| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
teranin
| Rank #9 on Content Online Send mail to teranin Block teranin Invite teranin to be your friend flag avatar |
|
- Text/Links 1
- Pictures28 new588
- YouTube3 new42
- Animated Gifs8 new252
- Favorites1 new1898
- Friends1 new41
- Comments262 new6947
- Channels 19
- All 9792
latest user's comments
| #27 - www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=andrea%20dworkin | 06/14/2013 on Shrek? is that you? | 0 |
| #26 - Does a statement as sick as that really need context? Andrea … | 06/14/2013 on Shrek? is that you? | 0 |
| #25 - I'll stop mixing the two together when the actions of feminism… [+] (1 new reply) | 06/14/2013 on Shrek? is that you? | +2 |
| #33 -
N. Korean citizen (06/14/2013) [-] But they don't! You can find crazies in every group! Are you personally being oppressed? Is anyone in your country, for that matter? Are the big bad women trying to take away your man toys? Move to a country like Saudi you cunt. | ||
| #12 - That's actually not the case, women's tennis has a much lower … [+] (2 new replies) | 06/14/2013 on Effect of Feminism | +17 |
| | ||
| #326 - That part refrences this picture, specifically, not the whole … [+] (1 new reply) | 06/14/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | -1 |
| #317 - He's getting red thumbs because he misread the content and is … | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +2 |
| #300 - Ok, seriously man, re-read the content. It's not saying that … [+] (1 new reply) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #314 -
thatkiddonovan (06/13/2013) [-] Okay seriously this was probably posted on a feminist page and got removed because someone reported it and the mod just didn't want to deal with a bunch of shit over it. IF feminism was a social norm, it wouldn't be a huge fucking argument anymore. I'm not saying women are above men or anything like that. But they deserve to be respected and I see a lot of actions enforcing the complete opposite on FJ. And if people don't think rape culture exists, visit tumblr and find a girl who posts pictures of herself. People assume that because a girl embraces her sexuality and likes sex, that means they want to have sex with them. People say "if you were leading a guy on and then refused sex then it was your fault you were raped" or "Maybe it was what you were wearing you shouldn't dress like that if you aren't looking for sex" Rape culture doesn't mean that rape happens all the time and is in outstanding numbers. It means that rape has become something we shrug off. | ||
| #296 - I'm sorry, I did miss that. However, you made your statement … [+] (1 new reply) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| aight whatever man its way too late for me to try and argue im making spelling mistakes all over the place and we've gone pretty damn off-topic to the post to try and prove each other wrong in some way keep contesting the refutation of excellence in the feminism neo-culture blah blah big words | ||
| #294 - Dude, how are you misreading this? It's saying that THIS PICT… [+] (1 new reply) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +1 |
| Oh, I thought the paragraph at the bottom was being general, saying that nothing glorifies rape and such. | ||
| #290 - The reason it has that many thumbs, but seems so ridiculous to… [+] (6 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #299 -
thatkiddonovan (06/13/2013) [-] I agree that Rape isn't glorified. BUT there is a shitload of rape-porn, rape jokes scour the internet. There's a shitload here on fj. As well as "back to the kitchen" or "make me a sandwich" (and these same guys wonder why they can't get laid/find a girl) To say "There's not even any jokes about rape" is just blatantly wrong. And agreement with feminism isn't the norm at all. If it was then rape culture wouldn't even be an argument. I just think more people should have more respect for women. But then I have a sister who I'm really close with and I have to look out for her and If you think that rape culture is an exaggeration and that there aren't people out there who hear no and think it means yes, then you should live one day as a female just to see what its like. Thumb me down all you want. Sorry for liking women. Rape culture doesn't exist. There are people who are rapist, and they are wrong. No one is arguing that. A joke isn't harmful, a porn isn't harmful, unless it's depicting a real rape, which most of them don't. If you don't like rape jokes, ignore then and tell your friends not to make them. If you don't like porn about rape, don't watch it. If you don't like jokes about women, then ignore them, or tell your friends they make you feel uncomfortable. There is no such thing as rape culture, just privileged white girls who want something to bitch about. The only feminism I support is women rights movement in the Middle East and other poor countries. They actually have something to be angry about, and fight against. Acting like it's just as bad in America is ridiculous. I'm really close with my sister too. She makes rape jokes, jokes about women as much as I have. The difference being she has a sense of humor, and some girls don't. #381 -
