Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

thatonecommunist    

Rank #14877 on Comments
no avatar Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to thatonecommunist Block thatonecommunist Invite thatonecommunist to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:11/26/2011
Last Login:11/26/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#14877
Highest Content Rank:#14855
Highest Comment Rank:#3162
Content Thumbs: 32 total,  50 ,  18
Comment Thumbs: 1637 total,  1958 ,  321
Content Level Progress: 61.01% (36/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:70648
Total Comments Made:565
FJ Points:1481

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

latest user's comments

#28 - I didn't give a **** , my parents didn't hide it f… 11/10/2014 on Adoption 0
#80 - She should get on the pill or you should get condoms, duder. …  [+] (16 new replies) 10/31/2014 on They dont call it xxxxl... +3
User avatar #81 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
Tell me something I don't know

also precum only has a few thousand swimmers. If you get someone pregnant with precum, it's because god really hates you
#84 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
I got my ex pregnant with precum..... so trust me, tell her to take some kind of birth control or wear a condom.
#86 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
Don't tell me what to do, man
#87 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
Enjoy your future baby then
#88 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
hahaha, i actually won't, since my girlfriend and i are pro choice and she would get an abortion

also we're getting her on birth control when she gets back from france
#89 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
Yeah... that's what they say that they are "pro abortion". No but seriously, that shit's expensive. But if she's going to get birth control there should be no problem.
#90 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
abortion is free in most cases
but so is birth control, so if the pill fails we'll get her a good old fashioned all american abortion
#91 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
Wait, what? free abortion? where do you live? If it wasn't because she misscarriaged, I would be stuck with a baby because I'm broke
#92 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
why, california of course!

What about you?
#93 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
I thought you Americans had to pay for everything related to health service. I live in Spain and as far as I know is not cheap. Furthermore, she was leaving to Chile and I think abortion is illegal there so it'd have been even a shittier situation.
#94 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
No, America is actually really cool with health coverage, entitled far left retards like to exaggerate our situation.
They legally can't deny you health services here, you just have to pay for it after if you don't have insurance.
We have Planned Parenthood. Basically free contraceptives, abortions, condoms, birth control pills, etc...
Really helps with teen pregnancy, they don't need parent permission to go to planned parenthood, so teen girls who are pregnant are not discouraged from aborting because their parents would never know.
#97 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
Oh yeah a law like that was considered by the congress here but the right wing party voted against it because catholicism. Even buying condoms at a pharmacy is rather expensive here. And the day after pill is fucking 30 euros.
I honestly thought that in America, unless you have some kind of insurance, you were pretty much fucked with really limited rights.
User avatar #98 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
nah, and that sucks.
the far right wing can shove it
#99 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
I wish they would here. But the church is rather strong here. I don't really have anything against religion but I'd appreciate if they stopped trying to control our lives.
User avatar #100 - yorker (10/31/2014) [-]
oppression in the 21st century. I can guarantee they'll get overthrown or taken from power soon enough
#101 - arandomanon (10/31/2014) [-]
Problem is, they legally have powers to meddle on our business thanks to this fucking crap
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Episcopal_Conference
It's funny because something that a no-democratic leader created still has so much power.
#57 - Are you already the most negative thumbed person on funnyjunk? 10/31/2014 on (untitled) 0
#638 - But non-aggression and self-ownership aren't globally viewed a…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/30/2014 on 'Merica 0
User avatar #639 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
No, I think you can universalize non-aggression and self-ownership. Aggression by definition must be unwanted (and therefore not universal), or else it wouldn't be considered aggression. For example, the initiation of force in the form of homicide is called murder because it's against an unwilling participant, but against a willing participant is called assisted suicide. Since aggression isn't universal, non-aggression is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction
#634 - But it is also generally considered immoral to allow someone t…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/30/2014 on 'Merica 0
User avatar #635 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
But you can't universalize that. Abusing someone for their labor is subjective, which means it's not a principle but rather just preference or emotion. Those have their place, but they can't be used as a justification for violations of non-aggression or self-ownership.
#638 - thatonecommunist (10/30/2014) [-]
But non-aggression and self-ownership aren't globally viewed as correct either, there is nothing inherent to morality that everyone can agree on, the only thing i can come up with is the right to live after being born, if healthy.
User avatar #639 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
No, I think you can universalize non-aggression and self-ownership. Aggression by definition must be unwanted (and therefore not universal), or else it wouldn't be considered aggression. For example, the initiation of force in the form of homicide is called murder because it's against an unwilling participant, but against a willing participant is called assisted suicide. Since aggression isn't universal, non-aggression is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction
#611 - Okay... but those have nothing to do with minimum wage law. …  [+] (5 new replies) 10/29/2014 on 'Merica 0
User avatar #615 - douthit (10/29/2014) [-]
Sure they do.

Minimum wage laws are a violation of property, which is just an extension of self-ownership. Since we own ourselves, we own whatever we trade for the work done by our bodies and minds. If an employer and employee make an employment agreement, it violates their self-ownership and therefore their property to mandate how much either one must pay. A voluntary agreement between the two in no way initiates force, so to insert force into that is initiation of force, and is immoral.
#634 - thatonecommunist (10/30/2014) [-]
But it is also generally considered immoral to allow someone to abuse another for their labour.

