An agnostic atheist thinks there is no god but doesn't state it until it is proven. This is the closest you can get to a scientific view. But science and religion are in no way related.
#49 - electrictroll (01/14/2014) [-]
Wrong Agnostecism is the thought that there is no way to know or not whether there is any gods. However even if i don't believe in god does not mean i can't speculate about them or discuss religion.. Atheism isn't merely a religious belief in no gods it is also the certainty that science is correct.
And they are related because when it comes to the legality of gods it is important to consider whether they are real, and also whether if they are real the message really is theirs or if it has been twisted by man.
#42 - kaboomz (01/14/2014) [-]
#21 - All hail the red flag. 01/13/2014 on Calendurr 0
#130 - Comment deleted 01/12/2014 on The life of a dead user 0
#23 - Get your wigger ass of funnyjunk, faggot  [+] (1 new reply) 01/12/2014 on I died laughing lol -3
#51 - shodaihokage (01/12/2014) [-]
#52 - Obviously you have a totally inept idea of Communism, indoctri…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/12/2014 on Many probably thought this... +8
#190 - capitalists (01/17/2014) [-]
Problem is that Marxist economics doesn't focus on policy but tearing down opponents.
Undeadwill
User avatar #192 - thebtardist (01/18/2014) [-]
You obviously have never touched nevermind read a single book about communism in anyway. Even a biased book or unbiased book would tell that the whole idea of communism is focused on economics.



Taking down of opponents followed the aggressive form of marixism in its revolutionary rise through blood ideology that said that the only way a communism revolution can happen is for it to be baptised in total blood so to speak. Which might i say was never implemented by Russia since it was lenin who took command of the socialist parties at the time and brought about his own leninism view of Marx's communist ideal. It was also about blood but not so much as to totally slaughter people solely for the cause.

However, Lenin got his blood and so did the marxists who followed him in the red/white war.

These are the only times in the years of the marxist establishment in the world that ever saw the blood, besides in china.
#62 - preventerfire has deleted their comment.
User avatar #54 - immclovinit (01/12/2014) [-]
There are many ways communism was trying to be implemented but all were based of marxist version which branched into socialism but yes I'm sure I'm wrong, clearly I'm just a stupid american.
#60 - anonexplains (01/12/2014) [-]
I'm glad you see you're wrong. Nothing worst than people in denial.
#49 - Wat. Where'd you get this bs from? Im guessing your American?  [+] (7 new replies) 01/12/2014 on Many probably thought this... -2
User avatar #50 - immclovinit (01/12/2014) [-]
The idea of communism is really good I like it its just the way they implemented it and enforced it was all wrong. Yes I'm american, and you?
User avatar #52 - thebtardist (01/12/2014) [-]
Obviously you have a totally inept idea of Communism, indoctrinated by capitalists across the world. The idea is that everyone works together and gains the same amount in value to their job. This means that the cashier in a shop earns the same as every other cashier. Same with doctors.

This removes the ploys of capitalism to risk destroying entire countries just for the greed of more money. We live in one of the greatest economic down falls in 60 years, so unless your apart of some middle class rich boy club, youll know that people cant get that many jobs, its hard to maintain a high level of education, theirs more crime and their still people raking in a million pound bonus for owning a bank. While 6 years ago they made us bail them out millions, they lose nothing.

So no communism is not "doctors getting the same as fast food cashiers".

The communism you know was put forward by dictators and murderers who wanted to have power through using the people as a tool.


Im british.
#190 - capitalists (01/17/2014) [-]
Problem is that Marxist economics doesn't focus on policy but tearing down opponents.
Undeadwill
User avatar #192 - thebtardist (01/18/2014) [-]
You obviously have never touched nevermind read a single book about communism in anyway. Even a biased book or unbiased book would tell that the whole idea of communism is focused on economics.



Taking down of opponents followed the aggressive form of marixism in its revolutionary rise through blood ideology that said that the only way a communism revolution can happen is for it to be baptised in total blood so to speak. Which might i say was never implemented by Russia since it was lenin who took command of the socialist parties at the time and brought about his own leninism view of Marx's communist ideal. It was also about blood but not so much as to totally slaughter people solely for the cause.

However, Lenin got his blood and so did the marxists who followed him in the red/white war.

These are the only times in the years of the marxist establishment in the world that ever saw the blood, besides in china.
#62 - preventerfire has deleted their comment.
User avatar #54 - immclovinit (01/12/2014) [-]
There are many ways communism was trying to be implemented but all were based of marxist version which branched into socialism but yes I'm sure I'm wrong, clearly I'm just a stupid american.
#60 - anonexplains (01/12/2014) [-]
I'm glad you see you're wrong. Nothing worst than people in denial.
#48 - This is a true recognition of communism, however I feel that n… 01/12/2014 on Many probably thought this... 0
#169 - What the **** is the dev team doing because nothi… 01/12/2014 on Dear Admin 0
#228 - mfw we still have the North and the IRA murdered thousands of … 01/11/2014 on UK and Ireland 0
#227 - Uh not technically an army by any standards, its a guerrilla f… 01/11/2014 on UK and Ireland 0
#24 - Alien 4? Try Alien: Resurrection you filthy peasant 01/11/2014 on If only... 0
#67 - Windows seven you sexy bastard 01/11/2014 on How half of the windows work +7
#295 - To Aitazaz, RIP you hero of humanity. You a… 01/11/2014 on fuck suicide bombers +1
#54 - lol yeah soldier... sure.  [+] (2 new replies) 01/10/2014 on UK and Ireland -6
User avatar #223 - regaesnhoj (01/11/2014) [-]
What do armies have? Soldiers.
User avatar #227 - thebtardist (01/11/2014) [-]
Uh not technically an army by any standards, its a guerrilla force at best but 100% a group of terrorists and by no means an Army with ranking and discipline.
#100 - 9/11 wasnt funny at the time either... 01/10/2014 on yo no hablo engl├ęs 0
#155 - I definatly puked, thier was alot of yellow chip gunk to clean… 01/07/2014 on Dirty pentagons 0
#81 - da fuk 01/07/2014 on this guy +24
#110 - Nah, i just thought i was playing really good and the RPGS fel… 01/06/2014 on Dirty pentagons 0
#76 - Just very jaded, exposion were louder and more vivid, same wit…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/06/2014 on Dirty pentagons 0
User avatar #100 - jonathankitty (01/06/2014) [-]
Damn. I was hoping it would be some bullettime thing. Like the gunfire would swing by you in slow motion.
User avatar #110 - thebtardist (01/06/2014) [-]
Nah, i just thought i was playing really good and the RPGS felt like they were real.

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2450
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - schnizel (02/01/2015) [-]
Say what you want, I've taken your wall virginity.
 Friends (0)