thatkiddonovan (06/14/2013) [-] "if u arnt live in bad place in world that mean u hab no problems" that's you. that's what you sound like. They are kinda true. Hearing a bunch of kids on the internet complain about stupid shit, then look in the worst parts of the world puts things into perspective. And if you get offended over every little thing, you don't have a sense of humor. Trying to make me sound like an idiot when I put my argument into a good format just makes your argument seem pathetic. You just generalized what I said, and wrote it in a dumb way. You must be a great debater. #314 -
thatkiddonovan (06/13/2013) [-] Okay seriously this was probably posted on a feminist page and got removed because someone reported it and the mod just didn't want to deal with a bunch of shit over it. IF feminism was a social norm, it wouldn't be a huge fucking argument anymore. I'm not saying women are above men or anything like that. But they deserve to be respected and I see a lot of actions enforcing the complete opposite on FJ. And if people don't think rape culture exists, visit tumblr and find a girl who posts pictures of herself. People assume that because a girl embraces her sexuality and likes sex, that means they want to have sex with them. People say "if you were leading a guy on and then refused sex then it was your fault you were raped" or "Maybe it was what you were wearing you shouldn't dress like that if you aren't looking for sex" Rape culture doesn't mean that rape happens all the time and is in outstanding numbers. It means that rape has become something we shrug off. | ||
| #288 - So women can't initiate sex? A female is incapable of being t… [+] (3 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| Could you fucking misquote and misinterpret my posts any more I literally said "it doesn't matter if you are male of female" I'm sorry, I did miss that. However, you made your statement in refutation of my inference that men are capable of giving consent, as in, being the party who agrees to sex instead of the aggressor, so I was replying to your overall message of contestation, not to the specific words in your reply. aight whatever man its way too late for me to try and argue im making spelling mistakes all over the place and we've gone pretty damn off-topic to the post to try and prove each other wrong in some way keep contesting the refutation of excellence in the feminism neo-culture blah blah big words | ||
| #276 - So I'm sticking to my statistics guns? Not seeing the point o… [+] (5 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| Your point would make sense if sex was something that just automatically happened. Someone needs to initiate the notion of it, be it touching them up or simply saying "Can we please have sex". This is not giving consent, it doesn't matter you are male or female. Giving consent is when you have been asked for something, and you then agree to it. Like I said, you should atleast know the definition of consent before trying to argue about it. Could you fucking misquote and misinterpret my posts any more I literally said "it doesn't matter if you are male of female" I'm sorry, I did miss that. However, you made your statement in refutation of my inference that men are capable of giving consent, as in, being the party who agrees to sex instead of the aggressor, so I was replying to your overall message of contestation, not to the specific words in your reply. aight whatever man its way too late for me to try and argue im making spelling mistakes all over the place and we've gone pretty damn off-topic to the post to try and prove each other wrong in some way keep contesting the refutation of excellence in the feminism neo-culture blah blah big words | ||
| #218 - >Man is drunk >Woman is drunk >Both are too d… [+] (10 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +5 |
| If you're gonna try and debunk rape culture you should at least know the definition of "consent". And what sucks even more is the fact your post tries to debunk "rape culture" through statistics and then you straight up say "100% OF RAPE ACCUSATIONS ARE FEMALE TO MALE" So I'm sticking to my statistics guns? Not seeing the point of confusion there. Are you suggesting Men aren't also arbiters of consent, capable of giving or not giving it? Capable of being too intoxicated to give it, under your definition? So are you implying women are so much weaker mentally than men that they can become incapable of consent in a situation where a man could not? Your point would make sense if sex was something that just automatically happened. Someone needs to initiate the notion of it, be it touching them up or simply saying "Can we please have sex". This is not giving consent, it doesn't matter you are male or female. Giving consent is when you have been asked for something, and you then agree to it. Like I said, you should atleast know the definition of consent before trying to argue about it. Could you fucking misquote and misinterpret my posts any more I literally said "it doesn't matter if you are male of female" I'm sorry, I did miss that. However, you made your statement in refutation of my inference that men are capable of giving consent, as in, being the party who agrees to sex instead of the aggressor, so I was replying to your overall message of contestation, not to the specific words in your reply. aight whatever man its way too late for me to try and argue im making spelling mistakes all over the place and we've gone pretty damn off-topic to the post to try and prove each other wrong in some way keep contesting the refutation of excellence in the feminism neo-culture blah blah big words #243 -
