To be fair there isn't many girls either.

thanks man

>not wanting to fuck both





Why are normies infecting my site.

"lesbian space rocks" basically describes any gem character in steven universe

never before have i loved an anon's reply. i especially love the 'evidence' to back up your statement. i wish i could give more thumbs.

Good.

РАЈТ АВЕЈ :Д:Д:ДДДД:Д

You may be right but when the fate and future of whole country (Russia) is at stake there is no time to fuck around. The message is simple: We might shit on everything you love until you surrender (/release the prisoners/leave the city/etc), be it people that are related to you actions or not.

Answer: No. but the diplomats arent any military figure either. they're just russians.

So that means: "we" kill some russians to get our point across (this point can vary on many points)

Retaliation means: (for russians) Kill any and all people that relate to the people that kill the russians.

I see no harm here, It's both stupid and if you do it you end up cutting your own hand.

"but in situations like this it usually ends with just the terrorist dead when U.S. operatives handle it."

People believe this statement?

Pretty blanket statement to say "Americans" no? More or less "the western world".

The diplomats knew what they were walking into. The job of a diplomat is to negotiate with potentially hostile nations. The diplomat didn't deserve it, but knew he wasn't choosing the safest job, either. The relative that was killed might not have had, or wanted to have, anything to do with the situation, but was rather targeted because of something out of control (being a relative to another man). Out of the two, I'd certainly say that the KGB are the ones who took the more inhumane action. To respect that because "Well, at least they were actually doing something!" is to disregard any right to being a civilized society. This is the case because it's not about whether or not the victim deserved it. Rather, it's about what we're willing and unwilling to do, for our own sake.

Learn to be a better fighter and overcome, or come second. Someone will learn to beat him eventually.

maybe, we do not know his intentions. Hitting someone when they are down is not self defense. But yeah, the scene is pretty unclear. Maybe he was just trying to get back up, maybe he was attacking. idk.

the 'don't go beyond self defense' only sounds good in your head, when you are calm and logical. if someone comes at you, they want you to be hurt and if you only knock them down on the floor once, it will only make them more angry and just want to hurt you more.

First and foremost, no one forces them to do anything with the child. It' their choice to carry to term or not.

But Citrus hit you up on that already. Instead I want to go back to someone being forced to do something.

When an adult woman coerces, either through physical, verbal or emotional manipulation, a minor as young as 11 years of age into having sexual relations with them, becomes pregnant, carries the baby to term and then successfully sues the child, who was raped by said woman, into paying child support, where is the fairness in that? That this young boy will have to grow up a rape victim, something that will affect him for the rest of his life, now has to be further victimised, completely legally at that, by having first his innocence and privacy, but now his money and livelihood stripped from him until the day his child becomes an adult.

You think that is fair? Because the woman carried the child for nine months? When her victim is going to no doubt have relationship and trust issues for the rest of his life? That there is a fair chance he will develop Borderline Personality Disorder( www.helpguide.org/articles/personality-disorders/borderline-personality-disorder.htm ) as a result, which will make his life even harder?

That, as no doubt someone will reply to this and prove, there will be people who absolutely refuse to take the idea of him being a rape victim seriously, that tell him to suck it up and move one?

Oh but hey, what with men's successful suicide rates already being higher than womens, and their mental and emotional health constantly being marginalised, especially when it's rape accusations, I can totally understand how nine months of pregnancy is a completely and totally valid argument.

Next time a boy is raped I guess he should put a condom on, right?

See but here's the real nasty part there. The above is the worst case scenario. But you've got women intentionally putting holes in condoms, lying about their birth control, or liqouring people up so that they can't make a proper decision and/or control what their doing in a proper means.

These things happen, and have happened on more than just a handful of occasions, so instead of running from the problem at hand and demanding I 'grow up' why don't you actually sit the fuck down and think through some of the real issues that can lead to the entrapment of someone?

That and you still haven't addressed the fact that a woman(in a first world country where they fully have that freedom of choice) is never actually forced to carry a child.

Going even further past that, you said this-

as long as people have sex with people who care about each other and themselves, coming to an agreement shouldn't be too hard to do.

-But do you have any idea how many abusive relationships there are out there, for the man or the woman, emotionally or physically.

But again, if you're only argument is women CHOOSE to carry the baby then men should be forced to pay. Because clearly that makes sense.

That's like saying if I choose not to work for the rest of my life you should have to pay for me. Makes no sense.

What it is Ninjeh is that they have no argument base, so they only go after the small pieces they think they can win against, but missing the rest of the post means everyone knows they're failing anyway.

See comments 44 and 107.

yes they would have. There is a right way and a wrong way to add mass to any given area on your body. once you have mass on your stomach, it's damn hard to get rid of. you want to make that ass pop, squats and stairs.

Yes, didnt you watch the video? he was needlessly harming those poor women

To be fair, that was beyond self defense.

so you'd expect a texan to shoot you in the foot if you trespass on his territory.

maybe, we do not know his intentions. Hitting someone when they are down is not self defense. But yeah, the scene is pretty unclear. Maybe he was just trying to get back up, maybe he was attacking. idk.

the 'don't go beyond self defense' only sounds good in your head, when you are calm and logical. if someone comes at you, they want you to be hurt and if you only knock them down on the floor once, it will only make them more angry and just want to hurt you more.

It's what we do

Can't go wrong with more porn.

especially porn that we wanted

That's probably the most poetic thing I've ever heard.