The force is to ensure fairness in the exchange of labour, i fail to see how thats not a subjective morality question.
User avatar #635 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
But you can't universalize that. Abusing someone for their labor is subjective, which means it's not a principle but rather just preference or emotion. Those have their place, but they can't be used as a justification for violations of non-aggression or self-ownership.
#638 - thatonecommunist (10/30/2014) [-]
But non-aggression and self-ownership aren't globally viewed as correct either, there is nothing inherent to morality that everyone can agree on, the only thing i can come up with is the right to live after being born, if healthy.
User avatar #639 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
No, I think you can universalize non-aggression and self-ownership. Aggression by definition must be unwanted (and therefore not universal), or else it wouldn't be considered aggression. For example, the initiation of force in the form of homicide is called murder because it's against an unwilling participant, but against a willing participant is called assisted suicide. Since aggression isn't universal, non-aggression is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction
#207 - Morality is a complex thing, though. Some people beli…  [+] (7 new replies) 10/28/2014 on 'Merica -1
#609 - douthit (10/29/2014) [-]
As humans we share a basic common ethic that can be universalized, IMHO. The non-initiation of force and self-ownership seem to be universals in human morality.
#611 - thatonecommunist (10/29/2014) [-]
Okay... but those have nothing to do with minimum wage law.

I didn't say morality was 100% subjective, i just said it was complex.
User avatar #615 - douthit (10/29/2014) [-]
Sure they do.

Minimum wage laws are a violation of property, which is just an extension of self-ownership. Since we own ourselves, we own whatever we trade for the work done by our bodies and minds. If an employer and employee make an employment agreement, it violates their self-ownership and therefore their property to mandate how much either one must pay. A voluntary agreement between the two in no way initiates force, so to insert force into that is initiation of force, and is immoral.
#634 - thatonecommunist (10/30/2014) [-]
But it is also generally considered immoral to allow someone to abuse another for their labour.

The force is to ensure fairness in the exchange of labour, i fail to see how thats not a subjective morality question.
User avatar #635 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
But you can't universalize that. Abusing someone for their labor is subjective, which means it's not a principle but rather just preference or emotion. Those have their place, but they can't be used as a justification for violations of non-aggression or self-ownership.
#638 - thatonecommunist (10/30/2014) [-]
But non-aggression and self-ownership aren't globally viewed as correct either, there is nothing inherent to morality that everyone can agree on, the only thing i can come up with is the right to live after being born, if healthy.
User avatar #639 - douthit (10/30/2014) [-]
No, I think you can universalize non-aggression and self-ownership. Aggression by definition must be unwanted (and therefore not universal), or else it wouldn't be considered aggression. For example, the initiation of force in the form of homicide is called murder because it's against an unwilling participant, but against a willing participant is called assisted suicide. Since aggression isn't universal, non-aggression is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction
#206 - Or, we could increase minimum wage for companies that can obvi…  [+] (8 new replies) 10/28/2014 on 'Merica +1
User avatar #271 - pheonixinstinct (10/28/2014) [-]
My family runs a small business and what youre saying would hurt everyone. minimum wage should be raised to match inflation, but only to about $9.50 or so. anything more and businesses like my family's would start cutting staff, if not just outright close our doors. many smaller companies simply cant afford it. the excuse that people cant get other jobs is bull shit. there are a lot more jobs than people think, they just dont pay well at first and that scares people off.
User avatar #435 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/28/2014) [-]
If your family's business plan relies on paying people shit to make a profit then you have a shitty business plan and a shitty business.
User avatar #380 - adrilazzaro (10/28/2014) [-]
"the excuse that people cant get other jobs is bull shit. there are a lot more jobs than people think" Man idk where you are but as far tx goes a lot of my graduated colleagues can't get any jobs that arent shitty fast food restaurants. I am lucky and grateful to have a family that is connected and because of this it was easier for me to get employed, however not everyone is this fortunate. Unemployment is higher than the government is willing to admit.
User avatar #427 - Ashtaroth (10/28/2014) [-]
Well yeah. The government altered the way unemployment is reported. They say 6-ish% when it's more like double that. They only count people collecting unemployment benefits. So if that expires and you end up living on general welfare, you're not unemployed anymore. Living on the dole and doing nothing is actually a job now, according to D.C.
#325 - Womens Study Major (10/28/2014) [-]
Could pay people under the table.
#267 - themongoose (10/28/2014) [-]
I guess I'm what you'd call a realistic Marxist. As much as I want these ideas to work, there is no chance in hell that they will because unskilled labor has become expendable.

Pic related.
#246 - Womens Study Major (10/28/2014) [-]
You are incredibly wrong. McDonalds absolutely would cut employees if you forced them to raise the minimum wage to $15 dollars. You are effectively doubling the number of employees they have as 2 X 7.50 = 15 and for a workforce as large as McDonalds this is a huge impact.
#215 - goodhomer (10/28/2014) [-]
McDonalds profits dropped 30% - That is a HUGE drop.

www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-21/mcdonald-s-profit-drops-30-as-u-s-sales-slump.html

Not only that but they are at the forefront of replacing humans with machines even without having to pay more.

www.cnet.com/news/mcdonalds-hires-7000-touch-screen-cashiers/

No, the real solution is to make minimum wage just that, a wage that everyone gets as a minimum, as in paid by the Government. And the wage is reduced based on how much you earn.
#14 - they say the same thing about taco bell but that don't stop … 10/24/2014 on Oh fuck what 0
#3 - Detroit is looking good these days. 10/24/2014 on lol niggers +1

user's channels

Join Subscribe deadpool
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 950

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)