calibratuner (06/13/2013) [-] A girl with a strap-on or a guy thats much larger than you can rape you. | ||
| #210 - Or this www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #190 - Picture | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #154 - Neither, I'm arguing that the act of a woman reporting her rap… [+] (1 new reply) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #158 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] Ahh, okay. I was misunderstanding what you were saying then. Yes, that is much more sense make | ||
| #151 - I fully understand what free speech means, and yes, facebook h… | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #142 - won't* | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #141 - you seem to have cut my sentence there to make your point. I'… [+] (4 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +1 |
| #150 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] Are you making the argument that people perceive a woman who goes to the police for a rape as a victim when she's not, or are you arguing that getting accused of rape is worse than actually getting raped? Because if it's the latter I'd have to say it's a little silly to compare two situations that shitty and claim one is worse than the other, without having true experience of both #158 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] Ahh, okay. I was misunderstanding what you were saying then. Yes, that is much more sense make | ||
| #133 - This statistic isn't rape convictions, it's rapes reported. I… | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #130 - Yeah but the nice thing about math is it's Boolean nature, num… | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +3 |
| #120 - No one deserves to be raped, that is ridiculous. No one deser… [+] (11 new replies) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | +5 |
| #128 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] "You want to see a life get ruined? Don't look for the girl who got raped" Does this mean my friend who was raped by five men while taking a walk on the beach was doing just fine when she stopped eating, when she stopped talking, I never saw her smile again the way she used to before she died from malnutrition. Sorry, maybe that's a bit of an extreme example. But when someone is raped, they experience RTS, which is about level with the kind of PTSD a veteran may experience, complete with physical symptoms such as migraines and inability to sleep. If not treated, this actually affects the victim so heavily it can evolve into a mental condition. So yeah, rape kinda ruins lives you seem to have cut my sentence there to make your point. I'm not saying women who get raped don't get their lives ruined, I'm saying that the act of reporting it to the police ruins their lives far less than the act of falsely accusing a man of rape destroys his life. I am in no way implying that being raped will fuck a person's life up royally, that would mean something was very wrong with me... I can only assume you misunderstood my comment. #150 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] Are you making the argument that people perceive a woman who goes to the police for a rape as a victim when she's not, or are you arguing that getting accused of rape is worse than actually getting raped? Because if it's the latter I'd have to say it's a little silly to compare two situations that shitty and claim one is worse than the other, without having true experience of both #158 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] Ahh, okay. I was misunderstanding what you were saying then. Yes, that is much more sense make I find it unlikely that you yourself and many friends have been sexually assaulted on top of your other friend being gang-raped. Either you live in a proper dodgy area or you're exaggerating a bit, if the odds were that high everyone would know at least one person that had been sexually abused, and I'm quite sure that's not the case #144 -
N. Korean citizen (06/13/2013) [-] I think you're getting me confused with some of the other anons, that's pretty much the only related experience I've had Well for fuck's sake would you pricks make accounts if you wanna comment? Why are anons allowed to comment? | ||
| #118 - You're right, I should be saying something like "The aver… | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | -1 |
| #116 - Where are you getting those numbers? Also, please note that i… [+] (1 new reply) | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
| #114 - I agree with you | 06/13/2013 on Picture banned from facebook | 0 |
You have succeeded more than I have, and my account is older.. Whats your secret, do you have people working for you?
Wow, were you dumped by a lot of girls recently or why do you have to find satisfaction in hating on women on FJ?
Maan, your posts will surely teach them!
Maan, your posts will surely teach them!
#417 to #416
-
teranin ONLINE (06/04/2013) [-]
Not a liberal either, that implies an appreciation of authoritarian policies and government intervention. I am a libertarian, it's where I don't want the government to suppress my freedom in any way, nor the freedom of others. It's the belief that runs completely counter to the liberal mindset, but doesn't really mash-up with the conservative mindset, and do you want to know why? Because republicans and democrats are both Authoritarians, they just have different window dressing.
Republican:gay Marriage is bad! The government should make a law saying it is illegal!
Democrat: gay Marriage is good! The government should make a law forcing everyone to allow it!
Libertarian:The government has no business involving itself in marriage.
See the difference?
Republican:gay Marriage is bad! The government should make a law saying it is illegal!
Democrat: gay Marriage is good! The government should make a law forcing everyone to allow it!
Libertarian:The government has no business involving itself in marriage.
See the difference?
Hey, I was just wondering, do you still play items?
If you don't, is there a chance I could have yours or some of yours? :)
(obviously not the comment badges, those you probably wanna keep haha)
I'll even send the rade if you accept :P hehe
I understand if you say no, just figured I would ask anyways. thanks :D
If you don't, is there a chance I could have yours or some of yours? :)
(obviously not the comment badges, those you probably wanna keep haha)
I'll even send the rade if you accept :P hehe
I understand if you say no, just figured I would ask anyways. thanks :D
I'll take your lack of replying is that you're going to stop hating Religion?
Look, guy, you clearly feel very strongly about this, and that's great, but as I said before, we have come to an impasse in this discussion. I will not be changing my opinions on religion simply because some clown I don't know debates me without the benefit of even something as useful as a reasoned argument, instead only being able to operate in emotional tirades and childish tantrums when the discussion doesn't go his way. Furthermore, I have neither the time or inclination to continue this futile discourse. Feel free to leave whatever angry reply you wish, but I'm done with you.
Just like your arbitrary assertions that Religion causes all Wars? It doesn't. It is the people that try to mask Religion as a reason for War for their own greed, not Religion itself.
That's your logical argument, saying things that I did not assert and claiming that I am wrong for saying them? Strawman arguments are logical fallacies. I've told you that religion has been used as an excuse for evil throughout the ages, and that it has been used to rationalize horrible things throughout human history. It is an organization that actually wants to enforce thought crimes, and is therefore evil to it's core. I have never, and would never say that religion is the cause of all wars, so the whole statement made you look like a complete jackass. As I said, done with you.
That's your logical argument, saying things that I did not assert and claiming that I am wrong for saying them? Strawman arguments are logical fallacies. I've told you that religion has been used as an excuse for evil throughout the ages, and that it has been used to rationalize horrible things throughout human history. It is an organization that actually wants to enforce thought crimes, and is therefore evil to it's core. I have never, and would never say that religion is the cause of all wars, so the whole statement made you look like a complete jackass. As I said, done with you.
You did, in fact, say something along the lines of that. You refuse to acknowledge that Religion can cause more good than evil, and that people are happier because of it. I just thanked God because Jodi Arias was proven guilty for Murder. Stop trying to take away a right people have.
I'm not taking away your rights, you are free to believe as you wish. All I'm doing is telling you that religion is fucking retarded. As a human being, you are able to think for yourself, and as such do not have to sheep to my point of view simply because I express it.
If you think for yourself, then why suggest that I am trying to take away your rights? Since you are capable of independent thought, you should be cognizant that A: I do not have the power to stop you from practicing religion and B: You are free to ignore what I say at your leisure. If you are smart enough to realize those two things, why would you assert that my actions are an attempt on your freedoms?
Furthermore, Religion has been used throughout the ages to sheep people to a specific belief structure, and as I said, thought crimes are an actual thing in relgion. Tell me, ever looked lustily at a woman? BOOM! hell. Do you really think that is freedom? Or intelligent?
Furthermore, Religion has been used throughout the ages to sheep people to a specific belief structure, and as I said, thought crimes are an actual thing in relgion. Tell me, ever looked lustily at a woman? BOOM! hell. Do you really think that is freedom? Or intelligent?
I have read the bible, cover to cover, as well as the qu'ran and a number of the sutras, and if you are jewish, or of the fundamentalist christian belief that the old testament is still in effect, then just thinking lusting thoughts without asking for forgiveness will get you sent to hell. If you are new covenant then they are a bit more lenient, however the thought crime is still there, and you must still beg forgiveness for lustful thoughts. It's pretty clearly explained in the sermon on the mount.
Where the fuck is that in the Bible? that sounds like denomination-specific teachings that have little to do with the actual book, which is quite clear about how being forgiven works. (Hint, you need to ask for forgiveness while you're still alive in the vast majority of christian denominations)
#382 to #381
-
teranin ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
wait, what!? the fuck are you talking about!? The old testament was long before the time of Jesus... holy shit, you're a troll and have been this whole time, aren't you. Wow man, you had me going for a hot minute there. The books of the new testament start off as accounts of the life of Jesus from those who were supposedly around him. The old testament does not mention Jesus at all, ever, because it was written thousands of years before his supposed life. At this point, it is clear you are either a troll, or have no idea what you're talking about. Either way, I'm done. If you are a troll, well played, 9/10.
#400 to #382
-
caucasian (05/22/2013) [-]
Sorry for the delay, this Gif is hard to find sometimes.
The reason I'm saying NEAR is because it is NEAR the time of Jesus, not on it. The New Testament would be on the time of Jesus. I am comparing the times. It would make sense for Millions of Years to be somewhat separated by "Near", considering it would be close compared to that time.
Also, no, you and your Atheist uprising will create more problems. THE REASON EMPIRES FAILED WAS BECAUSE THEY HAD TOO MUCH LAND TO CONTROL. Might I add, the Crusades didn't cause an extreme drop in Technology. That's fucking stupid. If you can say that, I can say Jesus caused a jump in Medical Health with his Healing Powers.
I didn't know an Atheist could be so stupid to not know what "Near" means
If anything, you're the troll.
And no, it didn't take me about Two Weeks to come up with this. It took more of one monitoring this to see if you're serious, part of it to find this Gif.
The reason I'm saying NEAR is because it is NEAR the time of Jesus, not on it. The New Testament would be on the time of Jesus. I am comparing the times. It would make sense for Millions of Years to be somewhat separated by "Near", considering it would be close compared to that time.
Also, no, you and your Atheist uprising will create more problems. THE REASON EMPIRES FAILED WAS BECAUSE THEY HAD TOO MUCH LAND TO CONTROL. Might I add, the Crusades didn't cause an extreme drop in Technology. That's fucking stupid. If you can say that, I can say Jesus caused a jump in Medical Health with his Healing Powers.
I didn't know an Atheist could be so stupid to not know what "Near" means
If anything, you're the troll.
And no, it didn't take me about Two Weeks to come up with this. It took more of one monitoring this to see if you're serious, part of it to find this Gif.
That's a pretty weak argument there, guy. I don't think they or I care if you think we are obnoxious shitheads, the fact of the matter is that if I am willing to say something cruel and hateful, I should always expect to get the same back. So while some people do try to reciprocate in a negative way, overwhelmingly this website supports my shenanigans.
ok but again, still not seeing any negative consequences from it. Even if what you say is true, it is not a strong reason for me to stop, nor does it indicate any sort of general dislike of my posts. However, there is evidence that my posts are liked, in that I am currently 6th for content.
#297
-
felixjarl (05/01/2013) [-]
Alright, my theory is that ctrf reak is sporting a erratic behavior and seeks nothing than being random for some weird reason of amusement.
Due to several chats i would say that she is either quite young by our standards(12-14) and thus not working on the same lvl as us or the alternative theory that she is just doing i for the lulz.
Your thoughts on this and the case overall?
Due to several chats i would say that she is either quite young by our standards(12-14) and thus not working on the same lvl as us or the alternative theory that she is just doing i for the lulz.
Your thoughts on this and the case overall?
And the price of the biggest asshole goes to... you for reposting!
Now it's my time to say that I love you. Too bad I can't post pictures yet.
My old account was erased, made it back in early 2011
But thanks buddy
My old account was erased, made it back in early 2011
But thanks buddy

